How Only 1 Man Changed The Golf Industry!
News

How Only 1 Man Changed The Golf Industry!

How Only 1 Man Changed The Golf Industry!

WRITTEN BY: GolfSpy X (Published June 2010)

Big banks, huge chains, too big to fail, monopolies, more mom & pops closing, these are all terms you hear more and more in the news today.  And rarely is it a good thing for the economy or the consumer.  The consumer is the one that truly loses.  It leads to less competition…which leads to less choices for the consumer which in turn leads to more power for the companies at the top.  It is happening all over the country and in more industries across the nation.  Almost every town has felt the wrath of big business.

So…what about the golf industry…is it happening to golf as well?

Well you don’t have to be an avid golfer to notice the list of golf companies dwendling over the years.  Some of the largest and most prestigious golf brands from years past simply don’t exist anymore. And the number of companies with the biggest pieces of the pie are getting smaller and smaller. So…is this a good thing or a bad thing and is this a major issue for the golf industry?  Well…yes it is an issue…but not the most consequential one in my opinion.

The Issue I Feel Changed The Golf Industry

The way I see it…the most consequential issue I speak of might just be responsible for many of the issues golf has today.  Now…while this issue might have began as a somewhat friendly (well not really) competition and intended no harm on the industry it could be the one thing that is effecting it the most.

Think Back to The Late 90’s

The issue I am speaking of started way back in 1998…when one man who was respected by many and one who had risen the ranks at the company he was with…decided to leave his current employer and start a job with another company…who at the time was the leader in golf club equipment sales.  After a brief stint with the company leading the industry he decided to go back to his original employer.  This triggered an intensive legal attack from the past higher ups.  Not that uncommon we know…but the result of this battle (pissing match) is.  That’s because this battle has in my opinion lead to a trickle down theory which has sent ripples across the entire  industry both far and wide.

In my opinion this one simple job change even in a multi-billion dollar industry has lead to all of the following…all of which I will expand on below:

  1. Shorter Product Life Cycles
  2. Pricing Wars
  3. More Closed Down Retail Shops
  4. Less Custom Fitting Shops in Your Local Towns
  5. Less Access For Golfers To Improve Their Games
  6. Less Golfers Playing The Game
  7. I Could Go On For Days….

1. Shorter Product Life Cycles

You might have noticed that over the past few years the rate of new golf clubs hitting the market is on the rise.  The typical product life cycle for new golf equipment has gone from every 3 years, to every 2, to every year and now to every 5 to 6 months.  And for the most part it was all started by one company which was lead by this one employee we are referring to.  And basically we feel the roots of this new trend was all because of the “pissing match” we previously spoke about.  The focus on equipment has become less about the consumer and their needs and more about 2 companies trying to cut each others throats.

Now many of you might be saying, “so what is so bad about coming out with a new driver or new set of irons every 5-6 months instead of every 2-3 years”.  Well from a consumers standpoint it sounds great we all love new equipment right…and in the beginning of a new trend like this it usually is for the consumer and for the company who started the trend as well (profit wise).  But in the long term it could and seems to be having nightmarish consequences for the industry as a whole in my opinion.

When this employee I speak about worked for the company that at the time was the industry leader…they had an owner that firmly disagreed with reducing the current 2-3 year life cycle for his golf equipment and so did many other leaders in the industry.  There were many reasons why but one of the most important was…because if not…the vendors (Retail Golf Stores) would have a major issue on their hands in regards to controlling inventory and are now suffering because of it.  Every time a new piece of equipment came in they would have to deeply discount the old (basically new) equipment.  Which they had not even had time to try and sell and move off the shelves.  So now instead of sell-offs every 2-3 years they are having to basically give away all their almost new gear every 5-6 months.  The golf club manufacturers solution was to simply have them heavily discount their prices or they would offer buy backs for the surplus of inventory on hand.  Which has hurt both the vendors margins and the golf club manufacturers as well.  This coupled with the fact that the economy is not doing so hot has lead to more and more shop closings.  Which has lead to more big chains controlling the arena for golf club sales.   Which has lead to less talented lower paid positions for what used to be skilled fitting technicians.  Which has lead to a lot more issues. This new business model or business trend has created a “Keep Up With The Jones’s” type of mentality for the other golf manufactures as well.  Put yourselves in their shoes.  How can I compete unless I pump out new equipment as often as the other guy.  Because basically what this company has done is shifted from trying to brand a company to simply trying to grab market share.  They want every time a golfer walks in a store to buy equipment to be the newest and flashiest  gear on the racks.  Sounds like a great move right?

Well not if you think about the cost it takes to make and produce all this new gear.  Factor in all the R&D costs, marketing etc. and you start to realize that this is most likely the reason you are seeing less TRULY INNOVATIVE technologies being launched and more flash in the pan type of equipment with simply new paint schemes and weights being placed in a different positions.

2. Pricing War

Imagine for a second that you are an owner of a huge golf equipment company and you are trying to be the big man on the block.  What is one way if you were in a stalemate with another company to grab the #1 spot?  Well one way (not usually the best) is to make your price lower then the guy on the shelf right beside you that is competing for the same spot.  Well this is exactly what happened when the companies owner passed away from the company we spoke about being the leader in the industry.  The one thing other then keeping life cycles at a 2-3 year clip that he stood firm on was NOT lowering prices.  Too many repercussions could come from such a business model change.  Among them was having to produce a cheaper product for the consumer and cutting corners…something that can be devastating to a brand.

But he has passed away and a new man was in charge of the company who was basically an accountant…he must not have seen it the same way.  Seems he felt a “Pricing War” was what the company needed.  And so there you have it.  I do see his dilemma…competition is competition but still disagree with the move.  Because what it has created is the whole “Shorter Product Life Cycle” trend we currently have now.

How?…well pretty simple.  Think back again like you are the guy calling all the shots.  And you are in a “Pricing War” with your rival competitor.  You both have product on the shelves and they are both lets say $299.  Well you lowered your price and guess what…he matched you…so now what do you do to stay a step ahead of the competition?  You got it….COME OUT WITH A NEW PRODUCT.  Well that is exactly what we feel happened when this one employee was faced with his old companies new “Pricing War” tactic.  Newer product with the same price tag as the competitors so called out dated equipment and DING, DING, DING…you got a winner.  And they did have a winner and still do sales wise.  Might sound great and short term it has worked well for them…well once again sales wise.  But long term in my opinion it has lead to….

3. More Retails Golf Store Closings

If you are the owner of a Golf Retail Store your equipment and gear is your bloodline…it is how you put food on your table and the tables of your employees as well.  And if all the sudden the products that sell the most in your stores were basically worth nothing to you anymore you would have a major problem on your hands.  Well that is basically what is happening…store owners get in new gear and in a matter of a few months they are having to dump it.  (Which by the way…has also lead to an insane amount of issues on EBAY and by company golf reps.)  So if the number one sellers in your store became worth nothing to you tomorrow…would you be able to stay afloat?  Well many haven’t been able to.

4. Less Custom Fitting Shops in Local Towns

So as we said…we feel the “Pricing War” is contributing to the closing of golf shops across the country.  But one other major impact it has had is on the smaller “Local Custom Fitting Shops” in almost every town.

Almost every town with a golf course within a 50 mile radius and a population over a couple thousand people has at least one golf shop in town who sells components of some kind and does custom fitting.  Well at least they used to.

You see…customers for the most part whether they want to be or not are more price conscious then they are customer service and value oriented.  If not then there wouldn’t be McDonald’s an Wal-Mart’s popping up on every street corner across the country.  If this was not the case Mom & Pop’s would be flourishing…but they’re not.

I don’t want to go off on a tangent about that so back to the “Local Custom Fitting Shops” and why they are having problems today and how this is effecting golfers.  Well before the last 5 years or so there was a major price difference between custom fit clubs and the name brand gear you see on the shelves.  A big enough price difference that it created basically two distinct markets…and ones that could both survive.  Price was one of the attractive features of the custom golf shop…and the other was that you got to have someone custom fit you for your gear.  There were a lot of good slogans from these custom fit shops but one I always remembered was “You Must Be On Crack If You Buy Off The Rack!”

Anyways…with the surplus of discounted equipment that has been created by these “Shorter Product Life Cycles” that is flying around on sites like EBAY, Discount Golf Shops and Chain Golf Shops around the globe it has basically killed the custom fitting industry.  There is no longer enough of a  price difference between the two types of products.  So when the average golfer who used to shop at the “Custom Golf Shop” sees that he can get name band equipment at the same price they are deciding to go name brand and off the rack without getting properly fit for their equipment.  Which is unfortunate.  And yes the custom fitting options by the major golf companies has had an impact as well but the level of fitting you can get by trying out a biased fitting system by a major brand compared to an overall fitting process done by a qualified “Custom Fitting Shop” is typically not even something comparable.

So the result is that the majority of these shops are not able to stay in business and many are closing down.

5. Less Access For Golfers To Improve Game

So back to that one employee.  I feel that this one issue that was sparked in my opinion by a single employee in the golf industry…who led another major company to initially engage in a “Pricing War” which then lead to a “Shorter Product Life Cycle” has created “More Retail Store Closings”, “Less Custom Fitting Shops In Your Town” and also “Less Access For Golfers To Improve Their Games”.

The reason is quite simple…less shops consumers have access to leads to less access for golfers to go out and purchase equipment and practice with their equipment that can improve their games.  If a golfer who used to be able to drive to the local golf shop or driving range in 10 minutes now has to drive 45 minutes he is simply less likely to visit those places as often.  And over time if less golfers have less access to golf facilities and golf stores to practice on maintaining or improving their game it leads to…

6. Less Golfers Playing The Game

That’s right…”Less Golfers Playing The Game”.  There is unfortunately still only 24 hours in a day and now more then ever Americans leisure time is shrinking more and more.  So if you look at it from the standpoint of the guy out there looking to take up the game of golf and start a new hobby…it makes it less appealing if there are not as many stores around to get a starter set from.  Or for the guy that used to play a couple times a month…if your local driving range shuts down and your local fitting center is no longer around you might just give up golf for another hobby. Remember there is only 24 hours in a day.  Less Time + Less Access = Less Golfers.

Now like I said…this one employee I refer to I am sure never intended for any of these things to happen to the industry as a result of their new business model.  No different from a simple game of pick up basketball or hell even a game of checkers between two friends…this seems to have started out as a simple competition between two leaders in the industry.  But you know as well as I do that sometimes that in the heat of the battle…we can lose site of our original strategies and overall goals because the competitor in us simply takes over.  Which has lead to a hell of a lot of knock down drag out verbal and physical fights between even the best of friends…so just imagine if you were the head of an entire company.

* Speak Your Mind *

I am really looking forward to your comments on this.  I want to see how you all feel about this trend to “Shorter Product Life Cycles” and how you think they have impacted the game.

For You

For You

Golf Wedges
Apr 16, 2024
Vokey WedgeWorks Low Bounce K Grind Wedge
News
Apr 16, 2024
It Was A Masters To Forget For LIV Golf
Golf Apparel
Apr 16, 2024
adidas Pioneers Next Generation of Lightweight Golf Garments
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Our mission is #ConsumerFirst. We are here to help educate and empower golfers. We want you to get the most out of your money, time and performance. That means providing you with equipment reviews you can trust, as well as honest reporting on the latest issues affecting the game today. #PowerToThePlayer

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Driver Ping G30 Hybrids PXG 0317
3/4 IRON PXG 0311XF 5-GW Srixon Z 565
SW PXG 0317 LW PXG 0311
Putter EVNROLL  
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      iron knight hack

      10 years ago

      Howdy! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are
      you using for this site? I’m getting tired of WordPress because I’ve
      had issues with hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform.
      I would be awesome if you could point me in the
      direction of a good platform.

      Reply

      Sully

      10 years ago

      They don’t get it…It is like any industry, things change and you have to evolve. Layoffs and changes in how equipment is sold is inevitable. Changes in how equipment is sold already happened, but big brands can’t make the transition quick enough.

      But releasing new equipment as quick as possible is not the answer. I could talk for years about this..but they just don’t get it….

      Reply

      TwoSolitudes

      10 years ago

      Love the story.

      The ONE may have been the start, but I don’t think he was the cause. As others have pointed out, it was going public and facing the pressures of short term profits that killed the old way of doing business. This would have happened one way or another with or without the ONE. And it is not just in golf, the short term view is pretty much dominating every aspect of life in North America now. It’s why cable is all reality TV now, it is in effect in the auto industry, the computer industry, the smartphone, and many many more. Build in obsolesce, or at least a perception of obsolesce, and you pressure your audience to buy more often. Want more profits- just shorten the cycle. There is a fine line though between getting them to buy more and ‘better’ after which folks start asking if they aren’t being cheated in some way. And I think the golf industry has started to reach this point.

      I just came back from a summer break in Halifax, a place I grew up. I remember that clubs used to be a small part of larger hardware stores like Canadian Tire. Northwestern, Spaulding and Wilson- but no big names. More serious? Then it was to a small pro-shop and there were exactly 3 of them in town. When Golftown opened, two of the three shops closed and I don’t know how the last one manages to stay open. But going to Golftown this year and the reduction of products and service is obvious. They are faced with the same problem as Best Buy, people go to look then head home to buy on Ebay.

      Is the future direct sales from Brand to consumer? It would mean that the majority of sales would have to be sight unseen. At first this seems crazy, until you consider that it is pretty much happening now on ebay. I am willing to bet that half those sales are done after research on the internet without touching the club. A direct to consumer sales plan might actually be pretty viable business model- though it’s hard to imagine now.

      Building in obsolesce has now convinced most buyers that every new release is a waste of money to buy new. It will take years and years and years to change that perception.

      Meanwhile, you can still get a decent set of Northwestern’s at Canadian Tire.

      Reply

      Jeff

      10 years ago

      I believe we now have a growing dichotomy in the industry, where the companies on short release cycles (Taylor Made, Callaway most notably) have tremendous devalued their product, and the others that stand firm are (barely) holding their reputation as a top product. For example, think about Vokey wedges or Scotty Cameron putters. While I might wait for a driver or fairway wood to drop below $100 or a set of irons to below $300 on ebay, I would still happily drop $100+ per wedge, and am ready to drop about $80-100 to send my 8 year old Cameron Futura Phantom to be reshafted and regripped.

      Where there is access to custom fitting, I believe there is a market for customers paying a fair price (equivalent to lesson rates) to be custom fit, then take their “specs” and either order direct from manufacturer, search ebay, or buy through the fitter. I am intrigued by the business model of Hopkins Golf and others like it, which feels like a blend of the small custom fit shop with a nationally recognizable product.

      Reply

      p bliss

      10 years ago

      Everyone here has the answer,a600cc club with a 50 inch shaft? I made similar clubs just to see. It is a totally different swing just for a pro to hit a Cobra Long Tom. TM did ruin everything. If you break your driver the shaft costs 200 a newer used demo driver costs 80 bucks.People do not let others play through anymore.ME ME ME Pace of play was the beef, so the manufactures make range finders and adjustable clubs. I don’t care if it is against the rules, the weekender is going to fiddle with his Driver every hole. Ebay, knock=offs fakes and Scotty Cameron 4000.00 prototypes that 90% of the pros do not even know they exsist. Everyone thinks they know every thing. Maybe I’ll buy another fishing boat! Goodbye Hackers

      Reply

      apprenti23

      10 years ago

      I LOVE all of the points made in this article. Everything makes complete sense. I haven’t quite thought of what’s been happening to golf in this light yet, but have always likened this downfall to two main contributors. One being the Kohl’s business model (if you’ve purchased an item at Kohl’s for full sticker price I have multiple bridges for sale) and the other being eBay (there is NEW equipment on eBay at wholesale pricing).
      The Kohl’s business model has educated and trained buyers to the point that they want coupons and rewards for purchases and NOBODY pays full retail for anything anymore. Ebay killed the used club market and over the last few years (when multiple companies ditched the 2 year life cycles) has been flooded with new product.
      There is a way out of the mess and I feel it can be accomplished by making the game easier. The USGA had an opportunity with anchoring and failed miserably. Now they can save the equipment industry and THE GAME OF GOLF with bifurcation. Make a 600cc driver with a 50″ shaft so a senior golfer can hit their driver over 200 yards. Make golf balls that go a ton further. Make wedges with INSANE groove technology. With bifurcation you can make the game more enjoyable for everyone and save the equipment industry and the millions of people who have careers in same way shape or form in the game of golf.

      Reply

      Finalist

      10 years ago

      Would a boycott on TM and Callaway change things for the better?

      Reply

      dg7936

      10 years ago

      the OEM’s are running scared. They’ve saturated the market ( the same way course developers did) chasing the Tiger boom and cannot replicate the momentum from Tiger’s dominant era. Thus the pitch in every golf magazine about “growing the game”…..they really mean “finding new customers”. Their equipment is not that great from one year to the next, the public is catching on and we’ve even got the ding-dong president of TM talking about “hack golf” with large holes. For the sake of obscene amounts of revenue, the game is being sold down the river by the OEM’s. Golf always had and always will have a core amount of regular players; the fringe participants might play for a year or two then bail out. So what? You cannot make a market larger than is natural. The contraction we see is a necessary step to balance producers versus consumers. No one would really care if a few more OEM’s went out of business. They’re selling hope, not improvement. It’s too bad people lose jobs over this but where was the sympathy from TM and Callaway when Ram, Wilson, MacGregor etc closed shop? They didn’t give a squat about those great companies. Now we’re supposed to feel bad for the erosion of market share? The USGA is guilty also of selling the game short. How in God’s name can equipment be changed so drastically from the late ’80’s early 90’s …golf CANNOT be made into an easy game and selling it as such is a pathetic oversimplification. The equipment now, for the most part, is clown stuff. Oversize heads, golf balls that go too far, 3 woods the size of older drivers and still it can’t be sold. It’s the message these companies are trying to sell that is ringing hollow.

      Reply

      Joe Golfer

      10 years ago

      My Golf Spy,
      Good article.
      Loads of great points raised, and many more in the posts from the forum readers.
      Keep up the good work.

      Reply

      Adam

      10 years ago

      Great read and excellent comments.

      Reply

      Adam

      10 years ago

      well mostly excellent

      Reply

      John B. Hoeflich

      13 years ago

      Dear GolfSpy,
      If you want the real inside scoop, call me sometime.
      Hoefy

      Reply

      HONG KONG

      13 years ago

      PLAYA HATA~~~~~ Callaway said RAZA is 6 yards further than R11, Titleist have SFT that copy OR someone from TM that BRING it to Titlsist. These company have similar or BETTER technology(maybe)of TM but people still like TM R11, so what can TM do?? Stop innovation and wait for you guys??? Just like JasonB said :”no one force you to buy” but market share prove everything!! Don’t waste your time to write some bulls??t like this, use your time to think some REAL ways to win the golf culb competition. PEACE! (by the way, my english was sucks)

      Reply

      JasonB

      13 years ago

      It may be a surprise
      But many of you like to buy new equipment each year or two
      It brings allot of added joy to buy a new toy
      When if it fancies your eye & helps your ball to fly
      Now golf isn’t cheap and the green fees are steep
      But no one is forcing you to buy.

      Reply

      proshopb

      13 years ago

      I beleive the one man that changed the golf industry, was Gary Adams, the 1st metal wood for Tayor Made that started the ball rolling for new clubs every 6 months
      I all so believe Taylor Made either owns Adams or finances them, I have been ivited to many coled to the public and only top 5 dealers in the country, at every single event or party Gary’s Mother and afew other members of the Adams family were always invited and sat in row 1 with Mark King

      Reply

      GB

      13 years ago

      Great article. Reminds me of a similar situation in the automotive industry. Yes folks, there was a time when Ford et al did not present a new model every year.
      Someone came up with the idea of a launching a new ‘improved’ model every year to stimulate sales and the rest is history.

      Prior to the job hopping person of the article, I think another major change started with the birth of the Callaway Company.
      In my opinion, Calalway was responsible for the dramatic inflation in golf club prices.
      Other companies saw what people seemed quite willing to pay for” Big Bertha” etc. and decided they wanted to copy Callaway’s marketing.
      The super hyped, over-priced Drivers became like “Trophy” clubs to have in one’s bag.

      The knock-on effect of this was also to drive up prices for all new clubs, not just the top tier.

      Yes, the R&D costs can be considerable, but the real production costs would probably shock a lot of consumers.

      Oh, and one more thing. I may be treading in dangerous waters here, but why is Scotty Cameron seen as some guru of the putter design business, when all he seems to have initially done [IMHO] is tinker around with the weight and metal content of Karsten Solheim’s putter design……?
      is do fiddle about with

      Reply

      greg

      13 years ago

      l agree with most of the comments from you guy’s ,there is a great benifit for some one like myself that lives in australia we are a poorly serviced by club mgf and retail shops with only limited variations of different models avalaible in the big golf shops ,so if you try to get fitted for new clubs ,more times than not they will push you towards a stardard of the shelf model ,we also have the problem of the big names brands using cheaper shafts ,l recently purchased a new set of ping g15’s on the internet from a us golf shop made to my specs and saved 50% on the cost after shipping thats about $1200.00 aud, so why would you go to a shop get a sales man thats done a 4 day fitting course try to push towards something that doesn’t suit you, or like many go to e-bay and buy a current model used club for half the price with a supplied invoice from a big outlet

      Reply

      Wobbly

      13 years ago

      The biggest problem is the US, the customer. If it costs $100 to make we want to buy it for $90. If we receive a service by testing clubs in a local shop once we know what we want we go striaght on to the internet to see if we can buy it cheap.

      The demand from the customer for more for less pushes down quality and all that matters to us is how well is it adverstised? We all know there are fixed rules on making a driver, limits on size, MOI, COR, grooves, etc. This means all decent Beta Titanium 460cc heads with a 100% graphite shaft perform within an arms length of each other. I have only ever seen one magazine, GolfTime in Germany, that actually robot tested the drivers which is the only true comparison and the best performing driver was the HiPPO XXL, so what did we all buy – Callaway, Taylor Made, Ping – anything but the best product

      We are brainwashed into thinking a big brand name buys us something extra – IT DOESN’T. It might pay for a magazine ad, a tour bus or a big fat salary for some executives but all you are buying is advertising.

      Reply

      joel goodman

      13 years ago

      Product life cycle and discount/predatory pricing is but a drop in the ocean of problems fro golf club retailers.
      I see the biggest problem and threat to a continuing golf club business as THE supplier====CALLAWAY GOLF who has a direct sales thrust on the internet and through magazine ads. How can a dealer compete with the manufacturer in terms of assortment and availability. Overnight shipping and generous return and trade in policies will eventually kill the retailer and clubs will be sold almost exclusively by their manufacturers/assemblers—since almost no one owns a factory, but an assembly plant only. Our Chinese and Japanese friends do all the real manufacturing. If I were the owner of a golf store—I would look for something else do do and quickly….

      Reply

      Ryan

      13 years ago

      I wanted to comment on the grooves issue as it seems to have been a big deal about nothing. Stats have improved on the PGA tour since the condition of competition took effect. However, we will soon be forced to buy wedges that become worn out in a season which in my opinion sucks. Square grooves last a lot longer. Also, I believe that once a limit was set on the size of the driver and the .830 COR limit was imposed that manufacturers were forced to start reducing the product life-cycle in order to stay in business. Most people use the same irons for a long period of time. Many have upgraded their drivers due to shaft technology. Now that you have interchangeable shafts, the only real reason to upgrade the head is if you wear it out. .830 is .830 is .830… Everything else can be done with lead tape…

      Reply

      Don

      13 years ago

      I recommend that people interested in golf club manufacturing and product lifecycles read Tom Wihson’s “In Search of the Perfect Driver”. This little book explains the counterproductive ( to golfers) hype in the golf industry, and how the new drivers with longer shafts are a gimmick. The old cliche about a shorter club travelling farther is borne out in this book by Mr. Wishon, a master clubfitter and founder of Tom Wishon Golf. It’s an accurate and unbiased account of what works for a golfer versus what works for the golf industry. Really interesting, all facts and no hype.

      Reply

      dg7936

      10 years ago

      I have the book and it’s all hard-core truth. A real eye-opener about counterproductive trends in new gear. Jacked up lofts so you hit your 7 iron 10 yards farther than I do but you’ve really got 6 iron loft so it’s a wash. The altered lofts initiated the demand for gap wedges to even out the distance spacing since your PW is now a 9 iron etc etc. Ali I know for sure is the guys I play with using older gear are much better than the guys who swap their stuff every year or two. I know some clubs are legitimately better than their predecessor but they’re in the minority. For the 5-6 time a year player it still doesn’t help to buy new because the swing is not grooved. But how many guys have we seen with $1000 bags of equipment shooting 94’s……quite a few. Wonder what the new Hogan irons will look like when they come out in the winter. If the clubs are good and their “cycle” is only to intro new models every 2 years or so they will hit a home run and really eat into the TM and Callaway “players club” product line….. Better players just dont change as much. But this is only my opinion. there are deeper issues here. Lots of folks are simply geared toward new toys, whether it’s clubs or cars or clothes etc.

      Reply

      Gus

      13 years ago

      This is not just about golf it’s about all consumer goods. If you think club life cycles are short think about clothes. It used to be that clothing brand would make 2 ranges per year a spring/summer line then a fall/winter line. If you went into the mall in April and then went in again 3 months later you would see the same stuff. All of a sudden along came H&M and Zara who have at least 12 ranges, now you can go into the shop weekly and see something new. This makes people shop and buy more often.

      The other key point which will drive change further is the retail price versus cost of manufacture. The dollar is worth less, the cost of manufacture is going up. Consumers don’t want to pay more, and brands don’t want to make less. The only way is to cut out the middle man and cut the profit that they make.

      Old way:
      Brand – Distributor – pro shop – consumer

      Now:
      Brand – big retailer (golfsmith) – consumer

      Future:
      Brand – consumer.

      First the mom & pop shops got squeezed but in the future it could be the retailers.

      Reply

      Wobbly

      13 years ago

      You are already in the ‘future’. Most retailers already own their own brand which gives them higher margins and is the product they push to you. I have even been in a store where they offered to change the loft and lie on a set of in-house brand alloy headed irons which is complete nonsense.

      Reply

      John Donnachie

      13 years ago

      Well well, very interesting article, I started reading the comments, but there are so many I decided to disregard and say my piece.
      After 50 years in the business, these big guys have killed of all the small golf makers who made a product just as good but without the exotic claims made re performance, unfortunately most of it aimed at distance. As one who has played to a high standard I put more emphasis on accuracy.
      Not often you hear those big guys come up with proof that they have reduced handicaps, this again would have to be doctored. In my 55 plus years of playing this great game I have only had something like four new sets of irons and the same in drivers. How easy golfers are conned by these large companies who to me have spoiled the business as I knew it. For example in my County we had five manufacturing companies, we now have one new small one specialising in hickory and traditional equipment.
      I accept that I still hit the ball quite far for my age, thanks to this technology, however I still keep the ball on the fairway, where some seniors I play with are hardly ever on the fairway, my answer to them is that they would have been better golfers with their old clubs and invest in lessons. Who takes lessons? not a lot.
      I remember many years ago we had a sayig that you need not fear the guy with the shiny new clubs he was trying to buy his game, on the other hand beware the guy with the old worn set, he knew what it was all about and knew and trusted his clubs.

      The ramblings of an old golfer
      cheers to all

      Reply

      proshopb

      14 years ago

      You guys nailed it, you probably didn’t miss a beat maybe in different order for different areas of the country. I had a FULL SERVICE SHOP

      Reply

      Dude, Where's My Par?

      14 years ago

      Great article, one of the best I’ve read this year.

      As someone who has worked in the golf industry, there was nothing I found more annoying than the big companies – the Nikes, Titleists, Taylor Mades, Cobras and PINGs of this world – ramming their new clubs down my throat every 6 – 8 months or so.

      Constant emails, videos, press releases and phone calls: they’d stop at nothing to get their message across. I found their aggressive tactics really off-putting if truth be told, so much so that I became disenchanted enough with the industry to pack my bags.

      At the end of the day, these new irons or drivers probably won’t make you a better player, despite what they wan’t you to believe. These companies are releasing pretty much the same clubs every cycle, with a few aesthetic tweaks here and there ro create the illusion that they are in fact different – IT’S THE SAME SHIT, DIFFERENT WRAPPING!

      Where has the originality gone? I would much rather, for example, Titleist, to spend a good 2 – 3 years working on a completely new, original and innovative design for a set of irons, instead of simply bombarding and saturating the market with crap every few months.

      Sadly, I can’t see this pattern changing. Sigh…

      Reply

      Capitalist Swine

      14 years ago

      Great article. However, I must say that I thought of Ping instead of TM…the i10 i15 K… I also must say that I routinely tell my high school students that Jack and Arnold shot under par with ancient clubs. The golf industry biggies are shooting themselves in the foot. I remember paying $325 for a well used set of ping eye 2 irons and thinking I got a great deal! Now, everything in my bag is at least 4 years old at less than $40 a club and the only thing I bought new was my putter. Sad from a retail standpoint. ANYWAY (and yes, sir, it is WAY-you can only go one way at a time), golf is better than (YES, THAN, not then, then is a future participle) any other sport, so I’ll keep playing it.

      Reply

      Phana24JG

      14 years ago

      A guy with a S/N of Capitalist Swine is a teacher? Damn, you must be real popular at the union meetings. Whatever you do in life, do NOT get PhD and teach at the university level.

      Reply

      gh pennington

      14 years ago

      I couldn’t agree more….A small group of people made a ton of people changing the equipment we use and taking companies public. The result….handicaps haven’t budged, golf is too expensive, I have no need to buy new equipment because titanium will not wear out, developers have to build an 8000 yard course to challenge the game’s best players.

      I doubt if anyone is really having more fun than my dad did with persimmon, balatas, and 6900 from the tips.

      Reply

      Robert

      14 years ago

      Yeah, make the PGA courses longer and leave the equipment alone.

      Not sure I’m ready to go back to persimmon. I wore out my Dad’s 4 wood because i could not hit anything stronger higher than 20 feet in the air. I definitely appreciate the newer better equipment.

      Reply

      JDAIDONE

      13 years ago

      Ah, persimmon had quite collection at one time, at 53 I still look forward to new products .
      Keeps me in the game getting older you have to play practice a little more. PS my dad has a nice set. 77 blades titelist….. Nice

      Reply

      Gary Brady

      14 years ago

      I see the problem as “it still says caviar on the tin and you’re still paying for caviar but you’re getting cod roe!” One particular manufacturer has a stiff flex shaft that has 5.1 torque! That is what you would fit a Lady with, the head would be twisting about like it was on a piece of string! The problem is that the customer doesn’t know this and so thinks that they just need to get used to their new driver, it’s crazy! Have you noticed the “designed in conjunction with” labels on shafts? Hold the grip and twist the head from side to side, you want some movement but you’ll be stunned if you do the same with a premium shaft. People are being ripped off by some the big manufacturers. Unfortunately they get Tour Players playing with the club with a premium shaft and then sell you the same head but with a plasticine shaft in it. It will mean you’ll hit it left or right, high or low, depending on your swing. Then they say, “Oh you couldn’t get on with that one, try this one, it’s a different colour it’ll be better for you!” The problem is that golfers are better informed because of the internet and hopefully soon they will realise that these manufacturers have been ripping them off, even at the cheap prices. I have very little sympathy for many Pro’s who don’t know, or maybe care, what the problem is, they just want to hear the till ringing. I’m just going to climb down from my high horse now. Please anyone reading this please note that the shaft is 90% of the club which is why it’s such a shame we’ve lost the art of custom fitting. I doubt you need a new set of clubs so spend the money on getting yourself INDEPENDENTLY custom fitted. I no longer work in the golf industry by the way.

      Reply

      Ovie

      14 years ago

      Trust me Rabb, cash can do alot of wonders in the golfing world. :)

      Reply

      Gary Carr

      14 years ago

      There is light at the end of the tunnel. Ping is sticking to a 2 year product cycle and is the #1 selling driver and iron in our stores. We were also told that Titleist is going back to a 2 year product cycle again on woods as well. Guess that leaves TaylorMade and Callaway bashing heads until one of them takes the other out but TaylorMade has adidas so they probably have an advantage or some kind.

      Reply

      Rabb

      14 years ago

      I totally agree with you, except for the fact of pricing wars, many manufactures wont allow retailers to reduce prices below what they say. I remember a friend of mine that owned a golf store in Texas who was removed as a vendor for six months because he reduced a price of a name brand driver to clear it of the self just for the very reason you speak about. Prices are set by the manufactures, retail and discounts.

      Reply

      Ovie

      14 years ago

      This is article is right on from my perspective. I have operated a “mom and pop” type retail golf store for over 10 years and worked in and around golf my entire life pretty much. I have watched this evolution take place first hand. Nowadays there are so many obstacles involved with running your own golf store and I will try to mention a few. My store sells all the “top of the line” OEM’s. The past few years the economy has went to KRAP big time! Not to mention the market has been flooded with markdowns left and right. The average consumer thinks that the weekend tip on the CBS golf tournament is going to help them when in all reality it will only confuse them and mess them up even more. (totally agree with Brian)

      What they are not telling you is that most of the OEM’s have different standard lie angles. TaylorMade’s standard is a degree or so more upright than Ping. Callaway standard is basically 2 degrees upright from Cleveland etc…. etc… and it goes on and on. You go to the standard big box golf store and they could care less about truly helping you. Lets be honest, most would rather sell you graphite just because it costs more (and tell you nothing of the accuracy you are losing due to much higher torque). Fitting in most “big box stores” comes down to measuring your wrist to floor and telling you that standard length is all you need. If you are a golfer and are trusting a “big box store” to help you then you are being misled, PERIOD. True fitting is a scientific process that involves static and dynamic testing and in the end can really save you real strokes, articles on tv or commercials don’t. So I say if you still have a real local golf shop don’t be a jerk know it all like so many people can be, reading golf digest does not make you a professional fitter. Go see them, pay their fitting fee (which is usually waived if you buy) and don’t second guess everything they say, let them do what they do. There is way more than what you see on golf channel or read in golf magazines.

      Another thing most people are clueless to is the fact that if you look at golfsmith, golfgalaxy, tgw, dicks, or “insert any big box store name here,” the price is always that same so there is no real advantage there either. In fact, most “mom and pop” stores will offer you a better price if you just open your eyes. Bigger does not mean better anymore, it simply means more overhead, and less knowledge.

      Another advantage to “mom and pop” stores is warranty. If you buy from most big box stores and your club breaks then guess what? You need your proof of purchase receipt, a blood sample and fingerprint analysis to get taken care of. But guess what, OEM’s don’t care anything about that, in fact, I warranty golf clubs people bring in from who knows where because I am not defending the OEM or the big box stores bottom line, I am defending the customer.

      The last thing on my soapbox is Ebay. There is one rule that is truer than any in golf, “if something seems too good to be true, guess what, it prob is.” I see people get ripped buying new clubs off ebay on a sometimes daily basis. DON”T BUY NEW CLUBS ON EBAY!! Its usually a scam.

      So in conclusion I appeal to all of you guys on here because I truly believe that guys reading this website have more knowledge than the so called workers in “big box stores,” please try to educate your friends. Go to your local “mom and pop” store if you still have one and establish a relationship with them, let them help you. You will be amazed I promise.

      Reply

      Phana24JG

      14 years ago

      Ovie, I agree with 95% of what you have written. However, another comment pointed out the fact that those fitters with a full service practice area have a distinct advantage over remote locations.

      The other area I think the small retailers could could tap to improve their business is an association with a GOOD instructor.

      Reply

      Robert Wilson

      14 years ago

      Can’t say enough about it, great article and solid comments. I agree with some of the points that Dave Brennan added, the USGA has to shoulder some of the blame here. It is too soon to tell how seriously the average golfer is going to take the new groove rules, but I can tell you for sure that they will not like what they add to the price of a wedge or a set of irons. I do not get why the USGA, as Dave suggests will not “make the game easier with a bifurcation of the equipment rules.” Access to fitted equipment may be a part of the cause, but larger issues are time, money and competency.

      Sure, the paint jobs and marketing campaigns evolve faster than the real game improvement innovations. But on the other hand new and different (sometimes better) equipment variations (also called “golf equipment technology”) have always been part of golf’s appeal. Why is the USGA trying to sterilize that? Why is the USGA setting golf equipment limits for 6 million golfers based on the profound expertise of 200 PGA players. My only answer is arrogance. Of course, Golf is still the greatest sport, and will certainly survive and thrive the beyond incumbency of a few men with good intentions but blinded by their biases.

      Reply

      DonW

      14 years ago

      Robert, I agree with your comments about the equipment rules being set for the top 200 players.
      Another thing that I think hurts the publics view of golf are the seemingly arbitrary rules decisions at the PGA Championship (the ‘sand trap’) and the disqualification at the womens event for swinging a club with a weight attached to warm up during a delay in play.
      I know people will disagree with me, but I think these kinds of things cause the public to look down on golf just as much as they used to for the loud pants golfers were sont to wear (sorry John).

      Reply

      mark

      14 years ago

      Phana, I guess I just disagree with you about the market in general. If a guy wants to buy a scotty cameron and overpay for it, then shoot 120 it makes no difference to me. Its no different than a kid wanting to buy Air Jordans for when he shoots hoops with his friends. I don’t feel the need to run after all the kids who want Jordans and show them proof that its not the best performing shoe out there. Much of our sports fantasies are lived through the sports heroes we watch on TV and if someone wants to use the same putter as Tiger so they can have some sort of novelty feel when they use it, good for them. Who knows, there may even be some sort of placebo type benefit that the player gets from a false sense of confidence with that club.
      I think one could argue that this cycle has helped to grow the game of golf, not shrink it. If sales weren’t driven on what the tour players play, large OEM’s wouldn’t offer the kind of salaries to the players to use their equipment that they do now. This then drives young golfers to try to get better to earn a big contract. Instead of trying to become a superstar in basketball or football, now you might see more high schoolers choose golf. A lot of parents out there might get their children golf lessons instead of putting them in tee ball because there is a lot of money to be had by these big evil OEM’s.
      I’m just playing devil’s advocate here and trying to present an opposing view to the theory that all big OEM’s are bad and competition between them is a bad thing for the game.

      Reply

      Phana24JG

      14 years ago

      Mark, I appreciate your points. We live(d) in a free market where people are free to be as dumb as they can afford to be. Competition is essential for any economic distribution system to function properly and more importantly, to grow. Look at the wonderful standard of living in Cuba and North Korea.

      The problem I have is that far too many people look to technology to solve their problem instead of their swing. If this cycle has helped to grow the game, I would like to see where. In the DRNY (Democratic Republic of New York), the number of juniors enrolling in USGA events has been declining for 15 yrs. Some of this is pure demographics, but even as a percentage of the population, there is still a decline. Moderate to high-end clubs are disappearing and/or under tremendous financial distress (even pre 9/08).

      Where I see the OEMs contributing to the problem is what MGS referred in the OP. With the concentration on the short-term bottom-line to meet shareholder expectations, no one is looking at what this will do to the market in 20 years. This might not be a problem if the golf media would report the news instead of regurgitate propaganda. However, why should we expect better from the golf media than the state-approved media? The big companies will simply move (or accelerate the existing moves) to Asia, as that is where the growth will be.

      I love big (or small) companies that are successful and contribute to our economy. I simply happen to believe that this fixation with next quarter’s report results in many decision that are not in our long-term interest and that problem is certainly not limited to the golf industry, but golf is a good microcosm of how to cope with a mature market.

      There are many factors that are contributing to golf’s decline in the USA, and I believe this to be one of the relatively minor ones. However, I simply do not see how this pricing/product cycle phenomena improves the game. Thank you for a cogent and polite disagreement.

      Reply

      2ndSwingGolf

      14 years ago

      People do like to spend more on equipment than on lessons it seems… One of the issues with the short product life cycles is there is a lot of good ‘new’ technology out there that doesn’t carry the ‘new’ product price tag.

      Reply

      mark

      14 years ago

      mygolfspy, what is your response to John’s post? He makes very good points and I think points out a lot of holes in your argument.

      The consumer benefits whenever companies get into a “price war” because the products become cheaper. The quality doesn’t get any worse because if it did, you would see it on a launch monitor or in testing. I think you discredit a lot of the hard work that goes into making new products at a competitive price point.

      The rate at which products are released is also a benefit that you are seeing as a negative. If you buy a Brand X driver and it is a great driver, the fact that a newer one comes out in 6 months does not make your driver perform any worse or decrease the “value” at all. It is still a great driver. For those consumers who have a need to always get new products as soon as they become available, there is a premium to pay for upgrading frequently. The smart consumer would use this business model to their advantage and wait 6 months to get the Brand X driver cheaper. Why do you think that a re-sale value determines the value of a club? If your argument that the technology doesn’t advance much between models is true, then the driver you bought 6 months ago still has the same or similar value. Its still a driver that you can hit 300 yrds. You buy a golf club to play it, right? Not to sell it later.

      It is simple supply and demand. If consumers weren’t buying new drivers every 6 months, the manufacturers wouldn’t make them. Nobody can force someone to replace their driver to get the newest one. Blame the uneducated consumers for blindly believing flashy marketing or for giving in to their impulse to have the latest and greatest, not the companies for giving the people what they want.

      Reply

      Phana24JG

      14 years ago

      Mark, MGS is up to his eyeballs these days with the site and family so let me jump in here. I think John raised many valid points, but did NOT address the central thesis of MGS’s original post which was that the price wars/product cycling has NOT been good for the game. John’s argument that it was inevitable and has benefitted some consumers is well-taken and I think he correctly identifies that those small operations not realted to a practice facility were probably doomed in any event.

      The idea that “non-compete” agreements would have delayed the process is ludicrous. Do you have any idea in today’s global economy how difficult non-compete agreements are to enforce? Form an LLC with relatives as principles, become a “consultant,” do your manufacturing overseas and by the time the legal system catches up, the game for that particular product is over.

      The assumption that lower prices always benefits the consumer is a specious argument. What benefit does the lower price provide if the actual utility derived from the product is less? The combination of the poor quality of 75% of golf instruction (ever watch the Haney Project or read the bilge in the lamestream golf media?) coupled with the ridiculous marketing of technology to the average golfer has had IMHO a large impact on the lack of growth in the golf industry long before the recession. If I play with one more dude who has a state of the art driver, brand new irons, four Vokey wedges, and a Scotty on his way to 98 I am going to scream.

      It seems to me as though his comments about Ping merely reinforce MSG’s argument rather than counter it.

      I thought his observations on small retailers was excellent, especially for those retailers serving an area where the golf season is limited.

      Finally, Mark, I think your last paragraph suggest that either you did not get, or MGS failed to properly present, the hypothesis behind this entire discussion. You correctly state that supply and demand dictate the market. However, the entire rationale for advertising and marketing for a given segment of the market (i.e. golf) is to artifically shift/move the demand curve and position your company to take advantage of the change. The problem is that these actions have been very deleterious to the sport of golf. You very correctly identify uneducated consumers as willing accomplices in this game. MSG was created in large part to educate consumers and belie the boatload of BS from the dominant OEMs. However, to imply (or did I mistakenly infer?) that the OEMs should be held harmless from any blame in this situation is not justified.

      Then again, what do I know?

      Reply

      Bill

      14 years ago

      I miss the green grass golf shop. Now about all you can buy at a green grass shop are shirts and hats… It was nice to be able to hit the latest gear outdoors and actually see the ball fly… not like the big box where you hit indoors into a net or if you are lucky a simulator… puke!!

      Even though I am a huge advocate for custom fitting, face it, 95% of people who golf are not that serious about it and would never take the 2 hours or so it would take to do a proper fitting. Even though they will spend 6 hours playing a muni the next day. Even among the other 5% awareness of even what fitting is is minimal… the industry has never done a good job of selling fitting and now the major mfg’s just want to do OTR volume, that’s where they make money.

      I would love to see the majors start shipping club heads, shafts and grips so you could get locally assembled product from highly trained and skilled club fitters. It would be interesting to see what the mfg’s margins would be on that model versus a fully assembled club. I can imagine some benefits to the mfg. as a business model and huge benefits to the retailer.

      I do lament the current state of the industry, the one thing I don’t dislike is the velocity at which new products are introduced… as a golfer, the faster the better. I don’t care about having the latest model and am usually a year behind but boy, I hit the ball farther now at 50 than I did when I was 25. Bring on the new technology as fast as you can. I can decide if something is just cosmetic or actually performance improving and if I want to bag it. I think those who complain about short product cycles are retailers; for the reasons mentioned and posers who have to always have the newest model, you don’t have to buy that new TM driver every time they bring one out, but it’s nice to know you can the way I see it. If they come out with a new one every month, I don’t care.

      Reply

      Sam

      14 years ago

      awesome post. learned a ton. love the website

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      14 years ago

      Just checked out your site as well…look forward to seeing it grow…like the concept for sure. Tell me more about it.

      Reply

      MyBluC4

      14 years ago

      Terrific article and articulate business brief. Companies, whether golf club manufacturers or anyone else, must manage cash flow and be competitive at a profitable level to succeed and grow. This cannot be done with golf equipment because the margins overall are not large, no retail establishment, brick & mortor or web based, can plan on selling an even amount of all manufacturers’ products and have no way to understand how a customer necessarily differentiates between one technology and another other than price. Hence, the huge level of consolidatiion in the industry. Technology has its place for sure, but so does common sense. Does the average golfer find improvement with his/her game relative to equipment in a two year cycle? Probably not. Once a golfer finds comfort in using new sticks, will they be so quick to buy new at current price points so rapidly. Again, probably not. I don’t understand where the fight for market share exists, except maybe for top tier players who actually can understand and afford new technology and is willing to invest in improving their game where a stroke or two means a lot.
      In short, I think it’s nuts. I’m a 7.3 handicap index and still playing the same irons I purchased in 1996. Just now, 14 years later am I thinking about new irons and only so because of my age and reduced flexibility. I think most golfers into the game a number of years would rather invest in lessons to maximize the equipment they have than simply buy new sticks. In the end, if you ain’t got a swing, you ain’t got a thing!

      Reply

      Really great post. I worked in a golf shop in a private club from 2001-2008. During this time I was really involved in the manufacturing side of things along with the buyers. I was amazed at how many clubs these member purchased just because they were new and they have the cash to do so. I was also stunned at how many would drive 40 minutes to buy a new club from a big box store that was $10 cheaper!

      I personally get sick of the short product life cycle of clubs especially from Taylor Made Golf. It sucks because I am a big fan of their products.

      Reply

      Justin

      14 years ago

      For a game that struts its integrity as its most redeeming quality, it really doesn’t look that way when you pull away the shade. That’s sad, for me, because I love golf and have always used that point as a means to explain why it’s such a great game (and better, fundamentally, than football, baseball or basketball). Seems I was wrong.

      As far as equipment is concerned, how is something “longer and straighter” when all the individual parts that get tested by the USGA are at their max? I don’t see anything out there that will make a club longer/straighter than it is now… if aerodynamics were so great, wouldn’t Ryan Moore lead the PGA in driving distance (or at least, be in the top 10)? Then there’s all the rage with face inserts- Maraging Steel, SuperSteel, that sort of thing. Too bad they still can’t have a COR of no more than .85 (plus tolerances)!

      Are we consumers that misguided/blind/ignorant that we continuously fall for all these tactics? Why can’t we get together and remind the “super brands” that it’s just as easy for them to fall off the same way Lynx, Ram, Hogan and MacGregor did as it is to stay a major retailer? Will there ever be a point where enough is enough?

      Thanks for reading my rant. I feel better, at least a little bit, now.

      Reply

      Brian

      14 years ago

      I appreciate the economics of the big box stores, and competetive pricing and all. But these guys REALLY fail the end user who don’t know what they need.

      I can’t tell you the number of times I’ve walked into a big box shop just to ‘waggle’ at lunch or whatever, and overhear a staffer providing significant misinformation to customers who do not know a lot about equipment. I bet less than 10% of the guys on the floor couldn’t tell you the differences between a dynamic, precision, or KBS shaft. When guys ask, the reason the usually give? “abc shaft is preferred on tour”, which to the lay person translates to better, even though it’ll actually have an adverse affect on someone at their skill level. All the mags say is simply ‘be sure to get fit!’. But finding a fitter where the equipment is sold is tough!

      Part of the ‘big box’ economics is high volume low margins. Revenue is only one side of that equation. Alot of times the other piece is managing staff wages. Most of these guys are hourly, and few have the enthusiasm to prepare for their job, or simply don’t care enough to get the customers into the right gear. Rather, they care about moving inventory.

      Admittedly, for me, the research and due dilligence on equipment purchases is a lot of the fun. But it sure would be good to have a qualified sounding board at the shop to bounce thoughts off of.

      I’m pretty surprised that golfsmith and golf galaxy don’t have some sort of employee certification process, that they’d then ADVERTISE. If you assume the 80/20 rule noted above (20% of players are serious and buy 80% of the equipment – which seems reasonable) than it seems to me like their leaving a lot of money on the table by not distinguishing themselves in this regard.

      Reply

      C. Evans

      14 years ago

      What’s killing it? Counterfeit items getting into consumer’s hands, ebay killing golf shops on prices and product availability, and people trying to buy a golf game instead of developing one. It’s only going to get worse. Golf will eventually become a rich man’s game again, sadly.

      Reply

      DonW

      10 years ago

      Rich man’s game?

      Heck, the poor man can get his clubs for cheap on ebay or Golfsmith’s pre-owned clubs section.

      Reply

      Paul

      14 years ago

      The retailer makes so little margin he can’t afford to buy your old clubs off you.

      I used to swap my custom fit Ping irons every two years, at the same store every time, and he would take my old set as a trade in.

      The following year I’d trade in my woods – same deal.

      This year its woods – G10 fairways and the Rapture V2 Driver – I am only buying the driver as I could not afford to take his trade in offer on all the clubs – $100 for driver and $50 for fairways. He cannot sell the Driver for more than $140 (2 on the second hand shelf already) even though its the current model and in good nick.

      He makes 15% at best on clubs, and then 6 mths later sells tailors and callers at massive reductions – Why would someone buy my old Rapture for $140 off the rack when a previosly $600 disbolic is now reduced to $249?

      Ultimately, its the consumer who suffers – profit is not a dirty word but the clubs in my bag are not worth setting on fire due to the “dynamics” of the industry.

      NB I’ll still buy Ping again ‘cos at least they still retain some credibility whilst making an honest quid!

      Paul

      Reply

      pgd

      14 years ago

      mr king looks out for the year numbers only , which= bonus dollars , not the buisness as a whole

      Reply

      Dave Brennan

      14 years ago

      Your article is a solid attempt to identify the dynamics that take place in an industry over time. The implication of your piece is that the competitive landscape within the OEM and retail sectors, and its resultant impact on the golfer, has deteriorated–due mostly in part to the actions of one individual’s business philosophy. Though this individual may relish feeling that empowered, the reality is that he’s as much a victim as a villain. You have to go back another generation (the 1980’s–he was still playing in shorts) to find the genesis of the product cycle change you refer to.

      This response by no means is meant to excuse misleading marketing practices and does go beyond the scope of your point. However, after 20 years in this industry and 20 more previously in ski & tennis, experience tells me that what we’ve seen in golf is a result of multiple factors which impact many industries. Perhaps the most influential aspect has been the acceptance of new technology. I say “acceptance” because typically there is a lag-time from when a particular technology is available to use and when its adopted. On that point, the historical path taken by the golf industry was more conservative than that of other sports-related or technology-based industries. To your point on product cycles, technology has been and will be the largest driving factor for product cycle with a curve that’s generally very steep (i.e. products evolved quickly). Take Moore’s Law for example which has held up for decades. It states that a doubling of computer processing power will occur every two years (we wouldn’t be communicating in this way had it not). These technology-induced cycles usually continue until a level of diminishing returns is reached or, in golf’s case, a governing body intervenes and artificially slows implementation.

      Looking back specifically at golf, until the 1980’s the consumer’s driving force to purchase was to replace worn out equipment. Certainly there were new designs from a myriad of companies but the number of significant technological advances in product could be counted on one hand. As a result, business was based on a “replacement cycle” model. Then came the adoption of advanced composites in the late 80’s which changed the product cycle game and created a new business model for the industry–the technology-driven “product cycle” model. Phase 1 was the introduction of the Periodic Chart of materials–Carbon, Graphite, Kevlar, Titanium. Phase 2 was the ability to combine these materials to create new geometries–Big, Great Big and Biggest were the adjectives du jure used to quantify these changes. Phase 3 was analytics (projectile and ballistics analysis) which compared and contrasted individual product advances–materials, geometry and weight to optimize speed, spin and launch angle–this created very impressive performance advancements–460 cc driver heads,60 gram shafts and multilayer ball construction being the most visible due to the Tour. The result was stunning increases in driving distance and the death of the wound ball–accompanied by a great deal of controversy.

      Today we’re in the final moments of Phase 4–which has been the refinement of all these technological advancements focused at the individual level for “fitting”. Various levels of club (head/shaft/grip) fitting, ball fitting and combined club and ball fitting are now available to the average golfer. What’s next? Phase 5 which will be the return to a (post-recession) “replacement cycle”–unless the governing body allows technology to significantly influence performance once again.

      As to the comments in the article about the number of golfers declining, three quick points: 1) The number of golfers has been grossly inflated over the years. The real number that the industry uses, which has remained relatively steady for decades, is between 5.5 and 6.5 million serious golfers–the “80/20 rule”–those that purchase products and play regularly. 2) There is a real demographic problem the industry is facing, at least in the near-term, as to sustaining golfer numbers; an age lag exists in the post baby boomer population due to people marrying and having children later in life. Older golfers are leaving the game at a faster pace then younger ones are replacing them. 3) And most importantly, golf remains difficult and therefore takes a long time play, between 4-5 hours. It’s too long and too tough for most people’s lifestyle today. Perhaps we need to re-think how the game is “packaged” (18 holes vs. ? ) and/or make the game easier with a bifurcation of the equipment rules. This could help to make the game easier to learn and advance which in turn speeds up the pace of play which in turn attracts and retains more golfers.

      Here’s the bottom line for this 20+ year run up the technology curve: Hundred’s, if not thousands of individuals contributed to these advancements starting in the 1980s; the product cycles kept accelerating as more technology was introduced and refined; over time, many OEMs could not afford the cost to compete and their numbers fell; as the number of OEMs fell so too did the number of retailers as the variety of brands limited their ability to competitively differentiate themselves.

      Who are the biggest winners in the industry’s technology run up? Just go out to your garage (or your dad’s) and pull out some pre-1990 clubs and balls and go play your next round with them. That should answer the easy question “are golfers better off today?”.

      The harder question to answer relative to your statement “Only one man changed the golf industry!”, I’d say we all own a piece of that.

      Reply

      Piet

      13 years ago

      Great sum-up! Enjoyed reading it.

      However, for phase 5: my guess is that the game will become digitalized. More and more tools allow us to add an augmented layer of information on top of our game. Think personalized analytics, self-tracking, self-teaching, etc.

      Will not take too long before TM starts picking up on this trend. But to your point: to what extend will the governing bodies allow for these innovations to enter the tour?

      Reply

      Jared

      14 years ago

      I’ve been a part of the golf business for most of my 43 years. My family owned the largest retail chain in the northeast and I moved to the manufacturing/wholesale side about 20 years ago, working for both CG and TM. Product life cycles have been declining for years and, as rwelshjr said above, the first reason was the companies going public. CG went public in early 1992, followed by TM getting purchased by Adidas in 1997 (coincidentally, the year of CG’s highest market cap). Once this happened, the golf companies slowly and inexorably moved toward the financial market’s focus on quarterly earnings and away from satisfying the golfer.

      The second reason was an effect of the first–the constant, quarterly drive to improve earnings forced the mfrs to listen more closely to the big box retailers. Big box retail has some benefits–you generally get paid on time, the checks and orders are larger, your return on time is greater. Unfortunately, big box retail lacks the core of what drove the golf business–retailers who were invested in the game and the business. Since there is no longer any loyalty or emotional investment in the industry on the side of the retailers, the mfrs have been wagged by the tail and now they have to play the big-box game. Thus, new products all the time because most big-box retail (not just golf) has no idea what customer loyalty means, no idea how to truly sell and create loyal, repeat customers. They’re great on price and that’s about it, you might as well be walking into Target.

      Reply

      Ryan

      13 years ago

      I could not AGREE with you more!! You sound like you really do know what you’re talking about!!

      Reply

      Bill

      14 years ago

      If you think this is bad, try the bowling business… New balls released at random and they are
      all the biggest and baddest… Or, my business, consumer electronics! WOW, try to compete with
      Best Buy and Walmart.. The madness never stops my friend, they call that progress…

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      14 years ago

      I have heard that recently about the bowling industry but do not follow it so I don’t know much.

      Reply

      GeeMarie

      14 years ago

      Spanky.. really? The R-9 Driver is the same as the Burner Bubble?

      Reply

      Spanky

      14 years ago

      Somewhere in the world taylormade is planning the release of a driver with the same technology as the last 20 clubs they put out… When will the madness stop????

      Reply

      cheymike

      14 years ago

      Very interesting article and comments, and all about as close to SPOT ON as they could be! Here is what I would love to see happen: When Company “X” comes out with their new driver in another 3-4 months (I guarantee it will be before Christmas) and touts it as “longer, straighter, faster” and says it will beat the competition and make you a better golfer, I want Company “Y” to have some testing done by an independent testing lab. If it isn’t true (which it won’t be) then dammit.. hit the advertising world with BIG BUCKS and show the world that Company X is nothing short of a liar. Mom and Pop can’t afford to pay for the testing or the advertising or the lawyers for the lawsuits that would follow. It will be up to someone with deep pockets to do so. Sadly, I know I’m dreaming.

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      14 years ago

      Maybe we will have to do that test.

      Reply

      Rob

      14 years ago

      Good article…and I really like your website. But, something to think about…the very issue you are talking about is the reason that MyGolfSpy exists in the first place. Your site is constantly promoting / ‘outing’ the newest clubs and rumors on clubs. You advertise ‘$50 deals’. Once again, don’t get me wrong, I love your site, but your site is an example of the same mentality that you are argueing is ‘hurting’ the industry.

      The economy has changed and it’s almost impossible for the local ‘mom & pop’ stores to make a run of it. I know, I run a local computer repair shop, we are a much needed service, but we can barely stay afloat. People think they should be able to walk in a pay $30 and have their computer fixed in 1 hour. And they want free advice on what they should buy, so they can buy it somewhere else (ie – online and cheaper).

      It’s hard to fight it, I’ve done the same thing in the past. I once used the local golf shop to ‘demo’ clubs, then ordered on eBay for less. I’ve learned and try to support the local shops, but when you only have $X to spend, it’s difficult.

      It’s a cultural mindset that I think is changing, but maybe not fast enough. Anyway… just some ‘food for thought’.

      mygolfspy

      14 years ago

      We think about it everyday trust me…that is why we write the articles we do. If you are a regular reader of the site you will notice that we only say something positive about these new releases when the technology or improved design merits it.

      This site was developed with one thing in mind “Education” of the consumer and still is to this day. We are I think the only ones unveiling smoke and mirror type advertising and marketing concepts done by companies.

      JIm

      14 years ago

      I agree 100% with this statement by mygolfspy. Although they do show all the new gear their comments about the new gear are non-biased and helpful. Not just the same talking points you see in the Golfsmith catalog (yawn).

      n3andq

      14 years ago

      As an owner of a mom and pop service company, i understand the dilemma of saving a buck or two versus supporting a local shop and building a relationship. This relationship could be with a guy or gal who works in a big box store, or the owner or partner of a small shop. Either will benefit you, as the comsumer, in the long run. I have seen an entire staff move from one chain store to another. I swore I would never shop there. Then when I had the yips or needed a repair, I found myself at the new store, looking for the GUY who could help. If you think you cannot afford the small guy’s mark up then save your money for an extra week or two. You will make a person very happy and keep most or all of that profit in your community. I could go on for hours.

      DonW

      10 years ago

      The sad truth for the golf Industry is that for the average golfer, their clubs are not the problem.

      Taking time for proper instruction to gain those skills and then putting in time for practice is the path to a better and more enjoyable golf game .

      The good news for the golf industry is that most golfers or prospective golfers don’t realize that truth.

      Reply

      Lee

      14 years ago

      Great article and right on. I don’t even carry a driver. Still playing with TM200 steel metals (#2, #4, #7, and #9). More often than not I out-drive my playing buddies that have all the super duper drivers with my #2. Keep up the good work. Lee

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      14 years ago

      Thanks for taking the time to read Lee.

      Reply

      John

      14 years ago

      Let me start by qualifying myself, I’ve been in the golf industry for over 20 years I’ve worked on the green grass side of it, I’ve run a mom & pop shop, and I’ve worked for one of the biggest chains in the industry. I’m certified to fit any club in the bag. There are a truths to what you say but you reach in some other areas to make connections between the actions of one man and the state of the industry. First with just about any big business if you don’t have your high level employees sign a non-compete agreement then shame on you. You are right there are shorter product life cycles in the industry right now but Ping is doing pretty well for themselves not releasing their product more than once a year, they have also stood firm in their pricing structure demanding that all retail accounts sell their product for the same price and keeping a fair playing field. Just to touch on your “Pricing War” point golf clubs are as expensive as they have ever been, the prices that people pay for high end putters and “tour” product is crazy. I think the industry has done a better job having product available at all price points. Every vendor has the same opportunity to create these price point products failure to capture a least a part of the pie in these categories leads no one to blame but themselves. Historically “pricing wars” have always led the consumer to get a better deal not pay more so I know you think this is a direct link to shorter product life cycles but there is more to it than you speak of. When we talk about retail stores closing let us first talk business 101 and stores close for one reason or another but the biggest reason a store closes is that it fails to remain profitable. “Return on investment” is critical in any business and even more so in the golf industry. Better known to a lot of people as “profit margin” or just “margin” this return on investment must cover all of a companies operating expenses and then leave some money to invest in new product. If a business fails to run a high enough margin that is nobody’s fault but their own. It’s the death of a mom & pop shop to have the owners buddies come in and say “hey make me a deal on this driver we’ve been friends for a long time” that takes what little margin that club has and throw it right in the trash. I’ll also let you in on a little industry secret that most “mom and pop shops” fail to realize until it’s too late. THERE IS NOT ENOUGH MARGIN IN GOLF CLUBS TO SUSTAIN BUSINESS FOR A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF TIME. If you want to be in the golf industry you better have a high margin niche. I don’t care if that niche is teaching, or custom fitting, or if you want to be the only shop around that has J Lindeberg but you better have a high margin niche to make up for the low margin golf clubs that you will be selling. I am curious about your comments on “Less access for golfers to improve their games.” Golfers are going to improve by practicing whether that is on their own or with the properly trained eye of a professional instructor. Most golf retail facilities that have gone out of business in the last few years have not been true practice facilities. You also have new business popping up all over like Golf tec who specialize in this area of expertise to give golfers a place to practice under the watchful eye of an instructor. Let me also state here that most golfers don’t improve because even if they do practice they are only making bad habits permanent. Practice doesn’t make perfect it only makes permanent. Only PERFECT practice makes perfect. It is my belief that right now the golf industry is having a hard time growing and it is strictly related to the economy. Everyone here plays golf but if we didn’t have jobs how much golf would we be playing? The golf courses are the ones being hit the hardest rounds are down and as the golf courses close that adds to the unemployment rate and typically more than we think. Let’s look at that closely. First all the people we have contact with as we go to the golf course to play. The golf pro that runs the pro shop, and typically someone who handles the carts, a starter that manages the first tee, maybe a ranger or two, the cart girl or guy who runs the beverage and snack cart, the wait staff who works in the grill the General manager an admin person and then all the grounds crew from a superintendent to all the staff that they manage. So the two to three people that we come into contact with when we play our round of golf on the weekend or on a Thursday afternoon only touches the tip of the iceberg of who is affected when a business fails. It is my opinion that there are too many factors to point the finger at one man and say he is responsible for the state of the industry. Would MacGregor still be alive and thriving if they had gone public and had stock holders to consider or was their demise many years ago when they started selling box sets to K-Mart? We may never know. What we do know is that golf just like many other big business has evolved and if you fail to evolve with your industry you will be left on the side of the road to perish.

      Reply

      Fred

      13 years ago

      With reference to rounds being down around the US. There is a HUGE population group with plenty of money that is an untapped source of revenue due to misconceptions and ignorance. The disabled population of this country numbers over 50 MILLION with an annual income in the TRILLIONS of dollars. In spite of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the progress toward accessibility has been very slow. If you are a golf course owner and want to build up your presence in your community for additional rounds, as well as an improved public image, contact The Disabled Golfers’ Learning Foundation. http://www.DisabilityGolfer.com

      Reply

      Joe Golfer

      10 years ago

      I’d have to disagree with your assessment of why the smaller “mom and pop” golf stores have closed. I live in a major metropolitan suburb. When the big box stores, like Golf Galaxy, moved in, it just killed off the small shops.
      I knew the owner of one of them on a casual basis. He would match any price of another store (this was before the internet was even popular), but people just assumed that the smaller shops were more expensive than shopping at a big chain golf store.
      Plus, people often prefer the big shop because they feel less obligated to buy something. If you go to a small golf shop, you do get great personal service, but you might feel a little bit intimidated to purchase something. You might feel more comfortable just browsing in the big shop if you aren’t really sure yet and just want to browse and try things before deciding at a later date.
      It’s the same in any field. Business is business, and too many shops that sell the same products means the smaller ones won’t survive.
      Personally, I miss the smaller shops, not just in golf but in many areas of life.
      By the way, I don’t think the author over-emphasized his ideas. I agree with them.
      I would have liked to see a little more emphasis on the economy though as a cause of the decline.
      Many people have abandoned golf or in more cases simply play less because of the cost.
      Many people are working longer hours to make a living. If they aren’t working enough hours due to layoffs or having their hours cut back, then they can’t afford the luxury of golf as a hobby or even to hit the driving range, where a small bucket of balls costs a ridiculous amount compared to just 20 years ago.

      Reply

      Joe Golfer

      10 years ago

      P.S. Folks, when I said that I disagree with the assessment of why the “mom and pop” shops have closed, I was not disagreeing with the author of the article. I was disagreeing with the opinion of the person whose post I was replying to, “John”.
      While he raised some valid points, I just think he missed the mark on why the smaller shops can’t compete against the huge shops.

      Ed

      14 years ago

      Great article. Looks like golf has caught up with the electronics industry, who ever thought we would be buying 50in TV’s for $700 ??? or getting an Iphone ‘free’ for a 2 year contract with the phone company.

      I think it shows the lack of patience we all have. People want something new and better, if my friend gets and R9, I don’t just want an R9, I want something better like a R9 Superduper !

      The golf cpmpanies do this because they can, and we, by running out and buying the new stuff, encourage it.

      Not sure if there is an answer or even if this is a bad thing, workers at those companies, Kiddo at Golfsmith and Suzie at the pro shop all benefit from our acting like kids.

      Reply

      GLS

      14 years ago

      The golf companies feed an addiction. Most golfers want a club to fix their swing instead of working on the swing. If you buy a new set even every year, have you ever grooved a swing with the old clubs? Are clubs better now than 20 years ago? Sure they are Are they better than 5 years ago, not so much. Regripping and a groove tool solve a lot of problems, but the TM’s and Nike’s of the world would rather you not know that.

      Reply

      FSU#21

      14 years ago

      i’ve said on here before that i’ve worked in the industry for over 10 years and im currently the head teaching professional at driving range/par 3 course. i have also accepted partnership in our pro-shop/club repair facillity. not to long ago business would show up at your doorstep, i remember when the whole “tigermania” thing was just starting out we would be making orders on items that we already had orders placed. things would just fly off the shelves and every man or woman with an old 7 iron laying around the garage would buy a lesson package and usually get fitted for new sticks. now you need to go out and drum up business. everybody wants a deal whether it be equipment/apparel or even lessons and it really hits the profit margin’s hard. you’ve got all the major oem’s offering extra clubs,gift certificates and signing bonuses with the purchase of “just released” product. that stuff used to sell itself without freebies.you have to move a certain amount of $299 drivers just so you can afford to stay in line with the $100 markdown that’s coming in a few months. in this industry we all do what we have to do to get by as long as it’s within manufacter guidelines and anybody that tells you were getting rich is lying to you. it’s all for the love of the game.

      Reply

      rwelshjr

      14 years ago

      What killed the golf equipment industry was that the major companies went public. No longer was long-term financial stability in the cards. In today’s world, quarter to quarter performance is all that matters. Short term thinking has killed long-term stability.

      All of the above, is simply by-product of “today only” addiction.

      Reply

      Ghapac

      14 years ago

      absolutely correct. While all of the ideas in the original post are right, it wouldn’t have had the effect it had without all the companies going public. That is what led to the other behavior.

      Reply

      tony

      14 years ago

      I never understood why taylor made releases a new driver every 6mths, is there any REAL difference between the r9 and super tri other than its black?

      I think it works against the consumer as well, if you buy a full priced driver then go to trade it in 2yrs it will be worthless because 4 other models have been released in between.

      Reply

      titto

      14 years ago

      Best article on the forum…
      Always thought that this was always only european problem… seems global…

      They dominate the advertising of golf, so most of the golfers , like only to see this equipment in there bags(The tour player play it, so its must be the best money can buy)… They do custom fitting options on there websites , because they not want to sell there club-heads on small custom fitters… They spot the new trends on the web… (like the latest trend white is the new black) and copy this…
      Fore most of use golf is are passion,fore them its big money…

      Reply

      Tim Jonesbury

      14 years ago

      I thought in the early to mid 2000s that this strategy would eventually catch up to them, and the bubble would burst. but here we are a decade later and it seems business as usual. i know TM is part of a conglomerate, so it is tough to see the balance sheet. but i would imagine if they were an enron, adidas would have make wholesale changes by now.

      Reply

      Brian

      14 years ago

      Great article on a fasinating topic. It sounds like the defector is responsible for TAYLOR-making the quck-club cycle of today. It’s too bad the owner of the company he went to wasn’t CALLED-AWAY for a meeting when this joint venture was conceived. As a result, you’ve now got some company’s producing 6,7,R9 models a year, while the other responds like it’s been possessed by el DIABLO to put out their own number of models every year.

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      14 years ago

      Thanks for the comments Brian.

      Reply

      Ryan

      13 years ago

      Brian!! Well said!!

      Reply

      greg

      13 years ago

      well said brian

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Wedges
    Apr 16, 2024
    Vokey WedgeWorks Low Bounce K Grind Wedge
    News
    Apr 16, 2024
    It Was A Masters To Forget For LIV Golf
    Golf Apparel
    Apr 16, 2024
    adidas Pioneers Next Generation of Lightweight Golf Garments
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.