Open Your Wallets Wider, Golf Gear is Too Damn Cheap
News

Open Your Wallets Wider, Golf Gear is Too Damn Cheap

Open Your Wallets Wider, Golf Gear is Too Damn Cheap

Written By: Tony Covey

As I’ve heard it from hundreds of you; one of the prime suspects in the crime that is the decline of golf is the cost of the gear itself.

Golf equipment has gotten too damn expensive. These golf companies have a lot of nerve thinking they can charge $400 for a driver.

Nobody can afford to spend $400 in this economy.

The prevailing perception is that the manufacturers are gouging the consumer. They’ve steadily raised prices and haven’t given you a damn thing more for your money.

Those sonsofbitches.

Golf equipment is overpriced, right? They’re screwing us.

Probably not.

Let me preface all of what’s to come with the acknowledgement that what I’m about to say might be the most unpopular thing I’ve ever written for MyGolfSpy (and I’ve written some amazingly unpopular articles)…and so here it goes.

Golf equipment is too damn inexpensive.

I’ll give you a moment to choke that down…

Not only is the cost of golf equipment likely to rise (and soon), but I’d argue that the cost bump is not only justified, it’s long overdue.

Drop the rock.

Let’s be rational for just a moment.

Absolutely, $400 is a lot of money. I’m not arguing otherwise. Golf clubs are expensive, but that’s not the same thing as too expensive. Look around…over the past decade…the past two decades, the cost of everything around you has risen.

We’re all familiar with inflation, right?

Everything Costs More. . .Except Golf Equipment

Here’s the really amazing thing. Despite inflation and the rising cost of life in a general sort of way, the cost of golf equipment has remained nearly unchanged for the better part of two decades.

To this point in time, and unlike any other consumer product or service I could find outside of the technology industry (stuff with circuit boards), the golf equipment industry has defied inflation.

It’s astonishing.

Let’s look at some comparables from 2006 to 2013.

Worth a quick mention, there’s nothing particularly special about 2006, it was simply a point in time where all of the data (sourced from statista.com, NADA.org, and the Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor and Statistics all lined up).

I chose a mix of necessities, near-necessities, and entertainment options to paint a well-rounded picture of how inflation (and other factors) have impacted the cost of goods and services around us.

The Diff column shows the percentage difference between what something should cost today (based on Labor and Statistics CPI calculator) and the actual cost. Anything with a minus value reflects a cost difference that hasn’t kept up with inflation (consumer friendly – costs less than it probably should), while a plus value reflects a cost difference above the inflation rate (costs more than it should).

Obviously there are other factors (supply and demand, subsidies, etc.) that account for slight variations off of the inflation rate, but generalized, I think the data is compelling.

comp-chart

While the cost of nearly everything else on this list outpaces the inflation rate (some of them by more than a little), if we use 2006 as a baseline, a new premium driver adjusted for inflation should have retailed for something in the neighborhood of $462.22 last year.

You’re already $62 ahead. It’s the coffee guys that are screwing us.

But Wait…That’s Not What We Should Be Looking At

It’s actually totally misleading to use 2006 as a baseline because $400 as the standard for a premium driver actually goes back a lot further.

In 2005 the Titleist 983K and TaylorMade R7 Quad (among many others) retailed for $400. Ok…1 year isn’t that much further.

What if we go back to 2000? The TaylorMade R300 Series. You guessed it, $400.

How about 1997? Titleist 975D…$400.

1994? Big Bertha. Yup $400.

Over the years there have been anomalies (Great Big Bertha way back when was $500). The original Fusion driver was expensive, and TaylorMade has been known to exceed the $500 price point every now and again, but the occasional outlier aside, $400 bucks…not $400 adjusted for inflation, has been the standard ask for nearly every company’s premium driver for the better part of 20 years.

True story.

Adjusted for inflation, the equivalent of 1994’s $400 driver should cost $643.30 today.

Let’s flip it around. Today’s $400 was $248 and change back in 1994. Drivers (and it’s true of nearly every club in the bag) are substantially cheaper…nearly 47% cheaper…than they were 20 years ago.

A Price increase is long over-due

I’ve heard from a few manufacturers now that supplier pressure is increasing. Overseas factories are raising prices and that means higher costs for everybody.

Don’t discount the positive role that the flood of equipment has played in keeping prices down either. Many hate the fact that some companies habitually dump new product on the market every 4 to 6 months, but the reality is that volume too has helped keep your costs in check.

The rapid decline in equipment sales is going to have consequences for the consumer. Less gear ringing the register, and fewer discounts means the volume model isn’t going to work anymore. Your driver isn’t going to be obsolete after 6 months, but you’re probably going to have to pay a bit more for the increased lifespan.

Golf companies will need to make their money through higher margins, and that means higher prices for all of us…even in this economy.

$349 and $449…my guess is those will be the new standards. Some may go even higher. You won’t like it. Inflation or not, $450 is still a lot of money for most of us, but that doesn’t mean the gear is overpriced.

Golf clubs might be expensive, but the reality is they’re cheaper than they’ve ever been.

For You

For You

Irons
Apr 24, 2024
PXG Irons: Model By Model
Putters
Apr 23, 2024
PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
News
Apr 23, 2024
Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Brad

      9 years ago

      Good point. Great article and thanks for getting the word out. Just not sure we could get more for clubs. Wish we could and wish rounds of golf would increase.

      Reply

      Jase

      10 years ago

      Yep, Dave sums it up nicely, treat us better and the profits will come…certainly makes more sense than “just spend more” as the author would have you think. Seriously?!? If you had just read that out loud before writing this piece, you would have realized how ridiculous that sounds.

      Reply

      Mich

      10 years ago

      Get over yourself Dave

      Reply

      Dave C

      10 years ago

      +1

      Reply

      Sandy lang

      10 years ago

      Whoever wrote this article about pricing should be higher is a moron and probably working for the companies.
      And I guarantee this author has never a major size company or had to advertise to brand a product. These golf companies over spend in all the wrong areas. Pay way to much to be associated with touring pros. When in fact most of the pros would never play the clubs they are paid to play. The overhead these companies create which are unnecessary and the shipping from China and cost of advertising hurt the consumer. If these companies where run more efficient the profit would be higher and the cost would be down. I have been in the movie business and marketing business for 40 years. These presidents of these companies are killing this beautiful sport. They need to bring the consumer back to loyalty not to looking for the best deal and switching drivers because of price or because this shift is not available with this head. It’s all plan bullshit. Mr. Callaway once tried to get me to do his marketing but I had a conflict with another company. The consumer should always be king. Stop insulting the consumer with showing a pro hitting a club. Get to the truth in advertising and put the consumer first. And as a practical matter there are other places to manufacture golf heads much closer to the US.
      Golf courses are closing daily. They overbuilt to an extreme. To many new golf clubs much to soon. Buy a driver today 90 days later the same company has a newer product. At least in the car industry it’s yearly on new models. In the days of 100 dollar golf shirts and 50 dollars for a dozen balls you would think that these companies want to build the game not price the core golfer out of the game. Nike has all the money they do a business in other things golf is a candle on the cake for them. Start by creating true quality control. You order a certain flex and weight chances are more then 3 of the clubs in the set are not even close. Show the customer you give a damp and try to create brand loyalty. It’s gone for the most part. Sure a company needs profits. 10% if a company usually does 90% of the work. Stop over hiring and wasting money. Have executives get their monies with a base and let profits be there other way to increase their yearly salary. I could write 500 pages for what golf club companies should do to increase there business but in a nut she’ll less is more. Hire people in marketing that understand advertising and media. Have a product so well done that you could by time other then the dawn over priced golf channel. They have you over a barrel but there are so many ways to beat them at their own game. Put the consumer first and work bacwards. You will be amazed at the loyalty you can create.

      Reply

      Dave C

      10 years ago

      Your comment could carry more weight if you proofread and spell checked what you wrote.

      Reply

      Oldplayer

      10 years ago

      I understood exactly what he was saying and it was all very valuable input.

      sandy Lang

      10 years ago

      you may be write but it was done from a phone while waiting to finish another meeting.
      But at the end of the day what the hell has spelling got to do with the truth and more importantly facts.

      But thank you for your input. I would have respected your thoughts if you wrote a response on the text, not the fact that you are a grammar corrector!

      Dave C

      10 years ago

      “You may be write” – luv it
      But seriously, Sandy echoed what everyone else said – let’s get some operational efficiency, spend where it benefits the consumer, oh yeah, and lower the price.
      Though I agree with this in theory, incentives drive our decisions (and for those of you who say, “no, I do what is best for everyone” then that means you get paid with positive emotion/feedback instead of cash money, therefore you’re incentivized by making others happy).

      I firmly believe capitalism will rule. Most (typically the higher handicappers) think there are only a couple companies they can buy from, but then there are some lesser known brands (less marketing, improves margins assuming same manufacturing efficiencies) and plenty of (lightly) used clubs that are more than great for our use, regardless of our skill level. If the big boys price themselves out, then these other players/options will reign, and may be already positioned to fill the future void.

      Jase

      10 years ago

      This reeks of the industry side of why thy should charge more money. Forgive my skepticism, since this is a site that wouldn’t exist outside of the golf sales industry. Not sure comparing golf clubs to other industries makes sense, especially when the transportation costs of the industries you’re comparing them to deal in bulk transportation in amounts golf clubs will never see, and the cost of fuel impacts them much higher than the golf industry.

      Truth is the highest cost of producing golf clubs is advertising, and the same dynamics that play into FBS football TV rights, plays into golf sales. To sell clubs, manufacturers think they need a thorougbred in the stable like Rory or tiger, so they pay ungodly amounts of money on equipment contracts. So long as this is the marketing paradigm, then equipment cost a will be ridiculous.

      Let’s try something new and have the PGA Tour ban these types of contracts. Players can make more than enough on winnings and other endorsements. Let’s also take away the tour only, tour prototypes, and custom one-offs for pros, and make everyone play with stock equipment. Would definitely help out with the cost to play, and might help the PGA save som money on the tee it forward initiative that everyone ignores, because they’ve jaunt been sold the extra 500 yards a round the need to play the tips. Especially when it’s us fans/recreational players that foot the bill for all of this. A little social responsibility here would go a long way towards helping everyone. Hunk about that before asking us to just dig a little deeper.

      Reply

      Maslie

      10 years ago

      Money don’t lie. Yeah right. It’s too cheap; comparing to inflation. But Instead of getting a golf club now we getting bulk of junks! By using lower grade materials – cheaper ss, 15 rounds finishing layer, 10 rounds head cover, 30 rounds grip, etc, it only pleased hackers which very like the beauty of cosmetics. True players will never appreciate these kind of marketing strategy.Period.
      Dear OEM, please bring back those decent golf clubs if you thinking to increase prices.

      Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results – Albert Einstein.

      Reply

      David Walther

      10 years ago

      I could not disagree more, I live in a town in Florida. last year 5 courses closed this year it looks like 12 to 15 more, I could care less about the logic, I know that when 12 golf balls cost more the a round of golf, rase the price, LOL your funny.

      Reply

      Shawn

      10 years ago

      How about the “anti” inflation of your $400 or worse, Alpha driver which you bought less that 6 months ago, only has a trade in value of $150.

      Reply

      James

      10 years ago

      who pays 400 for a driver anyways? if its too expensive just wait a few months for it to go on sale.

      Reply

      Gary Lee

      10 years ago

      Golf equipment is too cheap???? That is a laugh. A driver with a $59 head, a bulk produced shaft costing $10,,and a grip that costs $1 in bulk. Paying $400 for a driver that costs less than $70 for components. Even if you say the components cost $100 which is a stretch doubling the price would allow the manufacturer to make a nice profit at $200. What is killing golf is the cost, period. A complete set of good clubs would be nearly$2000 for a good driver, a good 3 wood, 2 hybrids, a set of irons, and a putter at current pricing. Club manufacturers make a nice profit when clubs like the RBZ are discounted to 199. The limit placed on balls by the USGA has made the difference between the pro balls and cheaper balls virtually non existent for the average golfer. But clubs really set you back. Time to charge what people can afford for clubs not what manufacturers can get.

      Reply

      Shooter McGavin

      10 years ago

      The bottom line is until golf equipment manufactures make a drastically different and game changing club for the consumers, NO ONE should be paying as much as they are now for a new driver/irons. I hit my Cleveland Launcher 460 driver (a REAL game changer when it first came out) maybe 12 yards less than my friends new SLDR and I am fine with that since I average around 300 yards anyway off the tee. The only equipment I can see that you HAVE to replace every 2 or 3 years are your wedges since they wear out so fast due to how soft the metal is in those particular clubs (grooves and face milling patterns really help spin the ball back on wedges). Irons are next on the list; I would replace them every 5-10 years depending on how well you maintain them.

      The driver and putter though should last forever (unless they break or a rib becomes loose inside the club). Take the money you are spending every year on new drivers and put it towards lessons or golf school outings. You do not need new equipment to become better; make yourself better.

      Reply

      Bill

      10 years ago

      A lot of great responses and kudos to Tony for stepping into this mess in the first place.
      I compare golf club production and its future to the recent history of the average private country club.
      Clubs are selling off at a fraction of their purchase price. Some are plowed under and re developed. The rest are trying to reinvent how they operate. Many of the frills are gone.

      Golf club manufacturers will be doing the same soon. Less players, less demand, fewer private courses. The game is already shaking out. To suggest that higher prices with no leap in tech is imminent is a logic step I won’t take. The cost of driver heads is 21-40 bucks. Grips and shafts another what, 30 bucks. Add 6 bucks for a headcover and you have a 75 dollar club…That’s fine, there’s lots of channels to pay along the way…The future I see is in changing the channels. More direct producer to consumer sales with only a fitter in the middle. There’s a reason Power Bilt is producing drivers at a fraction of the cost that compete with the big boys. No, not saying the Power Bilt is as good as the latest Big Bertha or TM. But the average consumer that still wants to play and is doing it with far less purchasing power than a few years ago is going to either wait a product cycle or go for the club that produces nearly as well and scores well head to head with the Bertha’s.
      Ping is hardly a hero in my book. Nice clubs but their iron costs are outrageous. The operating costs need to come back down to earth. Less big buck advertising. Retail prices not designed to be slashed 50-70% within a year. I know bringing back forges to the US would be tough. The EPA and other government agencies make producing goods here a nightmare. But not long ago I would pick up forged Hogan heads at a forge amongst the farm fields of northern Illinois. No shipping from China charges. The ability to produce clubs (from start to finish) for far less. Granted, our government IS a factor in so many industries packing up and producing their goods elsewhere. Unions, government agencies “protecting us” (I use quotes because while some of it is well intentioned, much of it is nothing but over regulation for reasons that have nothing to do with protection of our health and well being).
      Most employers and employees are waiting to see where this leadership vacuum leads before spending big bucks in business or at home. Until then, many golfers will start buying when they NEED to replace their old clubs. My irons are years old and drivers I buy on EBay for considerably less or not at all. I can’t see ball prices being sustainable either. I used to buy Pro V’s from time to time, now I only play them when I find one. Otherwise I play 3 piece balls that cost $20 less. I’m a single digit handicap (well, until this year, when making a living has cut into my practice time and I’ll play 10-15 less rounds also). I like the premium balls but I’ve had to adjust my spending to live within my means. The golf companies will also have to re-budget and redefine their production/shipping/pricing techniques themselves or find themselves a footnote of American golf history (IMO).

      Reply

      Regis

      10 years ago

      I’ve been posting here and elsewhere for a couple of years that the cost of equipment has not increased over the last 30 years. My source (other than my recollections of personal spending) are the back pages of old golf magazines where retailers used to advertise pre-internet/email (remember the Alien wedge). What has changed is the quality of the stock shaft. Leave the price of a driver at $400 with a stock shaft (The aftermarket stock SLDR shafts are available on line for $29) but offer a decent variety of affordable real deal shafts as an upcharge (credit the $29) in a variety of weights and flexes with adaptors. Then even the Dicks Sporting Goods can do a decent on site fitting and the golfer can keep the head he loves , demo and buy additional shafts and slow the new product introduction cycle

      Reply

      Barbajo

      10 years ago

      I think some IF/THEN’s may need to be considered…

      IF OEM’s forecast a future drop in sales volume in the US market – fewer golfers buying fewer clubs….

      And IF gross profit margins have – in fact – been dwindling…

      And IF COGS (Cost of goods sold – actual cost to make the product) has gone up, or will go up – even slightly….or even if it hasn’t….

      And IF fixed and variable overhead has gone up or will go up (willing to bet it has)…

      THEN….net profit margins have been dwindling…

      THEN…production and inventory will have to decrease…

      THEN…overhead belt-tightening is looming…

      And price increases are also looming to keep the ship afloat…even in a competitive environment. Businesses can survive tough times if margins stay healthy and they don’t run out of cash. You make the same amount of money selling 100,000 drivers at a 20% gross margin as you do selling 200,000 drivers at a 10% gross margin.

      IF someone really wants a new driver, the price difference between $349 and $399 isn’t going to stop him.

      IF someone is going to be custom fit for a driver, dropping $500+ for the fitting/shaft/head combo is not unheard of.

      IF OEM prices are too high, then there are always less expensive alternatives — HIreko, DGT, Pinemeadow and others offer good quality equipment at comparably low prices. These guys should be excited if, in fact, OEM prices reach the market’s breaking point.

      Reply

      TheHacker

      10 years ago

      I think the hard question to ask is can golf equipment companies afford to price themselves out of the market and eventually out of business?

      Even the Rolls Royce of golf – Honma has to rethink what they are doing. See what happens when Scotty Cameron decides to price their releases higher – many will vote with their feet and everybody else will say a Scotty is overhyped.

      Yes an occasional fool will buy but there is not enough fools to go around anymore. They will eventually get exactly what they deserve – shrinking market share, and eventually shrinking revenue and profits.

      Reply

      Giles

      10 years ago

      Stick with writing about golf equipment and stay away from economics.

      Inflation is extremely complicated and you explained it poorly. You can’t compare the cost of one club to 8 different products. To understand how one product or product category compares to general inflation within an economy (in this case the US economy) you must compare the product’s price change with the inflation rate as measured by the Consumer Price Index. It is also important to note that many goods and services have an actual decrease in cost over a period of of time in relation to the general inflation rate established by the CPI. Other items decrease in real cost because their quality improves, manufacturing techniques decrease, labor costs are cut etc. But real cost and actual cost are well beyond the scope of your article.

      If a company can increase the cost of their product and maintain market share and revenue they will. That means the market is willing to accept an increased cost. Thus far, when a golf company has tried to raise the cost of a specific product they have failed to be competitive within the market and had to offer discounts.

      Inflation as measured within the CPI does not cause the cost of goods and services to go up. It is the other way around. When a fair market creates an environment where consumers are willing to pay more for a product then inflation occurs. Conversely, if the raw materials required to produce a product increases then the consumer must pay more for the product. The free market has not permitted golf companies to raise prices and compete within the market. Maybe the market will create an environment where golf companies can successfully charge more for their products, but that market change would not be directly caused by the general inflation rate as measured by the CPI, but the market for golf goods tolerating such upward cost changes.

      Therefore you are really writing about two different things and not distinguishing between – the market which constrains or increases costs within a specific sector and inflation. Instead you wrote a very muddy article poorly describing many things. The cost of golf equipment may be going up. But there are many many reasons for this. To simplify everything the way you did, and to throw as many different economic concepts into one article without recognizing the different pieces you touched on is to do a disservice to your readers.

      Reply

      Oldplayer

      10 years ago

      Thanks Giles. Interesting read!
      I think Tony might have bitten off more than he can chew!!

      Reply

      Drew

      10 years ago

      Thank you. This MGS piece was clearly written to generate traffic. Its so bad and inaccurate its not even controversial.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      Giles et al,

      If I’ve done a disservice to my readers it was that I made an apparently incorrect assumption that most of you would already understand that things cost more across sectors for a variety of different (though probably not as complex as you’d like to make them out to be) reasons.

      I’m willing to bet that most readers understand that the price of coffee is impacted by not only inflation, but by free trade agreements, fair trade practices, the rise of starbucks and no doubt a few other things.

      Football tickets…gross increases in player salaries, the cost of new stadiums, etc.

      Milk…it’s commodity to begin with, and it’s heavily subsidized by the government.

      All these things are not the same as golf clubs. You’re right. Of course, most people don’t actually need to be told this.

      I provided the comparison table to illustrate that basically everything short of electronics and computers costs more than it did 20 years ago. Using the CPI provides a baseline to show differences between segments. The intent was never to say that golf clubs are the same as movie tickets and therefore should cost 10% more than they would IF inflation were the only factor in play.

      Sure, I gave you an example of what they would cost adjusted ONLY for inflation, but that was a very simple example to make a very simple point. And again, most readers would understand that.

      The point of all of this was to illustrate that the cost of EVERYTHING (nearly) has increased while golf clubs have not. Quit frankly, the point wasn’t to dive into why different things cost more money than they did $20 years ago, but rather to make the point that most things do, and golf equipment doesn’t…and that’s a little weird.

      If you want to compare across similar markets, look no further than the cost of baseball equipment (bats, gloves, and the ball itself). Prices have increased steadily over the last two decades. Soccer gear. Tennis equipment too. Golf equipment has not.

      I should also mention that I thought it was equally as important to dispel the incorrect notion that club prices have steadily (or not so steadily depending on individual perceptions) risen. They haven’t.

      You’re absolutely not wrong…the comparative economic analysis could have been deeper, but that wasn’t the point. I’ll call Nate Silver next time.

      Certainly there are some here who are happy to to jump on board with anyone whose opinion is contrary to mine because well…I don’t think anybody likes the idea that golf equipment is going to cost more money, and based on the reported state of the economy, and the state of the golf industry, a price hike wouldn’t seem to make much sense, so obviously I must be an idiot who got everything wrong.

      Go back 20 years…Titanium…huge innovation…driver prices jump to $400. This is a fact. For the last 20 years, that $400 price, save an anomalous offering has not budged (also fact).

      Obviously there was some added expense with Titanium, but performance justified the sudden jump. Margins were good. Over time, margins declined (the cost of most everything associated with putting a club on the shelf went up), prices stayed steady. Product shifted to China…problem solved, profits maintained.

      To get us to where we are today lots of small things happened. Heads jumped to 460cc in volume…that raised material costs. Basic R&D costs increased (CAD software and the guys who know how to use it). Still retail prices stayed at $400. Time passes, and all those things Barbajo mentioned happened. Fuel costs increased. Warehousing costs increased, and most recently (and this is a really big deal) the cost of Chinese labor increased (which is why you’re seeing some manufacturing shifting to Malaysia and Vietnam). At the same time, golf companies were actually giving you more for your money (wrenches, adjustable tips, PVD finishes)…and while they were doing that we can conservatively assume a 2% salary increase for every employee on a yearly basis. Now we’re getting into compounding interest and whatnot.

      So how did costs stay unchanged while material costs, supply costs, and personnel costs all increased? By all accounts the industry streamlined production (“process improvements”), but you can really only improve the process to a point. Once you reach maximum efficiency you’re nearly done, because all your other costs (gas, personnel, etc.) continue to rise.

      To an extent, it doesn’t matter what your margins were/are because publicly traded companies (as most of the golf companies are) need to maintain profits. And so came the next part of how profits were maintained.

      1) The shift to a high volume model. Even Titleist wasn’t always on a 2 year cycle. Once upon a time it was 3 or 4 years between models. TaylorMade wasn’t always every 6 months (or worse). Consumers replaced their drivers more often, and that helped sustain profits amid rising costs (and without raising prices).

      2) Retail margins dropped. And this is HUGE. Most retail guys will tell you that for the average shop, margins on hard goods are so tight they’re barely manageable to begin with. 30% isn’t much when you have to pay rent, employees, and other expenses associated with keeping the lights on and doors open. The Net Down model makes this impossibly difficult because 30% can quickly become 15% or 0% on a previous model. There’s a reason why smaller on course shops have transitioned the TREMENDOUS majority of their inventory to soft goods. With the current pricing structure, real profits on hard goods requires sales volume that’s higher than most of those kind of shops will ever do.

      And so here we are today…the high volume model is basically dead (we’ve been conditioned to buy last season’s or last month’s leftovers at steep discounts), manufacturers have cut product costs to the bone, and material costs, particularly graphite prepreg continue to rise. It’s not an acceptable solution for shareholders to simply make less money.

      We can talk supply and demand, and what the market will bear, that’s all legitimate, but so is this bottom line…you cannot effectively sell a golf club for pennies above what it costs to produce.

      What may have been lost in all of this is that the sales model of the present is ending. You’re not going to see 6 month release cycles. You won’t see rapid price drops either. Drivers will cost what they cost (I stand by my estimate of +$50 over the current model), and eventually you’ll buy them because as quickly as you realized that if you wait prices will drop, so to will you realize that it’s not going to happen anymore. We’re talking about an entirely different sales model. Golf companies understand they’re going to sell less (volume), and so they’re going to need to sell for more (money).

      We can go back and forth about how I’m wrong…and what I may or may not have considered. You can even go so far as to suggest I have a 5th grade understanding of economics (I promise you I’m at least at 10th grade level). You can give probably suggest a half a dozen way I could have written this article (and basically any other article I’ve written)…and feel free to continue to do that, but let me offer one final point:

      Whatever you think is going to happen. Whatever your reasons for thinking prices will stay the same or drop, sit on them. I should probably tell you that my simplistic chart aside (again just to make the point that everything costs more, not to directly compare the cost of clubs to milk and a rolex), I’m not pulling this stuff out of my backside. In fact much of what’s in this article barely qualifies as my opinion of what’s going to happen. One industry contact floated an idea…and so I bounced it off 3 more. 4 guys…4 different golf companies with 4 unique approaches to the industry. Here’s what they all agree on…

      The pricing structure of the last 20 years is no longer viable, prices must go up.

      You think I’m wrong. You think I’m an idiot for even suggesting it. Hold the thought for now. Mark your calendars…let’s meet up in 2 years to see where we are. If we’re still at $400, or less, by all means feel free to remind my how stupid I am.

      Reply

      Barbajo

      10 years ago

      Well stated Tony. Folks need to remember that making money in manufacturing – or any business, for that matter – isn’t so much a game of volume as it is a game of margin. And smart business folks not only react to changing market conditions, they analyze the market and then figure out what they need to do to keep margins healthy in that changing marketplace.

      And price cutting – while attractive to the consumer – always hurt the bottom line. You can’t cut the price and make it up in volume – especially if the market is telling you that volume is going to decrease…

      Giles

      10 years ago

      Several of those things are true. The golf industry needs to change something about their release schedule and market lines. But you start out with the wrong idea of what inflation is. Coffee does not increase in price because inflation. Inflation is a tool to measure the buying power of a dollar. If it costs more to buy coffee then that is a way to measure inflation.

      Secondly, inflation is not simply the idea that something costs more therefore there must be inflation. Computers and the technology industry has actually lead in many cases to a decrease in cost. You may say, “But a computer costs more than it did 10 years ago.” True, but in economics, if a product increases in quality but the price remains the same or has a small increase in price over a short period of time then it has actually gone down in its “real value”. So if you can buy a computer with an i7 processor this year for $600 and next year you can buy a computer with an 19 processor for $650 the real cost of the computer may have decreased. Or at the very least you are comparing and apple with a watermelon.

      The simple fact is Callaway has lost significant revenue over the past 8 years http://www.statista.com/statistics/200389/revenue-of-callaway-since-2005/. It is likely due to a loss of market share. Increasing the cost of their drivers when the rest of the industry has not increased the cost of their drivers would likely lead to a a greater loss of market share. If they can be more profitable selling fewer drivers than that would be a smart move by Callaway.

      Also, the U.S. has been in one of the lowest inflation periods in history since 2008 and you could easily include 2007 and 2006 without heavily changing the outcome. So it would make sense that there would be little to no change in the cost of hobby based products.

      Lastly, you assume that the driver is where a company turns a profit. For a $3,000 Cannon camera, the current D5, Canon makes between $10-$25. I know this because I have a friend who is a rep. Those numbers may not be precise but they are in the ball park. But if Canon can create bran loyalty they make 100-3000% profit on bags and other stuff. So, if you like a Callaway driver than maybe the brand can create loyalty and get a consumer to play their golf balls, or buy a bag, or golf glove. These items may cost less but have a radically higher profit than the sexier driver.

      Like I said, there are many pieces at play with regards to product pricing, and it becomes more complicated when that product is a product related to a hobby. Here is an example disproving your thesis that a specific market should change due to other economic influences like that dreadful, increasing cup of coffee. In 1998 I purchased my first climbing rope from REI. I can tell you exactly what it was, a New England 10.2 mm 50 m dry rope. It was green. It cost me $240. You can go to REI and buy this rope(http://www.rei.com/product/735478/new-england-equinox-102mm-x-60m-dry-core-rope). My first rope and this rope are nearly identical, except the current model is 60 meters. It costs $100 less 16 years. later. According to your disastrous explanation of the market, economics and inflation this should not be possible. But a cup of coffee increasing in price does not cause inflation leading to a more expensive climbing rope. And New England Rope Company isn’t trying to sell me a $4 ball.

      Giles

      10 years ago

      One more thing, I know from my local pro-shop that there is still nearly a $100 markup on a Titleist 913D2 with a whiteboard shaft. Its what I bought a year ago. My pro could only mark it down from something like $379 to $330 for me because he had to make 10% on the sale. He said Golf Galaxy or a big box store could mark it down much more because they buy their products in bulk and pay a much smaller cost to the manufacture. I know Golf Galaxy had the driver priced @ $365 when I was going to buy. With shaft upgrade it came close to $400. And I know they were making a significant profit. Why would you increase the cost of a driver as a seller when you are making such a large profit per unit. The manufacturer could increase their cost by $10 a unit and there should be no real cost increase passed along to the consumer by the retail outlet. And if the manufacturer increased the cost per unit by $10 this year it would outpace the current inflation rate significantly. But again, I don’t believe the increase in your cup of coffee will impact anything here.

      Shawn

      10 years ago

      Tony,

      I can’t help believe some this problem has it’s roots in club manufactures becoming public traded companies and the constant pressure to keep the stock prices up. I would be curious to see the changes in product cycles when manufactures went public.

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      Shawn – That’s something we’ve discussed here recently. It’s easy to look at TaylorMade and Callaway and point the finger at the profit-hungry nature of publicly traded companies (gotta show returns for investors, right?), but I’m not sure there’s a direct correlation. PING is privately held and is generally regarded as one of the more restrained companies in golf. Titleist, also known for restraint is a division of a publicly traded company. Tour Edge private, Nike public…similar release schedules there.

      I think it’s philosophical more than anything else. Some companies (private or public) are content with steady and often predictable growth, while others are more willing to roll the dice on world domination. The TaylorMade model worked for a while, but it clearly isn’t working anymore. They’ll do something different for sure. Callaway has its own ideas of what can work in today’s reality. Even PING and Titleist will make adjustments (probably a bit more subtle).

      My point is that every company has a model and a strategy, but I’m not wholly convinced it begins with the distinction between private and public.

      ovidiov

      10 years ago

      Few years ago each brand had four-five heads for each driver in order to fit diferent players. Now we have one head that fitts all. It has be told to us that this is better for us, but isn´t that a way to take costs down? you reduce stocks at all levels since you just have to build one type of head…

      Reply

      Jadie Matthew

      10 years ago

      I think I might be more willing to pay a higher price for a club if I knew that the manufacturers wouldn’t be coming out with a newer, improved model in six months. Meanwhile, the club I just paid full price for is now steeply discounted. I suppose improvement is a good thing, but is the new Big Bertha significantly better than the one that just came out a few months back? Is it worth shelling out another $400 (or more) for? Maybe the answer is to learn to love the clubs you have, at least until some significant improvement manifests itself.

      Reply

      Lynn Schultz

      10 years ago

      A perfect example of what has gone wrong with this site. You have become a shill for the the manufacturers. They are still paying 10-15$ per? driver head from china and you expect us to pay them more than $400 for the finished club?!?!! Inflationary price increases only work if the manufacturer is paying more for the product (or at least, reasonable cost/retail margin).
      This was the last straw. You guys have ‘sold out’

      Reply

      Don

      10 years ago

      It is not the production costs as much as it is the cost of the prima donnas to wear/play with the products. And another thing is; in 1996 labour costs to manufacture and assembly golf clubs golf wear was + – 14. bucks per hour. the off shore price per hour was eight cents an hour and the price of equipment and clothes never dropped they just got more expensive. Conclusion, everything is overpriced to start with….don

      Reply

      leftienige

      10 years ago

      While I can see your point , I worked as an assistant in a pro-shop a while ago , and 60-70% mark-up was the norm .
      I don’t know about the rest of the retail world , but I’d guess the Superstores would KILL for a margin like that .

      Reply

      Andrew J

      10 years ago

      Yes. We would.

      Reply

      Dick

      10 years ago

      I read where a reader said he would not buy a computer from the 90’s at today’s prices
      because the computers of today are superior. The computer industry is always improving
      its product making it better and more efficient.
      The golf industry is different where we have a ruling body that always looks very closely
      at equipment and will not allow any improvement that may give a golfer an edge. I would not buy a computer that is not the current state of the art. Why should I want to buy golf equipment that is so controlled—only manufacturers advertising shows why it is so much better than last years offering when it is still the same old stuff……Can you imagine if the golf industry was turned loose with today’s technology ….but the rules of tradition must be upheld.
      I am a designer.

      Dick

      Reply

      Sorry lang

      10 years ago

      No problem raising prices but try and at least wait one year before companies make a club old news in 90 days

      Reply

      Andrew

      10 years ago

      Agree or disagree we can all see this from our own experiences.
      In 1996 my dad got me a set of Ping Eye knockoffs (“Vintage Classics”) for $200 from the local pro-shop. (this was pretty standard back in the day, what a crazy cottage industry! I’d love to read a story about that :) ).
      20 years later you are still close to these price points except to get a set for $200-$300 you just need to wait about 2 years post release.

      Reply

      Andrew

      10 years ago

      Whoa, 2 Andrews replying in the same thread. Yikes. I will start using my last initial.

      Reply

      Andrew / Drew T

      10 years ago

      Sorry, screen auto filled on me ;)

      TSmith

      10 years ago

      I would only say that the new expectations from golf manufactures is that we buy new equipment more often and that won’t happen if prices get higher. Also manufacturing is getting cheaper especially sense they all do most of the work in china.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      Production has been mostly in China for quite a while now, and here’s the thing, China is more costly than ever. Wages have gone up substantially in a short period of time. What was once a major cost savings (labor) doesn’t save what it used to, and everything else has gone up around it.

      Small performance increments aside, there are costs today that didn’t exist 10 years ago. Tips for adjustable drivers, weight ports/cartridges, wrenches, and while you many not realize it, PVD finishes (very expensive) all add to the production costs. Manufacturers have absorbed all of that, but at some point the added expense has to be passed on to the consumer if anybody is going to turn a sustainable profit.

      Reply

      Dave C

      10 years ago

      True – and, when all of the OEMs move in lock-step to increase prices, how long until a class-action lawsuit occurs for price fixing?

      wayne

      10 years ago

      I saw the Taylor made CEO on TV several years ago talking about making golf accessible to every one. How ever if he truly believed that he would keep the prices of his clubs down so anyone can afford them. As it is now they are quite expensive the average person that he said he wanted to play golf cant afford TM clubs or any clubs for that matter. Lets make clubs affordable to everyone and increase peoples access to golf.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      The TaylorMade strategy is part of the reason why club prices have been stagnant as long as they have. It has to change. EVERYONE I’ve spoken to on the manufacturing side has told me the current price structures are no longer realistic. TaylorMade has a new CEO now and the marketplace is very different.

      Reply

      Derek

      10 years ago

      Andrew

      LMFAO!! Pls. You’re looking at it from a domestic US perspective. I can tell you the reach and volume achieved from a WW perspective is UP UP UP!

      Industry is down? Really? I swear I’m seeing a lot of new distributors and retail stores popping up here in Asia. When I was in France last year I swore I saw Wilson and TM sticks flying off the shelves.

      You say unit sales are down. Come to china.

      Reply

      Andrew J

      10 years ago

      Not talking about China, or a world wide perspective, speaking to it from a US stand point. That’s all I’m worried about. I don’t care about china, my job isn’t in china.

      From a US standpoint, yes, the industry is down.

      Reply

      ric

      9 years ago

      Golf club manufacturers are and always have ripped the public off especially in the UK from what i see.they are all the same spin you a load of bollocks.They make the heads in China or Japan and the shafts ship them over here and charge what the hell they like.A modern day bunch of highway men,robbing bastards

      Reply

      Gerson Matter

      10 years ago

      It sounds a little bit obvious… a similar analysis could be done with the videogame industry, where the console price tag didn’t change very much on the past 20 years, with some price drops on the high end consoles (do you remember the NEOGEO price?).

      But, I have some questions:

      Where those drives were manufactured 20 years ago?

      How about the profit margin 20 years ago?

      How many units were sold per model?

      I do not know if they are really cheap… there is a lot of things that have changed on the last 20 years…

      Reply

      Lee

      10 years ago

      There is a few parts missing from the article to get to the true heart of the issue. In order to do that this would be a very long comment so I’ll make it brief. Look at what has happen to the vast majority of wages for the large percentage of golfers, stayed flat or decreased over this time. Manufacturers have increased thier marketing costs greatly with product endorsements. Costs have increased because conterfeit products because of the manfacturing location. They may have saved when they moved production but now what is the cost to combat counterfeit products. For 1-5% of golfers (much higher income than the rest) a $160 increase on a driver or set of irons is nothing. They have their sources private club or otherwise to reduce that increase if they really worry about the cost of clubs anyway. Remember it’s not the majority of golfers that it impacts not the upper side. So as this market ages, with kids to support, college costs, aging parents to assist, a 25% increase on a driver that will drop in price 60% next year why buy in the current year. The product cycle is to short to maintain the current price level as the market shows. They start to sell when the price drops becuase the supply is greater than the demand at the price point.

      Reply

      Barbajo

      10 years ago

      Some tidbits on price cutting and price increases….prefaced with the statement that I have no clue what the wholesale or retail margins are on drivers, irons or anything golf-related. This is just math…

      Let’s say the gross profit margin on a particular item is, say, 50% – meaning your margin is 50% of your selling price (sell it for $200, the gross profit would be $100). And let’s say you cut the selling price 15% (new selling price is now $170). Your gross profit dollars would only be $70 and your margin would be about 41% – which, depending on fixed and variable overhead, could mean the difference between profit and loss.

      But the real kicker is this – if the price cut is designed to increase sales volume (cut the price, make it up in volume), sales volume would have to jump 43% just to get back to where you were in terms of profit dollars. In simple terms, you’d have to produce and distribute 43% more product, and most importantly, you’d have to find 43% more customers. That means increases in marketing and advertising costs to drum up those customers. And you have to hope the other guy doesn’t have a pencil so he can cut his prices. And this is just to get you back to where you were before you cut the price. And the narrower the margins, the more you’d have to increase volume just to stay even. For instance, at a 20% margin – if you cut price 10% you’d have to double your sales volume just to stay where you were.

      Presuming the same 50% Gross Margin, a 15% price INCREASE ($230 instead of $200) would certainly drive off some potential buyers, but you could withstand a 23% loss of sales while not losing a dime in actual profit dollars. The question CEO’s would need to ask is, will I lose nearly one-quarter of my customers if my prices go up 15%? And the narrower the margins, the more volume you could stand to lose and still stay where you are in terms of profit dollars. At a 20% margin and a 10% price increase, you could stand to lose one-third of your sales volume and remain whole in terms of gross profit dollars.

      As T suggests, if the manufacturers are forecasting drops in overall volume – some tough decisions are going to have to be made. Price increases, along with some corporate belt-tightening, seem inevitable. That is, unless you have more money to lose than everybody else. Then you can price cut and force your competition – which doesn’t have as much money to lose – to do the same, and then drive them out of business. Hmmmm…..

      Reply

      George

      10 years ago

      Pricing is only relative to demand.With the current environment in golf it will be interesting as to how long a price increase will stick…..not long !
      The “big machine” shops are beholden to another master…MOVEMENT

      Reply

      Sprout

      10 years ago

      Every time I go into a golf store and hit one of the new drivers I ask myself, “does this driver hit the ball $400 more than my 2005 Cleveland Launcher 460?” and every time the answer is “no.”

      The only purchase that is justified from my 10 year old set is irons and wedges that conform to the new groove rules. And when you look at specs, if you take into account loft and length, matching my 44* 9-iron against the new 45* pitching wedge, the gains are negligible.

      OEMs may increase their prices, but more people will be like me and upgrade less often. This bodes well for 2-3-year cycle guys like Titleist and Ping; and poorly for 6-month cycle guys like Callaway and Taylormade.

      Reply

      kloyd0306

      10 years ago

      May I suggest that MarkB be invited to write your next editorial on this or similar subjects?

      Reply

      RAT

      10 years ago

      400 bucks is too high. I don’t remember any driver being this high in 1997 sorry but golf is a luxury, not milk or gas .. I don’t care how high they go ,I’m done with buying new drivers . Mine still hits as well as any today (ZL Cobra).

      Reply

      Tom

      10 years ago

      Problem with this analysis is technology. A gallon of gas (litre of petrol) is the same as it was. Hit your 97 Titelist against today’s, run your computer against your 97 computer against today’s, see how it goes? Would you pay the same today (lets say $2000) for your 1997 computer. You’re not comparing like with like.

      Despite what the OEMs say I’d be interesting to see what their margin per unit is. I’d actually be surprised, given how often they release clubs, if they didn’t just account for new sales but also on the discount model. Also you have to differentiate between OEMs and vendors, I don’t know but do the OEMs get 100% of their money by selling to golf retailers, or do they get a % depending on how many the retailer sells, this is a key question.

      What the new release every 6 months does is it gives them the opportunity to engage in price differentiation. The analogy is with flying a plane, the plane gets you from A to B, but if you pay more (Business Class) you get a little extra (the brand new club) but if you pay less you get more or less the same service (Coach Class ticket, or a driver which is perfectly serviceable but not the latest and greatest), and a properly run business accounts for both income streams, the newly released and the discounted model.

      Reply

      Andrew

      10 years ago

      Tom, OEM’s do not get paid a percentage of what the retails sell. I know this for a fact.

      Reply

      Tom

      10 years ago

      Thanks Andrew

      Drew

      10 years ago

      There are simply too few dollars chasing too many goods in the current economy. The middle class is being squeezed in so many ways to make ends meet. Folks are now debating the benefits of a college education because of soaring costs.

      Salary increases are simply being outpaced by increases in most basic necessities. As for the cost golf equipment…there is no room for increases. They will remain constant and we will see more and more coupon deals to persuade some to buy the latest toy. Because quite frankly, it’s not uncommon to see weekenders playing with 4 and 5 year old drivers…and much older irons. Reminds me of why best Buy is hurting…3D televisions flopped because the leap from HD to 3D was far less impressive than from from analogue to HD. So guess what? People are quite happy holding on to their 6 year old flat screens. The picture is crisp, colors are nice, there is no resale value…why upgrade? Same with golf equipment, move around some weights, make it longer, lighter blah blah blah…at the end of the day the consumer won’t be fooled.

      Reply

      Derek

      10 years ago

      Although price per unit has not increased in general in your comparison, it doesn’t point to the fact that VOLUME trumps UNIT MARGIN in most cases.

      The sooner the OEMs raise their prices, the swifter their death will follow.

      Reply

      Andrew

      10 years ago

      Wait a minute, you think volume (unit sales) is up? Lmfao!! Funniest thing I have read all day.

      No, same store (comp) units sales are not up. The industry is down in every metric there is except margin, those have stood steady. Retails are asking OEM’s to fund the markdowns that are being taken currently to move the overstocks mentioned in every article about the DSG layoffs.

      Reply

      Andrew

      10 years ago

      If you think the retailers are asking the OEMs for new product that will read in figure the market, you’re absolutely dead wrong. Tailor-made started the trend with the SLDR last year of breaking cycle and bring something in that was new before Q1. They had to make their year financially, and SLDR are was what they needed to do it with.

      By launching a new product, and a new technology, they force retailers to Biane, and flood the market with the new product. Mind you the proper markdown cadence had not been followed on the previous product, the R11 to make room for the SLDR. Retail companies had a hard time coming up with the dollars to spend during the launch because it was out of the normal cycle.

      The concept worked very well, and now retailers have been hit up for product launches starting in August by at least one OEM.

      When you ask the sales reps what is working, they give the typical canned answer of the newest technology. But when you ask them what a certain retailer is selling, the answer that they use is discounted goods from prior generations.

      Reply

      michael L.

      10 years ago

      You never took into account the average income of Americans. It remains relatively the same from 2000 yet inflation continues to rise. I would say golf equipment is getting more expensive.

      Reply

      Tom

      10 years ago

      Does the ‘average’ American buy golf clubs though? Look at income increase for the top 30% of income earners and it has gone up. Golf is a niche sport, look at who plays it, and who buys the gear!

      Reply

      michael L.

      10 years ago

      True, but how do you expect to grow the game if it’s only affordable to the top 30%? This article was created specifically because of the decline of golf in America.

      Tom

      10 years ago

      But the nature of golf is such that is inaccessible for a vast proportion of society. I’d say that’s just the nature of things. The problem with declining real income in the States (I’m in Australia) is the problem of wider society rather than the problem of golf (well I see it as a problem, some may not).

      Super Tuna

      10 years ago

      “Simply put, when you don’t bring in enough money there are consequences.”

      Sorry, just to skip back to this for a second Tony.

      Yes, there are and sadly said consequences aren’t what they should be. Because what should be happening is that the share holders should be selling off and relocating their money elsewhere if the returns are not enough for their taste.

      Everyone is entitled to reasonable profit for their efforts. Some of the publically traded companies both on the OEM and retail side have lost sight of what reasonable is (and before someone goes all crazy, that is a not a statement of capitalism is dumb. It’s a statement of industry sustainment).

      Yeah, Mr King started the discount ball rolling by bringing in the volume selling scheme but I have no doubts that he had to present it to the shareholders/board first which had them licking their lips at the potential return.

      Then again, it’s not like private companies are immune either. Ping brought in a product margins expert and all of a sudden we have 18 month life cycles instead of 24 with all of them on a rotating schedule so that something new is always on the way and fans of the brand always have something to look forward to. It’s smart, don’t get me wrong. And it’s, in my opinion, a better model then the flood, slash and dump we see a lot of now but it’s a definite pie grab move as well.

      We’ll see. I’m curious whether Callaway is going to call the sales of the BB Alpha (on it’s own, none of this joining the numbers with the standard BB) outside of the recent $100 price slash a success or not. If not, I’m curious who will be next to try the higher priced driver litmus test.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      Tuna – I think the new PING model is the best of breed solution right now. It’s predictable, manageable at retail, and it keeps fresh product on the shelves without flooding the channel.

      It doesn’t hurt that PING does a better job than most at differentiating their products either.

      As for who will be next to take a stab at a $500 driver…my gut tells me Callaway is going to take another shot. My hunch is that they thought there was enough differentiation between Alpha and Bertha proper to justify the extra cost. Maybe there is, but the timing wasn’t right, and I think they over-estimated demand (which is part of the reason why they changed course and cut prices). All indications I have are that they want to have a true premium offering…a luxury driver. They’ll take another stab at again…probably next spring. I’m all but certain of it.

      Reply

      Ryan

      10 years ago

      If equipment goes up I can’t see that helping bring new golfers into the game, which is what the game needs to survive. I have never bought any golf equipment from a box store or golf shop and never plan to. Hopefully OEMs will someday cut out the middle man and sell direct to the customer.

      Reply

      Randy

      10 years ago

      The article is lacking major factors. It is incomplete and of little value in the times we live in. What is missing is the US current economy and it’s history, as well as the world economic climate. From the early 80’s through the tech decline around 2000, EVERYTHING was way over inflated and as tech stocks corrected so did real estate, etc. The average consumer was much flusher prior to the correction. The US and the World economies have been going through a very challenging period in the past few years, and still is. The DOW, job numbers, etc don’t accurately reflect today’s challenges. Golf is a disposable income hobby for many, like boating, etc. The middle class made up a huge percent of club members, and public golfers. As in boating, the middle class has much less disposable income, and is getting smaller every day. The rich still have their country clubs and yachts. The lower income members still have their outboard fishing boats and public courses. The looser is what used to be the largest group, the middle class! A correction is happening, country clubs chopping fee’s and closing, more courses for sale than ever, more courses going broke, tv viewing at recent lows by a large factor. Interesting that 32 million watched a ESPN showing of an Gamer Tournament. An entire year of viewing on all networks are down double digits and shrinking. What the article is missing the the economic state of our world. Dicks laid off 500 PGA pro’s and GG fired most of the corporate staff ( regional managers, etc.). It is harder to save money now more than ever ( except during the depression) for those who have work. Price increases will take golf to an all time low, it they happen. I play a lot at many courses, I notice VERY little new equipment. Nothing is selling now, nothing, except marked down and sale items. Even those sales are down. Until the job markets improve dramatically, the world stabilizes ( wars and hot spots equals higher fuel pricing), our elected officials on both sides actually start doing the jobs, real estate bounces back, college education and trade school costs get addressed, and on and on, luxury deposable income, time sucking hobbies like golf and boating ( yes I am a boat owner) will continue to suffer. Callaway’s Apex irons may be great, but at over $1000.00 it’s a top 1% item as is their BB Alpha. I have seen neither in a bag on a public links yet. Again current and higher prices could impact the game we love in a way it may never rebound for the average guy. The OEM to figure this out, cut the fat in their company and shop/ order supplies smartly and use other Best Practices to produce quality products at LOWER pricing will be winner for the long haul, and maybe set a trend that could save golf. If not golf will continue its downward trend and return to a rich mans game.

      Reply

      Andrew

      10 years ago

      NGF data shows that 58% of consumers are waiting for a price drop when it comes to drivers alone before they pull out their credit cards. We KNOW their margins are long, and it’s obvious by the amount of marketing done. Hiring a private jet to fly reporters to a product launch. Buying a tank for PGA Show. Come on, who are you kidding?

      Reply

      Juan Ayala

      10 years ago

      Overly simplistic and I sort of agree with your point but before we feel sorry for these companies. You have to keep in mind that thanks to new technologies, moving production overseas and overall competition has lower the cost to produce these new clubs. I don’t see a price increase any time soon because I see more companies selling direct to consumers like Hopkins

      Reply

      markb

      10 years ago

      An interesting article, but you don’t need to worry about the price of your drivers going up any time soon. Golf equipment prices aren’t adjusted for inflation or cost of living increases. The market ultimately decides what it will or won’t pay for a new product based on the product’s perceived competitive advantage.

      In economics theory there are many different pricing models a company can use to price its goods. Some are desirable for the seller, some are not, but often the seller doesn’t get to choose what model it will implement. Often the state of the marketplace and the competition do the choosing for it. For example, the “commodity pricing” model is often seen with cheap goods that are found in great abundance — rice, beans, salt etc. Commodity prices are basically capped by abundant supply (or even government regulation) and profit margins are low.

      Then you have “contract pricing”, “discount pricing”, “luxury goods pricing”, “cost-plus pricing”, “competitive pricing”, and “value pricing” to name just a few more models. I won’t explain them all, but you can probably see that with competitive pricing, your price is determined by what your competition is already charging. This is seen in the golf marketplace a lot. No one has yet figured out a way to charge more for ProV1 than Titleist can.

      “Value pricing” is the one all golf manufacturers would like to use. In value pricing, you charge whatever the market will bear and you try to convince your customer that your product is worth mortgaging their houses to get. This is what Callaway managed to do with the original Big Bertha, thereby revolutionizing the golf industry. For the first time someone was able to get $400 for a driver in huge numbers. The BB was so hot, and it was perceived to be so superior to everything else, that everyone had to have one at any price.

      Tony is right to move his timeline of prices back to include the Big Bertha, but if he should have looked just a little farther back still, because the BB caused an anomalous paradigm shift. Pre-BB, premium metal drivers only cost about $150 or less.

      In any event, this history lesson doesn’t really matter now because in this current lousy golf economy with ever-shrinking demand, driver prices will have a hard time even holding the line. Driver MSRP’s are mere fictions promulgated to maintain the illusion that value priciing is still in play. Manufacturers are trying to tout their new pseudo-tech and new paint jobs as if they are evidence of true paradigm shifts, but the marketplace isn’t much fooled. To paraphrase the Who, we all know that the new boss is pretty much the same as the old boss.

      In the sales trenches, we can see that steep discounts are occurring rapidly after, if not simultaneously to, new product releases. Products launch, fail, and are replaced in MONTHS, not years. Overstock is EVERYWHERE and the abundant competition caps what any one manufacturer can charge for its variant of sliding weights or adjustable hosels. In this current marketplace the question is not “should prices go up?”, it is “how rapidly will they continue to fall?”

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      Great comments Mark, but in any economic model there’s a bottom line price. You can’t sell a product for more than it costs to produce (unless you can offset it with substantially higher margin offerings), and you realistically can’t sell for less than it takes to maintain your corporate infrastructure.

      Simply put, when you don’t bring in enough money there are consequences.

      We see that happening with Dick’s, and we’re unfortunately going to see that trickle down to some of the golf companies very soon as well.

      Supply exceeds demand right now, and when you can’t increase demand (it’s not possible in golf right now) the only real alternative is to decrease supply. That, I believe is the next step. Fewer releases, or certainly less units produced with each release. The trickle down will be fewer if any closeouts, discounts, etc..

      While sales are down, the big issue with the current retail model isn’t that golfers aren’t buying anything, they’re not buying anything at full price. The desire to put something new in the bag still exists, it will always exist, so if equipment companies can limit excess, there will be room to raise prices, which isn’t wholly unreasonable.

      PING and to an extent Callaway have already moved to higher initial price points. It’s in everyone else’s best interest to follow.

      A limited supply should trickle down to eBay as well. I believe much of what’s out there is the direct result of the reliance on Net Down. Authorized retailers have been forced to take on too much inventory that they know they can’t sell at MAP, so they dump it on eBay. With decreased and manageable supply they’ll be more incentive and profit in selling from the shelf…at least until the direct to consumer model puts everybody out of business.

      The Pro V1 is an anomaly in nearly any industry. It’s fascinating. At one time or another nearly every manufacturer has tried to undercut pricing on the Pro V1. They believe their ball is just as good if not better, and so the thinking was that if they priced it $5 or so below the Pro V1, golfers would leap at the chance to save on an equivalent ‘tour’ ball.

      What’s happened time and time again is that the consumer has taken that $5 difference as an indicator that the ball isn’t as good as the ProV1. Why get an inferior product for just $5 less right? At the same time, because the Pro V1 is so generally regarded as THE best, there’s no way sell a competing product for $5 more. Why would I pay more to get less than the best?

      The Pro V1 is the safest bet in golf right now, and baring some undeniable innovation, or a colossal screw up by Titleist (won’t happen) it’s not going to change in any of our lifetimes.

      Reply

      Andy W

      10 years ago

      “Simply put, when you don’t bring in enough money there are consequences.” Tony C

      Could not agree more, well, then again maybe NOT anymore. I keep looking for consequences for our $18 trillion debt and climbing, and so far, I see NONE. Do you? Since world order appears to be changing, the retail model may be changing. Maybe TM thinking is even with losing money, it creates market share thus eliminating competition; and paydays coming later after thier debt is forgiven! Maybe it’s the new world order?

      barbajo

      10 years ago

      Price is perceived as an indicator of quality, no doubt. It’s illogical to think that any ball could be better than the ProV1 and be less expensive at the same time. It does not compute. Not saying that other balls out there aren’t as good, or -in reality – better, but price makes a statement, and high price makes a positive statement and low price makes a negative one.

      I think Wilson has this problem – they have some great clubs, but because they’re priced well below the Callaways, Taylormades and Titleists, people have a hard time as viewing them in the same league, even if they belong.

      As far as the discounting culture for clubs goes – I still think the tail is wagging the dog here. The big box retail model, and their need for quarterly profits combined with a lowly paid, ill-equipped sales staff, got the merry go-round started. Cally, TMag and the rest are relying on the sales team at Dicks and GG to “sell” their high end stuff. More often than not, these guys are order-takers and couldn’t effectively sell one high priced driver vs. another. They rely on the OEM marketing and pre-season buzz to drive demand, but when that dries up and store traffic slows down, they need something in the next quarter to get more bodies in the store looking to buy.

      When the single largest purchaser of your products tells you sales have slowed down and we need something new to sell at full price, the pressure on the manufacturer to react is very strong.

      Bottom line is that the OEM’s are relying on the lowest paid and – from a sales skill standpoint – least qualified – people to sell their products.

      markb

      10 years ago

      I’m in complete agreement with all you said, so we aren’t even arguing. A reduction in supply has to occur or prices will fall because demand is not growing. Golf has its own challenging pipeline to market and Net down is primary symptom of disfunction in that pipeline. The pipeline formerly had a big wide funnel at the front end (Dick’s etc.) into which the mannies could jam product mercilessly. But the flow hasn’t been coming out the narrow nozzle at the front end. Ebay is not important to the mannies at the front of pipeline because they were jamming crap into the funnel.

      But Ebay is a very good barometer of a product’s ultimate desirability. Net down policies and overstock have produced a FLOOD of TMag, Nike and Callaway product available on the ‘bay. This is stuff that has fallen off the sides of the funnel, or been rejected after it squirted out the nozzle. It is cheap, cheap, cheap and it’s not fakes. At the same time there has been less available from Ping and Titleist, and very little Mizuno. Not surprisingly, prices hold much more for the latter companies than the former and the latter are not net down addicts.

      When we speculate on future supply shrinkage, I think we agree that we’ll see it in several ways. Mannies will first pare down their stables to proven winners or reliable workhorses. My favorite putter just got dropped by Ping. Why? No one knows, but it may just have been a marginal product for them.

      They will also belt tighten through lay-offs, consolidations, and mergers. Some will go belly up and that may be very soon. In the mean time they all will continue to look and hope for that next paradigm-shifting innovation, the next Big Bertha, or Eye2, or Pittsburgh Persimmon game changer. These game changers do happen and when they happen they are HUGELY profitable. Everyone wants to have one.

      In fact, one has happened in just the past year or two. Can you guess it? Of course you can — just check your putter grip. It’s holding a SuperStroke.

      Jondagcl

      10 years ago

      A very insightful exchange here Tony and Mark. I always appreciate the perspectives you both share.

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      SuperStroke is perhaps the best story in the golf industry over the last 5 years. We were just talking about them the other day. It’s a $20+ golf grip (face value that’s absurd), and yet it’s basically redefined the market. In any foursome you’ll probably find at least 2 guys with them, by next year it will be 3, and nobody bats an eye at the cost.

      Why?

      Differentiation.

      Until manufacturers figure out how to differentiate one of their own drivers from the next…and then that one from everybody else’s, the decline will continue.

      And you’re dead right about eBay too. When the consumer dictates price you really see what’s going on. Used clubs from PING and Titleist are selling more than shrinkwrapped clubs from TaylorMade and Callaway. And you’re dead right about the counterfeit situation too. Manufacturers want you to believe most of that low cost stuff is fake, but the reality is the majority is now legit stuff that retail shops can’t unload any other way.

      Half of the industry is undercutting itself. It’s positively bonkers.

      markb

      10 years ago

      Wonderful differentiation with a white grip and black letters so we could identify what that funky thing was that Jason and Phil were holding on TV.. But it’s differentiation combined with the perception that the things actually work!

      Same explanation for the ProV1. It is the best ball in golf, no question, and so it can command the highest price. It’s superiority and profitability permits Titleist to be staid and lacking in innovation in other respects. Other balls may be “as good” and if they’re cheaper, I’ll buy them. But if I find a good ProV1 in a pond, I’m going to fish it out, clean it off and play it.

      Dave S

      10 years ago

      One thing I don’t understand is the mindset that your driver – or other club – won’t become “obsolete” if OEMs stop producing so many new products. This is all in the consumers head. The fact that the decline in the golf equip. sales is going to drive down version turnover and extend product lifecycles has nothing to do with the quality of the product you bought. If product lifecycles increase, that just means the OEMs are holding back on R&D and instead of, say, 6 drivers with minor tech advances over two years, there will be just one or two big improvements. That driver you have will still be incrementially outdated compared to technology the OEMs COULD go to market with, but it will seem like it’s not, since they’ll be waiting to drop larger products on us.

      Reply

      Rex

      10 years ago

      Unfortunately, this article just seems to orbit around the primary factors that have led to the sales declines in equipment. The economic cost of goods means very little here as golfers will pay out the nose for true performance benefits. What does matter is 1) the margin of difference in the typical cost of a cascade unit (i.e.,year old new driver @ $199) and it’s progeny, now typically at $399, 2) The diminished or non-existent performance benefits (level of innovation) across all three products being tested (including the driver currently in the bag); and 3) empowering consumers with the ubiquitous means to vet the performance of each product on a launch monitor….what a huge headache this last factor has become for manufacturers and retailers.

      At the moment of truth, consumers are finding that the only real benefit of the $399 offering is typically that it is unblemished and bundled with innovator status…. while the $199 offering is unblemished and bundled with high value status (“you paid $399….I paid $199,,,you chump”).

      In the end (at the moment of truth), more consumers are simply deferring pulling the trigger based on their own internal calculus. In short, the value proposition of new and to a lesser extent, cascaded equipment, is in atrophy….and so are sales.

      Reply

      Rob Samson

      10 years ago

      The remember buying the r7 for $400. I thought it was pretty expensive at the time and I liked having the weight kit that came out months later. But along came the iMix FT5. I hate using the meme “game changer” but that’s how it felt. Callaway did something pretty cool when they started selling the heads separate from the shafts. I believe the heads were $300 with a number of shaft selections priced at $100-$200 .. but I couldn’t just have one shaft, I think I bought 6. I really liked this idea back then… being able to buy the head and shafts separate. All together I think I spend well over a thousand on the iMix. I didn’t think much of it at the time and didn’t realize I had spent that much on one driver. Actually, this article jogged my memory into remembering that how much I spent. …

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      It’s funny how we remember things, isn’t it? My first big boy driver purchase was a Titleist 905T. I bought it only weeks after it came out, and I remember it being $300 (I’m guessing that’s what I told my wife). In reality, it was $400.

      The FT-5…that one launched with a street price of $430.

      Ain’t that something?

      Reply

      Jason

      10 years ago

      While the pricing of golf equipment might have remained relatively stagnant, the average cost of green fees has not. So equipment manufacturers have to reconcile their costs with the total cost to play the game (green fees, balls etc.), combined with an apparent decrease pool of participants. Less disposable income, increased costs to play means equipment manufacturers don’t have the luxury of charging more for equipment without comprimising the volume of sales. I guarentee they have piles of stats about the impact of price increases on uptake of new equipment.
      Also golf equipment has traditionally had some of the highest costs of R&D in comparison to other sports, which is a greater driver to the cost then raw materials/production cost. Especially now that technology is more accessible and sites such as this can measure incremental improvements between new vs. old(er). You can’t make unsubstantiated claims and it costs huge dollars to find small % gains within the rules set by the PGA etc. Profit margins aren’t great, so you either focus on the volume play or the longer product cycle.

      Reply

      Adam Fonseca

      10 years ago

      Interesting article Tony. I have a couple questions:

      1) Forgive my ignorance when it comes to economic philosophy, but I suspect that $400 is still $400 to the customer, regardless of the year in which that money is spent. While the value of that price has gone down over the years for the OEM (as you and others have pointed out), the street price amount is still the same to the consumer, who likely believes the club is too expensive. Why would an OEM want to charge more in that case?

      2) In your opinion, how much influence do the OEM’s rapid production timelines have on setting the MSRP for new equipment? Would you agree they are hurting themselves in many cases?

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      Absolutely $400 is $400. It’s a lot of money. But $400 is also still less than $500 regardless of the year it’s spent. None of us like the number. We think it’s expensive, but the point is that $400 is actually less today than it was 20 years ago…you know…even if it’s still $400.

      The silly part is that many misremember (thank’s Roger) that golf clubs were substantially cheaper 5, 10, or 20 years ago. They weren’t.

      As to why…it’s not a case of want, it’s a case of need. Prices have been frozen too long, and it’s caught up with them. As Barbajo points out in his comments, while manufacturers have cut costs in areas where they can (and have taken increasingly deeper cuts out of the middlemen to maintain their profits), there are plenty of associated costs outside the scope of what the industry can control. The cost of nearly everything associated with designing, producing, shipping, storing, and selling golf clubs has increased while the retail price hasn’t. Even if you start with great margins, over time, it eventually becomes unsustainable.

      The rapid production model, I believe, simply delayed this inevitability. It’s definitely part of the reason why costs stayed down. If you look at the industry, you see competing business models that serve the same bottom line goal. You can release often and discount nearly as often if you can sell twice as many drivers (the TaylorMade model), or you release every couple of years, maintain price, and still end up with the same amount of money in your pocket…maybe even more because your design and tooling costs are less. The first way gives you marketshare (we’re #1), the second way gives you high margins and steady profits. Essentially you trade market share for actual money.

      It worked for a while…TaylorMade was positively flush for the better part of a decade, but often overlooked is the fact that Titleist and PING also did very well under what sure as hell looks like a more sustainable model.

      We too are part of the problem. We already think equipment is too expensive, and we definitely don’t want to pay more for it (even if no one has asked us to for 20 years). It’s crazy, right…

      We bitch about cheap made-for shafts, but we’re not willing to pay extra for perceived better ones.
      We hate that everything is mass produced in China, but we’re not willing to pay to have it manufactured at home.
      We hate that our clubs might get to us 1°+ out of spec, but we’re not willing to absorb the cost for tighter tolerances.
      We want more, and better, and we’re not willing to spend a dime more to get it.

      It’s unrealistic thinking, just like the notion that drivers can stay $400 forever.

      Reply

      mnfats95

      10 years ago

      Easy fix, release a new driver every 2 years and the price won’t drop so much and you can make higher margin. You also might actually be able to show noticeable changes between models.

      It would also ease the stress of buying a new driver since you won’t have 300 choices and worry that you bought the wrong one.

      I would be willing to bet that the people that buy a new one every year (like me) would still do it, we would just move between brands more as the brand we just bought last year might not have a new driver out yet.

      It might lower the total sales of a particular few OEM’s but overall I’ll bet the same amount of clubs still get purchased.

      Of course this is an uninformed and uneducated opinion, but like most things I’ve been wrong about in the past it makes sense in my head.

      Reply

      Sharpstik

      10 years ago

      This logic is BS.
      Frankly, manufacturing costs have gone down as technology has improved. In addition, if one understands the time continuum regarding the path from unique products to commodities, one knows that profit margins get degraded unless new inventions and technologies emerge that warrant price premiums. Thus you see the TaylorMade constant iterations in an attempt to stay ahead of the clones and other competitors.
      You likely fail to identify the rediculous margins that were made 15 years ago, and also fail to see the wasted costs in the market and distribution system and well as in R&D that are being eliminated with new techniques and technology.
      Like most product niches, there is a limit to what the mass market will bear in terms of pricing.
      Driver prices do not exist in a vacuum. They exist in a global market full of products and ideas. It only takes a few pieces of that market to constrain prices.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      *Some* manufacturing costs have gone down. Some manufacturing costs continue to rise. Talk to anybody about the cost of graphite prepreg for example. We hate low cost “made for” shafts. We don’t want to pay for real quality.

      Companies have saved through process improvements, and to an extent cutting the profits of the middle man (retail).

      Let’s assume you’re correct (and you probably are). Let’s say that 15 years ago there were tremendous margins (guys could actually make a living selling clubs), and plenty of waste. 15 years later that’s all caught up with us. We’ve reached the break-even or below point. I gave you the inflation adjusted price…and I’m not saying that’s what the cost actually should be (at face value just south of $700 is absurd), or will be, but time and the economy has finally caught up with the golf industry, and prices absolutely must increase…and they will.

      Reply

      barbajo

      10 years ago

      Not sure where the idea that manufacturing costs have come down really comes from. Sure, production technology improves, but there are costs to developing and acquiring that technology, as well as basic capital improvements to any ongoing manufacturing concern. Those costs don’t go away.

      In addition, transportation costs aren’t going down, the costs of warehousing, maintaining inventory, utilities, health care, etc don’t go down, regardless of the health of the economy. Heck, you gotta put stuff in a truck to get it where it needs to be – gas costs what it costs, y’know? And the driver needs to be paid, and the truck needs to be maintained — all costs that don’t go down. And every employee in the chain gets salary adjustments along the way – whether its the CEO or the guys in the warehouse.

      So even if the margins were huge back in the 90’s…if they aren’t today, pricing has to change. I work for a manufacturer in the construction industry, and we’re always looking at ways to streamline production, increase efficiency and control costs – not so we can drop the price of our products, but so that we can stay competitive and maintain a healthy margin and remain a going concern.

      MrSinister

      10 years ago

      I do see where a price increase would be the logical next step, but I cant agree with it. There is no reason a Driver at this point should cost $400 unless that puppy is made of gold lol If you look at Geek Golf or myself or even some other smaller companies. We are able to release Top quality products at a fraction of the price. Geek just unveiled Floyd the driver which I believe is an amazing design for the low price of $129 a head. I’m gonna assume he doesn’t order from the foundry in the hundreds of thousands like the majors so I will also assume he pays more per head than they do as do I, so if he can make a good living with high quality products at a fraction of the price of a major then there is no reason for $400 plus off the rack drivers. Now I understand they are Majors and have some extra cost then we do but still there is a point where greed plays a part. Also I don’t speak for Steve I just used his driver as an example because it was the most recently released driver I could think of.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      It’s all about the size of the machine. You and Steve…your machines are small and agile. You can power them (almost) for $129 a head.

      Big guys come with big R&D and engineering teams. Finance, HR, and accounting. Product teams for every category, VPs of everything, and of course PR and Marketing. Bigger machines require more maintenance, and more maintenance requires more money.

      Contrary to what many want to believe, the golf companies won’t sacrifice quality. One poor product can put a company out of business. The cuts have to come elsewhere, and the Dick’s situation signals the start of what’s going to be a near-industry wide downsizing along with a re-calibration of the current price structure.

      Reply

      Dan

      10 years ago

      Tony,
      When you say the golf companies won’t sacrifice quality are you just talking about the Major OEM’s or all companies such as GEEK, SMT and the other smaller companies. I believe Steve Almo makes sure that his driver heads are of the highest quality he can get and still sells them at a very reasonable price. Is it because his overhead isn’t as large as say TM or Callyway so, he can do this?

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      Obviously I can’t speak to how every golf company does business, but when you’re at the level of TMaG, Callaway, Titleist, etc., one bad product from a quality standpoint can all but end you. Golfers have long memories.

      I don’t think Steve Almo is the type of guy to cut quality either.

      To the meat of your question, yes…those guys can usually sell for a bit less because they have substantially less overhead. Worth a mention, most of them don’t actually sell for less. Wishon, Krank…they’re competing, at, near, or well above the standard OEM asking price. The trade off is that they don’t produce at the same volume so on a comparative basis, their per unit cost is higher.

      Bottom line, companies will cut wherever they can, but not on the overall quality of the product.

      Sure…we can bicker about what it costs to produce a ‘cheap made for’ shaft. Yes…it costs less than true aftermarket alternatives, but most golfers will never see a real any appreciable difference and part of the reason for the switch to .350 tips was actually to improve durability.

      golfer4life

      10 years ago

      Not for nothing but Titleist drivers were $299 in 97 I believe. Golf equipment just followed the golf trend that was happening at the time. Problem is that when the economy was good and there were a lot of new golfers, they could get those prices. The fact that they way over charged then is costing them now, as the business and economy have both declined.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      golfer4life, I couldn’t believe it either. All the info I found suggested MSRP of $500 and MAP (street) price of $400 for the Titleist 975D. I remember it being less…and so I checked in directly with Titleist. They confirmed that retail was in fact $400 at the time of release.

      Almost mind-blowing, isn’t it?

      Reply

      Christopher

      10 years ago

      It was £299 in the UK.

      barbajo

      10 years ago

      Interesting article. Whenever costs increase (and the cost of producing in China is NOT as low as it was 5-to-10 years ago) and selling prices don’t, that reduces gross margin, which means one of two things – overhead costs (advertising/promotion/R&D, etc) have to be trimmed (and that certainly isn’t happening) or net profit goes down. And the notion that increased volume will lead to a reduction in production costs is mostly a myth – you may be able to get better deals on raw materials, but you still have to invest in increasing productivity – more machinery, manpower, warehouse space, inventory costs, shipping, etc.

      So you have cost/revenue pressures on one side, and competitive pressure (selling price) on the other. While Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” of the market does play a role, I’m not convinced there’s a “what the market will bear” price. If a $500 driver is worth it to someone, they’ll buy it. The challenge is always: do the people responsible for selling the $500 driver believe its worth $500, or would they rather not have that fight with a customer and sell him something else for less money?

      That’s why the Dick’s story is part of all this — I’d bet the OEM’s would love to have more control over the direct sales of their products so they’re not at the mercy of $15/hour clerks and order takers at Dicks, GG or other stores. Poor salespeople have trouble selling higher priced merchandise.

      Reply

      JV

      10 years ago

      What you’re actually saying, is that the markets willingness to bear the high cost of golf equipment has been steadily decreasing since the mid nineties, and relative to inflation, consumers level of demand for new equipment has set the standard lower and lower regarding price.

      Reply

      Mild mild west

      10 years ago

      Your right, to a point. However margins I’m sure have stayed high as manufacture has moved from the US and Europe to China.

      As costs in china increase, which they will, then companies will look for the next place to produce things as cheaply as possible.

      Putting clubs to one side, which we don’t need to buy as often as many of us do, how have the costs of golf balls changed in that time? What about shoes? Clothes? Did we used to have GPS, lasers etc. profits can be made in other ways.

      Reply

      Jim

      10 years ago

      Interesting article. As you stated several times, $400 is a lot for a driver to most of us and frankly too much for my wallet. So I typically wait for 6 months and the prices drop $100 or more, especially if you play either TM or Callaway where they introduce new clubs every 6 months or so and their clubs are always on sale (even Callaway stated they wouldn’t drop the prices of the Big Bertha lines just dropped them by $100). Not to mention EBay where you can get clubs even cheaper from reputable resellers. Don’t see myself buying new clubs anytime soon I guess.

      Reply

      Eric Cockerill

      10 years ago

      Overly simplistic. Inflation is an average and as such individual items will vary widely. Further, inflation measures attempt to monitor commodities, whose value should track supply and demand more closely than a luxury item, and let’s be honest, sporting equipment is a luxury item to 95% of the population of the world.

      Pricing of manufactured, luxury items is based on, hopefully, a long term prediction by the seller on striking a balance between profit per unit and the number of units sold to maximize total profit.

      What this really tells us is that the public sees a decreasing value in the next big thing in drivers. In 1994, when an oversized metal wood was clearly superior to a persimmon driver, people were willing to pay more to keep up with their golfing buddies. Now, in the age of COR limits, the performance improvement is not as drastic or obvious, and the golfing public is less likely to pay more for them. It’s a testament to marketing effort that they’ve even stayed the same.

      Reply

      Dave S

      10 years ago

      Agreed. And I’d even go so far as to say that sporting equipment is a luxury to 100% of the population. No one NEEDS sporting equipment.

      Reply

      Golfer Burnz

      10 years ago

      Good point… I still use the set of Wilson Staff FG-17s, I bought back in 1980something for less than $150 through Nevada Bob’s. The sweet spot is small, but they still get the job done.

      Oldplayer

      10 years ago

      Great reply Eric. I think they should get you on the writing team so we can hear some common sense.
      Sorry Tony but this article is a fail.

      Reply

      hckymeyer

      10 years ago

      While I don’t necessary disagree with your logic, I just can’t get behind it. First you are assuming that the costs weren’t hugely inflated back in 2006, or 2000, or ’97. I’d love to see what the margins have done over that same time period. When talking about the health of an OEM it’s not about what they can sell it for, it’s about much more can they sell it for than what they pay to make it. So a more telling statistic would be the OEM’s cost to manufacture that $400 over the same time span.

      Secondly didn’t Callaway already prove that the market doesn’t support a $500 driver this year?

      Reply

      Dave C

      10 years ago

      I fully agree with the logic, but…
      I did not start golfing until ’94 (age 13), but can it not be said (and probably hard to substantiate) that there are other variables at play here? When did “woods” change from wood to steel to titanium to composite? It can probably be argued that the wood to steel transition was probably the most significant any may have “justified” the price bump. As efficiencies and competition increased, prices were held flat.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Irons
    Apr 24, 2024
    PXG Irons: Model By Model
    Putters
    Apr 23, 2024
    PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
    News
    Apr 23, 2024
    Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.