Hit the Ball Farther By Restricting What You See
News

Hit the Ball Farther By Restricting What You See

Hit the Ball Farther By Restricting What You See

Forget Everything You Know

During lessons and clinics, I’ll often have my students make swings with their eyes closed… sometimes golfers will actually hit the ball better that way than with eyes open (especially the new golfers), but why?

Historically, golfers have been instructed “keep your head down”. This type of instruction, whether formal or informal, has caused golfers to modify their swing and body mechanics, resulting in poor swing mechanics, poor club-ball contact, and risk of injury. It is understandable to think hand-eye coordination is important in golf, so it seems logical that hand-eye coordination would be the reason for success or failure during the golf swing. However, the human eye cannot see the golf club strike the ball nor its location upon the face. Impact happens too fast!

I knew that the “head down” mantra was a fallacy, but didn’t know all the why’s, so I quit my job and went back to school for a Master’s Degree in Exercise Science and Ph.D. in Neuromechanics. (I’ll leave out what my wife originally said about this decision, no turning back now!)

occlusion2

Thinking vs. Doing

Learning how to swing a golf club by watching elite players do it and trying to model their alignments is really almost useless. There are some good things that your brain will capture while watching, so please feel free to keep watching the good golf swings (and not the bad ones!), but ultimately, honing the golf swing is about motor control and learning through experience, not kinematic or positional analysis.

One way we learn is through explicit and implicit learning strategies. What does this mean? Simply put, explicit learning is something you can explain how you have learned the movement, while with implicit learning it is very difficult to describe how you learned the movement.

Let’s take riding a bike for an example. When you first took off the training wheels and began pedaling, how did you keep your balance and learn how to balance? I felt balance go side to side but really didn’t think about what I had to do.

occlusion4

In Golf Terms

Let’s take a look at some golf instruction that provides explicit details on how to position the golf club throughout all the 8 – 15 positions or steps during the swing… DETAILED INFORMATION. So when you go to make your swing, your brain is trying to process all that information in 1.5 seconds… wow, difficult! Now compare to how much thinking goes on when you jump on a bike and go riding when it may have been years since you last rode a bike. Not much at all after that first initial wobble.  

The Vision Occlusion Study

This is what led us to the idea of using the Nike SPARQ glasses as a training tool for the golf swing. The glasses have been proven to work in other sports, why not golf? Nike SPARQ glasses are based on stroboscopic training – lights turning on and off really fast. They are liquid crystal lenses that flash transparent and opaque (grayed-out) that can be set at different rates of transparency. The longer they are opaque, the less you see.

Test Conditions

  • 24 golfers
  • Two practice sessions per week for six weeks
  • Golfers divided into two groups: Group One practiced with Nike SPARQ glasses, Group Two practiced with normal vision
  • As weeks progressed, the level of occlusion was increased in Group One (increased duration by which glasses were grayed-out)

Test Results

The golfers that practiced with the Nike SPARQ glasses increased their driving distances compared to the group that just practiced… it worked! In fact, the total occlusion group improved by an average of 14.65 yards.

total driving distance

Digging even deeper into the numbers, within Group One, golfers that initially had shorter initial driving distances of 185 yards or less showed significant yards gained with their tee shots. Testers gained between 10 and 40 yards with an average gain of 25 yards.

Check out the graphs below:

total driving gains within group

How does this help your golf game?

By reducing your reliance on vision, you can begin to develop a better sense of where your body is during the golf swing. In scientific terms, it’s called proprioception – we are aware of what our limbs and fingers are doing without seeing them. Better golfers have better proprioception or “feel”, not more information. Actually, if you want to become the best golfer you can be, you need to stop thinking about the swing mechanics and become of aware of what you are doing to create your good shots. By practicing without vision (vision occlusion), you develop a better sense of feel.  

occlusion1-2

Try It Yourself

It’s difficult to find the Nike SPARQ training glasses anymore (Nike discontinued them), so I recommend using electrical tape on a pair of safety glasses (that’s what we do in a pinch).

Here’s what to do:

  • With your glasses in hand, go out to the range, tee up the balls, put the blackout glasses on.
  • You can peek below the lenses to find the ball and get aligned properly. 
  • Start swinging at 50% intensity with a mid-iron, 6 or 7 (you can peek at the ball to set up properly, of course).

blackout-glasses-2

Pay attention to what you are feeling, it will take some time for your brain to stop thinking and become aware of the swing.

Hit 15 balls while wearing the blacked out glasses. What do you sense with your missed struck shots compared to your well struck shots? By gaining a feel or awareness of what the differences are, you can begin to change your swing. As you gain confidence, you may increase the intensity of your swings. Now with the glasses off, try to replicate the same good quality motion you felt with your best swings.

Now pull out your driver, put on the blacked out glasses and repeat the 15 ball practice set. Do this practice set once or twice per week for a couple weeks and let me know how it goes!

 

test-nike-glasses

 

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Tony Luczak

Tony Luczak

Tony Luczak

Tony is pursuing a Master’s Degree in Exercise Science and Ph.D. in Neuromechanics in the Department of Kinesiology at Mississippi State University. He has been teaching and training amateur and professional golfers for the last 20+ years; most recently, one of his students, Jeff Flagg, won the 2014 ReMax World Long Drive Championship. Tony currently is developing a motion analysis lab at MSU, conducting research for various companies, and teaching members and non-members at Starkville CC.

Tony Luczak

Tony Luczak

Tony Luczak

Tony Luczak

Tony Luczak

Tony Luczak

Tony Luczak

Tony Luczak

Tony Luczak





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Golf America

      8 years ago

      Absolutely Agree

      Reply

      Scott Grant

      8 years ago

      Rickie Fowler practices this a lot.

      Reply

      Trevin Jesse

      8 years ago

      Lol, it makes a lot of sense!

      Reply

      Scott Grant

      8 years ago

      Wth

      Reply

      John Walton

      8 years ago

      Darn my luck I see an interesting article title, read it and now I’ve got to spend money on range balls to try this…lol really appreciate any article with a scientific look at golf. It really helps the lesser minded people understand swing mechanics and how to improve them. Thanks for taking your personal time to explore and study golf to help others improve.

      Reply

      Tony Luczak

      8 years ago

      Thanks everyone for your thoughts, input, and comments. There are some weak points about the study. I was running the golf course when one of the grad students did this for me. Now that I’ve decided to pursue a terminal degree I’m not offended that this study is not the purest in sense of seminal work. However, as I’m writing my thesis in movement variability does not have an adverse effect on the golf swing, I do know that type of practice does influence performance. I do know that most golf instruction is based in kinematics not motor control and you may not improve. Chances are, you will improve your swing by practicing with eyes closed and developing kinesthetic awareness. This is something I’ve seen in 20+ years of teaching golf and developing players and producing championship winners at various levels. I’ve had Jeff Flagg do it when we started working together before he won the WLDC in 2014.

      Reply

      Rob

      8 years ago

      There is nothing scientific about this “study” and this is the kind of thing that makes “mygolfspy.com” harder for me to take seriously lately. First of all, you don’t perform any statistical analysis of your results, but based on the error bars in your graphs, the observed differences are more than likely not-statistically significant. Further, as another comment pointed out, you clearly have a difference between your control and treated groups in the beginning. The control group contained longer hitters, which by your numbers suggest are less likely to improve using occlusion. Therefore, your data contains bias that must be accounted for in any statistical analysis. A more likely explanation is that those who drive the ball on average only about 150 yds, are more likely to see improvement after weeks of lessons than those who drive the ball closer to 200yds. I realize this is not a science article, but to present weak data and make strong claims off it is frankly unethical from someone claiming to be a real researcher.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      8 years ago

      “Rob” – Lots of assumptions…no questions.

      It’s important for readers such as yourself to understand that digging into the specifics of statistical analysis (standard deviations, P-values, etc.) might be interesting to a very small few, but it’s a recipe for total failure as far as presenting the information in an article golfers will actually read. What Tony presented was a simple summary of an extensive survey conducted inline with the methods you assumed were lacking. Again…with the results in, our goal was to present it simply.

      Tony can jump in with more details if he likes, but keep in mind these findings were presented as part of an academic research project. Again…just because we didn’t break down every last detail for a post on a golf site hardly invalidates anything.

      Maybe this will help just a bit:

      Reply

      Rob

      8 years ago

      Sorry if this posts twice, but for some reason it keeps bouncing my posts.

      But a Poster does not mean it is fact. Posters are not even peer reviewed and even most peer reviewed papers contain several flaws. Based on what I see, he is confirming my argument. He did not see a significant difference between treated and untreated (90% confidence is scientifically not-significant). The only statistically significant improvement came in the before and after comparison of the novice driver group. But this was not compared to players of the same ability in the control group. That is a big omission. Further, he did not account for the difference in average driving distance between the groups in the beginning. This is a huge omission as that is what his data confirms the most–there is a difference in improvement potential of novice and more experienced players. I’m not saying there should be a long discussion of statistics–but it was obvious from the data presented they were lacking (not an assumption). The technique may very well work, but the current data does not support it the way this article describes it. The fact that statistics are boring for most people is the very reason such presentations are unethical–most are not trained to find faults in the data. As a scientist (I have a PhD in Molecular Medicine and I currently study stem cell differentiation and cancer) I take offense to other scientists publishing through the media preliminary results.

      Rob

      8 years ago

      I hate to drop the “PhD” thing, I know no one cares and it makes me sound like a pompous jerk. But I just wanted to clarify I have some idea what I’m talking about here–at least in terms of analyzing data and answering scientific questions, if not in Kinesiology specifically.

      Tony Luczak

      8 years ago

      Dr. Rob.
      You are correct about the significant difference. We used inferential statistics as recommended by Hopkins. There is a suggestion to look at n of 1 studies in golf due to the motor abundance problem in motor control.
      Here is one thing I’m learning as I prepare my thesis and eventually my dissertation is that sometimes statistics can be used to prove that 2 wrongs do make a right. Once I finish my classes I may have a different opinion but in one golf exercise study both the men’s and women’s golf team did not significantly improve based in the protocol. However because n was larger when combined there was a modest but significant difference of 1.75mph in club head speed gained.
      As with our study if 90% of the golfers could improve so isn’t it worth to give it a try.
      Thanks for your input! This education will only improve my future work.

      Jason Geraci

      8 years ago

      Hail State! (Sorry, I couldn’t help myself).

      So, Tony, did the ball speeds go up? Did swing speeds go up? Did back spin numbers change? Was the wind/temperature/humidity different? I don’t see any graphs (I am looking at the mobile site), were the same golf balls hit in all the tests?

      And yes, we need to “science the s#!t” out of this.

      Reply

      Tony Luczak

      8 years ago

      Hail State! Baseball this weekend!
      Same balls were used newer PRo-v1’s.
      Indoor using foresight gc2 & HMT. Best system in my opinion. I’ll check on numbers.

      Reply

      Puffy

      8 years ago

      Interesting, but I’ve found that studying the pro swing has helped me immensely, provided that I’m videoing my swing and making corrections too. You honestly have no idea what your own swing is doing unless you’re taping it. I’ve also found that concentrating on the ball helps me with ball striking when I struggle. Mentally envisioning the club head travelling along the correct path and making a solid strike on the ball makes a huge difference to me. If I see the proper strike in my mind and focus on the ball, good things happen. It’s when I get lazy and lose focus that problems begin.

      Reply

      Nils Nelson

      8 years ago

      Open your peepers and read THE INNER GAME OF GOLF (1979), by Tim Gallwey. If you like it, try THE MYSTERY OF GOLF (1910, 1955), by Arnold Haultain.

      Reply

      Evan Kelly

      8 years ago

      interesting

      Reply

      Andy Paschenko

      8 years ago

      Interesting article. I do something similar when I can’t seem to pure the ball. I set up normally, but when I start my backswing I take my eye off the ball and follow the club head back. I only look back at the ball durring my 1/4 second downswing. It sounds crazy, but this works for me.

      Reply

      GilB

      8 years ago

      Closing your eyes and swinging the golf club requires balance. Maintaining your balance requires a smooth, rhythmic swing. That leads to better contact, thus, longer yardages. Take your normal golf swing with your eyes open and then close your eyes and just concentrate on maintaining your balance while swinging the club and a noticeable change can be felt. Forget about your normal golf swing. Close your eyes, swing the club and just let it happen. Bring that swing to the range to start with and the results are amazing. I’ve done this for awhile and the difference is mind blowing.

      Reply

      Alex

      8 years ago

      I’ve been playing golf for 30 years and I’ve noticed that I don’t consciously try to look at the ball during the swing. My head is down but I don’t remember seeing the ball in front of me. I don’t know how to explain this, I even find it weird. And for some time now I’ve played all my short putts looking at the hole. Been doing great in that departament.

      Reply

      Justin

      8 years ago

      Ben Hogan used to say that he never saw the ball during the swing. I don’t look, either; I look at a spot 4″ in front of the ball. It helps bottom out the swing at the ball (that “ball-then-turf” contact), which helps eliminate fat and thin shots.

      Reply

      Pete S

      8 years ago

      I started doing a drill on the range that simulates this as well. Place a broken tee about 3-4 inches in front of the ball and try to hit that.

      Ashton C Plumley

      8 years ago

      I’m in. I am definitely in.

      Reply

      Kenny B

      8 years ago

      “Where did that go?”
      “Right in the lumberyard. We’ll work on it.”

      Sorry, had to do it. Interesting article. I’ll give it a try.

      Reply

      John DeJoia

      8 years ago

      I didn’t know the formal name, but have believed this for sometime. Having had several eye surgeries and trying to adapt made me a believer. Get a swing that works for you and hone it. Do not over analyze and take practice swings to warm up only if you can “see” the result. While you are honing your swing it is important to develop muscle memory. Unless the situation calls for rules play, try to hit a good mulligan following a bad shot. Start with good basics and lessons. Then go get your game. Develop a swing that works for you – not the fictional average person. But most of all – have fun.

      Reply

      Max

      8 years ago

      I know it’s not the same thing, but I started wearing sunglasses full-time while playing golf (Kaenon C28 lenses) a few years ago and I find that if I try to hit balls without them on I struggle big time.

      Reply

      Kent

      8 years ago

      I don’t know that any significant conclusion can be drawn from the study other than practice makes you better.

      Looking at the 2nd graph (only the test group), it isn’t unusual that golfers who average 150 yards would improve with 12 practice sessions over 6 weeks. The “longer” half looks like they had a statistically insignificant gain.

      Since the control group was made up of “longer” players, when you compare them to the “longer” players from the test group, the results are identical. It doesn’t look like the vision aspect has anything to do with the gain in the overall test group.

      Reply

      4pillars

      8 years ago

      Yes

      That’s what I thought.

      The groups weren’t balanced at the start so you can’t say anything from the experiment.

      It stands to reason that the group who shot the furthest at the start would improve the least

      Reply

      Benjamin Lee

      8 years ago

      I may try it. Not necessarily for distance but body position awareness.

      Reply

      Jeremy Waddell

      8 years ago

      What’s the average golfer hit the ball? I want to know how this works for a guy who can hit the ball 300 yards.

      Reply

      Justin Ives

      8 years ago

      B*ll*cks. Give you a migraine more likely.

      Reply

      Tom D

      8 years ago

      There’s probably a correlation to why people like Jordan Spieth are successful looking at the hole instead of the ball while putting. I started watching the hole on 1-2 footers and miss far less than when I watched the ball.

      Reply

      Kenny B

      8 years ago

      I started that last year with 4-5 footers and it worked but over the winter I quit. This spring I went back to it, but this time I am looking at the hole on ALL putts. It’s scary at first but the more you do it, the more comfortable it becomes. I am making more long putts and when I don’t make them, they are a lot closer than before. I don’t sweat the short ones anymore either.

      Reply

      Jeff Mitchell

      8 years ago

      I just finished reading a very good book called “Instinct Putting” which teaches putting by looking at the hole instead of the ball. They even include drills and ways to practice building your skills and confidence in the process. I have only just begun to implement it and have not tried it in an actual round, but I am glad to hear that you (and Jordan Spieth no less) are doing this and getting good results.

      Justin

      8 years ago

      Do it with pitching and chipping, too.

      It’s just like when you play catch; you see your buddy when you’re about to throw the ball, and your body adjusts so you don’t throw it 40 yards over his head. It just knows what to do, based on the info your brain gave it. Same with pitching and chipping; if you visualize where you want the ball to land, there’s a good chance that’s where it will.

      It isn’t foolproof (is anything, really?), but the majority of your attempts will be better.

      CJ

      8 years ago

      Really interesting study. Just a few weeks ago I started experimenting with really moving focus off of/forward of the ball and have seen massive contact improvement by getting away with obsessing over the “hit.” In video it looks similar to Sorenstam/Duval. Not exactly what this study is doing, and at this point still difficult to control initial direction with clubs above 7i, but center contact (always have dr. scholz footspray handy!) has been off the charts.

      Reply

      Chuck Zirkle

      8 years ago

      Putting is all about feel.

      Reply

      golfercraig

      8 years ago

      Proprioception is the main reason it’s easy to teach a good basketball player to play golf. It’s why practicing putting with your eyes closed is an absolute must.

      Reply

      John Muir

      8 years ago

      Enjoyed your article. A few years ago I started swinging with my eyes shut as a joke (and last resort) after developing a bad case of the s word and it worked!

      John

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.