It’s Back! – 2013 Adams Tight Lies
Fairway Woods

It’s Back! – 2013 Adams Tight Lies

It’s Back! – 2013 Adams Tight Lies

In the modern era of golf equipment there are very few clubs you can point to and definitely say “That one…that one changed the game forever”.

The clubs that immediately spring to mind include Gene Sarazan’s sand wedge, Gary Adams’s first Titanium Driver, Karsten PING’s Anser Putter, and without question, the Adams Tight Lies Fairway wood.

Not only did the Tight Lies put Adams Golf on the map – in 3 short years the company went from less than 1 million in sales to 36.7 million; its influence changed the way fairway woods were designed, it spawned the modern day hybrid, and just for the sake of a good footnote, it was indirectly part of the impetus for transforming Nickent Golf from a clone company into an original equipment manufacturer.

It’s not a cult classic. Cult Classics are for fruitcakes and hippies.

The Adams Tight Lies is a true classic.

I Don’t Know How to Put This, But…

The original Adams Tight Lies was kind of a big deal. Actually, that barely scratches the surface. The story of Tight Lie’s success is all the more remarkable when you consider that the original design was done without the use of any fancy technology.

In 1995 Barney Adams didn’t own a computer, and by his own admission, even if he had, he wouldn’t have had a clue how to use one. Instead he sketched his idea for what would become the Tight Lies – essentially an upside down fairway wood with a trapezoidal shape, shallow face, and low center of gravity – completely freehand.

Given what we know about golf club design today, it’s probably fair to say that Adams got more than a little lucky. The odds are against striking golf gold with little more than a pencil and a yellow pad, but with his Tight Lies design, Adams did just that.

Particularly noteworthy given the space Adams occupies in the market today; when most people consider the Tight Lies, they think about a fairway wood. That’s how it was classified, and that’s how it was marketed, but Adams’s original intent was to create a club to replace difficult to hit long irons.

One can make a pretty solid argument that the Tight Lies was the original hybrid.

Anybody who was around golf in the mid to late 90s likely remembers the impact Tight Lies had on the game. As the distance wars were heating up, Tight Lies succeeded with a reputation not as the longest club, but as a club that was easier to hit from anywhere.

The Birth of the Modern Fairway Wood (and the Death of Versatility)

In 1996 when Adams launched the Tight Lies fairway woods were small, compact, and versatile. For most of the fairway wood’s history, the average club on the shelf was well less than 1.25” tall and plus or minus 140ccs.

Progress being what it is; like everything else in your bag, the fairway wood has evolved. It’s gotten larger, and as a direct consequence, it has all but lost its versatility.  With manufactures (Adams included) fighting for every additional yard, and borrowing design specifications from their drivers, the usefulness of the fairway wood for the average golfer has effectively been limited to the tee box and the occasional perfect fairway lie.

Rough, hardpan, sand…fuhgettaboutit.  That ain’t your daddy’s fairway wood you’re holding.

Fairway woods have become the driver-lite of the golf bag and not much else. They sure as hell aren’t easier to hit…not from anywhere.

Reviving a Classic

When any company revives the name of a classic club, my first reaction is that they’re making a nostalgia play. You don’t need to do anything revolutionary if you can play to sentimentality.

Cobra Trusty rusty anyone? Big Bertha? New Steelhead in 3, 2…

The truth of the matter is that the 2013 Tight Lies does have plenty in common with the original. Adams has retained the upright trapezoidal shape (the Tri-sole), the compact size (1.18” tall face, 133cc head), and as what Mike Fox, Global Director of Product Marketing at Adams Golf, describes as “a nod to the original”, 5 alignment lines on the stock Mitsubishi shaft.

It’s that upside down design that makes the True Lies what it is. According to Mike Fox, “the upside down design means the leading edge of the club will be longer/larger than the top line, creating a larger more forgiving surface where most golfers make contact”.

Of course, there’s more to reviving a classic then a new coat of paint. Even when you can trade on a name with the reputation that Tight Lies has, golfers still demand you include some modern technology.

With that in mind it’s not surprising that like every recent Adams fairway wood model, Tight Lies features a cut-through Velocity Slot designed for increased ball speed.

“This unsupported face is completely cut through, to allow a second area to store energy and allow the new Tight Lies to be long even with its low profile design.  The new TL has twice the speed as the original TL with a CT of 220.“ – Mike Fox, Adams Golf

It sounds long (and fast) right? It might very well be, but Tight Lies is about more than grip it and rip it. It’s a thinker’s club.

Distance Isn’t the Story

Perhaps the most remarkable piece of the 2013 Tight Lies story is that while Adams clearly feels their new club is long-enough, they’re not making distance the story.

I’ve frequently joked that a golf company would go broke trying to market a driver or fairway wood as the most accurate in golf, but to an extent, that’s exactly what Adams is doing with the new Tight Lies.

When Adams talks about the new Tight Lies they talk in terms of what they call overall distance. Similar to the PGA’s Total Driving stat, Overall Distance is what you get after you subtract how far offline you are from your target.

The argument is that 220 down the middle is better than 240 into the trees. I know…it’s now how I think either. I’m not a thinking man.

Targets vs. Distance

With the modern fairway wood, gapping and even hitting specific distances is almost an after-thought. The 3 wood is designed to be hit as far as it possibly can. The 5 wood is supposed to go almost as long (some actually hit their 5 woods longer, other hit them dramatically shorter). The 4 wood has become the compromise for the guy who doesn’t want to carry two fairway woods anymore.

Never mind versatility, even the notion of the fairway wood as a target club has been all but forgotten. Golf is a target game. Shouldn’t the same principles apply to the longer clubs as well? Adams thinks so.

According to Scott Blevins, Sr. VP of Sales, Adams Golf, unlike many fairway woods, Tight Lies is designed with a specific purpose in mind.

“The club is designed as a tool to do something very specific and that is to allow the player to hit a shot a specific distance from any lie.” – Scott Blevins, Adams Golf

According to Blevins, the worse your lie, the better the Tight Lies performs relative to the competition.

The 2013 Tight Lies isn’t intended to be the longest club in your bag, but Adams believes it will prove to be the most versatile, and the most reliable.

A True (and very depressing) Story

Just last week I was out on the course with one of our testers. Hitting his 2nd into a Par 5, he pulled what I thought was an unusual club choice. He explained that the club (in this case a hybrid) was his safety club. It’s the club he relies on when he’s got more than 200 to the target and absolutely needs to narrow his dispersion. As long as he’s straight he can afford to be a little short, or a little long.

When he asked me what my safety club was, I thought about it, and replied, “I don’t have one”.

It’s that void in my bag (and I’m sure I’m not alone) that the 2013 incarnation of the Adams Tight seeks  to fill. Tight Lies isn’t about chasing every last yard of distance. You’re not going to hear about a forwardly placed center of gravity, or a tall face, or anything else that inherently makes a fairway wood harder to hit.

Tight Lies is in a class of its own. It’s not a fairway wood or even a hybrid, it’s a Faithful Wood; the club you can count on from anywhere.

“Situations  golfers currently wouldn’t even think to hit some other market fairway woods, like out of the rough, side hill lies, hard pan, etc., the new Tight Lies is a real option. “ –Mike Fox, Adams Golf

Putting Tight Lies to the Test

I’m just short of positive that some of you are already looking forward to the new Tight Lies simply because you loved the original so much. In fact, I’m willing to bet some of you are thinking Adams couldn’t possibly make anything better than the original.

I’m also absolutely positive that there are some of you who absolutely love your fairway woods. You’re thinking there’s no way the Adams Tight Lies could be any better than your XHot, or your RocketBallz, or your whatever the hell you have in your bag.

Some of you will think this Tight Lies is nothing more than the latest example of marketing ‘crap’ run amok.

Well, we’re going to find out.

We’ve got some samples on the way that we’re going to be putting through their paces. We’ve come up with some clever real-world scenarios we’re going to use to determine whether or not the Adams Tight Lies really is easier to hit from everywhere.

Stay tuned. We’ll post the results as soon as we’re done.

For You

For You

Irons
Apr 24, 2024
PXG Irons: Model By Model
Putters
Apr 23, 2024
PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
News
Apr 23, 2024
Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Cedric B.

      9 years ago

      I still play with THE ORIGINAL Tight Lies & I still love them. I use the 3W – 11W. I’ve been considering the New Tight Lies mainly because I just would like to have some new clubs, maybe graphite shaftts this time, and these are the only ones I trust, plus the grooves have a little wear after 26 years of use. They do everything as advertised and now they have been improved upon…No brainer for me….I’ll be getting the lofts for 3W – 9W and continue to use my clone 13W & 15W along with my wedges & lofted chippers.

      Reply

      SDB

      11 years ago

      Just went to a demo today 2-28-13.went looking for a new 3 wood.It came down to 2,RBZ tour/Adams tight lie 14*.Then it came down to 1.The Adams 14* won,hands down.I hit a couple of so,so shots but quickly figured it out.At one point I hit 12 or so shots in a row straight as an arrow 230 yard carry.This is the funny part.The Nike rep who was next door came over to watch.He said to the Adams rep ,Ive been watching this guy he hasnt missed yet.They said I was starting to carve my name in the lone tree at 230yds. That was my aim point.Im sold, purchasing the club tomarrow (had to retry my 3 wood one last time).The club is long,straight,easy to hit draws,fades.Try it,youll see what I mean.

      Reply

      MG

      11 years ago

      Are you guys gonna do a full review on this club or what?!?!? I’ve been checking everyday and still nothing!

      Reply

      MG

      11 years ago

      I have to admit I’m really looking forward to this review. I haven’t had a 3 wood in the bad for a few years now for exactly their reasoning, no versatility. If this does what they say it does, it seems like a no brainer. I don’t need a 3 wood that goes almost as far as my driver. That’s why I have a driver. But I would also like to hear your opinion on how it stacks up to a hybrid. It still seems like the hybrid would be able to get the ball out of poor lies easier. In particular I’d love to hear how it stacks up against the idea super 9031. That baby looks pretty sweet as well!

      Reply

      Gregg R

      11 years ago

      I would like to try the 16* to replace an old (but still useful) TM original Raylor.

      Reply

      Ray

      11 years ago

      I don’t care if the slot is pink if it works. Have had Bang Mellow Yellow 5 and 7 woods vin my bag for over ten yrs. Get a lot of laughs when I pull them out but tends to get real quiet when I hit them. Looks just don’t figure in compared to performance when it comes to golf

      Reply

      RUSSON

      11 years ago

      I can’t comment on the slot’s true pro’s and con’s. I didn’t really like it on my A12 3i, till I hit it… It’s a little distracting and grass gets stuck in the slot, but the ball generally goes where I want it to.
      I’m sold on the who Wishon story as well, this club gives me both. (without the fitting granted)

      It’s just a shame Adam’s sold out the tight lies name with those horrid cheap iron sets.
      But considering that, this club should be a fair price.

      Reply

      Craig

      11 years ago

      I think the slot is hot. No need to remove it for me. Old school overall design combined with new tech. I love it all. I miss my old smaller headed easy to launch fairways woods.
      Trying to hit the rbz off of anything less than off the tee is hit or miss.

      Easy to hit accuracy is a great target.

      Reply

      Paul Narraway

      11 years ago

      I still have the original 3 and 5 woods of these..such a sweet club to hit from the deck..reading this might dig into the garage and pit them back in the bag for a while :-)

      Reply

      P-Gunna

      11 years ago

      Count me in, will be buying on the spot!

      Reply

      gunmetal

      11 years ago

      If they’d get rid of that stupid, distracting, ugly, useless (other than marketing and story telling of course) slot in the top, I’d be all over this.

      Reply

      Bob Pegram

      11 years ago

      The slot on the top and bottom allow the head to have the ball on the face longer and hit it farther. It is far from useless. Taylor Made thought enough of it to buy Adams Golf. Adams has the patent on the slot on the top and bottom at the same time.

      Reply

      gunmetal

      11 years ago

      Bob,

      You are correct about what the slot supposedly does, but the question is, is that slot really necessary in order to design a hot face? Exotics, Wishon, Ashton, Alpha, and now Callaway’s X-Hot all have extremely high COR’s without an ugly slot cut all over the club. Matter of fact, nothing from Adams is hotter than Wishon’s 929HS which is a traditional looking club.

      Bottom line is it boils down to 2 scenarios: 1) Adams designers don’t have the ability or design expertise to design a traditional head that has a high cor or 2) by adding a slot, it gives their marketing team an outstanding story to tell that resonates and makes sense with the public. I can assure you it’s not #1 as their BTY Fairway wood 6 years ago was/is as hot as anything out there today.

      Desmond

      11 years ago

      Everyone knows about cup face technology – that’s what Callaway uses, and what Exotics has used with the brazed face… Adams chose to go another way…

      Dave S

      11 years ago

      Great looking club, and I’m sure it performs as advertised… if I didn’t already have and love my Adams Pro A12, I’d consider bagging this.

      Reply

      Kevin Smith

      11 years ago

      Don’t think I’d ever put this in my bag.

      Reply

      Russ T

      11 years ago

      I must be in the minority, but for me its easier to hit a deep face fairway wood out of the rough than a shallow face.

      Reply

      Robin

      11 years ago

      this thing looks like a hybird!

      Reply

      aotearoabrad

      11 years ago

      This sounds like a great option for me. I’m really interested in how the testing pans out. The 16 degree sounds about right, and I’d happily have a straighter FM at the sacrifice of 20 yards.

      Reply

      Mr_Theoo

      11 years ago

      When does this come out?

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      11 years ago

      8/15 for 16° model. Other stuff coming after that.

      Reply

      Brewski

      11 years ago

      I took my fairway wood out of my bag a couple months ago, added a wedge to bridge the gap between my gap and pw. I don’t see the need for a fairway wood. was just taking up space in my bag. It is easier to hit than a driver from the tee for beginners, and that was the only reason I had it in the bag in the first place, now that i can bomb my driver straight, there is absolutely no point in having the fw in there.

      Reply

      RUSSON

      11 years ago

      That 16* would drop straight into my bag untested. I still use my Original 16*!
      It makes no sense to swing a watermelon 3 wood in the rough…
      Fingers crossed they make it 1/2 inch shorter as well.

      Reply

      Bob Pegram

      11 years ago

      If not, you could have it cut down 1/2 inch and re-weighted inexpensively by a clubmaker.

      Reply

      John Barry

      11 years ago

      Love the idea, and you make a great marketing push with no more longer clubs, but more reliable and straighter clubs, and that’s what I remember about Tight Lies!

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Irons
    Apr 24, 2024
    PXG Irons: Model By Model
    Putters
    Apr 23, 2024
    PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
    News
    Apr 23, 2024
    Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.