How To Find the Right Golf Ball
Golf Balls

How To Find the Right Golf Ball

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

How To Find the Right Golf Ball

Written By: Dean Snell

There are a couple of questions I get asked all the time:

How should I test golf balls?

How do I know which ball is right for me?

The answer is easier than you may think.

The Golf Ball Has Changed

Back in the early 90’s, there were basically two types of golf balls. There were hard, two-piece, Pinnacle balls and soft Tour Balata type balls, and there was a huge performance difference between them.

In fact, at that time, our tests looked closely at driver spin and 8 iron spin. What we found was that drivers produced around 4000 RPM for balata balls, while spin rates for the two-piece balls were generally in the 2500 rpm range.

The higher spin off the driver from the balata balls not only led to much shorter distances, but also to huge hooks and slices when they weren’t hit correctly. Golfers slicing the ball across 2 fairways wasn’t an uncommon sight.

With the next generation, balls like the Titleist Professional and Maxfli Revolution, driver spin was reduced to around 3500 rpm. Three-piece balls further reduced spin to around 3000 rpm. Today’s tour balls produced around 2500 rpm; equivalent to those original two-piece balls.

When it comes to distance off the driver, major tour ball manufacturers have a level playing field. The balls produce roughly the same spin and the same ball speed. If the aerodynamics are good – and they generally are – the balls will go the same distance off the tee. So, my personal opinion is that you should NEVER choose a ball based on driver performance.  Think about it…you hit maybe 14 drives a round, so regardless of whether you shoot 75 or 95, you’re going hit a higher percentage of shots with other clubs.

how-to-find-golf-ball2

Where Golf Balls are Truly Different

Ever wonder why you see tour players spin balls back off the green?

A tour player can generate wedge spin rates of around 10000 rpm. It takes around 9000 rpm to make a ball stop, so anything above that will spin back a bit. This is dependent of the slope and firmness of the greens, but in general, those are the numbers.

Now consider that an average golfer (18 handicap) only spins the wedge around 5000 rpm; basically half of what a tour player generates. Hence, for the average player, even wedge shots typically hit and roll out.

backspin-snell

Tour quality golf balls, like MY TOUR BALL from Snell Golf, will create much higher short game spin.  The reason for the higher spin is that the soft cast urethane cover compresses and rolls on the iron face, which produces lower launch and higher spin.

A typical two piece ball will have a tendency to “slide” a bit more on the face of the club, resulting in higher launch and lower spin – also known to a lot of players as flier-type shots. While there are a lot of players who like the lower spin and higher launch, and are OK with playing bump and run type shots around the greens, many better players feel they lose some control of the shot, and prefer the control they get from more spin.

slide-up-face

Finding the Right Ball

An 18 handicap players misses an average of 17 greens a round, so if you think about it, that creates the equivalent of 17 par threes on the typical course. That’s a lot of shots played around the green, which is why I recommend testing the golf ball from where you play the most shots. Inside of 100 yards is where the balls are truly different.

Take the time to give the balls a good test.  You spend a lot of money on drivers, irons, lessons, memberships, driving ranges, etc., but few golfers ever take the time to test the one piece of equipment you use on every shot.

17-per-round

How To Test

Here’s what you should do. Go out to the course, spend an hour or two, on course where you can try different shots.

Start at 100 yards…

Take a two-piece ball and a tour ball, or take two to three balls you are interested in testing (of course we hope Snell will be in this test).

Hit a series of shots varying the golf ball.

Move to 70 yards, then 50, then 30. Hit chips, putts, etc.

If a group comes up behind you, go to next hole and do the same thing…100, 70, 30, chips, putts.

Do this testing for 9 holes while noting how each ball feels and spins. Does it fly high or low? Does it check or does it release?

Look for the ball that does what you want it to. Ultimately, you should choose the ball that offers the performance and feel that you like the best.

ball-test

Don’t give a second thought to driver distance.

IF you walk off the last hole and find that you genuinely cannot tell any difference at all, then you should absolutely buy the cheapest one. Keep working on your game to get better.

For the more accomplished golfer, I recommend the same testing but move your starting distance back to 150 yards, and test over 9 holes. This will give you more of an opportunity to see how the ball performs in all conditions, including wind from varying directions.

Hope this helps get you started, and best of luck in your testing.

 

For You

For You

News
Apr 15, 2024
We’re Witnessing Greatness With Scheffler’s Dominance
Golf Accessories
Apr 15, 2024
Temu Finds: Saplize Putting Suite
Partner Content
Apr 15, 2024
Five Hidden Gem UK and Ireland Golf Tours
Dean Snell

Dean Snell

Dean Snell

Dean Snell worked for Titleist for 7 years where he co-invented the Pro V1. After moving to TaylorMade, Snell invented the TP Red and TP Black, Penta series, Lethal, and Tour Preferred line of golf balls. In total Dean Snell has been granted 38 US patents, all in golf ball technology. After 25 years in the industry, Snell left TaylorMade to start his own company with the goal of bringing a tour level performance to the consumer at an affordable price.

Dean Snell

Dean Snell

Dean Snell

Dean Snell

Dean Snell

Dean Snell

Dean Snell

Dean Snell

Dean Snell





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Tim C.

      9 years ago

      There is no doubt in my mind that the my tour ball by Snellgolf is the best ball on the market hands down!

      Reply

      _M_

      9 years ago

      Shocked at how many are complaining they can’t do this test. Give me a break. At the busiest course I play there are times of the day where I have the course almost to my self. Maybe it’s not at the time some of you are playing at your course, but go at a different time, especially later in the day.

      That is unless you don’t want to try the test, or think you know more than someone who has invented some of the most popular balls in golf.

      Now I have some Snells, haven’t played them yet but I’m looking forward to testing them.

      The name…no issue. I’m sure once upon a time Titleist or Callaway sounded weird too. The logo print is too big. I would just change the name from my tour ball to tour ball to differentiate it from the regular non-tour ball.

      Reply

      Mbwa Kali Sana

      9 years ago

      I am in total contradiction with Mr SNELL ,as the shots with the driver being the most uni portant in a round .Mr SNELL ,despite his background doesn’t Watch the Top Pro’s at the Major Opens .Between BUBBA WATSON GOING FOR 340 yards plus and JORDAN SPIETH HITTING to a ” bare ” 285 yards ,there’s a hell OF a différence .All top players ,including Amateurs ,who shoot low scores ,are long off the TEE .
      And the ” hard ” ball travels further than the ” soft ” ball .
      I’m very good at the short game ,including putting ( 24/28 puts per round ) and I play ” hard ” balls .What counts is to get the nearest possible to the Green with YOUR long shots .The amount OF spin with the short shots is OF little importance .
      I’ m an Oldtimer at golf ,AGE 81 ,and I Still play to a handicap OF 7 with ” run OF the mill ” balls .

      Reply

      horsefly

      9 years ago

      I’m with you, bub. What are your “run of the mill” balls?

      Reply

      Steve

      9 years ago

      I agree with the “old timer” on the drive being the most important shot for an “hacker”. A good drive always puts you in a position to get an occasional bird and almost guarantees a par or bogey with a 2 putt. A poor drive sets you up for no chance for bird, almost no chance for par and scrambling to avoid a double bogey.

      Typically I use SE balls…..Someone Else’s. Although recently I’ve been using Srixon Q stars because I got them free from a Golf rewards program. I’ve also used MG golfs balls when i actually paid for balls. For me as good as pro v’s or anything else i’ve ever played.

      Also, something Snell doesn’t address is that in the wind 2 piece balls are less affected by wind BECAUSE they are lower spin. I NEVER play a high spin ball in windy conditions since I’ve seen them go wildly off line.

      Reply

      Steve

      9 years ago

      After reading this article I said, “duh”. Nothing new or revealing here, at least to me. And i agree with one poster who asked where you can go to find a course that will let you do the “Snell test”. Bottom line we could all use more spin around the greens and less off the tee. I find that the balls from MG golf to be equivalent to Snell and Pro V’s and are 19.99/ dozen. They are also selling Callaway Chrome speed for the same price and are a great 4 piece ball.

      Reply

      Dan

      9 years ago

      You don’t compress a golf ball with a wedge shot, it’s actually the soft cover you feel. You don’t generate enough club head speed using short irons and wedges to even come close to compress the core of a tour ball. Doesn’t matter the compression. Smell sounds like he still works for titliest, fitting from the green to tee doesn’t make sense. If you are a higher handicap player, you tend to generate more spin using the longer clubs in your bag. It would help to cut that In half to get you to the green in less shots.

      Reply

      mike

      9 years ago

      It is hard to see anything in Mr. Snell’s comments that show prejudice for his ball. It is great to find information quickly in one place describing the history of spin, the effect of cover material on flight and spin, and a guideline as to how to test balls. The testing procedure can be kept simple by doing the various distances over the course of a round. I have done this with various balls by going out at low traffic times – not necessarily an exact test but one can get a very solid impression of what works best for you. I have not tried the Snell’s. But I had great spin/stopping power with the Maxfli U6 LC balls. Also I believe that Mr. Snell’s testing procedure is the same as that suggested on the Titleist website.

      Reply

      proside

      9 years ago

      I’ve read up on them and they seem just fine. I would play them if they were on the shelf or if they were not an import hassel.
      The name is a really poor choice. I play Snails, you’ve got to try them….. Ahhh, no thanks.
      I buy the Prov1 practice for 30 a box so there is no incentive except for the sake of trying others which I do, off the shelf mind you.
      I hope this guy makes a go of it but I wouldn’t be surprised if it fades into obscurity either.
      That name and the logo nuances really are doing the product a diservice. Any rudimentary marketing awareness makes that obvious.

      Reply

      Marc

      9 years ago

      I switched to the Snell ball a month ago, and they feel the same as the ProV1x I used to play – and they are cheaper.

      Reply

      Freddie

      9 years ago

      Please, tell me how to find a golf course where I can indulge myself in the luxury of performing the Snell Golf Ball Test. Determining which ball is “right for you” sounds so simple. All you have to do is “Go out to the course, spend an hour or two, on (a) course where you can try different shots. Take a two piece ball and a tour ball…”

      Oh, I only need two balls? Okay. After I hit each ball from 100 yards, then I’ll have to walk up to the green, get the balls and walk back until I’m 70 yards away. Hang on a sec. It’s also stated that I hit “…a series of shots, varying the golf ball.”

      A series of shots? Vary the ball? Sounds good. But I’ll need more than two balls, won’t I? What about clubs? There’s nothing in the test instructions about which club to use. Sand wedge, lob, gap? High, low? How about a little knockdown, so I can skin that puppy. But wait, I can’t be walking up to the green, fixing my ball marks, then walking back and hitting all these shots with just two balls and a couple of wedges. I’ll need, uh, three two-piece and three tour balls AT LEAST. Better double that. Now I’ll need my shag bag. Hey, this is fun, but look at all the divots I’m taking, and I’m still on the first hole!

      Uh-oh, there’s a group coming up behind me. Mr. Snell said to just go to the next hole. But I’ve got a bunch of balls to pick up and all these divots to replace. These players behind me–they’re screaming. “Hey, you! Are you an idiot? This is the course, not the range. Who do you think you are?” Oh no. Here comes a guy in a cart. Is that the ranger? Maybe it’s Mr. Snell with more instructions, like how do I talk my way out of this one?

      Reply

      Aaron M

      9 years ago

      I’ve tried ProV1 and Snell balls. I find that they don’t perform as well off the driver. I find Bridgestones (Tour RX and e5s) and Callways (Chrome) perform better for me both off the tee and around the greens. I suspect that I’m spinning the Titleist and Snell balls off the tee too much. That loss of distance is hard for me to ignore.

      Reply

      Dylan Scott

      9 years ago

      Chase Wright check this out!

      Reply

      Jason

      9 years ago

      I believe the test results especially given his history with the ProV1 and Tour Preferred, which are the balls I play. I suspect he could have come up with a better name for the ball. Snell is not the coolest name of a golf ball and I suspect marketing experts would agree. I think he is leaving a bunch of money on the table by not have a name that sounds cool, even though the name on the ball has zero to do with performance. Cool factor is big with golfers, probably as much as the cost and performance. His next generation should have a better name. He could even have a contest on this site to come up with the name with the winner receiving a years worth of balls. He arguably has the best performing golf ball, but the name doesn’t sell it.

      Reply

      DL

      9 years ago

      I have to agree, I find the logo to be too big and the name isn’t great. Either way, I would love to try a dozen out.

      Reply

      andrew

      9 years ago

      well, that’s HIS name, so… besides- if you’re a fisherman, you know what a snell is- and its kind of cool. but I’m interested in what you think would be a good name- would it have lots of x’s and z’s to be catchy?

      Reply

      es

      9 years ago

      say this out loud…
      Pro V1 vs. Snell
      Chrome Soft vs. Snell

      I’m asian, snell is a bit difficult for us to pronounce (I’m assuming it’s a long S…then nell) plus the logo and the name kind of looks and sounds like Snail to me. I’m not sure I want to play a Snail (slow) ball… then again I don’t like the number 4…

      Just my marketing insight, has nothing to do with whether or not the ball performs…

      DC

      9 years ago

      Is there anything to a version of a ball and its “X” counterpart, like “Pro V1” and “Pro V1x”? Would you still be testing from 100 or 150 yards to see high high it launches to determine which you prefer? Or, would the “X” factor be a more relevant testing parameter off the tee? Thanks!

      Reply

      Jamie McCormack

      9 years ago

      Andrew I’ve asked the same Question I think you have to order from USA so I’ll be ordering a box to try out

      Reply

      DL

      9 years ago

      As a side note, unless I find them on the course or hit up the used ball market, I don’t think it’s at all feasible to get these in Canada and I’m disappointed as I was excited to try them with all of the hype. With the Canadian dollar being $0.75, the mandatory shipping of $12 PER DOZEN + them using UPS according to some forums (across the board worst brokerage and duty fees), the cost is way higher than ProV1s for me.

      Here is a guy from TorontoGolfNuts forum: “If you’re into Golf news I’m sure you’ve read the new Snell golf ball reviews.. Golf digest and ispygolf have been hyping them up for about a month now..

      http://mygolfspy.com/direct-to-c…-buyers-guide/

      So last Friday I put in an order for a dozen balls.. Wouldn’t go through. So I left it.. Customer service calls me about 15 mins later.. They say min order of 2 dozen balls when leaving the USA. I said ok fine $64 to try em.. Why not..

      Then she says $28 for shipping.. After being on the phone with her for 15 mins I wasn’t about to say no.. (this is after I had to ask shipping charges)

      Mon am I get a ups notification for shipping. (in my head I’m thinking **** why UPS)

      So this am I check. My CC statement.. $114 CAD.. Mah whatever.. No further ahead then buying Pro Vs. But I want to try them.

      Ups just shows up at my door. Guy hands me the box and says ‘dude there’s a $48 custom charge, this must be expensive golf balls’.. I said to him, just send them back..

      So now these balls would have been $164″

      Even looking at $0 for brokerage and duties, I figure with the exchange rate, min 2 dozen order, $24 (or $28 shipping as the poster said above), + tax, I’m looking at a minimum of $128 with taxes in Ontario. As soon as UPS gets a hold of you it’s probably 20-50 more. When you’re talking $75+ a dozen, obviously that’s unreasonable, and quite unfortunate.

      Hopefully Mr. Snell reads the comments here on his article. is there any way for Canadians to get these for a decent price?

      Reply

      Gorse Richard

      9 years ago

      biodegradable please. just don’t understand why new golf balls need to last 1,000 years.

      Reply

      Teun Marskamp

      9 years ago

      few golfers ever take the time to test the one piece of equipment you use on every shot!

      Reply

      Andrew Purvis

      9 years ago

      Can you get snell gear in the UK

      Reply

      DL

      9 years ago

      Love this website and I don’t mind some advertising (like the much deserved Carbon Ringo stuff on the side panels), but this article being written by the guy trying to sell you his own ball is a bit much. Good info, but get rid of “about the author” and any mention to Snell from the article.

      OR, do some ball testing and run the Snell products through the gamut, same as the rest.

      Reply

      Chris

      9 years ago

      They did a direct to consumer ball test with the ProV1X as the control ball, and the Snell My Tour Outperformed not only the other direct to consumer balls, but also the ProV1X

      Reply

      DL

      9 years ago

      I checked out the comparison and love the look of the Snell balls. While this site is always touting their neutral stance in terms of their relationship with golf companies, it starts to skew the line for me when you have a ball designer literally writing articles on the site.

      The only thing that brings me TO this site is that I can trust that I’m getting all of the real world numbers, without spin (pardon the pun).

      Now where can I get some of these Snells? :)

      Undershooter30

      9 years ago

      Actually this originally wasn’t an article for the website. This is an old post from the mygolfspy forums. Mr. Snell was kind enough to answer some questions for the forum members about golf ball design. This was his post about what we should look for in a golf ball when we asked.

      Also I didn’t take this article as a plug for his company at all. Yes he mentioned his company but why wouldn’t he? He has designed golf balls for many years.

      DL

      9 years ago

      Ah ok, that makes sense, so they took his forum post and popped it on the website. Thanks for the clarification.

      mygolfspy

      9 years ago

      Our goal is to empower and educate consumers on the best performing products in golf. Once we test those we hope golfers will begin to put the best performing vs best marketed products in their bags.

      For that reason you see this article today. Snell golf balls outperformed all other balls first of all and Dean Snell is an incredible source of information for golfers. Hence the dual reason why you see this post. We want to make more golfers aware of this golf ball because of how it performs.

      #PowerToThePlayer
      #ThinkBIGPlaySmart

      Reply

      DL

      9 years ago

      Thanks for the quick replies guys, I will definitely check out the head to head. Does Snell pay you anything to be on your site?

      TB

      9 years ago

      This ball is the real deal, I’m happy to read an article from him. He even says go test a bunch of balls and pick the one you like, never endorsed his own product. I’ll do that for him, it’s legit.

      DL

      9 years ago

      I guess my message wasn’t clear, I’m sorry. The last thing I’m trying to do is question the product, it looks tremendous. I’m simply wondering about transparency on the relationship between Golfspy and Snell. Either way I’m fine with it, I just think it would be a good thing to put out there, considering how neutral this site tries to be with testing, etc.

      Lou

      9 years ago

      Dude, head over to the forum. Mr. Snell actually posts there and answers ALL of our questions when he can. I do believe he’s even part of other forums.

      They promote his product because it won out. Same with the Taylormade putter that won last year. They answered your question above when they said

      “Our goal is to empower and educate consumers on the best performing products in golf.”

      They tested it, it won so they promote it – no biggie

      doug

      9 years ago

      I am a 2 hcp and played the Pro V for years…..Ordered the Snell “My Tour Ball” a couple of months ago for the first time. I have since placed subsequent orders for the Snell ball as it performs as well as the Pro V and it is a heck of a lot cheaper.

      Nick

      9 years ago

      U.S. Kids golf.
      They make balls for different swing speeds. My 11 year old son loves the 70 mph model. Great distance and moderate bite around the greens. They’re a bit pricey but at that age they don’t hit it far enough to lose too many.

      Reply

      robert

      9 years ago

      I found that for my young kids, the lower compression helps with distance although the spin around the greens are not enough. is it my misperception or does compression really matter for slow swing speeds (<80mp)? I would really like to find a low compression urethane ball for them but can understand why many manufacturers decide this category is not worth pursuing.

      Reply

      andrew

      9 years ago

      chrome soft.

      Reply

      Perry

      9 years ago

      Both the Callaway Chrome Soft, the Bridgestone B330Rx and the B330Rxs are 65 compression, urethane covered, 3-piece golf balls.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 15, 2024
    We’re Witnessing Greatness With Scheffler’s Dominance
    Golf Accessories
    Apr 15, 2024
    Temu Finds: Saplize Putting Suite
    Partner Content
    Apr 15, 2024
    Five Hidden Gem UK and Ireland Golf Tours
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.