Callaway Updates a Ball I didn’t Like Anyway
News

Callaway Updates a Ball I didn’t Like Anyway

Callaway Updates a Ball I didn’t Like Anyway

I don’t like the 2015 Callaway Chrome Soft Golf Ball.

There, I said it. I feel better just putting it out there. For me…it’s shorter off the tee, and it just doesn’t do what I want it to do around the green.

For me.

As with most any other piece of golf equipment, your individual mileage may vary significantly.

If I’m Callaway, however, I don’t care even a little what Tony at MyGolfSpy thinks because, while we can split hairs over whether or not its self-proclaimed #BallThatChangedTheBall actually changed the ball (it’s still round, it still has dimples, and it’s not edible), Chrome Soft has absolutely made an impact on the market.

chrome-packaging

#3 Is Actually Really Good

Consider this; of the Top 10 selling golf balls in 2015, 8 of them fall under the Acushnet umbrella (Titleist & Pinnacle). The other two are Callaway balls. For its part in this story, the Chrome Soft outsells everything without ProV1 in its name.

And it’s not as if Titleist is the only player in the market. There’s real quality out there…Bridgestone, Srixon, and TaylorMade too. #3 and basically surrounded by Titleist is a hell of an achievement in the ball category. Toss in, as I did when I discussed the PING G30, that a healthy number of golfers are just really happy with what they got for their money, and well, you’d have to be a special kind of obtuse not to call Chrome Soft a success.

Even if I don’t love the ball, Chrome Soft has definitely shifted the market. It’s a great story, but #TheBallThatShiftedTheMarket is lousy hashtag.

The Missing Piece Layer

marshmallow

And to be fair, if I don’t like the Chrome Soft (and I don’t…did I mention that?), it could be because Callaway didn’t exactly give me another option. On a relative scale, I don’t like the ProV1, I like the ProV1x. I don’t like the Srixon Z-Star, I like the Z-Star XV. I don’t like Chrome Soft, I might like…you see where this is going.

My reality is that I generally find the performance I’m looking for in a four-piece ball. The 2015 Chrome Soft was a three-piece ball without a four-piece counterpart. The 2016 Chrome Soft is that four-piece alternative. It could be #TheBallThatMadeMeLikeTheBallThatChangedTheBall.

Feel free to use that one, Harry. No charge.

Better Than The Original? Always!

chrome-soft-feature-sheet

I’ve already spoiled the surprise.

The big change here is the addition of a 4th layer; an outer core which allows Callaway to make the claim that it’s the only company that has Dual SoftFast Core technology. That’s not to say that Callaway is the only one with a dual core structure – basically every four and five piece ball does. Nor does it mean that Callaway is the only company using soft(ish) materials in their core(s). It just means that Callaway is the only one using a Callaway trademark for a proprietary blend of materials not dissimilar from everybody else’s proprietary blend of materials. But hey, this is golf…everyone Trademarks everything and calls it exclusive because it sounds more exciting that way. It is what it is. Why fixate?

Moving on…

ball-goo

What is intriguing (to me anyway) about the new Chrome Soft are what Callaway claims are the benefits of that additional layer.

  1. It’s longer of the tee. That addresses one of my issues with the original.
  2. It offers more spin on aggressive shots into the green.  Well there you have it…sign me up.

Callaway HEX Aerodynamics, Tour Urethane Cover, and of course, soft feel…all of that good stuff carries over from the original.

Let’s watch and listen as Phil breaks it all down for us:

Yeah, it’s true that nearly every ball manufacturer makes similar claims with every new ball. If it doesn’t offer more distance and/or more control than what came before it, then what’s the point, right? But in this case the extra layer should make a difference in both of those areas where the original just wasn’t right for me.

Chrome Soft feel (I did like that) with four-piece performance….the 2016 Callaway Chrome Soft, or as I’ve taken to calling it, #TheBallThatChangedTheBallThatShiftedTheMarket, has me curious.

Availability for the Chrome Soft begins 2/5/16. Retail price is $39.99, which makes it even more interesting.

SUPERHOT 55

superhot-box

Also introduced is the new SuperHot 55; a soft three-piece ball designed to be longer from tee to green while lowering spin to reduce hooks and slices.

Available 2/5, the SuperHot 55 will retail for $27.99 per dozen.

More information on both the Chrome Soft and SuperHot 55 can be found at CallawayGolf.com.

For You

For You

News
Apr 22, 2024
Strength Training for Golfers: Building a Strong and Stable Core
Golf Balls
Apr 22, 2024
Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
Golf Technology
Apr 21, 2024
Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Dennis

      7 years ago

      Why can’t they just leave the ball lineup alone for a few years. Just got used to playing the SuperHot 55, and now its the SuperHot 70. I’ve played a lot of 70 comp balls, and most are fine for a higher handicapped player, just like myself-but I was really playing well with this ball. Brought my score down 10 strokes over 2 seasons. OK, might not be all about the ball, but it did seem to change my game first time out. Distance was good, and keeping it in the fairway was this balls mission once it left the tee. My slice would turn into a soft fade. Like to think it was the ball. Anyway, looking for a gamer again. And not spending more the $25 a doz.

      Reply

      THOMAS REDOLPHY

      8 years ago

      I also did not care for the 2015 “Chrome Soft” ball. It did not perform anywhere near the “ProVI” in distance or around the green performance.
      I am anxious to use the 2016 “Chrome Soft” 4 piece ball since, I have found a four piece ball consistent with the “ProVI” that I have been using with great results.
      That ball is the “Vice” “Tour” ball and, it is a joy to use matching the “ProVI” in every way in my game.

      Reply

      Border Collie Golf

      8 years ago

      I liked the ’15 Chrome Soft except off the short stick.

      I would hit 25′ putts 10′ by on the same stroke my V1x/TM TPx was 1′ past… could not game it.. driver spin was bad too but wedge play was GREAT

      I found a Snell My Tour Ball on our frozen course 2 weeks back… played it the next round and shot my lowest ever score (-3 under) and was mesmerized by the aerodynamics of the ball… flew a little further off Driver but I was getting summer iron distances in 42F temps, great backspin on iron shots and perfect putter feel.

      I bought 6 dozen immediately… only $158 with free shipping

      I usually game Taylor Made TPx and Pro V1x or on quiet wind days V1… found Snell on my LM tests the last week to be better than all for my game

      Hcp 1

      Reply

      Clayobx

      8 years ago

      Tony, picking up a new set of clubs after a twelve year back hiatus, I can with certainty state while working and synching my swing from 50 plus years of play, I’ve played every new ball save very few. Certainly the top OEM’s and the Snell Tour, on your recommendation. After one year of intensive play, I live on a course playing some times twice daily, I settled on Callaway chrome soft. I found TM right beside the Callaway but the feel was not as perceptive, to me. I don’t find the ball rolls out any more than say “the number one ball”. Maybe it’s my swing plane at 6′ 4″ I have a high launch angle and backspin is not an issue. The CS fits me. I like the price and can’t wait to try the new ball. As the game goes I’ll probably hate it!

      Reply

      Al D.

      8 years ago

      I will give the new Callaway a try. I was not impressed with the 2015 Chrome Soft, but several of my playing partners were. The ball that stood out for me last year is the Snell My Tour. Thanks My Spy for letting us know about this fabulous ball at a great price point.

      Reply

      Fred

      8 years ago

      Realistically the minor construction difference between the vast variety of balls on the market make no difference what so ever to the average golfer’s game. Let’s face marketing budget dictates ball popularity.

      Reply

      Bob

      8 years ago

      Here’s a thought why not do a ball distance test so we will finally know which ball is longer, use a hitting machine and hit the balls with different swing speeds, say regular shaft , stiff shaft and X stiff shaft swing speeds. Do carry and total distance, most people know which balls spin best for them but it’s hard to tell which is consistently longer

      Reply

      Uhit

      8 years ago

      robotest.com did this with the 2015 er balls…

      …the findings are published in the magazine GOLF TIME 8 – 2015

      the Chrome Soft had around 10 yards less carry @105 mph club head speed (XR @ 9 deg loft), than the Nike RZN Black, the Taylormade Tour Preferred X, and the Pro V1x (which was leading this category by around 2 foot ahead of the Nike and TM TP X ball.

      Maybe the new 2016 Chrome Soft fills the gap of 10 yards…

      …however, Taylormade has already a further advanced 2016 TP X ball out…

      Personally I prefer the stability of the TM (and Bridgestone) balls in the wind…
      …so, the nice distance gain with the TM balls, is just the icing of the cake.

      Reply

      Border Collie Golf

      8 years ago

      TM Tour Pref X is the best into the wind I find… then Snell MTB and V1x… all seem to barrle through, the CS ballooned on me… I play on 1 very windy course and a good low spin Driver ball is essential

      Thx for the tech article

      Bob

      8 years ago

      Is there any way you can actually view this data without having the magazine, I can’t find it,

      Uhit

      8 years ago

      I guess that you have to wait, at least until february, when the new Golf Time is available, before they publish the data. Same with robogolf.com.

      They made the test, but even as a registered user you have to wait a few more weeks, before they show the data on their pages.

      Sorry, but at the moment it seems, that you really have to have the magazine to see the full data.

      Also interesting is the Lob Wedge department (65 mph @ 60 deg Mack Daddy 2) , where the Chrome Soft is also rated behind the Pro V1x and the TM TP X in the Spin Rate category…

      …I hope they test the new Bridgestoneballs (B330 S) soon. :-)

      Steve

      8 years ago

      I also was not crazy about the Chrome Soft. Especially for the going price. Then I got a email from MG Golf about a 4 piece Callaway Ball labelled Chrome Speed. Apparently Callaway had produced it when they produced the “Soft” as an alternative to the Prov 1x but didn’t bring it out.(at least that’s the story MG Golf originally claimed) MG golf apparently bought the inventory cheap and were selling it for $19.99. I bought 2 dozen and was VERY satisfied. Personally I can’t tell the difference between it and the ProV1x in distance or spin. Seemed to be proven out on a launch monitor test I did last summer. I think MG golf is still selling them.
      I wonder if this is basically the NEW ball?

      http://www.mggolf.com/cal_chrome_speed.asp?ru=0

      Reply

      Steve

      8 years ago

      Duh…..the link I provided shows them sold out at MG Golf. Should have bought more…..

      Reply

      ComeOnSense

      8 years ago

      So the ” ball that changed the ball” just got changed again in less than a year??
      Come on Callaway, you see why we think you are a joke?

      Reply

      Brian Cook

      8 years ago

      I got to play this ball yesterday…awesome!

      Reply

      David W

      8 years ago

      Seems very odd to me that so many people say it’s so much shorter than the Pro V. I’m by no means a scratch golfer (shoot high 70’s to mid 80’s) but my normal golf partner was a college all-american and played the mini tours (still carries a positive handicap). He has always played the Pro V1x since they came out and it’s definitely his preferred ball. However, I had some of these (got a great deal, I personally prefer the TM Tour Preferred for it’s green side spin since I’m often chipping around the green :-) ) and he compared them side by side with his Pro V1x. He routinely hits around 290 (actually 290, not perceived, I know I only hit it about 230 to 240 most of the time) and can get up to 320 or so when he really catches one. He could barely tell any difference in the distance of the 2 balls.

      Reply

      Gord Connell

      8 years ago

      Love this ball around the green. ProV1 is still my preference off the tee, with Srixon Z a close second

      Reply

      Marc Watkins

      8 years ago

      ProV1X is the best ball and it’s not even close. PXG tested all of them

      Reply

      PRINCE

      8 years ago

      Where can we access the PXG test results?

      Reply

      Duncan Castles

      8 years ago

      Not mentioned in this article, but interesting that Callaway have hardened up the compression on the new version of the Chrome Soft when most other manufacturers are lowering compression of their tour balls.
      I like the original Chrome Soft – particularly the Subbuteo Ball High-Vis version – but I still think the Wilson FG Tour is a better ball. I’ve never had any issues with greenside spin with the FG Tour and I feel it’s more consistent on full iron shots.
      Wilson went low-compression with its tour ball before anyone else, and went to a four layer construction before Callaway (without increasing compression) before Callaway. It’s not too big a leap to conclude that they’re still ahead of the game.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      8 years ago

      Excellent observation. My guess would be that the original was probably too soft by tour standards and as popular as it was, found itself in this weird market position of being more than a mid-tier ball and not quite a true tour ball.

      Between the SuperHot 55 and the new Chrome soft I think they’ve settled into more traditional market positions, but I also believe they’ve done something fairly incredible with their Chrome Soft market saturation. More on that later perhaps.

      Regarding Wilson…yeah…I argue with myself with this sort of stuff. Did Wilson do it first? Almost certainly. One senior level Wilson employee described Chrome Soft as “The Ball that Changed Our Ball”. There may be something to that, but nearly everything in golf is derivative.

      Nike will tell you it was the first to make a rubber core golf ball. Ironically, now everybody in golf but Nike uses rubber cores. Iron shaping, Aerodynamics…everything comes from everything else.

      Ultimately I’ve come to believe that it doesn’t actually doesn’t matter who does it first. And sadly it probably doesn’t matter who did it best. For golf companies, the only thing that matters is who sells the most,

      Reply

      Duncan Castles

      8 years ago

      Good point on who does it first, and one that is backed up by this list of design firsts from Wishon Golf, a company that certainly doesn’t sell the most: http://wishongolf.com/technology/design-firsts/
      Yet while it might not matter to some golf companies who did it first or best, the latter is definitely relevant to us golfers!

      Mark McCarthy

      8 years ago

      Aoife Murray that tecnólíocht glóthach tho

      Reply

      Christian Maki

      8 years ago

      Best Ball in the market, hands down!

      Reply

      Gil Bloomer

      8 years ago

      The ball that changed the ball that changed the ball. Where does it end?

      Reply

      Gary Lewis

      8 years ago

      It won’t, and words are words. They will always find something to tweak or change. If it makes golf balls better in the long run, it is probably fine. Pretty soon we evidently have the “Best Ball Ever” coming from Bridgestone.

      Reply

      Jamie McCormack

      8 years ago

      Fantastic ball

      Reply

      Sharkhark

      8 years ago

      The original title of this thread was very negative. While I appreciate candor I don’t like the anti Callaway tone in so many articles.
      The flame war with Harry needs to go away.
      I see for whatever reason you changed it from the title (that this morning basically said Callaway chrome soft sucks large to you personally ) to this one.
      Although your article still essentially says that.

      I also noticed a brash thread yesterday that said you had inside knowledge that taylormade was sold. Then you pulled the topic admitting that although it’s up for sale it’s not sold.

      Yet in my twitter feed this morning was a thread by you guys still saying boldly “taylormade SOLD!”.

      guys let’s not get too rude even when we don’t like a product & for hugely important statements let’s be pretty sure & accurate.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      8 years ago

      So much misunderstanding in this comment.

      1) There was no ‘original’ title. We routinely create several titles for each post and see what performs well. Which headline you see on a given visit is effectively a roll of the dice.

      Yes, one headline is tongue in-cheek about my experience with the ball, and also plays to the frustration of golfers who don’t love it when their favorite ball gets what is seen as an unnecessary update.

      Did you miss the part where I talk about consumer satisfaction as well as strong market share?

      2) Regarding the supposed flame war with Harry, it doesn’t exist. Not even a little. The reference in the article, and in our tweets, was meant to be in fun and i’m reasonably certain Harry took it that way. There’s an open line of communication and if Harry has an issue with something I write, he lets me know.

      Finally… Regarding the deleted taylormade tweet in your twitter feed… Take that up with Twitter. We deleted the original and posted a clarification. That’s the extent of it.

      Reply

      ryebread

      8 years ago

      Tony: Have you played the Supersoft? It has the lack of greenside spin and roll out issues that you site as concerns with the Chrome Soft, but I’ve found it to be a great distance ball. It’s about a half club carry longer for me (irons) and tee shots clearly have less sidespin (and the FWs hit #s show it). It’s seemingly what any medium to high handicapper would want out of a distance ball, if they like the soft feel.

      I ask because you site distance concerns with the Chrome Soft. I’ve seen the opposite out of the regular Supersoft.

      I’m not a brand homer on balls. I like balls from almost every OEM (not every ball from every OEM, but I’ll find something I like from everyone). I’m more just curious.

      Reply

      Gordon

      8 years ago

      I thought it was just me with the Chrome Soft not getting the normal distance I got with my Srixon XV………didn’t really consider they sleeve of balls I was playing as the reason.
      Now I know others had the same experience.

      I would be down to give the new version a try, but I do like my XVs and would be hard pressed to change for member events or anything like that.

      Reply

      David Price

      8 years ago

      Great ball.

      Reply

      Kenny B

      8 years ago

      So the video sounds like Phil Mickelson is endorsing the Chrome Soft; “and I like birdies”. Does this mean he’s switching from his Hex Black Tour ball? Probably not, but since his last win was before Tiger’s last win, maybe he should switch. Couldn’t hurt.

      Reply

      John K

      8 years ago

      Chrome soft did nothing for me either. In fact I thought I lost a good amount of distance and accuracy with it.

      Reply

      Christopher Hamelink

      8 years ago

      Lots of great options out there. The prov1 will probably always be top dog, but give them all a try.

      Reply

      Kenny B

      8 years ago

      Of all the “soft” balls that came out the last couple of years, the Chrome Soft was the best one I hit. I would probably be playing it if I hadn’t tried the Snell My Tour Ball. I’ll give this new one a try; but it will be tough to kick the Snell out of my bag.

      Reply

      Jason Geraci

      8 years ago

      You said that “it (the 2015 Chrome Soft) doesn’t do what I want it to around the greens.”

      What exactly were you wanting the ball to do, that it won’t do?

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      8 years ago

      Not enough greenside spin for me. Too much roll, not enough bite on partial shots.

      Reply

      Gary Lewis

      8 years ago

      I like the 2015 Chrome Soft fairly well, but it just didn’t cut it on chips and pitches for me, too much rollout compared to some other golf balls. Distance wise it is pretty good for me, being a slower swing sped guy now unfortunately. I am really anxious to try the new version out and would expect to see noticeably improved control around the greens over the first version Hopefully it is at least as long off the tee and irons as the 2015 version. I think that there are some golf balls which will compete pretty well with the new Chrome Soft, Wilson Duo Urethane, the new version of the Taylormade Project A, and the Snell MyTour for 3. Have tried all three around the greens in practice and they all appear to perform better than the 2015 version. The MyTour isn’t as soft but it has got a great feel to it on chips and pitches.

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 22, 2024
    Strength Training for Golfers: Building a Strong and Stable Core
    Golf Balls
    Apr 22, 2024
    Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
    Golf Technology
    Apr 21, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.