2011 Golf Digest Hot List – {HAS IT BECOME THE MEDIOCRE LIST?}
News

2011 Golf Digest Hot List – {HAS IT BECOME THE MEDIOCRE LIST?}

2011 Golf Digest Hot List – {HAS IT BECOME THE MEDIOCRE LIST?}


Remember When You Couldn’t Wait For The Hot List To Arrive?

I remember before the internet became what it is today…golfers all over the country would literally chase down their local mail man to see if the “Golf Digest Hot List” had arrived in the mail.  Golfers couldn’t even get through the front door quick enough before ripping it open to see if the driver they were currently playing made the list.

But over the past few years the luster of the list seems to be wearing off.  Times have changed…but the list stayed the same.  Not only are there about ten thousand other places you can get reviews of golf clubs…but golfers are much more educated about the equipment they purchase now as well.   The Hot List was basically the golfers bible in regards to helping them decide what equipment to purchase for the upcoming golf season.  But now you hear more rumblings about it being bias or basically an advertorial for the big brands then you hear golfers singing it praises.

Golf Digest Was Aware Of Reader Complaints

Hot List writers were well aware of the opinion many of their readers and other golfers were starting to voice but until this year they didn’t acknowledge it.  They seemed to believe in the old motto, “If it ain’t broke…don’t fix it.”  But…at this years Hot List Summit meeting writer Michael Johnson stated, “”One of the complaints regularly heard about the Hot List is that it tends to be dominated by the large equipment companies.”  So…they were well aware of its perception…and this year I was told that would change by more then a few insiders.  Although…I still had my doubts.

That’s because over the past few years it seems as though no matter who you are (as long as your a big name in golf and you are an advertiser in their publication) your company either gets a Gold or Silver medal in the Golf Digest Hot List.  And last year at this same time we wrote an article where we were critical of their results being biased towards their large advertisers…which promptly resulted in a email and return phone call from one of their head writers disputing our post.  He asked us to promptly take our post down…although we stood behind our findings and our sources and chose to keep the post up.  Below is one of the statements we received from one of their long time advertisers.

Previous Statement:

Just the other day I was talking to a high up at another golf company…and he was telling me about his unhappiness with the treatment their MAJOR golf company got for the millions of dollars they spent on ads in Golf Digest which also included the “Hot List” Edition.  He had received a proof for the article they had written about their product that was to be published in the “Hot List” article and let’s just say it was not to his liking.  Well they called the writer and said if he didn’t make some drastic changes to his opinion and their placing in the list that they would pull all the ad spending from their publication.  And guess what….he made the changes.

* (THIS IS JUST ONE PERSONS OPINION AND NOT STATED AS A FACT – GOLF DIGEST CONTACTED US AND DISAGREED WITH THIS ABOVE OPINION FROM OUR EXTREMELY RELIABLE SOURCE)

Well another year has passed since that statement, and this year at the “Golf Digest Hot List Summit” they claimed there would be changes to the system and that this years list would be different.  They talked about including more niche brands along side the big names in golf.  Here are some direct quotes from one of their writers at their summit meetings:

  • We asked a follow-up question: “Would it be a bad idea then to even consider niche companies?” The reply came as a relief.  “I don’t think it’s a mistake to have small brands on the list,” one Leigh Bader of Joe & Leigh’s Discount Golf Shop at Pine Oaks GC in South Easton, Mass. “I think it may be a mistake not to.” Several heads nodded in agreement.
  • “Prepare to be Surprised – The slightest hint of brand bias will not be tolerated. Be ready to be underwhelmed by a club from a popular manufacturer and likewise, be ready to fall in love with a club whose name you’ve never heard of.”
  • “One of the complaints regularly heard about the Hot List is that it tends to be dominated by the large equipment companies. Our counter to that has always been that big equipment companies are usually big for a reason: they tend to spend more on research and development and more on quality materials and manufacturing, thus usually (but not always) leading to pretty good products.”
  • “One of the joys of being a Hot List judge is finding the hidden gem.”
  • Comments made by Michael Johnson, read complete article here.

So Did The Hot List Results Actually Change for 2011?

Well a quick glance through this years “Hot List” winners and you soon realize it is much of the same.  Still the big names at the top and 9 out of 10 being sponsors in their magazine.  And what about the complaint many golfers have about them giving Gold and Silver medals out to just about every big name product on the market?  Well more of the same in 2011.  We know that reviewing clubs is not an easy task…especially with the amount of clubs and testers that they use in their process.  There is a lot of time and energy involved.  And even more data and results to compile.  But in the end if your purpose is to have the most thorough and in-depth golf club review process as they claim to have shouldn’t the point of this process be then to give golfers the most informed decision they could have after reading the article?  What is the point of giving almost every major name brand golf club either a gold or silver in every category?  How does this helps the readers?  Well in our opinion there is no point…at least for the golfer.  But if you don’t want to ruffle any feathers in the industry and keep everyone happy it sure is a good way to achieve just that.  Once again just my opinion but sure seems to be the case with the “Hot List” results year after year.  And yes many of these clubs are very close in quality and results but there should still be clear winners in my opinion.

So…What is the Point of Reviewing Golf Clubs For Readers Then?

Well I feel it should be to first and foremost to give detailed and accurate results of all the equipment that is available to golf consumers.  And after collecting that data to then provide readers with clear and concise results to help them make more informed decisions when possibly purchasing this equipment.  If that isn’t the case then why do the reviews at all?  So…is there any value to the reader when there are 14 drivers being listed and 8 Golds & 6 Silver medals are awarded with little to no distinct differences being noted amongst them?  How does this do anything other then further confuse the reader and make the decision process on what is best for their game even harder to decide.  Like I have stated previously I understand their issue…tough to tell a Callaway who is one of your biggest sponsors that they didn’t win any awards compared to giving them a couple golds and a few silvers to keep all your big sponsors happy.  It might seriously impact their business.  But is it the right thing to do is the question.

And that is exactly why MyGolfSpy was created.  If we continue to grow and if you continue to demand more un-biased info and golf club data…sooner then later we feel we will have to come out with our own new site dedicated solely to nothing but reviewing all the golf clubs on the market and letting you know which ones REALLY perform and which ones are a waste of your money.  And also by including some of the amazing niche companies that we try and spotlight on our site as well. There are some amazing products that are being left out and that is a fact.

We put a quick feeler out to some of our Facebook followers right before writing this article to see what your opinion was on the current status of the “Hot List” and this is what some of you had to say.

2011 Golf Digest Hot List Results

2011 Golf Digest Hot List Results

What Is Your Opinion?

We want to hear your opinions on the “Hot List”…so have your voice be heard.  Can the “Hot List” be improved on?  Or do you like it just the way it is?  Do you think it has lost its luster and become not as useful in regards to helping you decide what equipment is best for your game.  Or do you still think it is the best review process and format in golf? Has it become “The Mediocre List” has it “Jumped The Shark”?  Have any other points you would like to make or debate…lets hear’em!

* (INFO IN THIS POST IS JUST OUR OPINION AND NOT STATED AS A FACT.)


For You

For You

Golf Apparel
Apr 19, 2024
A New Go-To Rain Jacket from Galvin Green
Wilson Staff Model Irons Wilson Staff Model Irons
News
Apr 19, 2024
Ask MyGolfSpy: Wilson Golf
First Look
Apr 19, 2024
Team TaylorMade Junior Clubs: Small, but Mighty
Adam Beach

Adam Beach

Adam Beach

My name is Adam Beach. This place, this site, it’s more than just a business to me, it truly is an expression of who I am and what I believe in, down to my core. I feel the work I do is a reflection of who I am and the idea behind the work I do is more important than the work itself. You see, I don’t actually see myself in the golf business at all, I am in the business of caring. I am a guy who wakes up with one goal: do the right thing.

Adam Beach

Adam Beach

Adam Beach

Adam Beach

Adam Beach

Adam Beach

Adam Beach





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Conrad Glewicz

      12 years ago

      Buyer beware; like Mr. Hogan said, “The secret is in the dirt.”, maybe the manufacturers should start selling dirt…

      Reply

      Bill Miller

      12 years ago

      I don’t care who gets what as long as it is accurate! Without unbiased testing the results as well as the resulting magazine are worse than useless. Just give me the facts and let me make up my own mind. I agree that smaller companies, or any that make excellent products, must be included to give the magazine any credence.

      Reply

      Sean

      13 years ago

      I think if you are going to bash the list, and tout that there are better products out there that were not tested, or rated highly, you should be giving a list of those you feel should be included. Don’t just complain and not give an alternative or solution.

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      13 years ago

      Ummm…did you read the article?

      Reply

      Scott Maxim

      13 years ago

      Full disclosure here folks: I’m just beginning to learn how to play golf, and to this point I’ve never even played a round, but I do have a take on the “Hot List”. Write me off as a noob or take this as an unbiased opinion, but here’s my 2 cents…

      When I purchased my first set of clubs in December 2010, I did a lot of research into the offerings from just about every manufacturer, and the place I started WAS the Hot List. I read everyting I could call up on the internet going back as far as they were archived online. However, I’m not a name brand guy and merely used the HL as a jumping off point. Of course the big-name “usual suspects” dominated the awards and to a certain extent, I found the information useful. However, I’m the kind of guy who believes in getting info from multiple sources.

      The search branched off to the internet. This site and many others provided me with much more information regarding equipment options. The opinions of everyday golfers proved to be a much more reliable measure of just why one club was superior, or why it’s better for the type of skill level I possess. Ok MORE info to catalog and cross reference.

      Finally, I spoke with shoppers at PGA Superstore and Golfsmith (I found this to be another great source of info as well as inspiration!) and of course, the most trusted source, my dad. He’s been playing for over 40 years, so I have to believe he knows a few things!

      When it was all said and done, I weighed the pros and cons of each source and arrived at the following:

      Taylormade R5 XL driver ($20 used)
      Adams Tight Lies 3 wood ($20 used)
      Adams Ovation 7 wood ($20 used) Probably a bad call for the bag, but c’mon, CHEAP!
      Nickent 4dx 2 and 4 hybrid ($45 for both, used)
      Nickent Genex GH Plus Irons 3-PW ($50 used, off ebay)
      Lynx SW ($29 New)
      Tour Edge Backdraft GT Putter ($30 new)

      As you can see, some of the gear WAS on the HL, but much of it was not. However, I feel that all of the stuff I have will suit me well as I develop my game. When I showed the gear to my instructor, friends and dad, all agreed I did a good job.

      So do the research, cross reference multiple sources and have fun discovering new gear from some great companies who can compete with the big boys in quality, if not in advertising budgets!

      Reply

      Jon

      13 years ago

      I’ve got to agree with Reg on this, it always seems biased. I myself have not bothered with it in a while, i always prefer to read actual reviews like MyGolfSpy does. It makes a purchase a hell of a lot easier for me as i am quite indecisive at the best of times!

      Reply

      David Powell

      13 years ago

      I agree that the Hot List is nothing but advertisement. You put in the money and I will tell you what you want to hear. Why not tell it like it is. Who has the longest/most forgiving production driver?
      Have Mr. Robot tell us. What is the best shaft for different swing speeds. What is the best combination distance/ control for different swing speeds. Let Mr. Robot tell us. Who has the most consistant/solid feeling iron for different handicaps players. 0 to20. Let Mr. Robot tell us. Same with best shafts in the irons. It seems to me if you want to be non bias, which I assume is not going to happen, you could offer some really good information as to best of the best by experimenting with clubhead/shaft combinations. As it is, its just advertising as usual.
      I remember years ago when Frank Thomas was talking at a USGA meeting. He started by saying
      Topflite is the longest ball. Why, because they say so.
      Tell me something that I can go to the bank with, or just do the same thing and just play around
      with the manufactors, kiss their butts and for God sake, don’t make them mad.
      David Powell
      3 handicap and sick of the bullshit advertising.

      Reply

      Mark S

      13 years ago

      BD: any more color you can provide on type of equipment you sent in, how long your company has been in business, if you have sent equipment in before, etc.?
      Would be great to hear more of your thoughts –

      Reply

      BD

      13 years ago

      We sent some product in to be tested for the “Hot List” but when we asked for them back well after the testing was finished. They come back with out 1 mark on all products. They pretty much took them out of the box and then sent them back when we asked for them back. We do not pay for advertising in GD. It makes me not want to as well since they say that the “Hot List” is a fair contest.

      Reply

      golfboys?

      13 years ago

      Digest seems to be really focusing and pushing folks to get custom fit..it was all over the Hot List issue and is on ther website too..in fact they now list the top clubfitters in the country..so clearly they recognize the need for custom fitting.

      Reply

      Tim

      13 years ago

      Honestly, the only reason everyone hates the hot list is because they see the gold sticker and pony up the $400 for a driver that doesn’t fit their swing with a shaft that has the wrong flex and launch. Than they blame GD for advertising/ rating a “bad” product. If you want new clubs, go talk to your local pro and get properly fit. Just tweaking lie angles goes miles towards improving your mis-hits. The clubs may not be the most hyped or highest rated club, but if it helps you shoot your lowest round ever, who really cares?

      Reply

      Wineguy21

      13 years ago

      I agree. I recently tested the Callaway Razr Hawk, the Taylormade R11, and the Titleist 910 D drivers. The Callaway was nice, and many people will like it. The Taylormade hyped up R11 was a friggin joke. $400 for what? It has the worst feel at ball contact that just about any driver I have tried over the past 40 years I have played golf. You could give it to me and I would not play it.
      I loved the new Titleist 910. Great feel and performance. And I am not a Titleist diehard. In fact, this is the first Titleist driver I have owned in many years. Titleist does very understated ads. If you look, many tour players have gone back to Titleist with the release of the 910.

      Reply

      Richard P. Jacobs II

      13 years ago

      I could not agree with more MGS’s stance, nor many of the above comments, though I think if you take the Gold List figuretively instead of literally, it becomes a little easier to digest(no pun intended). Number one, of course the magazine is basically held hostage by their advertisers when it comes to judging these advertisers’ products. And there is very little that can be done about that situatuion with the current set up. I have worked for myself since I was 27yo( currently 50 yo), and one of the top two reasons is that, sink or swim, I did’nt want to answer to someone who’s views, values or objectives did not coinside with mine. Yet if I was in the editor’s shoes @ GD, I would do exactly what he has done & will continue to do. Of course he’s going to deny any inproper actions or bias. To do anything else would be corporate suicide. And to take any stance other than his present stance of denial would be ludicrous, not to mention career threatening. Anyone who says otherwise is either not being honest or they are extremely foolish & have not been in the upper echilon of corporate structures(sr. level mgt.). I use the DG list to keep me abreast of all the latest offerings, though it would be nice to know what’s new with the smaller companies. Number two, In true competition, there is one gold, one silver, one bronze. Period. I could even live with two apiece. But eight golds & six silvers in the driver category. That’s comical. Take the ratings with a grain of salt, learn about the clubs, then go hit the ones that interest you. And the editor & other GD messangers? You should feel sorry for them because nomatter how large their paychecks or power base w/in GD, at the end of the day, they are nothing more than a corporate bitch. Excuse the language, but there is no more fitting word. Feel sorry for him(them). Think if you had to conduct the Hot List then defend its integrity….with a straight face!! Now that takes talent!!…..Greens & Fairways 4ever……Forged4ever

      Reply

      Jesse the Body

      13 years ago

      All the comments here are dead on. I can remember the first “Clubtest” issue of Golf Magazine in the early 90s (late 80s?). That was a big deal in the pre-internet days; getting to see companies that you had never heard of at the time. When Maruman was a hallowed name that only the likes of Strange and Woosnam played west of Asia. And does anyone remember Zett, Cactus Golf, Wood Bros, or back when Ram, Powerbilt, Spalding, Wilson and Maxfli all were top clubmakers?
      When Golf Digest’s Hotlist started it seemed the perfect extension of those beginnings.

      But now, they have devalued the Hotlist as a brand, and just turned it into a “paid advertisement section”. I can’t wait to see this site come up with it’s own independent testing forum; it seems a perfect fit. But in the mean time, these guys at Golf Digest need to take things more seriously. One thing they could do is have each tester award gold/silver/bronze to their favorite. From that they could award category wide gold/silver/bronze. I even believe that there should be one single item, whether a club, accessory or training aid, that is the innovative product of the year.

      Either way it’s broke and needs fixing. But mygolfspy.com doesn’t. This is where it’s at.

      (Plus they make a kick-@ss putter cover too.)

      Reply

      Tom Crisan

      13 years ago

      I used to look forward to GD hot list. Took a couple of hours to read, held on to the mag as reference to my buying decisions. Now it takes 15 minutes to read and then disgard to trash. This is the last year for my subscription. If you want the best critique, subscribe to “Today’s Golfer Magazine” out of the UK. Their approach is unbiassed and ahead of the equipment curve. I am now anxiously awaiting for MyGolfSpy to take up the mission on this side of the pond.
      I’m holding off my purchases till I read your assessment
      Get going guys; Tom

      Reply

      JasonB.

      13 years ago

      The categories they use are only of benefit to Golf Digest so that they may hand out more ‘Golds’ and appease advertisers. Categories such as ‘Innovation’ , ‘Demand’ , ‘Look/Feel/Sound ‘ are all subterfuge & muddy the waters. Innovative is a broad term, Demand is the same as mass demand – i.e. there is mass demand for Twinkes, and Looks/Feel/Sound is an odd way of saying ‘Feedback’ when the word Feedback is just one word – that’s because L/F/S can be purposely misleading & interpreted any way they like. A picture is worth a thousand words so the viewer will instantly know if the club is unappealing to their individual eye – so no need to talk about visuals – beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Performance is all that matters.
      Any testing group that is a for profit entity can not be trusted to produce unbiased results – that is just reality. I stopped subscribing to Golf Digest long ago – they repeat the same instructions tips over and over, simply assigning them to whatever player of teacher is the flavor of the month. Thank the stars we have forums to share knowledge outside of the corporate realm ( for now ).
      Any ‘independent’ testing needs to be published every 6 months. The testers HAVE TO be videotaped so we can see their swings & body type. And they must provide proof that they play at least twice a week on a variety of courses – no range rats. (I’m a range rat too).
      Any putting testing must be done using the same distance, break, line for all putters tested going back and forth between putters as the break and speed is learned.
      Once a year the ‘oldies but goldies’ from as far back as 3 years are compared against the top picks and evaluated and rated against the newest equip.
      All winning clubs are then shipped to me for a full 3 year evaluation.

      Reply

      Neil

      13 years ago

      Considering Wilson Staff gt 1 silver bu thas built the top quality irons for years.is beynd a joke. Tells you what big money can buy.

      Reply

      Mark S

      13 years ago

      MGS – what do you think of the categories they use to rate clubs? It looks like they have changed over time some but not a lot (I found a chart of GolfWRX here: http://criticalgolf.com/blog/). Also does it do any good if all of their team is way better than I am? Their handicap is about 5 on average. Seems like they should test with different kinds of people not just really good ones.

      Reply

      Joe Mama

      13 years ago

      Perhaps GolfSpy could confirm or deny what I have suspected in all trade reviews for some time; that there is an “entry fee” required to even get your product evaluated.
      Whether the “fee” takes the form of free products well above and beyond the test subjects, advertising purchased, free travel or outright cash is irrelevant. It limits the field to only those willing to pony up the tribute.

      What say you?

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      13 years ago

      You have to submit your clubs for the “Hot List”. Although I don’t consider that to be an issue at all. Sending in product for review to magazines or the like is the norm and is not where the bias typically comes in to play.

      Reply

      Mitch Gross

      13 years ago

      While I have enjoyed reading the Hot List in previous years, I feel it has lost some credibility. I’m confident the panel made an honest effort to objectively assess them. The results whether fortunately or unfortunately, indicate there are no bad or underperforming clubs out there and the differences between gold medal winners is minimal. Possibly this is the case. Probably it’s not, at least from a statistical standpoint.

      I’m unwilling to accuse the judges of bias toward their advertisers, but in the future I would like to see them publish objective numbers derived from the testing, particularly the Iron Byron. It’s possible every club they reviewed was wonderful and their selection of the same fortuitous. It’s just a bit much to accept.

      Reply

      Clay Rouse

      13 years ago

      What I would like to see is a listing of clubs that they feel weren’t good enough to earn even a silver rating. It seems disingenuous to say that the clubs only break down into two categories, really good (Gold) and good (Silver). Imagine the ire of an advertiser to find their product listed as poor.

      Reply

      Johnny Thunders

      13 years ago

      I look forward to reading the equipment lists from Golf and Golf Digest, but its just a list. Not enough data, much prefere the forums to get real world data. Can’t remember if it was Golf or Golf Digest that one year had HotStixx use a trackman on the all the drivers and fairway woods to get real distances, Very Nice.

      Reply

      TheSpoon

      13 years ago

      I could not agree more with your findings/opinion. There is an old axiom I adhere to: the more a product/service is advertised, the less value it has.

      e.g.: Apple, Chrysler, Callaway, and any major beer brand.

      If it was good, why would you need to spend so much to convince people? Another effect of massive advertising is that those costs must be added to the final price.

      It would be logical then, that the more spent on advertising, the less you could spend on R & D. Big frequently means bad.

      Reply

      golfboys?

      13 years ago

      Who has the time to hit all the clubs we can buy? I look at the hot list as a great service..and I don’t agree the advertisers influence decisions..I see nike ads all over GD yet they don’t have as many wins as others..but the ones they have won are good products. Yes they are bigger companies with more ad $$..but they also have bigger R&D budgets..and so maybe they just make the best clubs?! Here’s a great testimonial..yes the PGA Tour Players get paid to play..but they also have to perform..if they don’t they slip down the $$ list and then lose endorsements..so it starts and ends with being the best players they can be..think they would play Snake Eyes..or how many played Macgregor when they were in business? They play the clubs that are the best..which are the ones that usually win in GD..so it must be that they really are better..

      Reply

      TheSpoon

      13 years ago

      … and the clubs the pros play bear about as much relation to the stock offerings in the golf shops as does the Ford or Chevy you see on NASCAR tracks do to what you will find in your local dealer’s showroom. They only look the same on the surface.

      mygolfspy

      13 years ago

      Here is the one question that Golf Digest should answer:

      “Has an advertiser ever effected the results in ANY of your magazine reviews?”

      What do you think the honest answer would be?

      Reply

      Oldplayer

      13 years ago

      The favouring of the big OEM’s by Golf Digest is nothing new. It has been the status quo for many years now. As an experienced gear head and club ho it is a total joke that Callaway won the medals it did. Just about all the club ho’s and dedicated players of the game I converse with have very little time for Callaway and their equipment. I don’t want to sound like a snob, but Callaway players seem to be predominately wannabe hackers who believe all the hype and are trying to buy a game. There is so much quality equipment out there, and a lot of Callaway’s and Taylormade’s stuff is not among it. I will concede that I am talking from the point of view of a lower handicapper (5).
      Having said that, it is a little out of place for Mygolfspy to plublicly comment and criticise Golf Digest when there is a clear conflict of interest. Not that I am questioning the integrity of Mygolfspy, I am a big fan of the site and their very good reviews. Save to say that as the popularity of this site increases and overtakes organisations like Golf Digest the advertising revenues follow. This site does accept paid advertising and has grown very much from it’s humble beginings.
      Let me say lastly and repeat, I am not questioning the integrity of Mygolfspy, just their wisdom in being a leader in this campaign against Golf Digest. I do believe Mygolfspy to the to best and most impartial reviewer of golf equipment in the industry.

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      13 years ago

      Thanks for the comment OldPlayer – want to make one thing clear:

      THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ACCEPTING ADVERTISING WHICH IS NEEDED TO BE ABLE TO KEEP THE LIGHTS ON AND BEING BIASED TOWARDS THOSE THAT DO ADVERTISE WITH YOU.

      IT IS A TOUGH LINE TO WALK FOR ANY PUBLICATION BUT I FEEL IS ONE THING THAT SETS US APART. WE ACTUALLY TURN DOWN ABOUT 6 OUT OF 10 COMPANIES THAT CONTACT US TO ADVERTISE. BECAUSE AFTER WE EXPLAIN OUR POLICIES WE ASSUME IT IS NOT GOING TO BE THE BEST FIT.

      I AM SURE AS THE SITE GROWS THERE WILL BE MORE AND MORE LARGE OEM’S CONTACTING US TO ADVERTISE WHICH IS FINE…BUT W WILL NEVER SKEW OUR VIEW BECAUSE OF THIS. AND THAT IS WHERE GOLF DIGEST AND MANY OTHERS HAVE GONE WRONG.

      THEY CAN SAY WHATEVER THEY WANT BUT PUT THEM ON A LIE DETECTOR AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS. I WOULD BET MY BANK ACCOUNT THAT 100% OF THEM FAIL WHEN ASKED THE QUESTION “HAVE YOUR REVIEW RESULTS EVER BEEN EFFECTED BECAUSE OF ADVERTISING REVENUE?”

      Reply

      Oldplayer

      13 years ago

      Thanks for your reply Mygolfspy. As I said I am a big fan of the site and it is perhaps because I care about the site that I made the original observation
      I do not dispute that Golf Digest is biased towards the large OEM’s. Likewise I also do not dispute that Mygolfspy has integrity and is unbiased. It does not change the fact that you are competitors in the same industry. It is precisely the unbiased position that Mygolfspy has to protect. I fully believe you when you say you operate from a position of integrity, especially in regards to advertising. What I am saying is Golfspy not only needs to be fair but be seen to be fair. If this issue with golf digest continues to escalate you do not want to be seen leading a mob figuratively carrying torches and pitchforks.

      mygolfspy

      13 years ago

      I am glad you are a fan of the site. But on this topic we are going to have to agree to disagree.

      I did not create this site in an attempt to try and be fair or unfair. Like I said this site has floruished because I feel we try to meet the demands of the reader. And if the readers demand a better review system then that is what we are going to try and give them.

      We are not at all competitors with GD and I think they would agree. And whether we are should not matter in considering whether or not we bring attention to things we fell are not being done right in this industry.

      Why do you think it is seen as unfair for us to bring attention to this situation with the “Hot List”? You are making me feel like we should do like everyone else in this society does when issues need to be addressed…most don’t speak their mind. And in the end nothing ever changes. So what good comes of that. I feel we should ABSOLUTELY be the ones to escalate topics like this. Like I said before I am not in this to be politically correct or rub elbows with media interests. I am in this to do the RIGHT thing and that I feel is not what was being done with the “Hot List”.

      Oldplayer

      13 years ago

      Thankyou once again for reply on this topic. I have enjoyed the robust debate. If nothing else it has allowed me to clearly understand your position on this. Keep up the good work and thankyou for taking the time to address my comments.

      mygolfspy

      13 years ago

      I sincerely appreciate the time you and others have taken to comment on this article. I feel this type of debate and conversation can only help the process in regards to how clubs are reviewed in the future to help golfers make better informed decisions about the equipment they purchase.

      So thanks again Oldplayer for the discussion.

      mygolfspy

      13 years ago

      And regarding the conflict of interest comment. I am not in this business to be politically correct or brown nose the big wigs…so conflicts of interests are thrown out the window for me.

      I am in this to bring the consumers what they ask for. And if they want a new review system then that is what I will develop. I did not start this site thinking that is what I would do. I have let the readers decide how it will evolve and then I will try and go out and give them what they ask for.

      So if doing what the consumers are asking is considered a conflict of interest. Then stick with Golf Digest because they are doing just the opposite…and that is appealing to the companies instead of the readers. Pick your poison.

      Reply

      gunmetal

      13 years ago

      It’s all about the cash. The big companies obviously pony up big money so they can slap a Gold or Silver badge on their forthcoming advertisement. To the casual golfer looking for new sticks, that symbol means they must be good. To the more educated, we laugh it off.

      My disappointment is how there is SO much good equipment that doesn’t get the publicity. Offerings from:
      KZG
      Alpha
      Nakashima
      Snake Eyes
      Wishon
      MacGregor
      Machine
      Bridgestone
      …the list goes on. Occasionally they throw in a token Silver or Bronze but it’s never at the expense of the big boys.

      Fun to look at the clubs, nonetheless.

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      13 years ago

      I could not agree more Gunmetal…there are so many companies being excluded from this list and not because of the quality of their gear. I have tested just about every club you could think of in my career and I know of many that would out perform the big name advertisers they list year in and year out. So yes it is a shame…not only for these companies but for the public as well.

      Reply

      jim wachna

      13 years ago

      I thought it was a little strange when Golf Digest gave Cialis a Gold Medal.

      Reply

      Rich Coon

      13 years ago

      I’d like GD to publish the raw data they collect. All of it, then maybe I could for my own opinion about the various products.

      Reply

      Brad Smith

      13 years ago

      I think you can ascertain some differentiation between the clubs by looking at the rating stars. (Of course, for this, you must assume that there is some statistical meaning to the star ratings) Consider drivers. I personally would only care about Performance and Look/Sound/Feel. The Cleveland and Titleist had 10 stars and the Ping and TaylorMade had 9.5. So for me, those were the real winners.

      There is one other interesting bit of data to be found in the report, and that is iron lofts. (I know you can go hunting on the OEM’s sites and find that data, but it is convenient to see it in one place). What struck me is how the ever decreasing loft campaign is alive and well. Lofts on the 6 iron were as low as 27 degrees for the Burner 2.0. And many of the pitching wedges were 44 or 45 degrees. These are about a club ands a half stronger lofts that the traditional clubs up until about 20-25 years ago when the march toward “Our new iron is longer than your old iron” began. I still have a set of Arnold Palmer blades from 1970. 4 iron was 38″ long with 25 degrees loft, 6 iron 37″ long with 33 degrees loft. Pitching wedge had 50 degrees loft. Step forward to 1994/5 when cavity backs had taken over and the rush for “my iron is longer than yours” had begun. Hogan Edge, Titleist DCI’s and Spalding Top Flights 6 irons were 32 degrees, but the new “hot clubs”, the King Cobra and Callaway S2H2 were 29 and 30 degrees, respectively.
      So now, in the Gold winners, the 6 irons range from 27 to 29 degrees. These are about a club stronger lofts than 15 years ago and and nearly two clubs stronger than traditional clubs used by Palmer, Nicklaus in their prime.

      No wonder they go farther!!!!

      Reply

      Michael

      13 years ago

      Well, this subject certainly has generated a lot of discussion. Before I get flamed for this post let me first sat MGS has been my bedrock for equipment reviews. I buy golf clubs based on their reviews. What better testament to my belief in what they are doing. That said and I know that MGS has asked folks to respond regarding the “Hot List” standing at present. I think we (as consumers) would be better served posting on GD’s site what they could do to improve the “Hot List” so that it doesn’t appear as though an advertising medium. That is the only way (other than subscription cancellation) that GD will get the idea. Also, I believe it the right way to do things. If you don”t like what the other guy is doing……tell him about the problem. I close by saying I am hooked on MGS. The best equipment site around by far and relative to topic. Maybe GD could learn something here.

      Reply

      BTO

      13 years ago

      MGS…. My take and info you can use or not. I submitted the M-PULSE seriesfor the 08 and 09 Hot List. Was told we were in the Finalist process for one of those years. Even had a small bone piece in Golf Digest later, and was told by ******* Hot List selection member that the small article was, “a no-brainer”.
      Same no selection for the list happened in 09. I was told by many PGA players I know that I was wasting my time because only the be boys and $ make the list.
      Last year I received another invite. I was contacted by one of the assistants and was told this 2011 Hot list was to feature custom and adjustable products. Our M-PULSE series was made for this issue and I agreed to submit three M-PULSE Mallet putters. I want to repeat, This 2011 Hot List issue was to feature custom and adjustable golf products. I am on my way to pick up an issue to throughly check up before I make any other comments, however, I believe we are not included.
      One more point, I was warned again prior to sending the putters last year, not too!! A very high profile PGA Club Pro, (using our putter) stated the Hot List should be called the “Money List” They totally control the selection process. By the way, many had called the Hot List winners last September.. I will comment more after seeing the issue.

      Reply

      Bill

      13 years ago

      I’m a gear head but when I was playing better I didn’t find it helpful because the reviews are being made by golfers with handicaps in the stratosphere. I think they should take categories with playing level into consideration. I think TG made a great point to put the equipment on a robot with adjustment for miss hits and semi miss hits. Any way you look at it it is a big advertisement for the big OEMs.

      Reply

      David

      13 years ago

      Well written article and factual to boot! Thanks guys.

      Reply

      Tim

      13 years ago

      Looks like PING won they had 15 medals between Gold and Silver! That how they keep score in the Olympics.

      Reply

      Steve Collins

      13 years ago

      I think Troon McAllister said it all in his novel “Scratch”. The real differences between high quality golf equipment are probably so miniscule that if you could disguise the identy of the clubs tested, human testers could probably not distinguish one brand of club from another.

      Reply

      Pheadar O'Tyrrell

      13 years ago

      The Hot List has become, or quite likely, has always been, a hoax. It is just fortunate that the companies always listed and awarded do make a high quality product…for the most part. Remember this as well: players do not score well because they lack good equipment. It’s because they do not devote the necessary time to practise and learning. And there’s nothing wrong with that. They must become satisfied with their scoring no matter what the equipment because the clubs can only help those that become more skilled thru practise. A person that plays to an 18 handicap and only plays…say twice a month and no practise, is really a very good player…and patently dangerous to a scratch player! On a good day that -18 player can figuratively ‘murder’ a scratch player. So, in the end, the Hot List is really nothing more than the insiders slapping themselves on the back with nothing more than profits in mind. The great Universal Business Model! I will now throw-up and begin drinking again…stopped my subscription to that rag years ago. The most offensive ads though are the ED group. Just WHO needs that much sex when there’s golf to be played? And where are the grey haired ladies barking loudly to be attacked by the ‘Blue Pill’ golfers among us? Golf magazine yr’arse! Rather sink a thirty foot downhill breaking right putt, get me a good whiskey and a good nights sleep.

      Reply

      Nick Macleod

      13 years ago

      I tried as many clubs as were available at a few large golf discount stores before settling for three brands I thought were best. I then searched out a demo day to hit the clubs on real grass at a driving range. I wound up hitting the Callaway Diablo Forged irons the best, and they gave me the best feel on solid hits. They also gave me the most feedback on off center hits. Unfortunately for me, they were also the most expensive clubs I tried and liked. I wound up buying them and I absolutely love them. My previous clubs were Cleveland CG 4 Tour irons which I also loved for a long time. I wasn’t hitting them as well as I had been so I looked for a more forgiving iron which the Callaway’s are. Sometimes the big brands are truly the best, at least in my experience. I too, would like more technical info in the Hot List by Golf Digest.

      Reply

      GolfSpy T

      13 years ago

      @Magoo – It’s been my contention that the perfect review process doesn’t exist (too many variables, too many different opinions on what matters). All you can do is, well, the best you can do. And that’s what we try to do here. I certainly hope everyone understands, and in a perfect world, appreciates what we’re trying to accomplish.

      As far your contention that are process is flawed because we put tape on the face. You’d be right except as I’ve said before: WE DON’T PUT TAPE ON THE FACE!

      One more time: WE DON’T PUT TAPE ON THE FACE! (for exactly the reasons you mentioned)

      Crown – yes. When you have a couple of dozen guys testing, some of whom are high to very high handicappers, you have to so that the clubs look nice for everybody who tests. Occasionally we tape the sole too, but I’ll say it one final time:

      WE DON’T PUT TAPE ON THE FACE!

      (for irons and wedges we don’t put tape anywhere)

      Reply

      Blu Magoo

      13 years ago

      I love it. Stimulates sales. Every item that makes gold. Sales bump for a month. Keep on keepin on GD. Besides what else is there to do with a foot of snow on the ground? Read the latest hype of golf equipment. Mizuno made the gold list.. and they don’t go to any extremes to advertise.. name a tour pro real quick they sponsor. 1 – 2 – 3… Times up!! lolol but their new sticks are SWEET

      Like “TG” I want specs.. no tape on the face(for several reasons).. a robot hitting the clubs and balls. etc.. One reason I think the process MGS uses is flawed, because of the tape used on the face. Reduces the spin. But I get the drift of what they are trying to do.

      ALL IN ALL>. Both can be used togain a little more knowledge before heading down to plunk the bucks down on a new club or set or irons

      Reply

      Dwight Hansen

      13 years ago

      The biggest problem with the Hot List is the inclusion of the BUZZ factor. Buzz is created in part by advertising and since GD makes it’s living off of ads, the inclusion of Buzz skews the results and makes this a “popularity” contest and not a true list of what performs the best.

      Most consumers today just want to have equipment that is better than what they currently own and using the Hot List as a guide only gives them what is “Hot”, not what is best! This obviously heavily favors large, established wall street brands who spend millions on advertising and already have established a huge presence at retail.

      This leaves virtually no room for newer or smaller companies who often times have product that performs just as good, if not better!

      Reply

      Pablo

      13 years ago

      I don’t like the demand/buzz category either- it rates clubs on popularity, not on performance, and it does skew the results. How does the new TM hybrid win in buzz when I’ve barely heard about them. I’ve heard more buzz about the new Nike VR Pro and the Cleveland Mashie (which got great reviews but somehow got Silver for its “raw” finish that apparently no one liked). So overall a HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE category.

      Reply

      Robert G Dwyer

      13 years ago

      Other than seeing the major manufactures new stuff all in one place the article has little relivance. Players (non-tour player) are still going to buy what they like regardless of the list. At the end of the day a golf club is a golf club. I’ve seen guys shoot in the 80’s with a Walmart set of clubs and I’ve seen guys with $1K clubs shoot in the 100’s. as with most things today much to do about nothing. Grab a stick you like and just go out and play.

      Reply

      joel goodman

      13 years ago

      The clubs that got the “awards” are almost all new and never in the hands of the playing public. The “editorial” staff makes all the decisions. It is purely a payback and pandering to their major advertisers. This sort of award system is quite similar to the academy awards and other phony and ridiculous self congratulatory farces. This sort of measurement system is usually referred to a “pure unadulterated bullshit”

      Reply

      Frank

      13 years ago

      And jsut for th erecord I received the e-mails cause I am a UPRO GPS holder. thought it was the best bang for the buck. as far as being able to move the cursor for exact yardages and such….needed to throw that out there not knocking callaway but the hot list itself

      Reply

      Frank

      13 years ago

      Right so the better part of 75% of callaway’s equipment is all GOLDEN. I’ll put my hathaway up against any drive rthey have right now!!!!!!!!!!!! Philadelphia PA 19145 Give me a time and place and I will be glad to bring it out. in fact i woul dput any of my clubs against the callaway for playabiliy workability etc…….

      Reply

      Frank

      13 years ago

      Sooo…right on cue i received this in the subject line of one of my e-mails today “Callaway Wins 11 Gold Medals” in the words of chris berman and his espn crew COME ON MAN!!!!!! now callaway does make some decent products and I never hit a straighter club than the GGB driver but needless to say do they have to blast their clientel with this craps. keep up the good work MSG we know where to get our REAL review instead of the PAID FOR BY THE FOLLOWING Critques….if that’s what you call them.

      Reply

      skip

      13 years ago

      I think it’s funny that the one negative they had to say about the Adams a7’s was that if you bought them a year ago, your now used set of a7’s would worth $100 or 1/2 of what a set of “older” X-22 would be worth. X-22’s debuted in October of 2008, and a7’s in spring of 2009 (roughly 6 month difference). How many people all over the country buy their clubs from October thru Spring, I’m thinking not many.
      So, if you bought X-22’s at retail you paid $700 and if you bought a7’s you probably paid $500. (steel shafted sets) So with a7’s you are now out $400, and with Callaway x-22’s you are now out $500. How exactly is that a NEGATIVE for the a7’s??????

      Reply

      skip

      13 years ago

      FOR THE RECORD, I LOVE MY a7’s!!!

      Reply

      Sactown

      13 years ago

      I was thinking about buying a new Bettinardi this year. Not now that it is only a silver medalist.
      Thanks GD for saving me the cash!
      ;)

      Reply

      Golfboy

      13 years ago

      Silver is bad? It’s about 10th out of 350 putters…think again

      Reply

      GolfSpy T

      13 years ago

      I went back and forth on whether I should start a secondary debate here, but two points I would make:

      1. Stating that the list is flawed on the basis that your personal favorites aren’t on the list is problematic. My favorites didn’t make the cut either, but that in and of itself isn’t proof of any shenanigans over at GD. Of course the fact that the brand by brand medal count seems to breakdown along the lines of company size and advertising budgets (Nike being the glaring exception) is a whole other thing.

      2. Regarding the broad generalization that “Anybody who has hit anything” from Scratch falls in love with it. We recently tested Scratch irons along with several other forged cavitybacks. Not only did Scratch finish near or at the bottom in almost every category we graded on (save accuracy, which is obviously extremely important), and basically nobody fell in love with the irons, there were quality issues that, in my mind anyway, would be justification enough for the clubs not to take home one of the 60 or so gold medals GD awards in any given category.

      The wedges…almost certainly deserving of gold.

      Reply

      fozcycle

      13 years ago

      I see that Powerbilt made the list again for the second year!…this time for the Air force One Nitrogen filled irons. I don’t recall one ad by PowerBilt in the last couple years…..I guess GD can use that to say they are not biased?

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      13 years ago

      I will just that comment with a :)

      Reply

      Thehacker

      13 years ago

      I have never bothered about the hotlist anyway. I suspect sometimes peopleuse the hotlist to sort of justify their purchases.

      What I really rather see is scientific measurements of the clubs performance compared to other brands. For example drivers you want to compare distances performance, forgiveness, spin rate, launch angle… All these tested by robot of course.

      Reply

      JTS

      13 years ago

      Just received my copy of the Golf Digest “Hot List” in the mail tonight……what a disapoinment! Already excepting the fact that the hot list is in a downward spiral mimicking our economy over the past couple years! The hot list use to be the issue we all waited for! Thank you MG Spy for keeping all of us addicts up to date!! JTS

      Reply

      Addicted2Golf

      13 years ago

      Sorry, but the fact that a company like Scratch only got one acknowledgment tells me all I need to know about the GD Hotlist. Anybody who has hit anything from that company falls in love with the brand instantly.

      Reply

      Pablo

      13 years ago

      Well they only have 4-5 products total. XD In all seriousness though, I agree, but the 8620 wedge is one of their only affordable/normally-priced products they have. Why do you think it was tough for them to put the great new Fourteen wedge that costs like $180 until now?

      Reply

      Jamo

      13 years ago

      Wilson gets one medal?!?! Seriously?!?!?!

      Reply

      Nic

      13 years ago

      The fact that they have more golds than silvers in nearly every single category makes me laugh. Gold club? Big deal! 75% of Golfsmith’s stock is apparently the best you can get.
      I also like how the Adams a7 went from gold last year to silver this year. With no change in the club itself!
      Oh except there is a new set out, bump it down to silver and gold the new series! Please
      BTW this comes from a huge Adams fan

      I just use it as a window shopping catalog as opposed to a hard-line review

      Reply

      cheymike

      13 years ago

      A mediocre list? *YAWWWNNNN* perhaps. I haven’t paid much attention to it the past couple years, except long enough to verify that nothing has changed from year to year.

      Reply

      chris

      13 years ago

      crap, my subscription expired and for some reason, golf digest online only has drivers, or is it just me??

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      13 years ago

      Chris I think they are stringing it our online over a few days or so.

      Reply

      steve

      13 years ago

      What did PowerBilt get the silver for?

      John Barry

      13 years ago

      Hot list, hardly. Wilson, tons of great golf product, little to no notice. Hireko’s Golf Brands, needs more attention. The magazine is a joke now, no one reads it for equipment, they read it for articles and access to players you don’t usually get on the net, and about courses and destinations. The only reason I do.

      Let them have their advertiser’s hot list, and focus on the human aspect of golf, and they can stay in business, leave the equipment to the unbiased!

      Reply

      Pablo

      13 years ago

      I read the Hot list, only to see if they actually improved it and to see a bunch of golf eye-candy. For me, it’s like going out with a supermodel, for the looks but no real substance in it. But I will note SOME improvements- not as many complaints about lack of 9 woods and they weren’t TOO harsh on the player’s clubs. But they still refuse to judge blades/MB’s because they think they have idiots for readers that will play blades after seeing them. Isn’t that their choice anyhow?

      Reply

      GolfSpy T

      13 years ago

      Clearly what they meant when they implied substantial change was that they weren’t even going to bother with bronze medals anymore. Kudos…what an improvement <– that right there is sarcasm.

      Year after year the "Hot" list leaves me shaking my head. Since I've started doing the reviews here at MGS, I've become somewhat fascinated by data, numbers, etc. Leaving out for a moment that fact that the hot list is 100% subjective (that's not how I prefer things, but there's also nothing inherently wrong with it, to each his own), what's ridiculous is that the results are, from a statistical and mathematical standpoint, almost certainly bogus.

      Speaking as a guy who more or less created the evolving scoring system we user here at MGS, I'm willing to acknowledge that just about any scoring system begins by assigning some sort of arbitrary value to something (doesn't matter if it's quantifiable like distance, or completely subjective like feel). Of course, once the scoring starts, inevitably you have clubs that score better than most, clubs that score worse than most, with most of the clubs falling somewhere in the middle. You know…it's the bell curve – and any truly meaningful scoring system grades on it.

      At GD, however, better than 50% of the drivers (57% and change) earned gold medals, which certainly implies they're above average, which apart from being a statistical improbability (if not impossibility) further implies that either they don't have an actual scoring system (Callaway is on a "Gold Level" advertising package), or they're using a threshold (anything which gets more than 60 points gets gold), neither of which provides any useful or COMPARATIVE data for the reader.

      Don't get me wrong, it's nice to see all the clubs in one place, but I'm not willing to blindly buy into the notion that everything in Callaway's lineup is above average? If that truly is the case, the least they could do is compare Callaway to Callaway, although I suspect we'd learn that every Callaway driver is better than the average Callaway driver. It doesn't take a mathematician to figure out that none of this makes any damn sense.

      Annual rant over.

      Reply

      matt

      13 years ago

      I used to love getting the hot list issue to see the new equipment but now since i have been on MGS the last year or two i have already known what the new stuff is going to be months in advance. The Hot List has become nothing more than a picture book without any real informational value.

      Reply

      john

      13 years ago

      I use it as my third or forth review spot to see if a club could be worth it. I have always felt that the reviews where too vague

      Reply

      P-Gunna

      13 years ago

      The hot list might as well say “Advertisement” across the top. I don’t even bother with it anymore.

      Reply

      engelburger

      13 years ago

      Its beyond me why the new Titleist 910’s didn’t win in every catagory. Not only does it look bad-ass, but it offers a whole new dimension of adjustablity that the other drivers do not. The club is a total game-changer.

      Reply

      Pablo

      13 years ago

      Well at least the fairway woods got Editor’s Choice, that’s a big thumbs up for such a promising lineup. =)

      Reply

      Nick

      13 years ago

      The Hot list is a nice place to see some general comments about the new equipment, but honestly, it’s just a list of decent equip by well known manufactureres. Why can they ever say – Most of our reviewers felt that really missed it on this one, or this iron is great if you carry a 2 handicap, but if you can’t stroke it like Tiger, move on. Seriously, I’m sure that many of the reviewers hated at least one club in the test, but the “cons” they list are such softballs, that you can’t get any real value. Personally, i think at least half the issue if not the ENTIRE issue could be the hot list with every reviewers comments about each club. Why not? you invited all these people to test them, let’s see what they have to say? I may find that one person in the group really matches with what I think and feel about equipment and therefore I may value their opinion more. I don’t care what (M) handicap said about a club, because I don’t know who that is, or what they like.

      Bottom line is the article is too vague, and comes across as a platform for companies to announce their latest equipment. I’d like to see MUCH MUCH more of the issue dedicated to the reviews, and list everyones comments, not just a few. Don’t give me a quote from an unknown person, let them create a paragraph on their thoughts and feelings of each piece of equipment.

      Reply

      TG

      13 years ago

      As a gear head, I have always prefered technical data. Put these clubs on a robot and let us know spin rates (toe, center, heel), launch angle, distance (toe, center, heel), what ball and shaft were used. I will then test several clubs based on that data and determine my own look, feel and demand. So much of their reviews is opinion. Even if they are not biased to advertisers, something as simple as the ball they use can have a big impact on feel and performance (right? isn’t that what they tell us in their own ball ads).

      If I want to know about innovation, I can read the manufacturers opinions on their own website.

      Reply

      Leonard

      13 years ago

      I agree with you 100%. That is what the robots are for, unbiased data. Everything is equal on the Bot.

      Reply

      Justin

      13 years ago

      Golf Magazine used to do that, then suddenly stopped. I wonder why…?

      Rodger`

      13 years ago

      Good comment. I agree totally. Let’s do a double blind study–blindfold the testers and hit unmarked clubs. Okay, the former might not be feasible but unmarked clubs with everyone comparing their personal notes AFTER identification would be noteworthy. And perhaps trustworthy.

      Reply

      salman khaliq

      13 years ago

      TG’s comments are the most objective and useful of the comments I have read. ROBOTS. Ball types being named. Distace, Direction, spin rates, flight trajectory all being named. Human error or favour factor ou.
      Otherwise the present format of the Golf Digest Hot List is useless and I wont buy the next issue.
      Salman, Pakistant

      Reply

      Josh

      13 years ago

      Just look at callaways homepage… all but one of their products received gold. I personally think their edge irons are ugly as hell… http://www.callawaygolf.com/Global/en-US/Articles/GolfDigest2011HotList.html

      Reply

      Justin

      13 years ago

      I have an FT-3, FT-5 and FT-9 and all I can say is “meh”. The original Nike Sasquatch (which I still have, along with a SuMo 5000) and the Acer XK have been my personal favorites.

      Reply

      Reg

      13 years ago

      I’ve always considered it paid for editorial.

      Reply

      peter mohan

      13 years ago

      It’s kind of like in grade school now – everyone gets a medal. What if the Olympics gave everyone Gold and Solver medals? With so many Gold medals there is no recognizing a superior product. If every is equal, why should we pay the big bucks for the name brands?

      Reply

      MJ Martin

      13 years ago

      While I am not a Callaway fan, I have no idea wether they deserve all those golds or not. The truth is I have never paid much attention to the ‘Hot List’ because what I like, I like and somebody’s idea of what I should like is not important to me.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Apparel
    Apr 19, 2024
    A New Go-To Rain Jacket from Galvin Green
    Wilson Staff Model Irons Wilson Staff Model Irons
    News
    Apr 19, 2024
    Ask MyGolfSpy: Wilson Golf
    First Look
    Apr 19, 2024
    Team TaylorMade Junior Clubs: Small, but Mighty
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.