ULTIMATE REVIEW! – Adams Speedline Fast 10 Driver
Drivers

ULTIMATE REVIEW! – Adams Speedline Fast 10 Driver

ULTIMATE REVIEW! – Adams Speedline Fast 10 Driver

adams speedline fast 10 driver review

speedline fast 10 review 1-speedline-fast10-5 1-speedline-fast10-2 1-speedline-fast10-7

The Adams Driver was part of our New! Ultimate Review System … from here on out at MGS you can expect to have the most thorough reviews in golf.  No need to go searching from site to site or from magazine to magazine anymore…because we have come up with a system that is not only the most un-bias and painfully honest reviews but also the most complete, comprehensive and detailed golf gear reviews PERIOD!

Adams Speedline Fast 10 “ULTIMATE” Driver Review!

by: Our New GolfSpy (aka: GolfSpy T)

Before I became a new golf spy for MGS, when I wrote for a different site, I once made the mistake of referring to Adams as one of the “little guys”.  Oh the mail I received…  Although I would still argue that Adams doesn’t have the marketing footprint of some of the big names in the industry, there isn’t a doubt in my mind (or in the minds of the legions of loyal Adams enthusiasts), that club for club, the Adams lineup stacks up quite nicely with any other manufacturer in the industry.

The Speedline Technology

For 2010 Adams has released the Speedline Fast 10 driver, the 3rd generation of Adams’s wind tunnel, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD for all you science types out there) tested Speedline Technology.  It seems that while some of the other manufacturers were trying to figure out how to build a longer, more forgiving driver, through the use of exotic materials and some fairly radical (and sometimes painfully wretched looking) head shapes, the guys at Adams we’re busy trying to figure out how to use the principles of aerodynamics to increase clubhead speed.  What’s more, they wanted to do it without sacrificing anything.

The latest results of their efforts is the Speedline Fast 10 driver, which Adams bills as “The Fastest Driver In Golf”.  They claim the high launching, mid-spinning, Fast 10 can add up to 15 yards more distance because it has 10% less drag (achieved through changes to the heel and toe curvature).  Because of increases in both MOI and face area, the Speedline Fast 10 is also 10% more forgiving.  The assumption is those percentages are a comparison to the previous model.

Speedline Fast 10 Driver Technical Specifications

  • Loft: 8.5° (RH Only), 9.5°, 10.5°, 12.5° (RH Only)
  • Length: 46.125″
  • Volume: 460cc
  • Swing Weight: D2
  • Stock Shafts: Aldila Wasabi (60g), Matrix HD (60g)

What We Tested, and How We Tested It

Adams sent us a Speedline Fast 10 for testing.  Our sample has the following specifications:

  • Loft: 9.5°
  • Shaft: Matrix HD 60g
  • Flex: Stiff
  • Grip: Adams Tour Velvet

Upon receipt of our test club, the driver was put through MyGolfSpy’s new SpecCheck system.  After SpecCheck was completed, the crown, face, and sole of the driver were covered with GhostTape.  GhostTape does an outstanding job of protecting our test clubs from scratches, sky marks, and the other nasty things that sometimes occur during the testing process.  Our in-house tests have shown that for driver and wood testing, GhostTape has no measurable impact on ball speed, launch angle, or spin rate.  We pretty much love the stuff.

All performance testing was done using PGA TOUR Simulators, powered by 3Trac, from aboutGolf.  Testing took place at Tark’s Indoor Golf Club; a state-of-the-art golf training, club fitting and repair facility located in Saratoga Springs, NY.

With our simulator’s data capture capabilities disabled so that distance and accuracy wouldn’t influence our subjective opinion polling, we asked several golfers to provide us feedback on the look, sound, and feel of the club.

A subset of testers including golfers with low, middle, and high handicaps, was asked to participate in more thorough tests where not only was data collected for the shots they hit with the Speedline Fast 10, but also for their current driver.

For full details of MyGolfSpy’s testing methodology, see our testing details page.

SpecCheck

For woods and hybrids, our current SpecCheck involves verifying length, Swing Weight, and Flex.  The Speedline Fast 10 we received measured out exactly at the 46 1/8″ that Adams lists as the standard length for this driver.

We measured the Fast 10 two full Swing Weights heavier than the published spec.  Some may prefer the slightly heavier feel, but we like it better when our measurements match the published specs.

Finally, our flex tests measured the Matrix HD shaft at 245 CPM (at 45 1/8″).  On MyGolfSpy’s flex chart the plot point lands on the leading edge of the stiff range.  While for the purposes of SpecCheck the club is “true to flex”, golfers deciding between S and X flex may be better served by going with the stiffer option.

While testing for flex, we observed a noticeable wobble in the oscillation pattern.

1-speedline-fast10-6

MGS SpecCheck Chart for the Adams Speedline Fast 10

speedline_speccheck

SpecCheck Score: (20 out of 25)

Subjective Feedback

Looks

Almost to a man our testers really liked the look of the Adams Speedline Fast 10, particularly at address.  Ron, one of our testers said “It’s very traditional.  I mean that in a good way”.  Perhaps no one summed up the majority feeling about the Speedline better than one of our low handicap testers:

This is how a driver should look” – Andy (2 Handicap)

Kent, also a low handicap golfer, mostly liked the look of the Fast 10, but said that it looked a little too square for his eye.

High handicap golfer Anthony (who also approved of the traditional look) was the only golfer surveyed who commented on the sole design of the club:

I’m not crazy about the aquamarine graphics and the scooping looks a little strange, but it’s not like I can see either when I’m trying to hit the golf ball” – Anthony (18 Handicap)

Not a single tester commented on the visual alignment aid, or in the case of the Fastline 10, the lack thereof. We take that to mean it isn’t an issue. Our experience has been that no alignment aid is always preferable to a bad one anyway.

Sound

The majority of our testers approved of the sound of the Speedline Fast 10 at impact.  All of our testers rated sound highly, although Andy and Anthony weren’t quite as impressed as most of our other testers.  Andy called the sound “somewhat muted”.  Anthony agreed adding:

“It doesn’t quite have a sound I love, but it’s not a dull thud or a smashed can sound either” – Anthony (18 Handicap)

Hear How The Adams Speedline Fast 10 Driver Sounds!

Feel

When it comes to the feel of the Adams Speedline Fast 10, feedback was mixed.  Frank, a mid-handicap golfer with mutant-sized hands, thinks the club is too light, commenting that he can’t “feel the head”.  High-handicapper, Anthony, called the feel “just ok”, but also commented that the Fast 10 feels solid when struck on the sweet spot, but that you can definitely feel a mis-hit as well.  Mid-handicaper (and long driver of the day) Dan, who initially thought the shaft felt “a bit whippy” was more impressed:

“Speedline is a great name for this club.  You can really feel the head accelerating through the impact zone.  The more I hit it, the more I like it” – Dan (11 Handicap)

We think tester Nick, a middle-handicap golfer who was anxious to try and Adams driver for the first time, summed up the majority opinion when he said:

“It looks great, it sounds great, it feels great” – Nick (17 Handicap)

Nick did follow that up by saying “of course, I’ve been swinging this thing”, as he showed us his Nike Sasquatch Sumo2 driver, so perhaps, it’s all relative.

Subjective Score: (22 out of 25)

Performance

The Adams Speedline Fast 10 is the first driver we’ve tested using our new testing and scoring methodology.  Not unlike the first girl on the balance beam, our scores may be slightly skewed by the possibility we’re keeping higher scores in our back pocket in case something better comes along.  Giving a score to a golf club, especially when you haven’t done the same level of testing on any other club, is a tricky proposition (which is why we prefer head to head competition).  So with that in mind, we’re reserving the right to raise or lower the performance  score as we review more drivers.  Whether they knew what they were getting into or not, we’d like to offer a sincere thank you to Adams Golf for stepping up and going first. Now on to the results…

In every case, regardless of whether just a hit a few balls were hit, or whether we were collecting more detailed data, every golfer who tested the Adams Speedline Fast 10 increased his ball speed.  It’s worth noting that at 46 1/8″, the Adams Speedline Fast 10 is more than an inch longer than what most consider to be the standard length for a driver.  That said, it’s probably only fair to point out that, despite the increase in shaft length”, two of our testers actually increased their accuracy.

Andy (2 Handicap) who plays a highly regarded driver model he purchased two years ago, increased his average ball speed by 7 MPH (155 to 162).  Ron, whose driver is also about 2 years old, also saw increases upwards of 8 MPH with the Adams Speedline Fast 10.  In the interest of full disclosure, he did catch one ball with his current driver that matched the speed he was registering consistently with the Adams.

Of the 3 golfers we collected more detailed data for, only Dan showed a measurable decrease in accuracy.  We’re strict in our testing procedures, and we’ll stand by the results, however; it should be pointed out that Dan – a mid-handicap golfer who generally struggles with driver accuracy anyway – had a little trouble adjusting to the feel of the Adams.  While there isn’t any documented proof, the suspicion is that, if we gave him the Adams to swing for a week, his accuracy numbers would probably improve (that’s not to say they’d equal those of existing driver).

Here’s the numbers breakdown for the 3 golfers for whom we collected detailed data:

fast10_results

On the day we tested, Anthony claimed to be having an off day.  We’ve seen him hit balls before, and know that he is capable of consistently longer drivers.  He did agree, however, that the dispersion pattern was accurate, and that the Adams was noticeably straighter.  He also commented that although he felt he lost more distance on mis-hit balls with the Adams, he liked that fact that he had an easier time keeping the ball in play with the Fast 10.

We asked Kent, the best golfer, and most consistent shot maker of our testers, to take several more swings with a couple of other drivers we had lying around the shop.  We wanted to find out how the Adams would stack up against shorter shafted drivers.  From an accuracy perspective 46 1/8″ Adams fell right between Kent’s current driver (detailed above), and an old TaylorMade R580XD we had sitting in our workshop (9 yards offline on average).  Both of those clubs measured 45″.

Dan, who clearly lost some accuracy over his current driver, showed the largest increase in distance (yardage, not percentage).  Dan averaged 285 yards with the Adams Speedline Fast 10, and hit 3 balls which cleared the 300 yard mark; the longest reaching 307 yards.  Based on the launch data collected, Dan is the only 3 of our detailed testers who would likely benefit significantly from a higher lofted club.

The results show that Anthony and Ken both increased their accuracy with the Adams by 28% and 20% respectively.  Dan, however, actually reduced his accuracy by 28%, although, again; we do believe the results would be measurably better once Dan got a feel for the club.

While none of our testers hit the upper limit of the “up to 15 yards” that Adams claims, most of our testers picked up between 5-8 MPH, which led to overall yardage increases across the board.

Interestingly, our highest handicap golfer showed only modest gains in distance (+1.2% on average), while our middle and low handicap golfers posted gains of 3.2% and 5.4% respectively.  What we find noteworthy is that of the 3, only Anthony is playing with a current driver model.  Dan’s driver (the only off the rack driver of the 3) is from TaylorMade’s 2nd generation of 460cc heads, and is several years old.  Kent’s club, which he assembled from components, is also a couple of years old.  The conclusion we draw is that, in general year, over year raw distance gains are minimal.

Performance Score:  (43 out of 50)

Conclusion

While we’re never pleased when a club’s specs don’t line up perfectly with those stated by the manufacturer, we can’t argue with the golfers we spoke with who absolutely love the Adams Speedline Fast 10.  From looks, to feel, to sound, the club is what you might call a subjective super star.  While not everyone loved everything about the club, only one tester (Frank) had anything truly negative to say.  The overwhelming majority of the feedback received was positive, with the rest no worse than indifferent.

While we have concerns that the longer shaft of the Adams Speedline Fast 10 is one of those ball speed tricks that manufacturers play to squeeze out an extra couple of yards (at the expense of accuracy), there’s no denying that 2 of our detailed testers actually tightened their shot dispersion.  If it is a trick, it worked as every golfer we tested registered faster ball speeds when compared to his current driver.

“It’s a shame you guys don’t sell these, because I’d buy one right now” – Ron (mid-handicap golfer who loves the Adams Speedline Fast 10)

While it may not prove to be the perfect club for everyone, our tests suggest that Adams has another winner on their hands – and no doubt their loyal fans, and likely some new fans as well, will be adding the SpeedLine Fast 10 to their golf bags this season.

>> Total Score: (85 out of 100)

For You

For You

News
Apr 22, 2024
Strength Training for Golfers: Building a Strong and Stable Core
Golf Balls
Apr 22, 2024
Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
Golf Technology
Apr 21, 2024
Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Phana24JG

      12 years ago

      We need a little more info. Age, hdcp, fast/moderate transition, ball flight, typical miss, that sort of stuff. Have you seen the new info where all the latest drivers are compared? http://mygolfspy.com/mygolfspy-compare-clubs-system/

      While all that stuff is useful, it would be dieal if you opted to get fitted by someone who knows what they are doing. If that is not an option due to time or financial constraints, see if you can at least get some swing data from a Trackman or Flightscope.

      Reply

      Peter langan

      12 years ago

      As for the performance of the Speedline……….it feels a little head light, and a bit inconsistent………which probably best describes my game………..so what is the next recommendation?

      Reply

      Peter langan

      12 years ago

      I’ve had my Speedline for 6 months, bought it on sale in Phoenix. R shaft, 10.5 loft. Now I’m getting itchy because all the new drivers have been tested, anyone recommend something that really stands out for distance and accuracy? My swing speed is between 90-95.
      Thanks

      Reply

      Matthew

      13 years ago

      Great review. These are on sale at Dick’s Sporting Goods and I think I’m going to have to try it out. Excellent info.

      Reply

      cxnag

      13 years ago

      i did not see in your review where any testers used diff flexes based on there swings—would not some golfers need diff flex for testing based on swing not handycap ???

      Reply

      Kevin

      14 years ago

      If and when you try this club you will not be disappointed. Get the Wasabi shaft not the Matrix. Very forgiving I used a demo for 2 days and was averaging 293 yds off the tee, used gps off the every tee. First ever Adams club that I have purchased loved my Callaway but to much distance not to buy it.

      Reply

      mayee

      14 years ago

      Had it for 2 weeks now and satisfied with the performance. When i manage to hit it at the sweet spot the ball flew much farther than my last driver a TM Burner Draw, need to tee it a bit lower though. Good innovation by Adams, keep it up.

      Reply

      Keith Bertog

      14 years ago

      added the speedline fast 10 to my bag yesterday!

      Reply

      Rich

      14 years ago

      Wow, great review.

      I just bought this driver in a 10.5 degree loft with a Regular shaft and Draw weighting. I have been hitting a Callaway Steelhead III with a steel shaft because prior to the Adams driver I have not been able to hit anything with a graphite shaft. Everytime my clubhead speed went up, my shots went right.

      Bottom line for me is this driver is giving me club head speed and straigter hits than anything I’ve tried before. Last week I was hitting over 40 yards further than my Steelhead. I was also hitting straighter than any driver I have ever tried.

      I loved the driver so much, I bought a matching 3 wood and I hit it farther off the ground than I did my old driver off a tee. The 5 wood is on order and I’m waiting for it to be delivered.

      Reply

      Phana24JG

      14 years ago

      Outstanding first review. One item that may assist golfers in evaluating the club is to include the swing speed of the driver in the results. Knowing the smash factor (ball speed /clubhead speed) will give us insight into the quality of contact the testers made. The only other item that was less than ideal was the fact that you opted to omit what driver(s) the golfers you collected detailed data were using.

      However, you are to be commended for publishing deatiled information of the testing procedure PRIOR to doing the testing, and providing detailed information for all levels of golfers. IMO you have a real winning formula on your hands.

      Reply

      Doc

      14 years ago

      I’m of the opinion that perhaps noting each individuals swing speed, along with ball speed, would help in making some comparisons. It may be that ball speed is a better comparison, but I use swing speed as a guide more than ball speed. Just me.
      Doc

      Reply

      Bignose

      14 years ago

      I feel like the numerous comments about the swing weight being off are a little harsh. I have several reasons why. 1) The difference in 2 swingweight points for a club 46.125″ long is 3 g. 3 grams at the head. Try this as a test: you will need an impartial tester who will randomly tape a (U.S.) nickel to the bottom of your favorite driver. You need to swing the club several times with and without the nickel. If you can honestly feel the difference, then you are well above average. An average human will not notice any difference between 2 swingweight points at all. 2) Swingweight can easily be manipulated by adding mass to the grip as well. One loop of tape around the base of the grip would have brought this club back to D2, if it was really that important. 3) Manufacturing tolerances of all the components are going to come into play here as well. I am sure that the tolerance for any golf head is plus or minus several grams. Same for the shaft. Same for the grip. If each of those was off only a single gram — pretty amazing to only be off 1 g really! — that swingweight could be as many as 4 or 5 points off spec. 4) I think that total weight is a much more meaningful spec than swingweight. The total weight has a more significant effect on how fast a club can be swung because it is the m in Newton’s law F = ma. Your body can generate a certain amount of force, F. That force is equal to the product of mass (m) times acceleration (a). If there is less m, then there can be more a. More acceleration leads to more speed at impact. Now, obviously, there is more than just that when it comes to swinging a golf club, because it isn’t just about speed, but directing that force in the correct manner to hit the ball where you want to. However, the force your body generates doesn’t care if there is mass in the grip or in the shaft, all that matters is total mass. Where the mass is located affects feel, but not the acceleration. 5) Finally, if you can tell the difference between 2 swingweight points, it is something that a good clubbuilder can adjust very easily. As I said, a loop of tape under the grip can lower the swingweight. If it is too low, a dab of rat glue inserted into the head can raise it. Or even a strip of lead tape added to the bottom of the sole. This goes back to my point #2 above about how the swingweight scale is easily manipulated — with enough rat glue and lead tape, anyone can make a telephone pole swingweight to exactly D2 or D4!

      That’s why I think all in all, putting that much emphasis on the swing weight is overkill. Sure, it would be nice if it was perfectly to spec, but I’d emphasize other spec issues as being far more important. Why not measure the stated loft and lie? Compare the cpms of the shaft to the shaft manufacturer’s specs — since there are no standards, the designations “regular”, “stiff”, and “X”, are all rather arbitrary anyway. For that matter, why not profile the entire shaft instead of just reporting one cpm number? The total length of the club (as you did measure) is important. As I wrote above, the total weight I think is more meaningful than swingweight. All of these measurements, I think are more meaningful that swingweight, and if you incorporated them into the SpecCheck section, I think that you’d have a really valuable resource for golfers on your hands.

      So that you don’t think that I am all negative, I do think that what you reported from the testers is very thorough. I especially liked seeing the side-by-side of the golfer’s current driver vs. the tested one. Keep up the good work in this part of the reviews!

      Reply

      TL

      14 years ago

      nice review. I’ve just started using this club with the Wasabi R shaft. Clubhead feels very light, a little hard to sense where it is. Very forgiving. 5-7 yards extra on the launch monitor, no difference appreciable from my ’09 Burner on the course. Shaft feels a little skittish–maybe its the shaft, or maybe I need an S?

      Reply

      winodave

      14 years ago

      i have always hit adams drivers furture and straighter than other brands. i have the 1st generation and would like to try the fast 10 to compair the two.

      Reply

      Foster

      14 years ago

      Terrific Review………I hope you plan on the same format for other reviews…..say how about a review on the Powerbilt Air Foil driver?

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      14 years ago

      I think that would be a good idea Foster. We will contact them and get one in the new review system for you.

      Reply

      John

      14 years ago

      Damn, one more thing that I must have!

      Reply

      Andy Greenwald

      14 years ago

      Review hit a home run for me. I like the format and the material is first rate. Will definitely look at the Adams at the end of the year when the prices come down.

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      14 years ago

      Glad it was a round tripper for you Andy. I hope this gives you and other readers the best source for an honest review that is not only subjective but data driven as well.

      Reply

      matt

      14 years ago

      Looks good.
      Performs good.
      To bad i just bought a dymo str8-fit or i would def. be taking a look at this one.

      Great Review, love the new system !

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      14 years ago

      Thanks so much Matt. We will continue to improve on the system but I think it is the most thorough out there.

      Reply

      Brian Allman

      14 years ago

      That is one solid and thorough review, nice job giving your readers all the info. they should need to determine if these clubs are for them or not. Adam’s is doing a great job carving out their spot against the big boys: imagine what some interesting advertising would do for them.

      I love what they are doing with their line of women’s line (which won the Australia Open this weekend), there is no denying these guys are for real!

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      14 years ago

      Glad you enjoyed the new review system Brian. I think our next one you will really enjoy. This next one will be fun.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 22, 2024
    Strength Training for Golfers: Building a Strong and Stable Core
    Golf Balls
    Apr 22, 2024
    Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
    Golf Technology
    Apr 21, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.