The Club Report: Bridgestone True Balance Putters
Putters

The Club Report: Bridgestone True Balance Putters

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

The Club Report: Bridgestone True Balance Putters

By Dave Wolfe

To Sell Stuff, You Need Stuff To Sell

It was a week or so ago when Tony mentioned that Bridgestone was planning on making a big golf market impact in 2015. While we don’t really know what the “big impact” will look like, I’m willing to bet that it will involve bringing new gear to the consumer.

OK, so that’s not the most revelatory of statements. If a company wants to sell stuff, they need to have stuff to sell. For Bridgestone, I believe that first of all it means that they need to get more gear out there for the consumer to try. People who have tried Bridgestone clubs always rave about them, but most of us will never find them in the local shop. I have a huge shop near me, and it is lacking Bridgestone clubs to demo. Hopefully improved access will be part of the 2015 plan.

Making existing designs available is a good start, but probably not a plan that will equate to big impact. For that, Bridgestone needs new gear. They need better gear. More innovative. They need golf gear that separates them from the other companies in the marketplace. They will need to standout in the already crowded shop for consumers to take notice. I’m sure we will see huge advertising campaigns like they’ve done with their balls. When the B330 swing-speed-fitted balls launched, they changed the ball marketplace. Their new club lines will need similar innovation if they are to do anything sustainable in the market.

Fact is, they need to take some risks. Some of their designs need to be on the edge of technology, and also on the edge of golfing consumer acceptance. The golf pool is very full already and Bridgestone will need to make some waves if they hope to hit open water. Slapping a big “B” logo on a boring cavity back iron or marginal driver will not get it done.

Although it’s not 2015 yet, Bridgestone is already showing the golf consumer that they are willing to take some risks. Today we will look at the Bridgestone True Balance putters. This line is a risky venture. Bridgestone is wading in uncharted waters. The True Balance putters are that different from other putters out there. When you swing one, you will feel something unlike any other putter that you have swung before.

I know that that last paragraph sounds like something a carnival barker would say. Come and see the True Balance putter. It’s right between the strong man and the bearded lady. Calling the True Balance design freaky is a bit over the top, but it definitely is not your usual fare.

Making a putter line that deviates from the field is a risky, but becomes less risky if the different and innovative design actually works.

Bridgestone True Balance Putters-34

Specifications: Bridgestone True Balance Putters

  • Head Material: Stainless steel with dual layer groove insert
  • Head Weight: 360 grams
  • Loft: 4°
  • Lie: 71°
  • Shaft Weights: 103 g (steel) / 33 g (True Balance graphite)
  • Grip Weights: 83 g (rubber) / 10 g (Standard EVA) / 20 g (Oversize EVA)
  • Traditional Models: TD-01, TD-02, & TD-03
  • True Balance Models: TD-01 & TD-03

True Balance Technology: The Grips

Bridgestone True Balance Putters-22

I am still working to finish up my degree in polymer chemistry, so I’ll defer to the internet for information on Ethyl Vinyl Acetate.

Ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) is the copolymer of ethylene and vinyl acetate. It’s an extremely elastic material that can be sintered to form a porous material similar to rubber, yet with excellent toughness. It is three times as flexible as low-density polyethylene (LDPE), showing tensile elongation of 750% with a peak melting temperature of 250°F (96°C).

This material has good barrier properties, low-temperature toughness, stress-crack resistance, hot-melt adhesive waterproof properties, and resistance to ultraviolet radiation. EVA has little or no odor and is competitive with rubber and vinyl products in many electrical applications.

Porex Plastic Manufacturing

I realize that most putter articles are totally devoid of plastic polymer discussion, but it is relevant with the Bridgestone True Balance line because the EVA grip is so atypical. I was very curious about the material, because it seemed like it was made from the same plastic foam as swimming pool noodles. As it turns out, I wasn’t far off as the noodles are made of polyethylene. Maybe that is far off. Again, not a polymer chemist.

Getting to the point, my initial take on the puffy yellow grip was that it was very light, and comfortable to hold, but potentially fragile as it gets used to putt, and also as it is moved in and out of the bag. Learning a little about ethyl vinyl acetate gives me a little more confidence in the longevity of the grip. Time will tell if it is truly a strong enough material to stand up to the rigors of play. More on the play experiences in a bit.

The EVA grip is available in both standard and oversize sizes.

Now I just need to go an look up sintering.

True Balance Technology: The Shaft

Bridgestone True Balance Putters-11

Graphite putter shafts have been around for a while now. Matrix has been making them for a few years. I believe that the Bridgestone True Balance line is the first retail putter line to feature graphite shafts though.

The huge difference between the other graphite putter shafts in the market and the Bridgestone True Balance shaft is weight. The previously mentioned Matrix putter shafts weigh in at 125-145 grams. The True Balance shaft is only 33 grams. For reference, the steel shaft is 103 grams.

The 33 gram shaft, combined with a EVA grip that weighs 10 or 20 grams depending on size, results in a putter where the vast majority of the weight is in the 360 gram head. That’s roughly 90% of the weight in the head.

True Balance Technology: The Circus Trick

Bridgestone True Balance Putters-35

The above photo shows one of the most interesting features of the TD-03 putter. You can set it on the ground, and it will stand up on its own. There is so much mass in the head that it anchors the club to the Earth, thus preventing it from tipping over. Bridgestone should run a contest where people take photos of the putter standing up in interesting places. I’d love to see where people would put it.

Anyway, there must be a point to the head heavy design. It must relate in some way to how it plays. The balancing is a great feature if you want to keep grass off of the grip when you are chipping, but for some reason, I don’t think that allowing the putter to stand on its own was the designers goal.

So what is the point of the True Balance putter’s unique head-heavy weight distribution?

“If you can feel the head, you can control the head”

Line, Roll, and Speed

I don’t have the skill of a tour player, and definitely not the knowledge of a Top 100 instructor. Even so, I am pretty sure that if someone can effectively account for line, roll, and speed when putting, then he or she will probably putt very well. If you struggle with one of these areas (or more than one), the True Balance system is here to help. Bridgestone says:

  • Balance point less than 5″ from sole provides incredible feel and connection to the putter head, improving speed and distance control
  • Naturally “gates” through the stroke and squares to the target, eliminating the most common miss of short, right
  • Make more putts!

If you can feel the head, you can control the head.” is the quote on the True Balance product page. I interpret this as an awareness of the position of the head, and what it is doing during the stroke, should allow the golfer to make sure that the head is in the correct position when it impacts the ball.

This is an interesting take. Bridgestone is marketing “incredible feel” with their putters, as opposed to something more traditionally marketed, like a unique alignment scheme. I suppose counter-balanced designs also market “feel”, but those go in a totally different direction. The counter-weight in the grip of a counter-balanced putter reduces the feel of the heavy head, where as the light grip and shaft combo dramatically emphasizes the heaviness of the head.

Could it be that an awareness of the head’s position could make you a better putter?

The new line features three models, the TD-01, TD-02, and the TD-03. This new True Balance technology is available in the TD-01 and the TD-03.

TD-01

Bridgestone True Balance Putters-13

The TD-01 is probably the most atypical of the heads in the line, though it looks somewhat normal at first glance. The TD-01 is a compact, round mallet. It’s face-balanced, like you would expect, and its insert combined with it’s head shape and mass, delivers a responsive roll on the ball.

Then you look at the neck. That’s unusual. Slanted, long-neck hosels are definitely not a common feature these days. Then you add on the True Balance shaft and grip and all of the sudden you have a compact mallet that gets more original in its design in a hurry.

If you are a mallet player, and interested in the True Balance technology, this is your putter. The only drawback is that this model can’t do the stand-up-on-its-own circus trick.

TD-02

Bridgestone True Balance Putters-24

Truth be told, I discounted the TD-02 when I first saw it. I viewed it as boring compared to the other two True Balance designs. It has a traditional grip, and steel shaft. To use that word again, it’s very traditional.

Brandt Snedeker made this one a little more interesting when he dropped his long-bagged Odyssey for it. That made me a bit more curious about the TD-02.

After rolling is for a while, I get why Brandt would switch. It’s he switched to the TD-02 because Bridgestone pressured him to use it. Maybe they did. I don’t know, I was not part of that conversation, but I believe he switched because the TD-02 is a great little mallet. Sure, bagging one more Bridgestone club does ingrain him deeper with the Bridgestone brand, but these guys still want to win, so they will only play what works.

Brandt is an excellent putter, with a unique “pop” style of putting. If it wasn’t a quality putter, and he didn’t putt well with it, I don’t see him playing it.

I’ll put it this way. If the new idea True Balance versions did not exist, I would feel very excited about what Bridgestone was bringing to market after rolling this TD-02. The TD-02 can’t come in a True Balance version, as its double-bend shaft bending doesn’t mesh well with that whole graphite shaft thing.

Don’t think of the rubber grip and steel shaft as a handicap though. The TD-02 is still solid. Though I didn’t have steel versions of the TD-01 or TD-03 to roll, I bet those steel versions roll very nicely as well.

Those of you who are interested in Bridgestone’s putters, but wary of the True Balance technology, should definitely start here. This putter should be in the conversation with any other similar mallet in the marketplace.

TD-03

Bridgestone True Balance Putters-02

The TD-03 is Bridgestone’s take on the classic Anser design. It has all of the features and specs that we associate with that style head. It’s a little head heavier than competitors, as are all of the heads, but the heel and toe weighting, along with a roughly 4:30 toe hang, should make someone who plays this style of putter very comfortable.

The TD-03 does come with the True Balance options, and that steers it away from the just-another-Anser conversation. The head-heavy feel of the TD-03 will not be found in another model of putter in the shop.

This would also be the model that can do the standing-up circus trick.

How Does it Play?

Bridgestone True Balance Putters-33

For on course adventures, I selected the True Balance version of the TD-01. It had the True Balance shaft and the oversized version of the grip. Heading out to the course, I had two main concerns. How would the foam grip hold up to bag time, and how would the True Balance system work during play?

So maybe those two issues are not of equal importance, but the grip resilience and longevity really worried me. It just seemed like the foam would be easily cut, chipped, and on its way to being too damaged to comfortably play after not too many rounds of golf.

How did it hold up?

Not a mark after eighteen holes walking, and another eighteen riding. I still don’t know what EVA is all about, but it is definitely stronger than I expected. I still have concerns about a season of play with the grip, but maybe Bridgestone will have replacement grips available so it won’t really be an issue.

FWIW, I definitely preferred the oversized version to the standard version. The standard version seemed a bit undersized , with a fairly sharp underside geometry where it would interact with your fingers. It’s not that putting was hindered by the smaller grip, it’s just that I liked the larger, rounder grip better. Again, FWIW.

So how did it play? First of all, it was fun to have random people pick up the putter. The weight never failed to shock. I said before that the feel is different with this True Balance line. Not a single person could remember another putter that felt like this one. Most of them were also surprised at how it rolled the ball.

Again, so how did it play? Was it the king of line, roll, & speed? Line was good. The simple alignment system worked. Roll was excellent. The insert is lively and provides ample feedback should you wander the face.

Speed control is astounding. This was the part that I expected to be the most difficult and inconsistent. With the weight distribution being so strange, I fully expected to spend the rounds long and shore of the hole. Not so. The TD-01 was amazingly consistent with distance. I guess that means I was amazingly consistent with it, and usually speed control gets me a bit. For lack of a more concrete explanation, it just feels like you know how hard to swing the putter for various distances.

Maybe this is the result of increased awareness of the heavy head. I lean toward that explanation since the weighting is the big feature. Regardless, I was not alone in this feeling. Guys on the practice green also commented on how easy it was to hit the distance number. This also held true for the TD-03, by the way.

Take it for what you will but in the two rounds there were lots of one-putts, a handful of lip outs, and no three jacks. I was very impressed as this was not a putter that I felt that I had dialed in through practice. It just worked.

On a side note, putting with the TD-01 was unusually fun. I think that this is due to the almost absurd overall lightness and the bright yellow foam grip. One of the guys named it Mr. Foamy during the round. Another one wanted to know if it floated, perhaps for easier fishing out of a pond. For whatever reason, the Bridgestone True Balance putter added more lightness to the round than just it’s grip and shaft.

I really enjoyed putting with the TD-01, much more so than I expected to. The fact that the putts were also pretty good was almost secondary. Almost.

Are You Willing To Try New Things?

Bridgestone True Balance Putters-37

I just finished listening to a great TED Talk podcast about What is Original? The speakers had some very interesting ideas about if it was in fact possible to come up with something truly original. Most of the experts agreed that innovation is rarely truly original, but rather the best original ideas reflect a combination of prior ideas put together in new ways. In other words, new successful ideas build upon previously successful ideas.

Bridgestone has not come up with a totally new putter design with this True Balance line. I know that someone reading this is just waiting to get to the end to let us all know that the TD-03 is just an Anser clone. I’m not going to argue that, it definitely is derivative of the Anser.

However, I have rolled the True Balance putters enough to know that there is definitely something to what Bridgestone is doing. They have taken an idea, and built something new into it. I don’t know that the lightweight shaft and grip design will become a foundational design element that other putter makes will then “improve upon” down the road, but I do know that Bridgestone has made something that feels very different with these putters.

I really hope you can find these in your local shop for demo. Hopefully you will have a “wow” moment when you feel their weighting, followed by another “wow” when you roll some balls on the green.

For You

For You

News
Apr 22, 2024
Strength Training for Golfers: Building a Strong and Stable Core
Golf Balls
Apr 22, 2024
Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
Golf Technology
Apr 21, 2024
Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

A putter-obsessed recreational golfer, constantly striving to improve his game while not getting too hung up about it. Golf should be fun, always.

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
Apr 23, 2024 | 2 Comments
Toulon Golf Small Batch Meadow Club Putter
Apr 11, 2024 | 3 Comments
Bettinardi CB24 and MB24 Forged Irons
Mar 26, 2024 | 11 Comments
Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      AL

      9 years ago

      Isn’t this club all about the lightweight shaft. Could’t you that the shaft, or any super stiff graphite shaft and put it into a putter head of your liking? And get the same effect??

      Reply

      Nocklaus

      7 years ago

      Probably.

      Reply

      Ken

      9 years ago

      Forget the marketing hype, this putter work for me. Right time, right place, maybe, but this putter has renewed my feel of the putter and it is resulting in more made putts fem 6′ and in… PERIOD…. I only hope it not just a honeymoon period as my last two rounds have been sub 30 putts, a sight I have not seen in quite a awhile.

      Reply

      doug

      10 years ago

      Just ordered the TD01 I have a 3 day tournament this weekend, full report when I get back!

      Reply

      Walt Pendleton

      10 years ago

      David…let me first say how much I enjoy reading The Club Report. It’s both articulate and personal in style and transitions very well from technical to subjective observation. However, as most of your readers know, putters are only as good as they enhance a “go’fer’s” ability to post lower scores…repetitively! At the end of the day it boils down to; Read it, Roll it and Hole it. To that subject I’ll make my point…It’s the Indian, not the arrow with the problem in putting!

      As an inventor of an computer putting system that teaches and monitors the putting stroke while you practice on a real green, I believe Bridgestone is right in their innovative approach to a new style of putter. However, they’ve totally missed the mark with the design change; the first step in sinking more putts is “KNOWING” where to start the ball, (2) how fast it will be traveling and (3) teaching a player to do so in a repetitive manner. In fact, it’s not a putter at all go’fers need…its a Training System for Dummies so they can learn the fundamentals of putting by themselves! Maybe Bridgestone should have built a putter that reads greens…however I believe The EGOS Putter already has a corner on that market, right?

      THE FINAL SOLUTION: Golf needs a putting tool/s that helps golfers become more decisive about reading putts. A product that teaches ball speed relative to intended line and opens their eyes to how stroke cadence causes the face angle to return to impact! Go’fers need some kind of “live” visual feedback so they can SEE what a well timed “putting stroke looks like as they practice their OWN well timed putting stroke.” A dance teacher so to speak for the putting!

      You see, an inanimate object in the hands of a go’fer is only as good as his or her limited ability to reproduce results and without an instructor to hover over the player’s changes; it’s like chasing our own tail when we make our putting changes. I have personally spent hundreds of hours looking for the “MAGIC TOUCH” only to come off the putting green worse than a started and totally frustrated in what just happened. We’ve all been there and done that…but there is light at the end of the tunnel and its Coming Soon! http://www.Nside10.com

      Reply

      Nocklaus

      7 years ago

      What a load of crap.
      Sure, if you want to get better at anything, practice is good. We all know that. You just want to sell your training aid, that’s all good. But that is not what this is all about. It’s about the arrow !
      Give an indian a crooked arrow and see how it goes. It will probably go as well as a dancer with too small shoes. Or too big for that matter.
      Of course getting the right driver, irons, wedges and putter for your game, will help to improve your game.
      If you don’t get that, I just have to say I’m so sorry for you…

      Reply

      Dalton McCrary

      10 years ago

      —————- I have a thought and then a question. Same thought and same question for all putter companies.
      Marketing Hype, Marketing Hype and more Marketing Hype. Go to PGA.com/bestputterof2014 and you’ll be able to see video straight from 8 putter manufacturers including Scotty Cameron with Titleist personal presenting their Marketing Hype. A picture is worth a 1000 words. I don’t want the head of marketing telling me how good the feel the putter feel to him. What feels good to one does not necessarily feel good to another. That means nothing to golfers. Watching how often the Professional Tour Players change putters during the year and the simple fact that no Tour Player is standing up touting and endorsing putters means more than listening to your Marketing Hype sales pitch. What I and other golfers want to see is the dispersion pattern vs the other putter companies. I don’t hear or see any putter company saying or showing their putters dispersion pattern. So my question is : FORGET YOUR MARKETING HYPE COMENTARY AND SHOW ME HOW ACCURATE YOUR PUTTER IS FROM ANY PUTTER MADE 5 YEARS AGO FOR I DON’T BELIEVE ANY OF YOU HAVE MADE A PUTTER MORE ACCURATE IN THE PAST 15 YEARS THAN ANY PUTTER FROM 30 YEARS AGO. Because you are still using the same weighting formula, it’s been proven that the force put on a ball by any putter is not enough force to actually compress the all and with the fact that the ball is not on the face less than 0.022 seconds inserts do not have time to effect the ball at all. They can’t. So show the accuracy —- everything else is pure Marketing Hype.

      Reply

      Toots

      10 years ago

      Angry elf.

      Reply

      Nocklaus

      7 years ago

      Well said !

      pgadt

      10 years ago

      The reviewers missed the interesting fact about this putter. It reduces skidding and bouncing. Myself and two other professionals actually tried jabbing at putts, trying to make them bounce offline. We found it very difficult to get the ball bouncing or skidding off line. That to us is the selling point because most players struggling with putting woes, seem to have excessive skidding/bouncing, which causes off line putts, and distance issues.

      Reply

      Nocklaus

      7 years ago

      !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Reply

      Rich P

      10 years ago

      First The True Balance Technology is patented…

      The science behind the True Balance is that the overall MOI measured from the club head to the grip cap is very different than a steel shaft and rubber grip. This difference allows the club head to release and square at impact. Johnny Miller comments quite often that under pressure the putters toe does not release and the result is blocked right.

      The club head is not heavy. 350=360 grams is the average putter head weight sold today.
      If it feels heavy it is because you are feeling the putter head for the first time….

      EVA has been in used in the soles of tennis shoes and fishing rod grips for a long time. I have had a EVA putter grip in my bag for two and a half years with no signs of ware. If you want to refresh or change the grip feel, use sand paper with the grit to your liking. Just a light sanding motion is recommended…

      The mallet putter that would not stand on its own is because the neck is in the closed position. If you adjust the neck back to square it will stand up.

      Reply

      Andy W

      10 years ago

      What is patented? EVA? gotta a Pat. #? Do I have this right, that with a pressure putt, claiming the putterhead will release to square EASIER due to lesser wieght in shaft & grip? My issue is the pull yip, and when I tried this puppy on the green, it felt like a toothpick in my hands…

      Reply

      RoverRick

      10 years ago

      Oh, does Bridgestone make other clubs? ;)

      Reply

      Kenny B

      10 years ago

      Tried it at a demo days in May. I can see why this putter would fit Snedeker’s pop stroke, but it doesn’t fit mine. Very easy for me to flip my wrists. Too bad it missed the Most Wanted Blade test last month. Maybe Bridgestone will be more confident with it next year.

      Reply

      adan

      10 years ago

      Eh… not really moving the needle for me.
      I thought Bridgestone used to partner with Bettinardi?

      Reply

      Dave Wolfe

      10 years ago

      For some reason I remember there being some TP Mills (aka David Mills) prototypes associated with Bridgestone. IDK about Bettinardi.

      You should roll these before giving them the “Eh” though. Interesting take.

      Reply

      Andy W

      10 years ago

      Don’t remember TP Mills with Bridgestone. My recollection and all divorced:
      Bettinardi with Mizuno.
      Never Compromise with Cleveland
      Grace with MacGregor

      Rossa still with Taylormade

      drjacko

      10 years ago

      Question, previous putter reviews kindly put forward how the reviewed putter would respond to various putting strokes is straight back and through, mild/slight arc etc. Am I right in thinking the true balance tech suits the arced stroke, based on the ‘Line Roll Speed’ section?

      Thanks, its a very nice review. Were there any fitting options offered?

      Reply

      Dan

      10 years ago

      Reply

      Dave Wolfe

      10 years ago

      The TD-01 and TD-02 probably best fit the straighter arc. I usually sit on the iPING border between straight and slight arc and the TD-01 feels right on for me.

      The TD-03 would be slight arc for sure.

      Reply

      adam

      10 years ago

      Wanna try one of these. Cant help it.

      Reply

      David W

      10 years ago

      “I’d love to see where people would put it.” Be careful what you ask for!!

      Reply

      adam

      10 years ago

      thought the same thing when I read that

      Reply

      Jondagcl

      10 years ago

      “If you can feel the head you can control the head” really resonated with me. When I putt well that’s exactly the sensation that I have. This probably sounds bad, but the hardest part for me would be giving up the fun of pulling out my scotty with its custom paint and boys and their toys Christmas head cover from my bag and put a bright yellow grip, graphite shafted putter with a tire manufacturers logo in hand. I guess if I made a ton more putts I’d get over that.

      Reply

      will klosek

      8 years ago

      I have a Cameron and replaced it with the Bridgestone td 01….Cameron’s are all overpriced hype….the td01 is a better putter all the way

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 22, 2024
    Strength Training for Golfers: Building a Strong and Stable Core
    Golf Balls
    Apr 22, 2024
    Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
    Golf Technology
    Apr 21, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.