MGS Tested: Golf’s Most Wanted! Laser Rangefinder
Buyer's Guides

MGS Tested: Golf’s Most Wanted! Laser Rangefinder

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

MGS Tested: Golf’s Most Wanted! Laser Rangefinder

(by Dave Wolfe)

The laser rangefinder is an essential tool for the golfer wanting exact yardages. But which laser rangefinder is the best of the bunch? Which laser should you choose to be your go to measuring device. As always, MyGolfSpy is here to help.

We put eight laser rangefinders from the top manufacturers head to head to determine which one deserves the title of Golf’s Most Wanted Laser Rangefinder.

The Contestants

CaseofLasers
Invitations were sent to the major, and minor players in the laser rangefinder industry. These eight rangefinders represent the 2014 contestant field. Here they are in alphabetical order by company:

Features (Click To Enlarge)

SmallerTable1

How We Tested

testingphoto

As always, Golf’s Most Wanted! testing at MyGolfSpy is #Datacratic. We don’t base our rankings on brand names and desirability, we base our scores on data. Each of the lasers tested had an equal chance to earn the title of Most Wanted, and the laser that does, has the numbers to back up its title.

To determine Golf’s Most Wanted! Laser Rangefinder, we scored the following four categories: Accuracy, Speed, Optics and Display

General Test Parameters

Prior to measurement, our group of ten testers was given as much time as they required to become familiar with the operation of each laser. Once comfortable, testers measured distances to three targets (flags). One was close (100 yards), one was moderately distant (150 yards) , and  one was distant (200 yards). Targets were measured from the closest to the farthest for each unit; measuring all three with the same laser before moving on to the next unit.

New batteries were installed into all rangefinders prior to the first round of testing.

Measuring accurate yardages is a critical feature of any rangefinder, laser or other. As such, accuracy accounted for 30% of a given laser’s total score. Testers were told to give the number that they would enable them to confidently select a club to cover that distance. As mentioned above, the testers targeted flags without reflectors at 100/150/200 yards. Prior to the first tester and after the last tester, distances to the test flags was measured with a control laser. Accuracy values were then calculated as per deviation from the control.

The use of a laser rangefinder, or any range-finding device, has the potential to slow down the pace of play. As such, the Most Wanted! Laser Rangefinder must be able to acquire the accurate yardage rapidly. This is very important to course usage and as such, speed to confident reading also equated to 30% of the overall score.

The unit with the fastest average measurement time for the ten testers at the three distances was awarded the maximum score of 30, with the other units scoring proportionately less relative to the degree that they were slower.

The speed to a confident number also takes into account many other aspects of laser design. Button position, eyepiece shape, case ergonomics, and other factors all influence the speed of operation. A well-weighted and balanced laser rangefinder will allow the user to acquire a confident yardage quicker than one that is hard to hold steady in your hand due to a poorly balanced design. Speed is definitely affected by design.

Testers scored the Optics of each unit as well as the Display quality for each unit using a ten point scale, with ten being the best. Testers based their Optics score on factors like lens magnification and clarity of image. Display scoring was based upon the readouts shown during operation. Size of numerical readout, display contrast, and quality of targeting reticule all factored into the display score.

The Optics and Display combined represented the remaining 40% of the overall score, though display was weighted slightly higher at 25% vs. 15% for optics. We skewed the data this way knowing that a quality display is more important to a good measurement than perfect optics. In other words, and yardage you can’t read is more of a problem than a flag that’s not quite in focus.

Golf’s Most Wanted Laser Rangefinder: Scores

LaserDataTable

Winner: Bushnell Tour Z6 Jolt

mwlr-1st-bnr

As you can see in the above table, the margin of victory for the Tour Z6 over its Tour V3 sibling was very slight. Both were equally as accurate, and the Tour V3 was even a little faster than the Z6. What pushed the Z6 to the top though was the slight edge that it had in both Optics and Display over the V3. The magnification is 1x stronger, and the fit to the eye more comfortable compared to the V3.

Testers commented that the Z6 eyepiece lens was a little easier to see through when compared to the V3, and that improved visual path also made the display even easier to read. It was a close race, but the Bushnell Tour Z6 Jolt deserved the title of Golf’s Most Wanted! Laser Rangefinder.

 

Runner-Up: Bushnell Tour V3 Jolt

mwlr-2nd-bnr

As mentioned above, the Bushnell Tour V3 actually acquired targets faster than the Tour Z6. In fact, it was the fastest range reading unit that we tested. When we combine the data from all distances measured, and for all of the testers, the Bushnell Tour V3 Jolt was able to give the tester a confident distance number in an average time of 2.07 seconds, with many scores coming in under two seconds. Remember, time was recorded until the tester had a yardage that they would be confident playing to. For the Tour V3, that averaged 2.07 seconds.

Had we included a value/price score in the scoring matrix, the Bushnell Tour V3 Jolt would have possibly slipped past the Tour Z6 Jolt into first place as the V3 has a MSRP $100 below the Z6. The optics and magnification are better in the Z6, but many golfers will be very happy buying the Tour V3 and having that extra cash.

 

The Rest of the Field

mwlr-3rd-bnr

mwlr-5th-bnr

mwlr-7th-bnr

mwlr-4th-bnr

mwlr-6th-bnr

mwlr-8th-bnr

Testing Notes

LASER-DATACRATIC-STATS

As the data shows, the entire test field was very accurate, and relatively fast. While the Bushnell Tour V3 was the fastest with an average time of 2.07 seconds, the slowest laser was only a few seconds behind that at 4.08 seconds.

All of the lasers tested are extremely accurate. On average each was accurate to within less than one yard of our control measurement. Many lasers hit the number exactly, with the worse reading, from all of the shots, being 2.1 yards from the control at 200 yards. Some of the lasers will take you longer to measure that number, but ultimately, all of the rangefinders have the ability to give you accurate yardage readings.

The greatest difference between the units really came down to the quality of optics. Price of the unit tested corresponds with higher scores for optics and display. The lower priced units will give you an accurate reading, but the lens clarity, magnification, and display will not be as good as the high end units.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

A putter-obsessed recreational golfer, constantly striving to improve his game while not getting too hung up about it. Golf should be fun, always.

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Toulon Golf Small Batch Meadow Club Putter
Apr 11, 2024 | 3 Comments
Bettinardi CB24 and MB24 Forged Irons
Mar 26, 2024 | 11 Comments
Toulon Golf Texas Small Batch Putter
Mar 14, 2024 | 0 Comments
Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Mbwa Kali Sana

      9 years ago

      All this fuss about rangefinders is not appropriate .Unless You’re a scratch golfer ,you can’t adjust YOUR shots to +|- 5 yards .Hand held rangefinders slow considérably the game .A GARMIN or TOM TOM wrist Watch do the job quicker and with enough précision .You CAN also use your eyes ,especially for the short game ,where the Range Finder is OF nô REAL use !

      Reply

      Dan

      8 years ago

      So how well does your watch help you on the driving range?

      Reply

      Bunny

      9 years ago

      I have an older bushnell and there are times when I want a newer one that has the ability to use slope on the first time around a new hilly track but other than that, this can be a great ebay pickup when someone else needs to drop dime on the newest model. I have worked with a few other GPS devices and I still like using the laser much more, I find it a much faster way to figure layups, carry distances, etc. And living in the cloudy PNW, I never have to worry about a signal

      Reply

      Steve

      9 years ago

      Does anyone know whether or not the Bushnell and Leupold vibration/beep features work with all targets, or do you only get the “jolt” when locking in on the pin?

      Reply

      Mbwa Kali Sana

      9 years ago

      All these hand held rangefinders are a pain in the NECK and very rapidly become obsolète .All they do is to slow down the play ,Sensible ( and good !) GOLFERS all play now with the wrist GPS : all it takes is a glimpse at YOUR wrist ,and there you go .Distance finding is useful only when you CAN shoot the Green :they are most Helpful for short distances ,e.g under 100 yards .All you need is to know how far you are to the pin with an accuracy of roughly 2/ 3 yards .
      I really hâte playing with somebody who is constantly wielding a hand held rangefinder .
      Thet are seldom good players :A good Player ” feels the distances ” as WELL as a range Finder !
      Perfectionists are never top players !

      Reply

      Joe

      9 years ago

      Anyone that is “constantly wielding” a rangefinder doesn’t know how to use one. It should take 5 seconds.

      Ever been there when 4 guys get 4 different readings (some off by more than 10 yards, or a club) from 4 different GPS devices? Not so with the laser.

      Reply

      ryan

      9 years ago

      I will use my handheld rangefinder to also view the contours of the green and surrounds to help gauge where to try to land the ball. Very helpful when you are on unfamiliar courses. I play a lot of rural Australian courses which have not been correctly GPS mapped and the variance in readings that I see from other players using GPS would annoy me. I also hate having anything on my wrist when playing golf, so the wrist GPS, although very cool and practical would not suit everyone. Laser devices are also unlimited by the objects they can measure and being able to ping individual trees and objects like when practicing can be an added advantage.

      Reply

      eron

      9 years ago

      Went out with the bushnell z6, and then the Leupold GX 3i2 to my home course and another two. Build quality of the leupold won out, definitely felt better with the aluminum body. The optics won out there too even with the bluish tint. Did seem to help in the bright day and sunset. Both give read outs in OLED format, but the Gx 3i2 seemed sharper. Scan mode was good. Z6 pin seeker was better on picking up but not by much- hand shake seemed to affect the Bushnell less. Definitely try them before you buy. I took test results and used it to narrow my search. Very satisfied with my decision. And feels good supporting leupold ( I live in Oregon :) )

      Reply

      Mike Novotny

      9 years ago

      Id love to see the kickbutt rangefinders on this list (perhaps they were emailed and didn’t respond or declined). I own the maxgrip 600 version and love it. at $159.99 it’s nearly $100 less than any in this review and eludes to being made by the same company that makes the optics for bushnell.

      They also offer a Odell that includes the slope feature for $249.99.

      Reply

      thomas murphy

      9 years ago

      to me rangefinders can all be trusted and it does get to the preference of fit to hand, eye/glasses – I see how you imply this to speed but this can easily be determined by use in a store if it is really ergonomics. I have an older bushnell and there are times when I want a newer one that has the ability to use slope on the first time around a new hilly track but other than that, this can be a great ebay pickup when someone else needs to drop dime on the newest model. I have worked with a few other GPS devices and I still like using the laser much more, I find it a much faster way to figure layups, carry distances, etc. And living in the cloudy PNW, I never have to worry about a signal.

      Reply

      MrDJD

      9 years ago

      Where I would like to use a rangefinder is at the driving range to see how far I am hitting each club so pinseeking doesn’t apply here. Will any of these or any other unit pick up a ball on the range

      Reply

      T Davis

      9 years ago

      sign me up for the newsletter

      Reply

      Mbwa Kali Sana.

      10 years ago

      Using a rangefinder slows down the game and impedes your concentration .A GARMIN Watch is enough for most OF us ,Besides you yourself or Even top notch pro’s are not That good enough to know the distance with better than a one Yard précision .
      If you are a seasoned golfer ,you don’t Even need a rangefinder or a GPS ,you ” feel ” the distance :when I compare my guts feeling for distance and the rangefinder ,the différence is less than 5 yards !

      Reply

      George

      9 years ago

      Wow, Mr. Sana, you are truly amazing! You can “feel” that the distance is 195 yards not 185, which is a club length. Too bad all of us are not as gifted. My GHIN Index is 8 and I have used a wrist GPS and at times a laser. I see benefits in each. laser is good to judge the carry over bunkers, water, etc and as others have stated, takes far less time that trying to find a sprinkler head on a strange course.

      Reply

      Bob

      10 years ago

      You didn’t mention, or maybe I just didn’t see it, that the Bushnell units don’t have a scan mode. That means that when you press the button the unit will find and lock onto the closest object in its field. If it is not the flag then you have to depress and shoot again until you get something that you feel confident is the flag. Same with bunkers, rocks, trees, etc. Leupold has a scan mode as well as a press and lock mode.
      You also didn’t mention what the cases are made of, battery life, waterproofness, and other settings available. Not that your testing was not of value but in my opinion it was not enough to rank the products and determine a best in class.

      Reply

      Bob

      10 years ago

      What is your definition of optics? It appears to be a deciding factor but not sure what it really means. Is it a subjective measure or an objective one.

      Reply

      Mbwa Kali Sana

      10 years ago

      There’s a new BUSHNELL Z 7 on display ,with the “JOLT “system and correction for the slope .How does the Z 7 compare to the Z 6 .It magnfies 7 times instead of 6 and 5 for the V3

      Reply

      Michael Haman

      10 years ago

      I really don’t have a dog in the race as far as the arguments go, but I have a Bushnell V2 and my league partner just went and bought the cheapest one he could find at the local sporting goods store, which at the time was a Callaway Nikon product, cost about half as much as mine and in my opinion, his works considerably better, faster, and picks up targets easier. Worse than that though is the fact that his battery probably lasts close to three times as long as mine. I don’t know if I got a lemon or what, but my battery life blows. I’d buy the one he’s got if i could do it over. To each his own.

      Reply

      Golfyogi

      10 years ago

      I’d be curious to see battery type and, at least, company testing numbers. Also, are all units waterproof and what it the ease to use with included carry case? Is it easier from a push cart, walking, riding? Can you wear the device while swinging? (example, holster)

      Thank you for a nice comparison chart

      Reply

      Pravda

      10 years ago

      Hi could you also do the same for the gps watches please

      Reply

      Golfyogi

      10 years ago

      Hi could you also do the same for the gps watches please

      +1 to this suggestion. I haven’t worn a watch in 15 years and I use a pretty good wrist cock. Did anyone have luck using a GPS watch when they normally don’t wear watches?

      Reply

      Dave S

      10 years ago

      Navy SEAL snipers use Leupold sights and lasers. I’ll take one of those please.

      Reply

      Golfyogi

      10 years ago

      I’d love to see your comparison chart…AS long as that doesn’t cross any website rules!!!

      Reply

      Best Golf Rangefinder

      10 years ago

      You have a top list here MGS.

      However, talking about the speed, I think Leupold Gx-3I are way faster..Comparing with different users and experience. But when it come to branding and marketing the bushnell brand leads them all in popularity. I will for myself before the introduction of Z6 always rely on leupold gx-3i

      Interms of accuracy and speed.. I choose leupold. Leupold on the other hand is not so easy to use and its even more expensive then the normal Tour V3. Tour V3 has been the custormers choice because of its price and ease of use.

      Your top three are really the best out there, but which is the first choice depends on how much the individual wants to save.

      For the money and value, I still stick to Tour V3 standard edition
      For more advance user or better option.. Leupold Gx 3i or Z6..

      I made a very detailed comparison table if you like I could share with your users.

      Thanks

      Reply

      luke-donald-duck

      10 years ago

      As much as I respect MGS and any of their data and findings, I think I’m gonna have to respectfully disagree on one point about the rangefinders, their speed. I have a friend who owns the Bushnell Z6, and another friend who owns a Leupold GX-3i (not the 3i2). When I tried both of them out to see which one to buy for myself, I found that the Z6 took considerably more time than the GX-3i from pushing the button to actually getting a reading on screen (a few seconds, vs not even a second for the Leupold, which made the Z6 more susceptible to my shaky hands), especially when I was lasering bunkers and hazards for carry distances. This is why I purchased a 3i2, and I love how fast it works – press the button, and see the yardage pop up.

      Reply

      Bob

      10 years ago

      You didn’t mention, or maybe I just didn’t see it, that the Bushnell units don’t have a scan mode. That means that when you press the button the unit will find and lock onto the closest object in its field. If it is not the flag then you have to depress and shoot again until you get something that you feel confident is the flag. Same with bunkers, rocks, trees, etc. Leupold has a scan mode as well as a press and lock mode.
      You also didn’t mention what the cases are made of, battery life, waterproofness, and other settings available. Not that your testing was not of value but in my opinion it was not enough to rank the products and determine a best in class.

      Reply

      Bart Casiello

      10 years ago

      Hi Spies,

      We’ll you have done it to me again. You have forced me to make another golf related purchase, that my wife is currently unaware of. She is going to kill me. After reading the article and comments I went out and bought a Z3 at my local golf store. I use to think that the GPS on my phone was enough, but having played a couple of rounds with the Z3 I can say it is changing my game for the better.

      I guess it is a situation of ‘aim small miss small.’ The Z3 Is quick and accurate. My home course uses the crystal reflectors on the flagsticks. So I like the jolt feature because there are also tons of trees behind every hole. When I am approaching the green there is no more generalizations, GPS units give you a distance to the middle, front and back that is usually within 3-5 yards of being accurate. But from there I would make a guess as to which number to use and that caused me to pick a club to just get me on the green. Now I know with confidence that flag is 124 yards away, it is in the front guarded by a bunker so I need to focus on what I can carry that distance.. Something I never really focused to much on before. In the first couple of rounds my approach shots have been much more accurate. I know my skill level hasn’t magically improved, I’m just focusing on a smaller target.

      So thanks MGS for improving my game again. Just please don’t tell my wife yet.

      Reply

      USAS

      10 years ago

      I do have one question Nikons rangefinders have a scan mode which I have on my Xhot (Rfinder) its convenient, I love it ect. I tried a friends v3 and didn’t notice any type of scan feature ( maybe I just missed or didn’t know how it worked) if that is the case why would you not give Nikon a bit of a bump for a feature others don’t have?

      Reply

      LR

      10 years ago

      I do not have time to read all the comments but the review appears to NOT exclude those models that have slope and other functions that are illegal during competitive play when a local rule allows distance measuring devices. We have used a Callaway branded Nikon laser for years with great success and it appears to us that you have mixed illegal with legal units.
      Thank you.

      Reply

      Bob Pegram

      10 years ago

      There is also a different kind of device that suits the same purpose. A Sky Caddie has a map of each hole with yardages from various landmarks, traps, etc. It shows hidden lakes, traps, and other hazards. Because it isn’t a rangefinder, you still have to walk off the distance variation from your ball position to the nearest yardage shown. It is legal in tournament play because the data is static the same as if you printed it out on paper.
      Are range finders legal in tournament play? I realize it may depend on the vote of the tournament committee. If carts have yardage indicators that are not turned off for the tournament, range finders should be legal in order to put the walkers on the same level of information as cart riders.

      Reply

      CMC

      10 years ago

      Your testers appear to be some mighty fine gunslingers. I generally get in about 70 rounds a year and what I generally observe is that the use of laser units is a pain in the backside. I carry a Jones bag. Once I tee off, it is my hope to never unzip any bag pockets let alone having to constantly zip and unzip to store/retrieve my range finder. Those that ride have an easier time but even riders find themselves returning to their carts to retrieve the units left behind. Please don’t get me wrong. There is definitely a place for laser units but I do not believe they are generally used to enhance the pace of play. On the other hand, I love my gps watch which requires zero effort to find and use and most assuredly speeds the pace of play.

      Reply

      David W

      10 years ago

      Ernie, they are legal in practice and for a handicap establishing round, but they are not legal in competition.

      Reply

      Jimithy21

      10 years ago

      I had a Bushnell tour z6 and it was rubbish. As soon as it went cloudy or overcast I couldn’t use it (and I live in the UK so that happens a lot). The Bushnell customer service was completely useless and very unhelpful, I won’t by Bushnell ever again. Thanks to the great service at American Golf I changed it for a Nikon Coolshot. It’s pretty basic but it does the job really well. I recommend trying it out.

      Reply

      sasovalerio

      10 years ago

      Laser range finders are great tools for those who are capable of being accurate enough to need one in the first place. Tools, are the people who buy these and add time to shots while nearby a yardage marker and still fail to hit greens. I see the point of a garmin watch due to its instantaneous read out being a better alternative for most amateurs and weekend warriors.

      Reply

      Warwick Weedon

      10 years ago

      What about a Bushnell watch. It will be faster!!

      Reply

      Nick

      10 years ago

      Thank you for completely ruining my entire life. I bought a Leupold Gx3i2 three months ago after recommendations from the forum and the blog, had it imported to the UK, waited 5 weeks for it to arrive…to find out it is a whole 1.8 points away from being the best! Bin it and it’s slow response and obviously flawed optics…or thank you for the excellent test and though I changed brand from Bushnell to Leupold, glad to hear that it is amongst the best units out there. I am thoroughly impressed with the quality of everything about it, Leupold definitely need a more proactive UK distributor.

      Reply

      Ernie

      10 years ago

      Great review again.
      I believe rangefinders are legal on the pro tours I wonder why you don’t see pros or caddies using them, I think they are a great tool, is there a specific reason why you don’t see them on pro tours?

      Reply

      Dave S

      10 years ago

      They do use them, just not during the rounds… the caddies use them to map their yardage books that they give to the players before the tourney. Pro golf is slow enough… imagine if they pulled out a laser before every shot and then analyzed it?? They put in a ton of pre-work so when they get to a shot, they already have an idea of how it’s going to play. They also have the luxury of knowing the places their ball is most likley to be on a course (within a certain radius) so they can really map them well beforehand.

      Reply

      Sluggo

      10 years ago

      Not sure why battery life is bad for some. I got the v3 about 6 months ago, and am still,on the first battery. I bought like 6 extra batteries in anticipation, but still haven’t had to switch one out. I don’t use it for every shot, but when I do use it, it’s fast and then put away…

      Reply

      Annika

      10 years ago

      When do pros on tour use rangefinders? I have never seen one being used. Do the caddies use them to map the course? They don’t seem to use them during play either.

      Reply

      golfer4life

      10 years ago

      I don’t know if you would find a tour caddie that doesn’t use one during practice rounds to put their yardage book together. They are an essential piece of equipment for caddies and tour pros.

      Reply

      RAT

      10 years ago

      Why even build a device that isn’t USGA legal? ooops MONEY..

      Reply

      Blade

      10 years ago

      The device is legal. You just can’t use the slope feature in a stipulated round. You can use it all you want for practice or making a yardage book if you do that.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      Always the cynic, RAT. I can appreciate that.

      Money isn’t why they make them, it’s why they charge more for them (at this stage in game, the additional development costs have been more than covered). The reality is that the majority of the golfing population doesn’t keep a handicap, and most certainly doesn’t play by the letter of the USGA’s nearly incomprehensible rule book. It’s not cheating if you never claimed to be playing by the rules anyway.

      For recreational golfers, there’s a lot of value in a slope feature (it also has the potential to move them along for the rest of us). My first rangefinder had a slope feature, and over time it’s proven itself to be a valuable teaching tool as it basically taught me how to adjust to…well…slope.

      I particularly like the Leupold offerings because the slope feature is essentially removable. They can be made legal for tournament use, but slope feature is there for casual play, or for charting a tournament course in advance.

      Reply

      Dave S

      10 years ago

      Why not just make the slope feature legal already? I don’t find it to be cheating considering the recreational golfer doesn’t have a full time caddy to tell them every presise yardage. You can damn well guarantee that when a tour pro asks his caddy if it’s playing 130 or 140, the caddy will know its playing 138. It’s akin to when I’m playing with buddies and one of us hits a drive just off the fairway into a few trees and we all saw it land, but when we get up to the spot, no one can find the darn thing for whatever reason (depth perception, leaf, etc.)… we don’t require a drop and penalty stroke on shots where a tour pro would certainly have found their ball (Marshalls, fans watching every spec of rough).

      Sam Wedge

      10 years ago

      Battery life and type of battery used is a significant issue. I originally had a Bushnell and was having to replace the 9V battery every month or six weeks. I’ve had a Callaway/Nikon for 4+ years and it uses a camera type battery and lasts 6-9 months. I buy two batteries for the Callaway/Nikon every year and always have a spare. It seemed like I was always having a dead battery on the Bushnell because I ran through them faster than I could remember to buy replacements.

      Reply

      KyleMo

      10 years ago

      Always cover some great things! I would’ve liked to see a durability test… Flying out the side of a cart, dropped from chest height, etc. I could care less about one taking an extra two seconds to hit the pin; however, if it lasted about 2-3 more drops then we’d be on to something!

      Good review as always guys! Thanks

      Reply

      845guy

      10 years ago

      I had a Bushnell Tour V6 with Cart Mount and some doush stole it right off our cart when we went in for essentials at the turn. Absolutely ruthless people out there, so beware. I would have paid double to catch the thief in action. Using my backup V2 for now. No color, no jolt, but still works like a charm.

      Reply

      markb

      10 years ago

      I’ve used laser rangefinders from all three main companies and I can’t argue too much with any of your conclusions, but I wish you had emphasized some of the “big picture” issues, besides just the fact that they are all accurate to .5 yards. Namely,

      1. Size and weight specs are really not important with any of them. They’re all small, light and fit in a golf bag pocket. None is a tank, so this a non-issue.

      2. Any rangefinder that has “Pinseeker”(tm) or its equivalent (the ability to select a closer target from background clutter) is satisfactory. Any that does not have this feature is close to worthless and should be avoided.

      3. Why does anyone need Jolt? Is it a secondary reminder for the blind golfer? Yes, they shake in addition to flashing optically when they acquire a target, but they’ll also shake when they acquire the wrong target (i.e. limbs in the line of sight of the flag) and who needs the shake? Jolt reminds me of the Opti-Grab nose brake from Steve Martin’s “The Jerk”, an unnecessary circumlocution.

      Reply

      drjacko

      10 years ago

      This is great and a helpful place to start in the hunt of a laser finder. Was there any way to have visuals of the projected image from different finders? This would have given the uninitiated something concrete about visuals being graded.

      Reply

      Dave Wolfe

      10 years ago

      I have tried to get these photos and they never quite come out right. The best thing to do is to look through them firsthand. Most shops should let you open the boxes up and look through the unit before buying one.

      Reply

      ondra

      10 years ago

      Maybe in sunny CA, but here in europe mountain, Leupold hands down, fog most of the time on course.

      Reply

      Dave Wolfe

      10 years ago

      Testing in Europe was not within my budget this year.

      Reply

      Eric Cockerill

      10 years ago

      I see that there wasn’t much difference, but why test accuracy against a control…why not actually measure the distance directly (i.e. roll wheel). I realize you were probably at a range, but I bet they would have let you check it before or after hours. We want to know how actually accurate they are, not now accurate compared to a control that also could be wrong.

      Reply

      Dave Wolfe

      10 years ago

      That’s an excellent suggestion. Even that number could be off though if the range is not totally even in topography. Still, I’m curious to see how much difference there would be.

      Reply

      Blade

      10 years ago

      A roll wheel would be far less accurate than a laser which has a direct line of sight.

      Reply

      golfer4life

      10 years ago

      Nice article guys, def something people want to know about these days.
      What was the actual procedure for measuring speed? Also were the optics and display test numbers compared to what the products advertises? Thanks for info you guys obtained from this. Very helpful
      G4L

      Reply

      Dave Wolfe

      10 years ago

      I gave each tester a three second countdown and then a reading was taken. I started the timer when I finished the countdown then stopped it when they said the yardage.
      Overall the yardage numbers were well within what the companies advertise for accuracy.

      Reply

      golfer4life

      10 years ago

      Thanks for the answer Dave. Did you see any pattern for a certain tester to a particular unit? Maybe a certain display was better for someone wearing glasses (or better vision) than not…

      David W

      10 years ago

      I currently have a Callaway RAZR which is made by and looks just like the Nikons. I can tell you it isn’t nearly as fast as the Leupold (GX-3i) that I originally owned (and that was stolen from me at a driving range). I went with the Callaway the second time because the quality and speed of the Leupolds had caught on and the price was actually higher than when I bought my first one. Callaway was $100 less and I still like it but if I had to do it over again I would have spent the extra money.

      Reply

      MG

      10 years ago

      I bought my first laser (the callaway RAZR) over the winter and I think you would have to be crazy or just have money to burn to buy anything else. I bought it brand new on amazon for about $160. Now I don’t have anything to compare it to but I get a perfect reading every time and it seems plenty fast to me. Perhaps it’s a second longer than others but I still walk 18 holes in under 2 and 1/2 hours so I don’t think it’s slowing me down too much.

      Reply

      MG

      10 years ago

      I lied, it was the callaway xhot.

      Gordon Steen

      10 years ago

      Can’t follow the logic in your survey at all. Nikons Coolshot give information far quicker than any of Busnells Rangefinders.
      As for the optics, again Nikon wins out here. Try using a Busnell against the Nikon on a cloudy dusky day and you will find far more brightness and clarity in The Nikon, FACT.
      Makes me wonder how much Bushnell are paying My Golf Spy. And of course both will deny it.

      Reply

      Dave Wolfe

      10 years ago

      I am sorry that you are confused by the measurements. We had testers shoot targets and timed how long it took for them to feel they had a playable number. The accuracy of that number vs. a control value was then assessed.

      I am not sure where you obtained your clarity and brightness “FACT”s, but I’d love to look at the data.

      Let me address your bias claim. If you look at the upper corner of this page, you should see an ad for Nikon. Your argument would be better if you asked how much Nikon was paying.

      Reply

      Joe Golfer

      10 years ago

      That’s telling him, Dave.
      I always hate it when some guy just tries to slam the author without an basis in facts, such as claiming that you were bribed by Bushnell, or claiming that he has “FACTS” that dispute all of the testing which you just performed, but he has no date to back it up.
      Keep up the good articles.

      David W

      10 years ago

      Are the Leupolds slower now than the original versions (ie, GX-3i) or are the Bushnells that much faster now? Two years ago when I bought my GX-3i the Bushnells couldn’t compete with the speed of the Leupolds.

      Reply

      Dave Wolfe

      10 years ago

      The Bushnells are very fast.

      Reply

      kygolfer1980

      10 years ago

      I have the V3 jolt. Very impressed so far with the performance. Don’t know why I used a gps so long, V3 is way better in my opinion.

      Reply

      Dave S

      10 years ago

      IMO, a watch GPS (Garmin, Bushnell) are the best option. Take far less time than pulling a laser everytime. Plus you get added features like shot measurment, swing analysis, etc. I’ve measured their accuracy against a laser (Bushnell V3) and found them to be either identical or within 1 yard… that’s far more accurate than I need it to be.

      Reply

      Desmond

      10 years ago

      You don’t discuss construction, weight, specs, although the top 3 models are within .5 ounces and close to size. I believe the Leupold is slightly smaller and lighter. Construction? Ergonomics?

      Reply

      Dave Wolfe

      10 years ago

      Ergonomics is reflected in speed. A unit that is heavier, harder to grip, and so on will take longer to operate due to its awkwardness of design.

      Reply

      Casey A

      10 years ago

      How do you NOT have Laser Link in this survey? You must be kidding.

      Reply

      Dave Wolfe

      10 years ago

      They were emailed, but they did not reply.

      Reply

      Kenny B

      10 years ago

      Thanks for the review. Would like to know if testers wore glasses or not, and did that make any difference. I do, and have not had much success using a laser quickly. It worked better if I took my glasses off, but that takes time. I could see that wearing those Bolle sunglasses reviewed last week could be a problem too.

      Reply

      revkev

      10 years ago

      Kenny,

      I have glasses and a shaky hand – I’ve had the V3 jolt for six months and love the thing. It is every bit as fast for me as advertised, remarkably accurate. I’m able to shoot flags between limbs so long as I have a clear shot to them (for friends of course – it never happens to me. :)).

      With use I’ve learned how to shoot tops of traps or grass to get a sense of distances to hazzards and carry distances. It’s quick, accurate, light and very affordable.

      I would highly recommend it.

      Like others here I’m interested in battery life but this is a huge upgrade from my last go round with a laser.

      Good luck!

      Reply

      Kenny B

      10 years ago

      Thanks for the info. That’s good news. I use gps now and while its OK, there are parts of a course that I would like more information; i.e., traps and corners of doglegs. But I have never been a fan of knowing how far it is to the flag without also knowing front and back yardages, generally not possible when you can’t see the green.

      Dave Wolfe

      10 years ago

      Some testers had glasses, some did not. Overall, there was little impact on the measurements.

      Which Bolle sunglasses are you concerned about? I wore them all round yesterday and had zero issues using a laser.

      Reply

      hckymeyer

      10 years ago

      Good call Sen, battery life would be interesting.

      Just curious if any of the testers already owned rangefinders and which ones. May have swayed the results if a bunch of guys were already familiar with using the Bushnell products.

      Any explanations for why the speed and optics where so different between the 3i2 and 4i2 Leupolds? Also were the units that allowed slope tested with the slope on? Too many numbers in the display can sometimes get confusing.

      As always great write up and thanks for the review!

      Reply

      Dave Wolfe

      10 years ago

      The extra information in the 4’s display could likely be responsible for the lower score for display. We tested the lasers in the configuration that they arrived. The battery was inserted and then the tests began.

      Reply

      sen

      10 years ago

      Just bought a z6 few days ago since golf galaxy had a 50 off deal. I knew it was similar to v3 but what isn’t included in this review is the durability of the z6 and subjectively the size of the z6. Very happy with it. Maybe on the next test you can do battery too!

      Reply

      Dave Wolfe

      10 years ago

      The batteries in these go for about 5000 or so shots. It would be an interesting measurement to see, but 40,000+ shots to kill all of the batteries is a bit too labor intensive.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.