Tell Nike Which Driver Should be the Next Covert
Drivers

Tell Nike Which Driver Should be the Next Covert

Tell Nike Which Driver Should be the Next Covert

While we can’t be certain of anything until we actually see the Nike VRS Covert 3.0 (or whatever Nike decides to call the next one), it’s far from unreasonable to think that the core design of the next iteration of Nike’s flagship driver is likely among several drawings we found in a recent patent application (actually, it’s a continuation of several previous patent applications, but you get the point).

If you gave Nike Golf’s President, Cindy Davis two words to describe Nike, or perhaps the Nike Spirit…not to put word’s in Ms. Davis’ mouth or anything, but I think Relentless Innovators would probably be in the general ballpark of her response.

That whole innovation thing certainly would explain why Nike’s application contains no less than 16 different descriptions of various ways to move mass through and around a golf club head.

Some of the drawings feature…shall we say familiar designs, while others are arguably unique.

Along the way there’s mention of things like plastic crowns, weight members with shock absorbing features, and adjustable MOI (and spin rate) too.

As you’d expect from most any patent application, there’s plenty of broad ambiguity as well.

The receptacle could be open or closed
Weights could be the same or different
Those weights could be moved independently or together

One of these could be the next Nike driver, or maybe none of them.

You Choose The Covert 3.0

It’s not like you get an actual vote or anything, but if it’s any consolation, neither did I. It’s safe to assume that by now any decisions about the tech that will power the next Nike driver has already been made, but that doesn’t mean we don’t get to have an opinion.

I’ve sorted through the various drawings and picked a mix of the interesting and the probable, and now we want you to tell us which of these 6 designs you think should become the Nike VRS Covert 3.0 Driver.

Here are the top contenders:

Figure 15 – Dual Weights (Crown & Sole)

fig15

Figure 18 – Dual Weight Ports (Sole)

fig18

Figure 19 – Adjustable/Swappable Weight Core

fig19

Figure 20 – Horizontal and Vertical Weight Cores (adjustable CG and MOI)

fig20

Figures 21-22 – Internally Placed Sliding Weights

fig21-22

Figure 25 – Sliding Weights

fig25

What Other Features Would You Like To See in the Next Nike Driver?

Tell us in the comment section below.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Leigh

      10 years ago

      How about offering a back weighted version of the driver.

      It is known that pros use the back weighting technology in their clubs as well as putters, we have now felt the difference in swinging a back weighted putter and how easy it is to keep online, how about making the driver available to the consumers.

      Sure it may cost $50 more than the normal driver….but if the difference in hitting it was as different as putting with a back weighted putter, then it would really be some driver.

      It would also keep Nike at the forefront of technology as no one else is offering this in a driver as yet, what better way than To introduce it on one of the most innovative drivers to come out in the last 3-5 years.

      Reply

      Evan

      10 years ago

      Figure 20, except have two horizontal weight ports on the sides instead of just the one.

      Reply

      Carl Ethal

      10 years ago

      I’m currently very happy with the ’14 Covert II. But…… I would really like to see The # 18
      design @ 320cc. Seems to me it would be more workable for shot making.

      Reply

      darren

      10 years ago

      which is the one that swings itself?

      Reply

      flaglfr

      10 years ago

      20 is the best IMHO. Good luck with the Callaway suit for patent infringement for the moving weight design. Looks to be quite similar to BB Alpha. The way it looks, you would have not much ability to have all front or all back weighting if either of these settings tends to be the best ball flight for you. Perhaps they could use a “dummy” rod (or give it the ability to be played without any weight in one of the ports) and have the ability to use all front or all back weighing. I also believe it may be better if the rear weight sloped toward the bottom of the club as it approaches the face. This might give you the potential to move the weight low forward in the face as well.

      If they use any of this, I want a free set and a piece of the pie: -)

      Reply

      RussT

      10 years ago

      Figure 18 looks like a winner! Cavity back, adjustable weights, and compression channel?!?!?!

      Reply

      bobo

      10 years ago

      I’m still waiting for the results of the Nike brand survey. Or did I miss them?

      Reply

      Kenny B

      10 years ago

      What other features…? Something besides red, even if that means Tiger has to change his shirt color.

      Reply

      Neil

      10 years ago

      Figure 25 shows what could be the most effective weight shifting.

      Reply

      Salmon

      10 years ago

      I agree.

      For some reason it just looks the most… Nike’ish

      Reply

      Ben Jones

      10 years ago

      Small head size driver a la 260cc sldr

      Reply

      Dave

      10 years ago

      Images from the modeling file contained in a provisional application may provide a little better feel of the aesthetics of the clubs; see http://golf-patents.com/2013/04/25/nike-golf-covert-driver-designs-that-didnt-make-the-cut-or-may-be-the-next-generation.aspx.

      Reply

      drjacko

      10 years ago

      Nike is into its fitness linkups (Nike+ with its shoes, the fitness bands etc) Why not with its clubs especially the driver? Imagine being able to see path, swing speed and face angle… On your mobile device.

      Reply

      Steve Barry

      10 years ago

      I believe they already have something like this, but they haven’t been able to get it to a point yet where it’s usable for the general population (too expensive).

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.