join

SHAFT REVIEW! – Mitsubishi Rayon Kuro Kage

Post image for SHAFT REVIEW! – Mitsubishi Rayon Kuro Kage

Kuro Kage shaft review

Shaft Review – Mitsubishi Rayon Kuro Kage

(Written By: GolfSpy Matt) Mitsubishi Rayon claims that a new technological breakthrough has allowed them to produce the Kuro Kage: a family of shafts which package top notch performance and trademark smooth feel with a (relatively) low price.  Does the Kuro Kage live up to these bold statements?  Read on to find out.

Notes, Feel,  Price, and Miscellaneous

Gotta start with this: Kuro Kage, or Black Shadow, is an awesome name.  It sounds like a comic book hero.  With a name that cool, I think the graphics are, frankly, disappointing.  The grey butt section fades to black through some square graphics around the logo.  Kinda dull, and a missed opportunity, in my opinion.  Oh well.

Mistubishi says that the Kuro Kage follows their “Smooth” profile, meaning that the shaft is softest in the tip, softer in the mid section, and stiffest in the butt.  I have also heard it described as being similar to a Blue Board, but with a softer tip.  This softer tip is balanced out by a “High Density Pre-preg” in the tip that creates more stability.

How does all that technical stuff translate to feel, you ask?  In my opinion, the Kuro Kage feels like a Kaili with a stiffer tip.  It has a nice kick in the midsection of the shaft on a good swing.  What’s interesting is that on a less-than-good swing, there is very little kick or feel.  This sentiment was echoed by a small group of other people who demoed the Kuro Kage with me.  However, as always, that’s just what my hands tell me.  You can read another MGSer’s thoughts here.

With regard to the hybrid shaft, I unequivocally love the feel.  Smooth, easy to load, with a nice firm tip.  And, as you’ll see below, the performance was excellent.

As I said at the beginning, the Kuro Kage is being offered at a much lower price than Mitsubishi’s Diamana series.  The wood shafts can be purchased for $175, and the hybrid shafts retail for $80.

For this review, I tested both the wood shaft and the hybrid shaft.  The wood shaft was a 70 gram stiff, and the hybrid shaft was a 90 gram stiff.  The wood shafts are offered in 50, 60, 70, and 80 grams with flexes ranging from ladies flex to X-flex.  The hybrid shafts range weigh 80, 90, or 100 grams and come in regular, stiff, and X-flex.

Performance – Driver

As usual, I’ve broken the Performance section into two pieces: Data (launch monitor testing) and Real World (range and course).  For the launch monitor testing, I put the Kuro Kage up against my Matrix RUL, both in an R9 460 9.5 head.  I hit 10 “good” shots with each shaft, changing frequently so that fatigue was not an issue, nor did I get grooved with one shaft to the detriment of fairness.  I went through this process three times and averaged the sets of data.

For anyone interested in the swing that produces these numbers: my club head speed is usually between 100MPH and 110MPH, my swing is fairly flat, and my misses are blocks and hooks, depending on which side of the bed I get out on.

DRIVER DATA

*For dispersion, the results are listed with an (L) for left of target, and (R) for right of target.

**The new launch monitor software that I’m using seems to really exaggerate roll, especially on low spinning shots.  This is why my pedestrian ball speed ends up with LM readings of 300 yards.

DATA

ANALYSIS

I’ll start out by saying, once again, that it’s not fair to say that the Kuro Kage isn’t good because it didn’t beat the RUL.  I’ve tried dozens of shafts, and the RUL is simply a great fit for me.  The only reason I include the comparison is to make the data a little more meaningful.

That said, the Kuro Kage performed very well for me.  You can see that it’s pretty much a mid-launch, mid-spin shaft like the RUL, with just a bit more spin.  Truthfully, it reminded me a lot of the Kaili that I played for quite a while last year.  If you like the Kaili, or if you want to try one without dropping $300+, the Kuro Kage is something worth testing.

REAL WORLD RESULTS

On the range, the Kuro Kage was difficult to distinguish from the RUL.  Based on the numbers, this shouldn’t be hard to believe.  The ballflight was very consistent from swing to swing, and it performed well into the wind.

Performance – Hybrid

For the hybrid shaft, I tested the Kuro Kage against the Alida RIP hybrid shaft in a 22* TaylorMade Rescue 11.  The testing procedure was the same for the hybrid as it was for the driver.

HYBRID DATA

*For dispersion, the results are listed with an (L) for left of target, and (R) for right of target.

DATA

ANALYSIS

The area where the Kuro Kage impressed me most was dispersion.  There were a number of shots where I felt that the result was much better than the swing deserved.  As you can see in the numbers, the Kuro Kage was slightly tighter on both the left and right side compared to the RIP.  The Kuro Kage did launch slightly higher than the RIP, but spun slightly less.

REAL WORLD RESULTS

On the range, I feel that the discrepancy between the Kuro Kage and the RIP was much greater than the numbers show.  For some reason, I had a very hard time getting a consistent shot pattern out of the RIP: I hit shots high, low, left, and right.  The Kuro Kage was much more consistent in producing medium-high shots that were generally straight.

Conclusion

With the Kuro Kage, Mitsubishi Rayon has produced a series of shafts that feature the performance and feel of one of their most popular shafts, the Kaili, at a significantly lower price.  If you’ve enjoyed the performance of past Mitsubishi shafts, or if you want to see what all the buzz is about, the Kuro Kage is worth a look.

VISIT WEBSITE: http://www.mitsubishirayongolf.com

{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }

Doc (aka:buckical, Ping45) May 22, 2012 at 12:14 pm

Ok!…Now. we’re talking…not too sure about what, but going in the right direction anyway. Testing the shafts has always been a primary desire of mine…not me testing, but seeing results of comparable tests of shafts. Now, if you fellows really, really want to impress me(us), find a couple testers that have a similar s.s. as me…say in the 85/95 range. And of course while you’re at it, do the same in swing speeds of 70/75 to 80/85, and 90/95 to 100/105….get my point? Oh, I realize it continues to be an increasing expense…Unfortunately, we all want you to bear that cost and give us the results. But I for one would be willing to throw another few $$$$ into the pot. Anyhow, thanks for this info and keep it coming!
Doc

Reply

mygolfspy May 23, 2012 at 7:23 am

We are just getting started with shafts Doc. I am sure it will improve over time and we would love to do some things similar to what you are referring to and even more. Just going to take some time to get there. But thanks for the comment and suggestion…we listen to all of them…and this is a good one.

Reply

GolfSpy T May 24, 2012 at 8:48 am

Doc – Your idea is something we’ve talked about from time to time. Yes, there are expenses involved, but the single biggest obstacle is actually time. As they say, there are only so many hours in the day, and there’s a lot of behind the scene stuff that takes up lots of time. Above and beyond that, each of us who creates content for MGS has to be a writer, editor (I’m not very good at that role), photographer, and at times a data-entry/business intelligence specialist too. Every new feature we add increases the workload exponentially. We’re not complaining, and we’re absolutely going to keep plugging away. We’ll get there, but it’s not going to be tomorrow.

Reply

Phana24JG May 23, 2012 at 11:18 am

Doc and Spy, where I think the problem lies is in the number of permutations of head and shaft combinations for a wide variety of golfers. Call me crazy, but I believe that unless you have access to dozens of shafts and heads, which brings the number of combinations to a ludicrous number, the data will always be subject to criticism. What I believe MGS can do (and Matt makes a great contribution here) is by identifying for the average to better player, what combinations are the MOST LIKELY for an individual golfer to maximize his return on equipment expenditures.

While we are still going to be somewhat “lost” in the proverbial forest, at least this kind of information gives us a compass so we can begin to identify where we are going.

Reply

Doc May 24, 2012 at 9:25 am

Phana24JG…
Obviously you are correct in your comments…I salute MGS for their intent , and applaud them for even trying to put some “common sense” into the idiotic system (or lack thereof) of shaft information. It is frustrating and outright disgusting to me…and most other golfers…that an industry so larger as this can not come up with some type of program that would classify all shafts into a type of listing that gives all of us…regardless of talent and /or swing speed, a realistic chance to obtain a shaft/club based on our own ability level, rather than haphazardly making a purchase… (for many $$$),… only to discover the shaft is of no or little use to us. At which time most of us blame the club, when with a little forethought info, we would have known the shaft was the culprit! Many low handicap golfers, after perhaps years of trying different combinations, may have a pretty good idea which flex combination they need/want. But for the vast majority of the newer, less experienced golfer, it’s a sad and costly series of trial and error trying to find the shaft that works best. It just seems almost a crime to me that we as consumers have allowed the manufacturers to slide on this. Thankfully, it’s the “caretakers” and testers like MGS that may have the wherewithall (and the GRAPES) to confront the mfg’s to get this changed.
Just my 2 cents…I’ll stop now…got to get to the corurse and take out my rage on that ‘lil white ball!

Reply

Super Tuna May 24, 2012 at 9:48 am

Doc,

This is actually something that Mr. Wishon will talk about from time to time if you ask. It’s really interesting to hear about how such an organization was formed but none of the OEM’s would play ball. They tried to get some standard testing across the industry but every shaft OEM required the way to do the testing to be their way and wouldn’t budge. Hence no standard for measuring shaft characteristics for the industry as a whole.

That being said, there are some out there who have taken the matter into their own hands. Wishon golf has a program that compare’s a huge amount of shafts in their database. The really good guys over the Fit2Score are EI graphing shafts to better let people understand the profile they should be fit into. There’s a couple others out there but they come to mind immediately. Heck even the custom fitting PDF from Cleveland isn’t that bad. It’s not the greatest but it’s a good start for those who are totally mystified about shaft profiling at all to start with.

Reply

Super Tuna May 23, 2012 at 9:26 pm

Great run down there Matt!
Again, sorry for the forum post first.

If you had to choose straight up whether you thought this was a better wood or hybrid shaft which would you go for?

Reply

Golfspy Matt May 24, 2012 at 5:15 am

Tuna:

No apologies necessary at all.

For me, the hybrid shaft is better, hands down. The feel is better in the hybrid and the performance was really consistent.

What are your thoughts on that?

Reply

Super Tuna May 24, 2012 at 9:43 am

I entirely agree with you actually. IMO, the hybrid shaft is the star by far and away of the Kuro Kage line and shows that MRC finally makes a good hybrid shaft. Not that the Thump was bad but it didn’t really have wide scale application and I’ve found the AX H to be meh at best for most people.

It’s not a bad shaft in a driver, slightly better in a fairway but as your comments in the review mention, it’s entirely consistent in a hybrid. Pair this shaft in the correct flex for someone and get them one of those super easy to use hybrid heads like the RBZ, Razr or A12 and you would surprise a lot of people with how point and shot they could be.

I’m glad these reviews are hitting the home page as well. Anything that helps people figure out the oddness of shafts and how they compare is a fantastic thing.

Reply

Yohanan May 25, 2012 at 1:08 am

Oh you enable me. . .
Oh what is a shaft slut to do?
I only buy adjustable heads now because of my need to tinker
Golfsmith bench vise heat gun and glue are next
Pretty soon after that. I will have my own shop to find more junkies to enable me more
Carry on msg!

Reply

Joe CoWhick May 31, 2012 at 3:11 am

I want to share some observations about testing golf clubs. Between giving golf lessons, during a ten year period, I tried hitting demo clubs some 2500 days at an indoor golf range in Manhattan, NY. In 1985, I was fortunate to have available a $15,000 Sportech Swing Analyzer which provided some objective feedback. Hitting the ball 10 feet into a netted backstop you feel impact vibration and see trajectory and direction. The Sportech machine gave me shot shape, tempo, clubhead speed, left and right weight distribution, distance & face and path directions. Some days you hit better than others. Some days you hit one club better than another and the next the opposite can happen. Your energy level can change from minute to minute and hour by hour based upon food and drink consumption, mental stress and physical activities.
Make sure you have a proper warm-up to make testing meaningful. At age 67 I swing the speed stick 70-80 miles an hour to start and it takes about 15-20 minutes before I reach 100 miles an hour.

Reply

Mauro Pari January 28, 2013 at 11:38 am

I love all these guy’s that try to buy yardage,with no separation in there swing,No shift and playing there bodies in front of the ball all the power spent before contact and expecting Tiger Woods performance,Look in the mirror and find the truth,I did….and I’m glad I did,K-Vest and Track Man is a great starting point .Not some dink that takes 125.00 an hour,Then a commitment that bigger than your life,I’m in the gym everyday Cibex as well as Cardio,I use the big mirrors for my golf swing reps not looking at mussels.and involve myself around real golf and real golf people,Notice how I left PROs,…out..get your self a mental game coach.and a swing coach like Robert Rock,and a putting coach like Mike Shannon,Then that 4 to 8 hundred dollar shaft will thank you!…..Watch for me this year on an US Amateur,qualifier line. , 2898 rpm with a 3.4 attack angle ball speed 157 mph and a 9.1 ball flight D-plane.

Reply

Leave a Comment