Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind Wedge – Is This Even A Good Idea?
Golf Wedges

Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind Wedge – Is This Even A Good Idea?

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind Wedge – Is This Even A Good Idea?
In 5+ years writing for MyGolfSpy I can’t recall a single product that has fascinated me this much.

Written By: Tony Covey

If you’re just hearing about the Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind Wedge for the first time today, let me give you the quick backstory:

After decades of professional golf Phil Mickelson came to the realization that he hits a lot of shots high and towards the toe. This isn’t a Phil phenomenon, it basically happens to anyone who likes to open up the faces on his/her wedges.

Phil decided he’d like to try a wedge that provides a bit more meat in that region of the club, so he approached Callaway; together, team Callaway started welding bits and pieces of other wedges together. A bit of creativity, shaping, some other refinements, and boom…one hell of a strange looking wedge.

Callaway-Mack-Daddy-PM-GRIND-17

And well, since this is Callaway, where if 3 weeks go by without a new product release people inside the company start to get twitchy, the company decided to bring Phil’s Franken Wedge to retail.

Lucky Us.

Sarcasm? Maybe not.

Along with the release came a semi-brilliant tagline quote from Phil Mickelson: It looks different because it’s designed different (I guess adverbs aren’t Phil’s thing, but given my personal propensity for leaving out entire words and inventing new ones, I’ll let it slide), and the money stat that the PM Grind has 39% more groove area.

My god…look at that massive toe, you’d better put some extra grooves on it.

pm-grind-how-it-was-made

It’s Versatile, But…

And so as I considered this most unconventional wedge, and it’s original target demographic (Phil Mickelson), I started to wonder if this newfound versatility would come at the expense of playability.

Flop shots, bunker shots, pine straw, desert, and nut-deep fescue aside, sooner or later all of us need to hit a full shot from the middle of the fairway.

So when I began evaluating the Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind wedge from the perspective of the average golfer, I really had a single question:

Is this even a good idea?

Callaway-Mack-Daddy-PM-GRIND-3

Design Obstacles

Those of you who read my work frequently already know that while my job is primarily to tell you how well a given piece of equipment works, I’m absolutely fascinated with the engineering side of it – the hows and whys behind why clubs behave the way they do.

In the case of the PM Grind a couple of things were glaringly obvious. All that additional surface area means a lot more weight – and where weight goes, the center of gravity follows. Basically we have all the makings of a total disaster.

Without some refinements, PM Grind would have been totally unplayable.

Callaway-Mack-Daddy-PM-GRIND-15

Saving Weight

To get around the weight obstacles Callaway did some creative things. The most obvious one was to remove some mass from the back of the club. Those shiny green dots, they’re not purely decorative, drilling holes/removing metal saves quite a bit of weight.

Other, more subtle weight-saving refinements include a shorter hosel, a thinner topline, a much steeper than average transition from the top of the toe to the hosel, and again (though not as pronounced) in the transition from the lower toe to the sole.

While Callaway declined to provide specifics about the center of gravity position – and we haven’t measured…yet – my suspicion is that while Callaway was able to make weight, the center of gravity is likely still higher and more toe-ward than it would be in a conventional wedge.

So again, I ask…is this even a good idea?

Callaway-Mack-Daddy-PM-GRIND-13

It’s not totally unusual for wedge designers to try and push the CG higher anyway. If you’re looking for a flatter ball flight with more spin, raising the CG will give you that.

Toss in the fact that some of us tend to hit wedges a bit high on the face anyway, and, well…a higher sweet spot isn’t without its advantages either.

Finally, when you consider that this wedge was designed to increase the hitting area towards the high toe, it makes sense to put some weight up there. On design alone, I can see how this could actually work.

What’s With the PM Grind?

In very simple terms, the PM grind is a big dimple of sorts on the sole of the club that provides the relief necessary to open the wedge up – and this is a wedge that absolutely wants to be opened up.

I know some look at the bounce numbers, particularly on the 60° and 64° models and assume there’s too much, but that couldn’t be further from reality.

Roger Cleveland is a firm believer that bounce is your friend (I’ve come to agree with him) and that philosophy comes through in the PM Grind. What you get is a wedge that has enough actual bounce to prevent digging, and a low-enough effective bounce that sliding an open face under the ball is basically effortless. The grind is the foundation of wedge’s versatility. It’s subtle, but it works.

PM-Grind-Specs

What About the Rest of the Sole?

Some of you won’t love the rounded sole that leaves the heel and toe above the turf when the wedge is sitting square. For guys who demand a square leading edge, we may have reached the end of our story.

The totality of the design, however, is actually quite fascinating. The sweeping heel relief provides the illusion of offset, but the rounded leading edge has been pulled down and forward such that it actually sits in front of the hosel.

What you end up with is sole design where multiple elements blend together in near perfect harmony. The onset leading edge sets up perfectly under the ball, the PM grind works with the contours of the sole to keep the wedge flat against the ground, while the rounded leading edge works with the bounce to prevent digging.

Callaway-Mack-Daddy-PM-GRIND-1

Looks Don’t Matter, But They Do…

Regardless of whether you call it hideous, or just unconventional, I understand. For me the Mack Daddy PM Grind is like Fairuza Balk in The Waterboy. By any reasonable standard, it’s ugly, but it’s not without its sex appeal either.

Of course that’s purely subjective. What’s less subjective is what happens visually as a result of that big high toe.

First and foremost, there’s more wedge.

It looks bigger because it is bigger.

Makes sense, right? For those of you who love compact wedges, PM Grind may prove too much of an adjustment.

What’s harder to quantify in absolutes is the effect the high toe has on the presentation of loft. Because the face extends farther up and out it gives the illusion of additional loft. While individual results may vary, to my eye, the 56° presents at a 60°. The 60° presents as a 64°, and the 64° presents as a spatula.

Callaway-Mack-Daddy-PM-GRIND-23

The consequences of this are two-fold. Firstly, you have to learn to trust the loft. While it may look like there’s too much loft for a particular shot, there isn’t.

Secondly, and maybe this is just me…while it’s almost counter-intuitive, I find myself fighting the tendency to open the additional face and add even more loft – even when there’s no practical reason to do so. The wedge presents a certain way at address, and my initial tendency was to fight that and instead try to manipulate the face to get it to look the way my mind thought it should.

It’s a bad plan, and one I’d advise you not to adopt.

To be sure, the PM Grind is a wedge that wants to be opened up…and because of how the loft presents itself, you really need to be more aware of face orientation than you might otherwise with a conventional wedge.

Ultimately, the PM Grind is like most anything else. It may appear strange at first, but if you look at it long enough, it becomes familiar.

Callaway-Mack-Daddy-PM-GRIND-20

Is it actually versatile?

In a word, yes? Quite frankly, there isn’t a shot I haven’t been able to hit with the PM Grind. Stupid high flop shots, little runners, 2 foot kill shots, and it’s really good out of the sand too.

There isn’t a lie I haven’t been able figure my way through either…maybe not the first time, and maybe not with 100% positive results, but with enough time spent learning the way of the wedge, there’s not much it can’t handle.

Interestingly, and I suppose this is a cautionary tale as well, square faced shots have presented the most difficulty for me.

It should be pointed out that I’ve had some combination of PM Grind wedges in my bag, 3-4 times a week, for over a month (and that’s before we start talking about the around the house stuff). Initially I loved the wedge at 64°, liked it well-enough at 60°, and considered selling it for scrap at 56°.

The higher the percentage of shots played with a square face, the less I cared for the PM Grind. Over time, and with plenty of reps (it’s a process), however, I have grown more comfortable playing it square. First with little runners around the green, then with ½ and ¾ shots, and now finally with full swings.

Callaway-Mack-Daddy-PM-GRIND-10

Again, individual mileage will unquestionably vary, but it took me the better part of a month hitting the 56° 85 yards (sometimes less) before I figured out what I needed to do differently to get my expected 100-105 out of the club.

To be clear…I wasn’t hitting shots fat or thin, I just wasn’t hitting them how they need to be hit with the PM Grind. It requires an adjustment, but here’s the crazy thing:  The damn thing is so good out of the bunker that I contemplated trying to play my way around the 30 yard gap between wedges.

I should also mention that having the 64° in the bag is like having a bottle of tequila with you at all times. It creates an opportunity for infinite fun and excitement, but can very often lead to some extremely poor decisions.

That said, for the guy who has never been able to hit high, soft wedges, Callaway’s PM Grind is a literal game changer. I’ve carried 64° wedges off and on for years, and have never found it easier (necessary or not) to hit a flop shot from virtually any lie. In that regard, the 60° actually plays closer to a normal 64° while the 64° PM Grind plays like nothing I’ve ever seen.

Callaway-Mack-Daddy-PM-GRIND-5

Buyer Beware

As much as I’m becoming more and more of a fan of this wedge with each trip to the golf course, I’m not going to feed you so much as an ounce of bullshit.

Putting a Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind Wedge in your bag is not a decision that should be taken lightly.

As I said, I’m heading into month two, and while I’ve mostly figured out how to hit every shot I’d ever want or need to hit, I certainly haven’t mastered them.

I have hit some tremendously good shots with it. I have hit some tremendously awful shots with it, and  lots of shots somewhere in-between.

My distance control, particularly inside 50 yards, still needs a lot of work before I’m dialed in (even by my standards) or consistent. Frankly it’s not close…yet.

Before the Mac Daddy PM Grinds even arrived on my doorstep I put in a call to one of the smartest wedge guys I know. We talked about the potentially good in this wedge, and the potentially bad in this wedge.

Callaway-Mack-Daddy-PM-GRIND-8

Having spent quite a bit of time with it, I can tell you that there is a lot of good in this, but as my designer friend surmised, to really master the PM Grind will almost require more practice than the average golfer can truly be expected to put in.

I believe that is the reality of it, and you have to be honest with yourself. Don’t believe for a second that you’re going to walk out on the course for the first time with a PM Grind and shave two shots of your game. Initially it may cost you a stroke or two.

To find regular success with the PM Grind wedge, you will need to work. You will need to learn the wedge.

On the course you’ll need to plan every shot right down to where on the face you’re going to make contact. You have to understand where your hands need to be on full shots, how different areas of the face behave, and the launch conditions they produce.

You need to know precisely how the head moves through different lengths of grass, how it moves through the sand, and you’ll need to control your backswing accordingly and always commit fully to the shot.

If you don’t do that, you will fail…often ingloriously.

It’s not hard, especially at higher lofts, to leave a 30 yard shot 20 yards short, or hit a 10 yard shot 20 yards too far.

There is a learning curve, and I believe it’s steeper than with most any other wedge.

Callaway-Mack-Daddy-PM-GRIND-2-2

Now I’m reasonably certain that better players will read this and think that’ s no big deal because it’s what they do every day and with every shot. And in that lies the lesson.

For the average golfer to be successful with the PM Grind wedge, he’s not only going to need to put in the practice time to learn the nuances of all those things I just talked about, but to be successful he’s going to have to fundamentally learn to think like a better player, and that’s easier said than done.

If you can’t do that, what I think you’ll find is that while the PM grind makes it incredibly easy to hit one set of shots, it can also make it next to impossible to successfully hit others. Consistency won’t come easy.

If you rarely open your wedge up, don’t even bother.

Callaway-Mack-Daddy-PM-GRIND-9

But It’s So Good

If I haven’t scared you off yet, you might have what it takes to get the most out of the PM Grind.

In 5+ years writing for MyGolfSpy I can’t recall a single product that has fascinated me this much. Nearly every time I pick up the wedge I discover something new…some subtle curve that that makes me further appreciate the design.

There’s a lot more to this than a big high toe.

The Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind wedge isn’t something I’d recommend to the recreational golfer. It’s not for the guy who plays once or twice a year. It’s a tool for the avid golfer, for the guy willing to put in the time it takes to learn how to do everything this wedge is capable of doing.

All of that said, it’s a wedge I’m really growing to love. I’ve got two of them in the bag right now, and as long as my personal progress with the wedge continues, they’re both staying in the bag.

Far be it from me to begrudge anyone for letting curiosity get the better of them. It couldn’t hurt to try one…right? I promise you it will be fun.

Callaway-Mack-Daddy-PM-GRIND-25

If you’re contemplating taking a shot with the PM Grind, my final word of advice is to start with the 60°. I find it to be the most playable loft. There’s a ton of potential on the 56°, but it’s not easily realized.

So to bring this thing full circle and answer my question: is the Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind Wedge a good idea?

My answer is an emphatic YES*.

As with many things Callaway these days, there’s plenty of fine print and qualifiers. There is an adjustment. There is a learning curve, and you’re almost certainly going to hit some atrocious shots, but when you figure it out , it’s so good.

The Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind Wedge has a retail price of $130, and is available now.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Todd Bonsang

      5 years ago

      I’ve been considering the 56 and 60 as I just purchased the Callaway Epic irons 4-pw. I’m going to buy a Mack daddy 4 in 50 and am considering the PM in 56-60. Your review was long but you had me laughing pretty good in some of your analogys. Fairuza Balk in the waterboy was hilarious, she has that crazy buy sexyness about her. This was one of the funnest reviews I’ve read, don’t know if I’m going to hit these worth a crap but I’m going to give them a shot. My 64 is a Callaway Sure Out. Thanks for the review!

      Reply

      Scott

      6 years ago

      I have the 60 – love the club from 50 yards in. For shots you need to throw at the pin it is the best wedge. I have 50,54 & 58 SM7 wedges I use for full shots or pitches with more room to roll.

      Reply

      B-rad

      6 years ago

      I contemplated this wedge for a year. When I first looked at it at address (chrome) I put it back right away. A long time later they made the black version and the finish really gives the illusion of a smaller face. I loved it for some reason 10 months later. Bought a 60. It does look like a 62 degree or more wedge. This thing is strictly a greenside marksmen. And it’s amazing how you have to literally think with pro levels of creativity to learn this wedge. I love short game practice so this thing has been fun. And getting myself out of short sided over bunker scenarios makes me look like a wizard.
      I’ve since taken the black finish off (wont be drinking coca cola anymore) and itll be staying in the bag for years to come

      Reply

      Joe

      6 years ago

      I just bought a used PM grind with the black finish. Has minimal face wear. How did coke soak make it look? I tried super blue on it like my old vokey raw finish but it didn’t take. Wonder if the bluing would work after stripping the finish. Thanks.

      Reply

      Billy Johnson

      7 years ago

      I started with the 64 PM grind, and had to get the 60, and the 56 ;-). I really loved the 64 around the greens, but after I got the 60, I rarely ever use the 64. The 60 is capable of most any shot that I need around the greens. And, I am dialed in on 90 yards exactly with the full 60 swing. The 64 is really difficult to control the full swing distances for me, and the 56 is a hit or miss. Part of me thinks that the 56 has too much bounce, but when I am in the sand with the 56, I absolutely love it? Sometimes I want to go back to my Taylor Made ATS wedges, because they are easier to hit, but I love the things that the PM grind brings to the table. I golf at least 5 days a week, so I get plenty of practice.

      Reply

      Steve

      7 years ago

      Going from a 56 forged to a PM Grind and picking up a 60 PM Grind, question is what has been the yardage differential on full shots going from forged to cast wedges? Currently 56 goes 95 stock and 52 goes 110 stock. Concerned with added distance going to 56 PM Grind. Any difference between chrome and black matte wedges?

      Reply

      PapaD

      8 years ago

      Might get a 56* to see if it can knock my PING Eye 2 SW out of the bag,

      Reply

      PC

      9 years ago

      I own the 58* and I can say by far it’s the best wedge I’ve ever had. I’ve hit incredible flops with it and more than a few incredible lofted shots over gigantic trees.

      Reply

      Papaw

      8 years ago

      Recently bagged the 60 MD and look forward to each shot I get to use it in the course. I still need improvement but it has replaced the Hogan TK 62. I wish it had just a little more head weight and thinking about filling the green holes with lead. Don’t care about the looks as I always keep infant socks over all wedges while in the bag anyway.

      Reply

      Robert

      9 years ago

      Purchased the 60 over a month ago, after 12 plus rounds and really countless hours of short game practice I am still not totally sold on this wedge. I have hit some very good shots which have been impressive, it gets me thinking this is the wedge I expected. However this wedge is going in the basement, I have little confidence with it even after the more than enough time I have spent with it.

      Reply

      Scott Siler

      8 years ago

      I’ll buy it off you!

      Reply

      Brendan Nelson

      9 years ago

      Dang Doug Nelson I told you lol

      Reply

      Doug Nelson

      9 years ago

      Brendan Nelson

      Reply

      Shawn

      9 years ago

      I think the true story behind this wedge is Callaway wanted to get the PING wedge out of Phil’s bag.

      Reply

      Harvey

      9 years ago

      New PM wedges (56, 60) have been in my bag for a few weeks and have been incredible. Even though I rarely play shots with open face I love the turf interaction especially from the fairway. I have hit several 90-95 yards shots to within kick-in range. I tried the 64 in a round this past week; saved me two shots and cost me two shots! It played 52, 58, 64 combination for many years but just recently have gotten away from it. In any case, I think the PM grind is a worthwhile club to try…..individual results may vary! Bunker shots have never been easier. I do know for a fact several of my local guys I compete with that have great wedge games have put one or two in their bag so that’s proof to me there’s something to these clubs.

      Reply

      Tommo

      9 years ago

      @tony covey @harvey

      great review – thanks tony.

      i was gonna say i hit these at the range. i also rarely open the face – but found these great to hit. i must admit i have been shooting in the 70’s recently and wedges are the strongest part of my game…but i found these really nice to hit square and amazing soft high flops when opening the face. interested why you think you struggled with the square face tony?

      also harvey i have been playing 46,52,58,64 for a long time. what lofts have you gone to know for your wedges and how have you found the gaps? i was considering my usual setup…but don’t feel (on paper) that the 58/10 has enough bounce to be a primary sand club. i was therefore thinking of switching to a 50,56,60,64.

      Reply

      Tommo

      9 years ago

      i guess i’m also trying to ask harvey that as a regular 58 and 64 degree user, have you missed not having a 64 anymore or is the 60 doing the job for u?

      scott

      9 years ago

      We have had several reviews regarding several different wedges..Renegar, Mack Daddy, Parsons, how about a comparison of these new designs?

      Reply

      Lloyd Jackson

      9 years ago

      Looks Do matter.

      Sadly, these are the ugliest shapes for wedges that I have seen.

      Hideous.

      Reply

      Zedsded

      9 years ago

      high toe…check
      Scoop sole….check
      Massive heel an toe relief…..check

      Wedge was designed in the early eighties…as it’s been mentioned earlier. Eye2

      Two best wedges ever created (modern era). Ping Eye 2 and Cleveland 588 (the one from 1988). Eye 2 best bunker wedge ever, so no surprise in the review about the bunker-ability. BTW, both wedges were cast. Sorry forged people

      Reply

      Keith

      9 years ago

      which remain in my bag…

      Reply

      Keith

      9 years ago

      Fascinating… Roger Cleveland has used his decades in the wedge design industry to produce… the Ping Eye 2… brilliant

      Reply

      Jim H

      9 years ago

      Although I’m happy with my SM5 Vokeys, I put this club in my hands at the store after reading about it and found that, while it is certainly a quirky looking wedge, it makes logical sense and appeals to my urge for something new. It felt good to my eye much more quickly than I would have anticipated. However, I am very glad I read Tony Covey’s excellent review before making my purchase. I was tempted to purchase the 56* but now think I’ll look at the 60*. I also might wait until this club begins showing up in the “previously struck” bins from those who didn’t have the patience to learn how this club plays, through the practice that is evidently required according to Tony. It just might make for an interesting project to work on for a few months before putting it into play with my current set up. Thank you for an excellent, well-written article Tony.

      Reply

      Scooter

      9 years ago

      Interesting, curious to know of Tony prefers this wedge to the previously raved about Renega?

      Reply

      JasonS

      9 years ago

      Lets be honest here… Callaway can give whatever reasoning and science behind the look of this wedge but its obvious what really happened. Its known that Phil used to bag the Ping eye2 lob wedge. Callaway didn’t want the face of their brand playing another brands club, so they made an updated version of it.. look at the 2 clubs side by side and you can tell. The high toe, the weight ports in the sole, same wedge just years apart. Hopefully this post doesn’t sound like its written in hate (not my intentions) just wanted to get my opinion out

      Reply

      Lou

      9 years ago

      I swung it at a demo day. I found it very easy to hit but it’s looks were too distracting at address for me to put it in my bag

      Reply

      Alex

      9 years ago

      Doesn’t this wedge take after the legendary Ping Eye 2 lob wedge?

      I think Phil played the Ping lob for many years.

      Reply

      LJ Costello

      9 years ago

      Have had the Eye2 and just got the Mac Daddy. After three rounds I like the Mac Daddy better, especially out of deep greenside bunkers and flop shots around the green. I am a 5 handicap. I bought the 56 degree and can hit it from 75 to about 95 yards full swing depending how I manipulate the face. I will say that I have had a tendency to over use it on occasion but can really see potential in this wedge. Worth a look.

      Reply

      Rob

      9 years ago

      I purchased this wedge because it finally fit a long time want of mine. I’ve loved playing the Ping Eye 2 sand wedges over the years but they had so much offset that I always went back to traditional wedge heads. That much offset was just awkward when my irons only had a few millimeters of offset. Now I have basically a Ping Eye 2 sand wedge without the offset and it’s awesome!

      Reply

      John

      9 years ago

      Dang it another new club in the bag I reckon, I’m going for the 56 as my new SW, what kind of grip is on this beauty?

      Reply

      wbealsd

      9 years ago

      Interesting enough I’d be interested in trying one, and probably ONLY one, specifically for bunker and high “flops” around the green. I just don’t think I’d want an enitire set of these.

      Reply

      Jericho Das

      9 years ago

      I’ll be at Golfsmith in about 5 minutes I just bought the Callaway Apex mb with px 6.5’s and just sold my sm5 vokeys ..so I need wedges ..gotta go hittim

      Reply

      John

      9 years ago

      Love the comment and yes I’m scared

      Reply

      Paul b

      9 years ago

      I just started using a renegar 60 degree wedge. Amazing wedge. Just sent for the 56.
      Huge difference. Immediately.

      Reply

      Colby Evans

      9 years ago

      Just wished they released them raw. That way I didn’t have to send mine off to BOS to have the plating stripped. Very versatile wedge though. The 56 and 60 are in my bag, the 64 was back ordered when I purchased then

      Reply

      Rookieblue7

      9 years ago

      lobe mine after stripping the plating off and rebuilding them raw with DG Tour Issue Black Onyx wedge shafts. The stock KBS shaft, IMO, is garbage in that head. It already wants to launch higher due to design and the whippy tipped KBS sends the ball even higher. The DGTI flattened it out just right. They’re much more playable with that shaft than the stock KBS. Love mine, even if I’m testing them head to head with Hogans now.

      Reply

      Lewis

      9 years ago

      I have been looking at the Hogans and would be interested in your comparison results…

      Reply

      Kenny B

      9 years ago

      Every brand of wedge I have played takes practice to learn how to play it from different lies. They all seem to work a little differently for me. I started with Ping, went to the Vokeys, then to SCOR. The SCORs fit my swing much better from most lies.

      “On the course you’ll need to plan every shot right down to where on the face you’re going to make contact.” This statement right here is enough for me to not want to switch. I guess a 9 HCP is not good enough to play these wedges, because I can’t control “where on the face” I hit anything!

      Reply

      apprenti23

      9 years ago

      “I should also mention that having the 64° in the bag is like having a bottle of tequila with you at all times. It creates an opportunity for infinite fun and excitement, but can very often lead to some extremely poor decisions.”

      ROFL great review!

      Reply

      dan

      9 years ago

      Great write-up, much appreciated. And, yes, I’m scared…

      Reply

      jaybruce3

      9 years ago

      I absolutely love mine..and I’m a vokey kind of guy..but out of green side bunkers and around the green..it’s hard to beat!

      Reply

      B.J. Mazurek

      9 years ago

      I need to get these!

      Reply

      Dan Gustin

      9 years ago

      Is that because your last one lightly bumped into the tree on 13 and fell in half?!

      Reply

      B.J. Mazurek

      9 years ago

      no haha…. that was a 64 degree

      Reply

      Dan Gustin

      9 years ago

      Oh ok! Yes you should get one these then so I can try it!

      Reply

      Golf Guy

      9 years ago

      I am a sucker for new ideas when it comes to golf. Like many of us dots and colors catch my eye on just about any club. I play an orange Cobra driver and Scotty for the obvious reason. To say that these wedges got me interested as soon as they got announced would be an understatement.

      I’m a 13 HC and have been playing for about 2 years now. I’m by no means a wedge expert or some kind of short game master.

      However, as soon as these came in (I got all three, 56, 60, 64) I went to my local practice range and had the time of my life. Flop shots that seemed impossible for me in the past jumped up ten feet higher than normal. Sand shots my personal least favorite shot in the game became a blast to practice.

      I now spend close to 20 minutes each time I practice in the sand box trying new shots. That alone has saved me close to 2 strokes per round. I’m sure I could have done this with any wedge. It’s the amount of time in the bunker that is actually the biggest part of the improvement but I love the practice with these things.

      If I am enjoying myself practicing a specific shot then the club, driver, iron, or wedge is doing its job.

      Have I found a few shots harder than others, sure I have. However I was never a master wedge player before so I’m learning how to hit all my shots with these wedges and crafting my game around their ability as a wedge and mine as a player.

      Overall, I could not be happier with a product. I don’t really see myself going to anything else. I have Hopkins custom wedges, RTX, and even a set of Miura wedges that I hate leaving behind.

      I just can’t seem to find anything that has helped me so fast and with so many shots so quickly.

      I highly suggest giving these a try for a couple months. Amazing product considering I have nothing else from the company in my bag ever.

      Reply

      Kfilly20

      9 years ago

      Picking up my 60 PM today. Excited to get it out on the course and see what I can do.

      Reply

      Josh Gold

      9 years ago

      Amazing new product…bought the 60* and played and practiced with it for two weeks then bought the 56*…it’s held up in Mexico so I have no feedback for that yet…but the 60 is amazing in every lie and you will have more control…

      Reply

      Springbok

      9 years ago

      The first week of practice I had with it, I thought it was the best wedge ever created…. then I took it to the course. I returned it the next day (Edwin Watts 90 day playability guarantee).

      In actual course use, I found distance control near impossible. Whether on full shots or shots around the green. The problem is that as mentioned, you feel like you need to open up the wedge. Even on full shots, I think the heavy toe weight made the wedge fall open. When you are playing around with it in practice, you just discard the distance control issues, but taking it to the course where it counts, the distance control issue becomes very infuriating.

      Reply

      Patrick Kanipe

      9 years ago

      did you test the 58?

      Reply

      MyGolf Spy

      9 years ago

      We did not test the 58.

      Reply

      jimmy culp

      3 years ago

      I use a 60* mack daddy 3 on full shots from 45 to 65 yards. I needed a wedge from 5 to 40 yards. I love to open up the club. face. That is why I just purchaced a 60* pm grid, I think this will be the answer! The MD3 60* is good on square faced shots, but when you start opening the face, it becomes inconsistent.

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.