The Next Big Golf Wearable Technology Frontier
News

The Next Big Golf Wearable Technology Frontier

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

The Next Big Golf Wearable Technology Frontier

PIQ beat me to it.

In February at the PGA Show I said it was time to write about how awesome it will be when a golf tech company looks beyond its niche and begins to combine multiple functions into one device. You know…kill two birds with one stone.

Turns out PIQ wants to kill three birds; combining a GPS rangefinder, swing analyzer and shot tracker into a single product (think ZEPP meets Game Golf meets Golf Buddy).

Sound interesting? We’re certain it’s exactly what the future of golf wearables looks like, which is why it’s worth your attention right now.

PIQ has already secured $5.5 million in funding, so we’re not talking about a pipedream. We’re talking about a product coming to market that may just convince you to take your stash of cash and go all-in on a pre-order for €269 ($299 USD).

home-full-width-1-image

Featuring a GPS and swing analyzer all-in-one that attaches to your glove and pairs with sensors plugged into the butt end of your grips, PIQ will display yardages for front, center and back of the green via an LCD display on the glove mounted GPS (provided through partnership with Mobitee), while simultaneously transmitting swing analysis data to your smart phone for immediate swing feedback…even in the middle of our round round.

Near Field Communication (NFC) sensors installed on the butt of your grips will track each shot during your round, though that will require a tap to your glove mounted GPS instead of automatically sensing swings)

All of this data will be piped to your smart phone via bluetooth allowing you to analyze your best swing, longest drive, distance for each club, and averages for clubs, best score “and other highlights” all setup to be shared via social media/text messaging.

Hey Bob, check out the triple bogey I just made on 12.

PIQ1

The swing analyzer promises to deliver data for swing tempo, club head speed. and swing path. While that probably won’t be enough to claim the title of MyGolfSpy’s Most Wanted Swing Analyzer, it’s considerably more than you get from any other GPS and round tracker currently available.

PIQ is thinking bigger than just golf. Their website suggests their sensor will analyze movements for football (not sure if that’s US or metric), snowboarding, tennis, fencing (you do cross train for fencing right?), boxing, skiing and more.

With all of these features making their way to a single device, it it will be interesting to see if a company like Garmin like will add full swing analysis to its watches (they’ve already added the ability to measure swing tempo), or will Zepp team up with GolfShot to provide GPS and swing analysis into one?

Technology companies are not alone in their pursuit of the perfect golf analysis system. Cobra Golf has patents filed for adding sensors under your grips (seriously, this sounds promising – imagine a swing analyzer and club/shot tracking device in one built directly into each grip), and TaylorMade just announced a partnership with Microsoft that will pair wearable tech with digital shot tracking and analysis.

Will the Apple Watch or Samsung Gear 2 allow these devices to take up even less space and power?

It’s hard to imagine that, moving forward, anyone offering wearable tech will be able to compete unless they can offer more feature-rich products. The larger question to be answered is which pieces will be combined, and will they be implemented in a way that actionable data will be easily accessible and interpretable?

In the meantime, PIQ is slated for release in September, and is available for pre-order now. We’ll definitely let you know our thoughts just as soon as we receive one of the first test units.

If you had to choose what pieces of wearable tech you’d like to see combined into one product, what would they be?

PIQpackage

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
GolfSpy Tim

GolfSpy Tim

GolfSpy Tim

Tim focuses on Tech and Soft Goods for MyGolfspy. In his other life he tries to play as much golf as possible, whether that's during travels for work as a wedding photographer, or during testing - Tim has a tough time hanging out at the driving range when he could be out on the course. Based in Folsom, CA Tim has a penchant for adventure and mischief.

GolfSpy Tim

GolfSpy Tim

GolfSpy Tim

GolfSpy Tim

GolfSpy Tim

GolfSpy Tim

GolfSpy Tim

GolfSpy Tim





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      @5Before50

      7 years ago

      Have been using Game Golf and Zepp Golf now for about 18 months, and all along I have thought to myself that if only one or other company brought out a device which combined both technologies, they would clean up. So it was with great interest that I purchased Piq Golf & Mobitee this Christmas.

      First to the down sides of the former two devices, which I had hoped Piq would address, some of which have been touched upon earlier. The Game Golf belt clip is pretty useless and the device falls off frequently; plus out of sight, out of mind, easy to forget to tag before a shot. The club tags themselves are made of rigid plastic and don’t stand up to repeated impact at the bottom of your golf bag. I have had 4 of them break on me, loosing the flimsy piece of semiconductor film therein. A rubber tag (a la Piq) much more robust. Onto Zepp, and the main issue I had with it was just it’s accuracy, especially with clubhead speed; often around 10mph slower than what Trackman was telling me. This then led to me being dubious of the other figures too. The only one I really trusted was tempo, which is the one I was working hardest on and mostly forgot about club plane, hand plane, backswing (rotation) and overall score.

      And so Piq. I used it for the first time today on the course. After a little confusion over the orientation of the device, as I didn’t trust the fastening clip to be as reliable as it turned out to be, the device sync’ed with my mobile phone fine, located the course quickly and was ready to go much quicker than Game Golf tends to be. I had no interest in swing stats today, just recording club distances and checking the odd yardage to the middle of the greens. I use a laser, so it was only as another reference point. No beep or vibration when you tag a club, not good as you have to check the device readout to be sure; but it is definitely easier to remember to tag a club as it is right there in front of you all the time. That being said, I still managed to forget several times in the heat of battle.

      One minor issue at software level whilst playing, in that the scorecard for my home course was incorrect, as the 5th hole changed to a Par 5 well over a year ago. That being said, there is an option to submit changes and requests. The 6th hole today was out of play due to winter weather, and It was a relatively quick and easy process to click NOT PLAYED on my phone. This was the only time I took the phone out of my bag, as I was trying to access how well it coped without human interference.

      After the round is where the real issues began. As others have said, the on-phone app is pretty simplistic and offers very little scope to amend / edit etc. That would be fine, if like Game Golf, the online support is really quite good; but sadly not for Piq, with a beta site still running with no way to edit scores or shots or any other parameter for that matter. Very poor. You also can’t see your Swing data online which is one of the key features?! With regards GPS accuracy, after analysing where the device had recorded the shots, as plotted on the map it provides, again poor; registering a good 15 yards off where I actually tee’ed up at times!

      All in all, I am rather disappointed after my first use, and I am sincerely hoping that Piq / Mobitee get their act together regarding GPS accuracy and the online editing / support and stat crunching that Game Golf excels at.

      Reply

      Andy

      8 years ago

      I actually invested in one of these, and use it on the course and on the range. On the course, I only use it for tracking my round. It takes a fraction of a second to scan the club and take your shot.
      I hadnt even considered what another poster mentioned about swing, look at swing stats, swing, look at stats, hit… I dont think the device actually allows that sort of feedback.
      I personally find the range information quite interesting, swing plane is nice to see but i don find that information particularly helpful.
      What I am finding is that the GPS signal on it isn’t great at my local course, and, since there is no tactile feedback, you sort of have to rely on the club tagging to have actually worked.
      The Mobitee app alongside the device work very well, and, I like seeing my round, where I’ve missed and so on.
      That being said, there are issues. The device and websites are still very much in their infancy, and when you compare the shot tracking to that of something like Game Golf, you can see that there is a LONG way to go still.

      I cant figure out if the GPS sensor is your mobile phone device, or if it resides in the actual sensor itself. But if it’s the former, then this might explain some of the problems I am seeing. I get terrible signal on our local course, whereas my wife, using her Game Golf, seems to have much better luck.

      I really hope that the teething issues I’ve seen are quickly ironed out as I can see it being a useful learning aid.

      PIQ are saying that the device will work for multiple sports, which, as an idea is very laudable, but I fear that it’s more of a jack of all trades, but master of none.

      Reply

      EagleOne

      8 years ago

      Sorry, but 270 bucks may not be much for most golfers, but it’s still a rip-off for 2 IMU sensors that basically just spit out some numbers that won’t tell you anything. If you want to improve your play, you need to be able to analyze full body motion – from your feet, hips to your torso and arms. You need a full bodily representation and compare that to a pro’s swing. That’d be innovative and helpful. All these gadgets (Zepp, Arccos and now this PIQ) are kids’ toys or have you seen a Pro use them? They use Trackman and similar highend stuff…

      Reply

      Ian Blackburn

      9 years ago

      I for one, was thinking someone must be able to combine the 2 although I haven’t seen the analysis reports. I bought a swingbyte 2.0 last year and it’s been really useful. However I have a young family and rarely get to the range to practice (to use it). Even when I do it’s off mats (UK) and I feel this hides things in my delivery. A swing analyser based on your true ‘on course’ golf shots is a great idea. Confirming if those bad shots are common to something you’re doing and can work on at a later date. For me I wouldn’t review the swing data until after the round. I’d just play and assess after (not impact to speed of play other than checking yardages but most players do that). I see slow play being people leaving their bag on the other side of the green, taking way too many practice shots and general bad play zig zag golf looking for balls….net this type of tech should help long term….hopefully. Very tempted as its my birthday in September ? but as said not seen the analysis info you get and how it looks I’d like to see that before jumping feet first as an early adopter.

      Reply

      Oldplayer

      9 years ago

      Great! Now through science and new tech we can confirm that our swings really do suck :)

      Reply

      Joe Elliott

      9 years ago

      Two problems,

      Tournament legality

      Putting stats (or should I putt with a glove on)

      Reply

      sean Hennessy

      8 years ago

      Solution would be to clip it to your hat or shirt and forget about swing data during your round. You could use the swing data at the range I’m not sure it would tell you much anyway.

      Reply

      Jim

      9 years ago

      I was very happy to hear about the glove. I use Game Golf and the tagging device is supposed to be hung on your belt. Mine falls off repeatedly, 2-3 times a round, as it doesn’t actually attach to anything. Game golf told me I would have to buy a brand new unit ($199) if I lose it.
      Poor design, in my opinion, as it should at least attach by way of belt loops. The glove would not only eliminate that problem but be an easier reminder to tag each shot as well.

      Reply

      Chris C

      9 years ago

      These devices need to come with warning labels strongly encouraging their use on ranges only. Having recently finished behind a group containing one who always had at least 6 to 8 pre shot practice swings followed by 6 to 8 post shot recap swings, I envision a sharp rise in on course incidents of violence should the use of these devices during play becomes popular. Swing – check phone – swing – check phone – swing – check phone – looking good – swing – check phone – swing – check phone – yes! I’m on plane – swing – shank shot – check phone – begin review….

      Reply

      GolfSpy Tim

      9 years ago

      I don’t imagine too many people using these on the course – just doesn’t really make sense – but…. just to bring another idea to the table – what if this product made it so that guy only needed 2 pre-shot swings and 2 recap swings AND then because of the technology, his ball landed in play vs lost out of bounds with him looking for it.

      what – just if – this could help people play better and faster.

      technology does not normally equate to slower if someone knows what they are doing with it – and this kind of tech is not something a total noob is likely to pick up their first round on a course.

      I think realistically people who play slow need some soft encouragement on how to speed things up.

      Reply

      MattF

      9 years ago

      I’m with Theoo, I dropped the glove years ago, so these new products that attach to a glove are a wash.

      Reply

      GolfSpy Tim

      9 years ago

      great point… probably not an issue for the majority – but still interesting to consider going forward

      Reply

      Raj LP

      9 years ago

      I think this is awesome. I don’t care too much for the yardages and all as my Laser rangefinder is about as good as it gets, (Unless it’s some sort of a blind shot and you don’t have line of sight. The stats are great. I would love it if I could on the fly all my stats and tendencies for the various clubs.

      Most people think they know the distances on their clubs, but they would be surprised once they see their averages over time. It would also be cool to see if this could actually track wheer your balls typically end up. Left or right of middle fairway/green and with which clubs. (I know good golfers will place it where they intend mostly, but a lot of people (including myself) just aim for the middle.

      Reply

      Dave S

      9 years ago

      The headline got me excited, but the more I read the less enchanted I became. Why would I want a product that does everything second (or third) best? Gives me yardages to front/back/center? I can get same thing wearing Garmin watch (but also distance to hazards, layup distances and pin placement on green. Keeps track of my round autonomously? So does GameGolf and Arccos, except the latter doesn’t require the obnoxious tapping pre-shot routine. Gives me bare-bones swing data? So does Zepp and probably more accurately.

      Yes, you will prob save $ not having to buy all three of those devices separately, but the limited functionality is a non-starter for me. I think we’ve just scratched the surface of devices like this. In 2-3 years, these will have made a major leap. I’ll wait till then.

      Reply

      GolfSpy Tim

      9 years ago

      I’m with you – likely lacking at first as the winner in all conditions – but this is a great step forward and agreed – give it 2 to 3 years (crap, give it 1 year) and I’m guessing things are gonna be on fairly level playing fields in this “niche” of combined tech.

      It’s exciting, but I get your level of let down.

      Personally, I think the majority of golfers would be better served only knowing front/back/center as far as distances go – but… that’s a whole separate article

      Reply

      AL

      9 years ago

      I agree, it would be better to have something that is all in one and doesn’t include tapping your belt before every single shot. A friend of mine showed me the website for a product called ClubHub (clubhubgolf.com) and it looks promising.

      Reply

      Adam h

      9 years ago

      As a guy that drops his glove at least once a round this is frightening.

      Reply

      GolfSpy Tim

      9 years ago

      gotta stop drinking so much coffee

      Reply

      Greg

      9 years ago

      Not too sure that this is needed. Don’t get me wrong, I think the tech is cool and could be useful, I just see it slowing down rounds of golf (people checking their stats during a round).

      Reply

      GolfSpy Tim

      9 years ago

      but…. just what if this sped up rounds – helped create better golfers, and allowed them to improve during the round and hit more fairways resulting in faster golf?

      needed or not – it’s here and it’s only going to grow – so best bet is probably to find ways to explore how this can be used to speed things up.

      Reply

      Xxio

      9 years ago

      Will the gps be legal for handicap and tournament play since it has the other things, much like a rangefinder with slope is not legal.

      Reply

      Kfilly

      9 years ago

      I purchased game golf recently and am not overly impressed. This looks like something I should have held out for.

      Reply

      GolfSpy Tim

      9 years ago

      What about Game Golf were you not impressed by?

      Don’t let future tech keep you from buying current tech – there’s always something better coming…

      Reply

      Kfilly

      9 years ago

      Tagging your club before you hit is kind of a pain. Very easy to forget. I’m doing better but there are still 5-10 shots a round that I miss.

      Also there is always a lot of editing after a round. When I upload my round , there are usually 5 or 6 shots I didn’t hit or shots that are not even close to where they were hit from or landed.

      I like it enough, and I plan on using it until I find something better but its just not nearly as good as I thought it would be.

      Theoo

      9 years ago

      What if you don’t wear a glove?

      Reply

      GolfSpy Tim

      9 years ago

      maybe you could get some bicycle gloves with the fingers cut out? (just playing man…)

      it’s a great point and I’m thinking one that will end up being addressed by PIQ at some point – or will see a competitor overcoming one day.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.