Callaway’s Apex Muscleback is Neither Bertha Fast nor Bertha Long
Irons

Callaway’s Apex Muscleback is Neither Bertha Fast nor Bertha Long

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Callaway’s Apex Muscleback is Neither Bertha Fast nor Bertha Long

Written By: Tony Covey

“The Apex Muscleback Irons are classically crafted, Tour inspired blades with playability in our most premium forged design, and if you’re an elite player, they need to be in your bag.”

Very quietly (by current Callaway standards anyway) Callaway has begun the process of letting the world know about their new 2014 Apex Muscleback. For now the Twitterverse is nearly mute, but give the boys time, I’m sure we’ll have a hashtag or two before the introductory period is over.

irons-2014-apex-mb____1

Is it the Right Time?

We know the industry is in a bad place right now, but that doesn’t mean the global release machine is going to (nor should it) come to a halt. Mizuno is moving forward. Titleist is moving forward. Callaway and Nike are moving forward too.

Given my rumored hatred for all things Callaway (you guys kill me), I’m sure some of you are expecting that I’ve come here today to bury the Apex MB, not to praise it.

So what the hell, let’s get on with it.

The language deficit continues. Shame on Callaway for playing on a series of predictable cliches that are omnipresent in the marketing of blade designs.

  • The new irons are Tour Inspired
  • They offer playability
  • They are most premium (premium is arguably an absolute)
  • And apparently unlike most irons which are manufactured, the Apex MBs are crafted…and classically so.

Yes, I am nitpicking, but if I come right out and tell you that I can’t find any real fault with what Callaway is doing here, the “how much did Callaway pay you crowd” will bury me too.

I’m trying to find some balance – My own personal Zen of Callaway if you will.

Ommmm.

Passing the Sniff Test

In reality, Apex Muscleback has the markings of a very solid release from Callaway. If we consider the new iron within the context of everything that is going wrong in the golf equipment industry right now, the Apex MB more than passes the sniff test.

By my recollection, the last true blade in the Callaway lineup (RAZR X MB) was released in early 2011. My personal feeling is that 3 years is an appropriate amount of time between releases, so there’s not a rational complaint to be made here about Callaway flooding the market in this particular category.

There is clear differentiation between the new Apex MB and everything else in the current lineup. It’s a blade, the only blade. There’s no reasonable chance of confusing the consumer, or overwhelming him with an overabundance of overly-similar products.

The marketing…at least the early marketing…is largely BS free. The Apex MB isn’t #BerthaFast or #BerthaLong it’s not Bertha anything (probably because it’s not a Bertha), and it’s not 3, 5, 7, or 17 yards longer than Callaway’s previous blade (apparently) or any of the other Callaway irons you may have purchased 3 months ago.

It’s a true player’s blade, and Callaway is treating that with the seriousness it commands.

high-performance-grooves

Yes, I nitpicked a few cliches and I don’t love High Performance Grooves, but everything has to have a clever name, and in fairness, Callaway has to say something to entice us. If they wrote it 100% as reality it would read more like this:

“The tour inspired Apex MB would look great in any golf bag, however, the majority of you have absolutely no business playing such an inherently unforgiving design, and frankly, you’d be better off with the standard Apex or even X2 Hot. A healthy percentage of our Tour Pros will likely play something more forgiving, and let’s face it, you…you’re no Phil Mickelson.”

Even I’ll admit that if the goal is to actually sell irons, Callaway wrote it better.

Aesthetics

Aesthetically the Apex MB is everything you’d expect from a true muscleback, and more specifically a Callaway muscleback. While the company has gradually transitioned away from the X-everything nomenclature of recent years, elements of the X-shaped back design remain.

Cosmetically that means the new irons will look nice alongside any Mack Daddy 2 (or X Forged Jaws CC) wedges you might have, or the new Apex Utility. It also means the Apex MB may not appeal to the purists who are absolute in their belief of what a blade should look like.

Worth a mention, while the X design fits well within the construct of that previous X-based marketing, the design was functional as it related to the placement of mass and the center of gravity. I’m guessing that’s still true today. At some point maybe the Callaway guys will stand in front of a coffee maker and discuss it in more detail.

sole-camber

From what we can tell, the rest looks pretty straightforward. Compact heads, thin toplines, minimal offset…you know the drill. What we don’t yet know (and chances are a set won’t be showing up on my doorstep) is whether Callaway has gone the progressive route and shaped the long irons a bit differently than the short.

I don’t believe they have, and here’s hoping that’s true. It’s a true muscleback afterall. There’s no need to get fancy.

Specifications

apex-mb-spec

The most hardcore of traditionalists will lament the fact that the pitching wedge is only 47° and that the 5-iron is an ungodly long 38″. By modern standards, however; I’d say the specs are on point. This is as close to traditional as you’re going to find. It’s time to move on fellas, the good ol’ days of niblicks and mashies are over.

At D1, the swingweight is perhaps a bit on the light side, but I’m sure Callaway’s custom department can help you with that. And while they’re at it, if you ask nicely, they can probably build off a 37.75″ 5-iron if you prefer.

Pricing

Like the other 2 sets in the Callaway Apex series, the Apex MB will hit the street for the higher-than-average prices of $1099 (retail 9/12/2014). $1100 (I rounded for effect) is a lot of money, but we’re entering a new golf economy, and while the consumer is going to grumble, $1100 means both Callaway and your retailer can maintain healthy margins.

Those sonsofbitches.

kbs-v-spec-spec

Also officially announced is the Callaway Apex Utility Iron which popped up just before The Open Championship. Street price for the Utility (available in 18°, 21°, and 24°) is $229.99.

Final Thoughts

Who doesn’t love a good blade?

I believe a true, clean muscleback should be a part of every manufacturer’s lineup. It’s the most-niche of any iron offering, but it’s the best opportunity any manufacturers has to showcase their aesthetic capabilities while creating a product that makes statement about the brand.

With Apex MB Callaway has created an iron that respectfully carries on the heritage of the Apex line while remaining true to the new identity the company has forged for itself.

Callaway’s Apex Muscleback is a statement iron; one that would look strong in any golf bag (even if you’re no Phil Mickelson).

For You

For You

Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
Buyer's Guides
Apr 12, 2024
Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
First Look
Apr 12, 2024
Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
News
Apr 12, 2024
PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Parke

      6 years ago

      Been playing the TM RAC MB irons for 5-6 years and love them, but mileage is getting up there. Been looking at irons for a year and these APEX MB’s look like the perfect replacement. Same head shape and muscle design with mass behind the sweet spot. RAC’s are like butter on pure hits, and consistent in shot length and dispersion. Also, forgiving enough on thin or toe shots. Any opinions from people who are playing this club?

      Reply

      Chris

      9 years ago

      You know ApexMBs’ are for the purist besides what players think is a “blade” and I mean they look freaky small at address, take note that Callaway worked really hard to present something for the elite player even if the company has struggled, all companies do it at the end of the day.

      Reply

      Sebastian

      10 years ago

      Let’s be honest. These clubs are great. I’ve played blades all my life, mostly Titleist 690, ZM and MB, but also Callaway’s X-Proto (my weapon of choice). These clubs are my next go-to purchase. I almost bought a set of Mizuno’s MP4s but, in fairness, they are just a copy of my old Titleist 690 that are getting dusted in my garage. I’m going to have my Apex MB fited and -hopefully- ready for my next round in two weeks. Finally, a word on the cavity-MB issue. You can play cavities and have some fun. They will play the same role that a good old Wooper does when you’re hungry, but we all know what happens if you have woopers for lunch every day….

      Reply

      Emiliano Russo

      8 years ago

      Lol

      I couldn’t agree more on the Wopper comment. I play off 14 and I arguably shouldn’t use blades, although my short game and putting probably add 8-10 unnecessary shots a round.

      I have a set of Titleist AP2 back home which I bought out of frustration, and I’ve been playing 3-4 times a week with APEX MB, Project X 6.0, in my garden leave.

      The thing is if one bothers to play blades then one would probably would learn how to golf…

      These guys are way less forgiving than the RazrX MB, which I played for 3ys with similar shaft (only difference is it was “flighted”, not sure I needed that considering my ridiculous ball height).

      However, when it comes to workability and feel they’re just amazing.

      Playing with AP2 (Spieth’s clubs) is good when one is not trained physically and mentally to play golf.

      The moment one loses that necessary “rooting” to the ground and hips start going all over the place, legs get weak, it’s when you wish you didn’t have players clubs in your bag…

      I absolutely love them and will keep them as my summer clubs for a long time.

      Playability is of course not their forte but that’s the whole point if one is looking for accuracy and has the arm that feels the shot, one would need a proper stiff blade which absorbs into the shot any variation in movement and speed of the swing.

      I must admit though you don’t see many players using them, it’s getting more and more rare..

      Reply

      Alex Kalionzes

      10 years ago

      Cannot wait to see how they hold up vs my Cleveland TA1’s. Yes, I am a blade player from day 1 (started with my uncle’s old Hogan Radials) and I really love that look. It has been down to the Apex Pro, the Mizuno MP-4’s, and now I can add these to the list of clubs to check out before I buy. I hope that demo head gets somewhere nearby soon!

      Reply

      Joe

      10 years ago

      First of all, what company releases a blade iron, and in the same breath speaks of ball speeds or length, or forgiveness? That isn’t what a blade is for.

      Second, what company releases any other type of product, that they don’t claim it to be the biggest or the best? Who buys any club based on a marketing claims anyways?

      Third, I have owned Callaway clubs for nearly 2 decades now, and can never remember EVER being disappointed with the quality or performance of their equipment, and I am a demanding sort of person. I cannot say the same for some of the Nike, Mizuno, TaylorMade, or Titleist equipment I have owned. Callaway is using the best of shafts, grips, and heads, and giving the consumer almost limitless customizations, and mostly at a no-cost/upcharge fee.

      There’s many great products out there form all the companies today. Along with Titleist and Ping items, I have a Big Bertha driver, and Odyssey putter in my bag, and can’t ever imagine them being shelved. I am also happy to see a smaller company like Callaway, compete with the big boys on the block.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      Tongue in cheek…apparently lost on some.

      Interesting that you would classify Callaway as a smaller company. They’re the #2 company in golf right now in terms of total revenue, and at one point this season was #1 in iron market share. If Callaway is small, who is big?

      Reply

      Joe

      10 years ago

      Some feelings aren’t just tongue in cheek for sure.

      Callaway is a Golf only company, and have built their fortunes on the golf consumer, as opposed to Nike or Adidas, that are exponentially larger. Similar as comparing large market vs small market teams in baseball. Nike/Adidas = Yankees/Dodgers and Callaway would be the Indians or As.

      Christian

      10 years ago

      In your sports analogy, that means the Cavaliers is TaylorMade

      Jase

      10 years ago

      Not sure if I’m buying the “these are different” line…nearly identical to x protos. Tiny change, new name, voila…ultra premium. Give me a break.

      Reply

      Tom

      10 years ago

      Callaway and the other mfg. companies should pay attention to the definite decline in this industry.

      Reply

      Ryan

      10 years ago

      Excellent looking club! Priced at $1100 that’s way out of my price range but I will give them a swing next time I am around Golfsmith. I love musclebacks and blades but most company’s price them out of the average guys wallet sadly.

      Reply

      RAT

      10 years ago

      Hey, honesty in this release? Hard to believe but it’s a step in the right direction. Congrats Callaway. It looks like a mix between the WilsonStaff FG V2 and an older Mizuno. Not bad though.

      Reply

      RON

      10 years ago

      I agree Andy W everyone wants to get better so whats the point on hiding bad swings with big headed cavities but then again if you know your swing inside and out a big cavity head could be good that fits with Fred Couples, he hits it on the button every time so a blade wouldnt be to important to him but for him a cavity is better because it straightens out his shots trajectory wise which is why a guy like Freddie uses a big cavity head and not a blade. But high handicaps looking to get better cavity back forgiving clubs will not help them improve.

      Reply

      Golfzilla

      10 years ago

      You wanna play golf, buy cavity backs. You wanna play golf swing, buy blades.

      Reply

      adan

      10 years ago

      They look pretty sweet. Reminds me of the “old” TaylorMade Rac TP irons

      Reply

      Andy W

      10 years ago

      I will just go ahead and say it. PING did a huge disservice to golfers when they introduced the perimeter weighted irons. In the 80s, I hit Wilson Staff blades, and there was instant feedback at contact if you hit a perfect shot or not. You knew immediately. And that bad shot feeling made me practice and get better.

      Reply

      markb

      10 years ago

      Yep, those are the two alternatives with blades: a few perfect shots and a whole bunch of NOTS.

      Reply

      Revkev

      10 years ago

      Yep per ping did such a disservice that it was the number one iron on tour. What do those guys know about golf anyway?

      Teaj

      10 years ago

      Yes such a disservice, bring more people to the game because they have a lot better time hitting a cavity back. to those people that can only get out once in a while because they have a life outside of golf, suck it up and hit MB’s.
      For-shame Ping….. for….shame!

      Really? while we are at it lets go back to the bellata golf balls and wood woods?

      Reply

      flaglfr

      10 years ago

      This one looks a lot like the original X prototype.
      Gotta say I have a LOT of angst regarding the use of Apex with anything other than a Hogan club. Am I an old guy? You bet you young whippersnappers!
      It is a great looking club.
      I agree with Tony that the cycle for this club was right. Now if only they (and others) could learn from it and repeat the rationale for this club with the rest of the brand, we might be doing better.

      Reply

      drjacko

      10 years ago

      The Prototypes looked just like the later RAZR MBs just the stamped logo. The Apex do bear the heritage but the bottom edge is plain flat.

      For the folks needing a visual, prototype/RAZR MB look like the jaws wedges.

      Reply

      David W

      10 years ago

      It’s a beautiful club that I will never swing.

      Reply

      Don Koo

      10 years ago

      Yup.

      Reply

      Adam

      10 years ago

      Nice looking iron…what else can you say

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
    Buyer's Guides
    Apr 12, 2024
    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
    First Look
    Apr 12, 2024
    Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
    News
    Apr 12, 2024
    PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.