2015 Most Wanted Driver – (Accuracy Awards)
Drivers

2015 Most Wanted Driver – (Accuracy Awards)

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

2015 Most Wanted Driver – (Accuracy Awards)

The Performance You Deserve.

THE LARGEST, UNBIASED, DATA-BASED DRIVER TEST EVER PERFORMED IN THE GOLF INDUSTRY.

We spent the past 365 days flying around the country, making conference calls, consulting with engineers, industry experts, statisticians, mathematicians.  The end result of that collaboration is what we believe to be the largest, fully-independent, 100% #Datacratic driver test ever conducted.

This year’s Most Wanted Driver Test took months to complete. Our testing procedures were significantly expanded. Our test included more golfers, more drivers, and more data than ever before.  28 drivers have been put to the ultimate test.  An industry standard 20 golfers just like you spent over 150 hours in testing.

Over 10,000 shots were captured, more than 250,000 data points scrutinized. All testing was conducted with a Foresight GC2 Launch Monitor with HMT. All testers used Bridgestone B330-RX golf balls.

Our goal is to empower the consumer with truthful and reliable information that will help you identify the best driver for your game. We celebrate all of you who love golf equipment.

This guide is for you.

dead-straight

For more details on our testing process, see our How We Test page

How We Consider Accuracy

While none of the manufacturers are looking to sell you The Straightest Driver in Golf, we understand that some of you actually value accuracy above all else. Hitting the ball a long way is great, but not if it means the next shot comes from out of the deep stuff, am I right?

Are you content to let the other guys pound balls in the woods in search of 10 more yards? Is Fairway % your money stat?

Our Accuracy guide is for you.

Be aware that while our accuracy measurement does consider all shots hit with a given club, it does so with with total disregard for distance. In this context straight and short is every bit as good as straight and long. Straight is all we’re looking for.

Our test for accuracy looks at how close a driver keeps the ball to the center of the fairway. Period.

2015 Overall Accuracy

2015 Most Accurate Driver Most Wanted MyGolfSpy

Nike Vapor Speed Test Report:

  • Showed negligible left side bias
  • Left to right dispersion was tightest of any driver in Top 5
  • The latest in a growing line of straight-flying Nike drivers

FINAL-1MWD-2015-acc-2

Nike Vapor Flex Test Report

  • Negligible left-side bias
  • Open-face design may help mitigate hooks

FINAL-1MWD-2015-acc-3

Callaway Big Bertha V-Series Test Report

  • The most left-side favoring club we tested
  • Produces minimal curvature. Ball starts and stays where the face is pointed
  • Clear best in class (ultralight) for accuracy

error-fix

Srixon Z745 Test Report

  • Moderate left-side bias
  • 45″ shaft is likely an accuracy advantage

FINAL-1MWD-2015-acc-5

Tour Edge E8 Beta Test Report

  • Moderate right-side bias
  • Produced the most ball flight curvature on any driver in the Top 5
  • 45″ shaft contributes to accuracy

FINAL-1MWD-2015-acc-5-1

Srixon Z545 Test Report

  • No pronounced bias for either side of the target line
  • Straight ball flight with comparatively higher total spin

FINAL-1MWD-2015-acc-5-2

Titleist 915 D3 Test Report

  • Moderate left-side bias
  • Higher spinning alternative to E8 Beta
  • Best stock shaft selection in the test
For more data see the 2015 Most Wanted Driver Data Page

above-100-bnr-lg

MWD-2015-acc-100+1

Nike Vapor Speed Test Report:

  • No pronounced left/right bias for +100MPH testers
  • Tightest left/right dispersion of any club in the Top 5

MWD-2015-acc-100+2

Nike Vapor Flex Report

  • No pronounced left/right bias for +100MPH testers
  • Open face design will benefit those who prefer to draw the ball

MWD-2015-acc-100+3

Titleist 915 D3

  • Moderate left-side bias
  • Left/right dispersion is 2nd tightest in this group. Well above the average.

MWD-2015-acc-100+4

Callaway Big Bertha V-Series Report

  • Most left-biased club among higher swing speed players
  • Again, a standout option for those looking to take the right-side out of play

MWD-2015-acc-100+5

Big Bertha Alpha 815

  • Slight left-side bias
  • Axis tilt, starting direction, and other accuracy related factors suggest a driver well suited for the middle of the bell curve
For more data see the 2015 Most Wanted Driver Data Page

above-100-bnr-lg

MWD-2015-acc-100-1

Tour Edge E8 Beta

  • Moderate right-side bias
  • An accurate option well-suited for golfers who prefer to work the ball

MWD-2015-acc-100-2

Nike Vapor Speed

  • Slight left-side bias for sub-100 MPH swing speed golfers
  • Tighest left to right dispersion of any driver in this group

MWD-2015-acc-100-3

Srixon Z745

  • Slight left-side bias
  • Data suggests a driver that’s largely ball flight neutral (no clear bias for either draw or fade)

MWD-2015-acc-100-3-1

Titleist 915 D2

  • Slight right-side bias
  • Higher spinning option with consistently straight ball flight

MWD-2015-acc-100-5

Nike Vapor Flex

  • Slight left-side bias
  • Modest axis tilt and low spin contribute to minimal curvature for sub-100 MPH swingers

view-the-data

Don’t Miss

2015 Most Wanted Driver – Distance Awards
2015 Most Wanted Driver – Accuracy Awards

Support Unbiased Club Testing:

We’re not lying when we say that we refuse to take advertising from the biggest names in golf. We truly believe it’s the only way to remain above the influence, publish real results based on real data, and continue to provide honest opinion and commentary about what’s happening inside the golf equipment industry.

If you found this report useful, meaningful, or just interesting, please consider making a donation to help support MyGolfSpy’s independence.

We accept credit cards through PayPal. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

[donation-can goal_id=’fund-the-revolution’ style_id=’mgs’ show_progress=false show_description=false show_donations=false show_title=false title=”]

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      mackdaddy

      9 years ago

      Will the data be posted by individual testers like in the past? It is nice to match up with our most comparable players to us in handicap swing speed and age. I tried many of these clubs this year and didn’t find any that were better than my RBZ Stage 2 with a Matrix Ozik TP7HD at 44″ . That said I found the Puma Fly Z+ to be the most forgiving driver head I have ever hit. Off center strikes went strait and only lost about 8-12 yards. It does feel a bit soft off the face but it flys long and true.

      Reply

      quidam

      9 years ago

      I was bored waiting for a flight So I scrolled through the contest submissions… Nobody’s in the running anymore. Almost everyone that picked the DBD for distance, ended up picking either G30 or titleist for accuracy. My favourite submission was the Callaway ‘BBQ’.

      Reply

      paul

      9 years ago

      I think the that maybe regardless of club head speed the skill of your golfers may have been a little high. If the g30 straight flight model scores poorly when it helps correct a slice, then it makes sense that the people using it didn’t need the correction. Would have been nice to see a chart that shows a handicap range around 28 and what clu s they hit the best. And then the same for 12-28 and 0-12. Or something lime that. We all love golf numbers

      Reply

      Dan

      9 years ago

      Ball speed longes driver the best 148.4 the accuracy the ball speed is 159,,,,160′,,,,,161???how Côme in the longes drive best was 148.4 how you can test longes drive driver ??????????????? With a 10 to 12 miles less longes drive smash 148.4 an accuracy contrôle with more ball speed 159/160/161????pls adducate me

      Reply

      4green

      9 years ago

      please send me a list of each clubs degree of loft for this test.
      Launch angle means nothing without this basic data.
      How can I make a logical purchase without it?

      Reply

      Dave S

      9 years ago

      Good point… MGS kind of glossed-over that big detail. But again, this is just another thing that can vary from person to person, that is a flaw in this (and any) club test. For a certain driver, 10.5 degrees might be the optimal loft for one tester, whereas it might be 12 degrees for another. If they’re both testing a driver that’s 11 degrees, how do we really know if the data is valid?

      Reply

      stevie c

      9 years ago

      I think the most important outcome from the annual test is it allows those reconsidering drivers to:

      See data
      See unexpected brands emerge from marketing deluge (Tour Edge, Royal, etc)
      Participate in dialogue
      See how brands have redirected their tech (Nike, from distance to accuracy)

      My personal ah-ha moment was Tour Edge: 45″ shaft & 440cc head…top 5 in distance, for hi and low speed, and top in accuracy in lo ss (middle of pack for hi). Was not on radar and begs the question: where is the point of diminishing return for ‘longer shaft/bigger head’–I think we are there.

      Reply

      Hugh W

      9 years ago

      Based on pivot tables using the data extracted from this test, the two drivers ranked consistently highest in distance and accuracy for overall, high SS and low ss are the E8 Beta and the X7SFD. I’m willing to wager no one saw that coming.

      Reply

      Howard

      9 years ago

      As I read through the article, I kept waiting for the April Fools twist. Am I missing something?

      Reply

      Andreas

      9 years ago

      To find the overall best driver I would like to see a simulation of strokes gained driving / 18 holes on a series of different courses. Mark Broadie does it in Every shot counts, so with the dispersion patterns of all drivers tested it should be a pretty easy thing to do. For me as a consumer it´s easier to understand and put a value on x shots saved / round than to estimate the value of x extra yards / shot.

      Reply

      Steven

      9 years ago

      I agree with the idea of a strokes gained approach. I don’t have Broadie’s book handy, but it seems like there would be some indication in it of the relative importance of distance over accuracy. It is best to be long and accurate, next best is to be long and inaccurate, next best is to be short and accurate, and worst is to be short and inaccurate. In the calculation of the overall ranking for drivers, distance should carry more weight than accuracy, though with so little difference among drivers I am not sure how much difference any of this makes (see my previous post).

      Reply

      Dave S

      9 years ago

      I agree, but only up to a point. The degree of inaccuracy has to be accounted for. I won’t argue with the numbers in Broadie’s book that indicate is better to trade some inaccuracy for a really long hit, but there comes a point where parabolic distance/accuracy curve tapers-off and you begin to see diminishing returns. For example: you’d certainly be better off with a 230 yd drive, dead-center fairway than a 300 yd drive so far off-line that you’re chopping out of the high stuff at best (losing your ball or hitting OB at worst). I agree with Andreas that the only way to truly know where that point of diminishing returns begins is to map out the dispersion patterns on various courses to see how those drives would have fared.

      Steven

      9 years ago

      I agree. It is never good to be wildly inaccurate. I will take the fairway over OB every time. I just think that there must be some way to quantify where the trade off is between distance and accuracy.

      Vincent

      9 years ago

      Congratulations for a very serious test. But how many golfers can shot 3 drives in a row inside a 12 yards/5 yards rectangle? Golf equipment is a push marketing business and golfers must keep cool when innovation is claimed by manufacturers.

      Reply

      JV

      9 years ago

      After studying the overall chart for a bit, I’m convinced that the best solution is to find a driver that looks and feels right and gives you confidence. There isn’t enough of a clear winner, in my mind, to go and throw out $300-$500 for a clear “game changer.” If anything, the distance results were a little more skewed, but pretty much anything on the shelf is going to be within a few yards short/long and left/right.

      Reply

      andrew

      9 years ago

      i really hate to be a downer, but it seems there are less data here than previously- would have liked to see a more in depth synopsis on the drivers, or at least a full list… hopefully we’ll see more on the overall list or behind the numbers. btw- me too- what happened to truaccuracy?

      Reply

      MG

      9 years ago

      I want to preface my comment by saying I LOVE when you guys put this list together and always look forward to it. Now, looking at last years top performer for accuracy: g25. I think ping had 2 years for r&d in order to come out with a better driver: the g30. So if the g30 is better than the g25 (and at least in terms of moi it is, and most of their tour pros switched), do we really believe 16 clubs are now more accurate than the g30, which itself should be more accurate than every club from last years test since it should be more accurate than the g25??? Not to mention a good number of those clubs ranked better in accuracy are “pro” style clubs. I mean the r15 430 is more forgiving than the g30? To me it just doesn’t seem to add up. And I have never owned a ping club in my life so I don’t have a dog in the fight. It seems like maybe this test could be done again in a month and you would get a completely different order of clubs. So in the end I don’t really know what to say or where I’m going with this except that maybe all the clubs are pretty good?

      Reply

      Dave S

      9 years ago

      I understand what you’re saying, but just because the G25 was super accurate compared to last years clubs doesn’t mean the G30 will be super accurate compared to this years clubs. Your logic is creating a correlation b/w 4 entirely different variable as if they have all remained constant. Last year = G25 vs 2014 field of drivers; This year = G30 vs. 2015 field of drivers. There isn’t a single similarity other than the brand names involved so why would you assume the results would be identical?

      My theory as it relates to Ping is this: they have had one of the top ranked drivers in accuracy the past two testing cycles and the G25 was top dog last year. I honestly think they were resting on their laurels… the G30 looks remarkably similar to the G25 (probably by design, bc why not? it was the most accurate driver last year) other than the “turbulators they slapped on the crown. You’re telling me that in 2 years, the R&D engineers at Ping couldn’t come up with anything better than turbulators? Meanwhile, all the other OEMs were pushing the envelope with tech… some stupid, some very effective. I really truly believe Ping got caught sleeping at the switch this year.

      Reply

      steve c

      9 years ago

      I promised not to be one of the ‘why don’t we test differently’ voices in the grand stand. But here goes:

      It seems the HSS & LSS creates an unnecessary gap…111 avg to 91 avg. I’d like to see the performance of these clubs in the middle… how many golfers are in the middle vs the edges? I’d like to see the group in the 100/98 SS range.

      I’d venture a guess and say most MGS readers are in the middle…an avg of HSS and LSS isn’t an idicator how a club performs with a ‘medium swing speed’ it’s an avg of extremes.

      Reply

      Dave S

      9 years ago

      This is my exact issue… I have a swing speed around 100mph… so which group do I favor when looking at the numbers? I can’t really favor either so I can only rely on the Overall… and that may be way off.

      Reply

      stevie c

      9 years ago

      Right.

      That’s why Tour Edge jumped out at me; top 5 in hi and lo ss for distance, #1 in lo ss for accuracy; yet it had a 440cc (the only one that did) and 45″ shaft…where is the energy being generated from and still maintianing energy. Very interesting.

      Never felt comfortable with long shafts and big heads…something is underfoot here

      Paul Morris

      9 years ago

      Guys, thanks for the testing, love your site.
      As a senior with a slow swing speed I’m using a TM Burner2 driver which is cut down 2″, improved my accuracy no end w/small loss of distance, now when looking for a new big stick everything is at least 45.5″ and I’m struggling to find one to suit, can you include club lengths in yr data?
      Keep up the good work

      Paul M from across the pond.

      Reply

      coldsoul

      9 years ago

      I would also like this feature, I settled on a 913 d2 last year after testing all the models and found it to be the longest and straightest for me. I am not at all surprised to see how well the 915 d2 is doing for the lower swing speed players. However, I think a lot of that might have to do with it’s stock 45 inch shaft versus the others 46 inch shafts, my golf spy did a test awhile back showing the improvement a shorter shaft can make. I am now questioning if the d2 was really the best match for me or if it was really just a matter of the shorter shaft making a difference. I would love to see companies carrying a range of shaft options (just for demo) at 44/45/46 inches you could then just custom order a driver at the correct length. As it stands I am not aware of any companies that do this despite the major brands all having interchangeable shafts.

      Reply

      Steven

      9 years ago

      I agree with the idea of shorter shafts. I cut 1 3/4″ off my driver and have never looked back. I am just as long and have more control.

      quidam

      9 years ago

      I second NJ18’s comment. My swing speed is in the same category as his/hers and despite wanting SO badly to end up with the G30, after testing more than half of the drivers in this review during various fitting sessions, I ended up with basically the exact same 5 clubs in my top-5 in terms of numbers. The only way I could get the G30 close was by changing shafts, and even then it was not quite there. After flipping the core on the BB alpha, I had a clear winner and couldn’t be happier with my decision. I just wish I haven’t told so many people beforehand that I will NEVER buy a Cally…

      So back to what was mentioned before… Nothing beats a good fitting, and I can personally say based on my fitting that Shafts DO make a VERY big difference.

      Great test for off-the-rack buys though! I eagerly anticipate the next category.

      Reply

      Frank J.

      9 years ago

      Has to be an April Fools’ joke. How can the Nike Flex, Srixon Z745 (not Z545, but Z745), and Titleist D3 (not D2, but D3) be among the most forgiving drivers in golf?

      Reply

      Chris C.

      9 years ago

      Lordy! Lordy! will it never end? The E8 Beta produces some of the slowest club and ball speeds in the sub 100mph class yet manages to produce one of the longest average distances. Furthermore, the E8( a club purportedly designed for high speed low handicap players and with a substantial axis tilt) absolutely destroys its “more forgiving” E8 cousin when it comes to accuracy. It is now time for me to pronounce my name backwards so that I may return to my own dimension where, if I drop a golf ball, it will fall down to the ground and not up into the sky

      Reply

      Dave S

      9 years ago

      HAHA my thoughts exactly! I cannot wait for the “Behind the numbers” discussion. Obviously a LOT to be discussed.

      Reply

      Steven

      9 years ago

      I may be looking at this wrong, but I think that the data shows that most of these drivers are more alike than they are different. I obviously don’t have the raw data to look at, but working from the summary data it shows that only 4 drivers are more than one standard deviation longer than the mean, only 4 drivers are more than one standard deviation shorter than the mean, and the rest of them are within 5.7 yards of each other.

      At one point Consumer Reports put in their ratings something like “differences less than X are not significant.” I actually think you need something like that where you state that, “drivers within X yards of each other are not significantly different.” Then the consumer can make an informed decision among similar models instead of focusing on .1 yard differences between drivers. Another way to put it is that I don’t think the top 5 is meaningful when the differences are so small.

      BTW–I already donated and wish you the best raising the remainder of the funds you need.

      Reply

      Dave S

      9 years ago

      Ironically, based on your logic, a scoring system more in line with that of GolfDigest’s Hotlist: Gold and Silver Medals only, where most drivers get Gold, would make more sense than a list ranking. The only difference here is that MGS’ list would be determined with real numbers and not subjective opinions influenced by ad dollars.

      Reply

      Chris C.

      9 years ago

      My head is spinning. Up is down and down is up. My inability to get my head around these results is best summarized by the respective results generated by the three Ping entries in the sub 100mph class, to-wit: Ping G30 LS Tech was most accurate, followed by the G30 and bringing up the rear was the G30 SF Tec. The engineers at Ping must be wondering on what planet was this testing performed.

      Reply

      ryebread

      9 years ago

      What happened to TruAccuracy from previous years? If we’re talking about a yard or two horizontal dispersion difference, it is put into perspective if there’s 12 yards difference in length………

      Reply

      J

      9 years ago

      Love the test and thanks for the information. Really looking forward to the overall category and the data provided with the overall ranking.

      Right now I would have to say that I like last years format, ranking criteria (prefer truaccuracy and the distance rankings from last year over this years) and data better

      I’m sure you guys still have all the data points from this year so you could look at it in the format of this year versus the format of last year as well. I’m sure the rankings would be similar but maybe there will be more separation between the first few drivers in each category

      Reply

      Adam

      9 years ago

      Just wondering. I know the data is all from the gc2. I ‘m curious about the environment. Were the testers in bays hitting to outdoor targets or were they indoors???

      Reply

      Dave

      9 years ago

      Completely agree with JW, and Dave S.
      ‘TruAccuracy’ a much better measure!

      Also average distance should also be a caragory, not just longest hits…gives no idea for forgiveness on miss strikes!
      Big step backwards over last years test….

      Reply

      Dave S

      9 years ago

      Just FYI – they do have the “Distance (Average)” if you click on the data page link.

      Reply

      dlinzy

      9 years ago

      Yeah a big Woo Hoo to Nike, 40″ of difference at 260 yds. between First and Fifth. Ridiculously close tolerances proving once again if you want to hit it farther, do more push ups and stretches Need to hit it straighter Practice and you’ll save 499.00

      Reply

      NJ18

      9 years ago

      I have tested every driver on the market this season, on only simulators, and I have found that this is 100% true. The new Nike Vapor is my most consistent driver by far. My swing speed is 105 to 112 and my spin with most drivers routinely his 3000 rpm. With the Vapor that number was way down and it performed extremely well. Hopefully, like all Nike drivers, no one will buy it and I’ll be able to buy it for around $150 by this time next season.

      Reply

      revkev

      9 years ago

      This should be called the – “She has a great personality” award. :)

      As always a great job that gets better every year. I would still love to see a test where the last three year’s top five are taken out and compared by the same group or testers just to see if there is any sort of real improvement year to year – at least in their hands. I’m guessing not.

      Reply

      sgurg

      9 years ago

      “I would still love to see a test where the last three year’s top five are taken out and compared by the same group of testers just to see if there is any sort of real improvement year to year” –great idea revkev!

      Considering the “older” drivers are now 50% or more off of their original price this would be great to see. I saw the SLDR on sale for $170 today – after TM saying last year they wouldn’t allow heavy discounting to happen in their retailers.

      Reply

      Regis

      9 years ago

      First of all the SLDR came out in July 2013 and held its price for well over a year and I believe it was Callaway that represented that their price on the BB series would hold.

      Dave S

      9 years ago

      The problem MGS will have in doing this is that the testing methodology has changed each year. Yes, I’m sure it was in an attempt to make it better via trial and error, but the collateral damage is that it precludes any real useful year-over-year comparison b/w products. I really wish this was available too… would love to see if the marginal performance increase in the new clubs is worth the marginal $ increase.

      Reply

      Kenny B

      9 years ago

      I agree with rev that it would be a great test for us, but I am not sure that the OEMs would like a demonstration that shows little or no significant improvements in their new products with their latest and greatest technology.

      As always guys, a great datacratic test. It gives us all excellent information in our quests for our new toy.

      Reply

      revkev

      9 years ago

      Once you have different testers or tester groups from year to year you are unable to make that sort of comparison. I’m suggesting going into the closet and pulling out the top 5 or 3 or even one driver for each of the past three years and having a test group hit those side by side.

      For that matter even the same group of testers year to year is difficult because everyone is a year older or one guy may had a health issue last year but not two years ago or this year. Just get the clubs together and test them head to head today.

      Average driving distance on tour has changed very little the past 5 years so I’m suspecting that we will see that there is little to no increase in distance or accuracy the past 5 years. Of course the OEM’s would hate it – MGS is concerned about the consumer and that test would be very beneficial for us!

      kyle

      9 years ago

      I am really surprised by these results. I think almost every other driver test(other golf websites and publications) had the Nike Vapor Flex and the Tour Edge drivers at the low end of forgiveness. Really gives you something to think about and try drivers that you would normally not consider.

      Reply

      dlinzy

      9 years ago

      Not only that, but the difference in the top 5 Longest Drivers is what, 1 point something yards?
      Some thing for Straightest, 1 . something yards, tells me any of the top 5 could be made to excel past the others proving club restrictions works.

      Reply

      Ron

      9 years ago

      Wow Nike…………….Just WOW! We’re Back!!!!

      Reply

      dlinzy

      9 years ago

      Why do you continue to use a ball few players use? Why not use a PRO-V1 or * there is differences even between the PRO-V’s who plays B-Stones?

      Reply

      Daniel Stone

      9 years ago

      Hi Dlinzy,

      I cannot believe your ball arrogance. Lot’s of people can’t afford to play PRO V balls.
      Also depending on swing speeds, if they are below 100 mph, then you will not benefit
      by using them. The Bridgestone E series balls are fantastic. The E6 is the most accurate ball on the market. It corrects hooks and slices like no other ball. Also it’s much longer than people think. The E5 is great around the greens. And the E7 is a great distance ball. All at prices well below your PRO V balls.

      Be lucky,

      Daniel.

      Reply

      Regis

      9 years ago

      With regards to the Tour Edge, was it the Beta that was exclusively tested. Only reason I ask is that the lightest stock shaft that is offered is 67 grams whereas the non-Beta has different shaft offerings down to 42 grams and it just seems the non-Beta would be better suited to players with swing speeds under 100 mph where Tour Edge fared so well

      Reply

      Geoff

      9 years ago

      I have been telling everyone for years that Tour Edge is up there for Drivers, Fairways and Hybrid. Here is another example of that people need to wake up and stop buying into all of the marketing dollar bullshit. Tour Edge may come up with products every year but they don’t have the marketing budget these other companies do because they offer a LIFETIME WARRANTY and a 30 Day satisfaction money-back guarantee. BEST fairways in golf though. Great to see a REAL test from MyGolfSpy where money doesn’t matter. #TRUTHDIGEST>ADVERTISINGDOLLARDIGEST

      Reply

      JW

      9 years ago

      Question, won’t “less offline” be biased toward lower ball speeds? Should we be looking at a ratio of ball speed to offline or even axis tilt to look at side spin?

      Reply

      Dave S

      9 years ago

      I just went back to look at last year’s Accuracy awards and it looks like the testing methodology used was different. Last year you used your own proprietary formula (“truAccuracy”) to determine the winner. It took into account not just how straight it was but also normalized each hit for distance (i.e. if every shot was 250 yds, how far off-line would they be?). You combined this with Fairway % to come up with “trueAccuracy”. It seems that this innovative (and advanced) statistic has been abandoned this year in favor of the relatively simplistic “Dispersion”, which doesn’t consider distance at all. Was this intentional? Am I misinterpreting the data? Thanks.

      Reply

      Bryan

      9 years ago

      Nice call out. Seems like a step backward this year by not doing the truaccuracy. Was this a result of the feedback from manufacturers? Even though MGS shares all the data I can see manufacturers not wanting to see propriatary tests.

      Reply

      Kyle Morris

      9 years ago

      Maybe that will factor into the overall category? This test is purely accuracy based.

      Dave S

      9 years ago

      That was the thought I had last year when they came out with “truAccuracy”… isn’t normalizing the hits for distance kind of the whole idea behind the “Overall” test? Overall winner should be the club that has the best combination of distance + accuracy, or “truAccuracy”. I don’t know if this was MGS’ thinking, but it seems possible that they’ve eliminated this calculation from the Accuracy award and will be utilizing it for the Overall award. If that’s actually the case, then there’s really no point at relying on the Accuracy ranking as anything more than data-point inputs into the Overall ranking… since a driver than hits it 210 yds, but ends up splitting the FW every time would be the winner…and no one would want to bag it.

      Duncan Jaenicke

      9 years ago

      As usual, the smart golfers among the readers make a FANTASTIC observation / interpretation. I admire MGS’s editorial team b/c they write in a very lively fashion, making everything CLEAR. In this case they were clear about the fact that distance was OUT as far as criteria go. So, after reading y’all’s comments here, I’m going to check out the 2014 study. Makes sense to me also b/c I’m a budget-minded buyer and I’d be buying a driver that’s one or two generations old anyway cuz of price. So 2014 study, w/ its “true accuracy” criterion, here I come! Thx, guys, for interpreting the data so well. I live being part of the MGS community. PS to MSG editors: better include the true accuracy algorithm next year–best comment was “since a driver than hits it 210 yds, but ends up splitting the FW every time would be the winner…and no one would want to bag it.” Or, what the heck, why not come up w/ an alternate report NOW, including this aspect? Courage to listen to feedback, an admirable quality.

      Darren Tan

      9 years ago

      Well, I’m quite shocked by Nike’s performance. Titleist I had expected will show up somewhere but no Ping? Major shocker.

      I do wish Tour edge is more readily available in Asia though .

      Reply

      MG

      9 years ago

      Where is the full list? I only see the top 5 for each. Am I missing something?

      Reply

      BK in TEXAS

      9 years ago

      Click on the link that says “For more data see the 2015 Most Wanted Driver Data Page”

      Reply

      Dave S

      9 years ago

      Looks like all the Nike haters in the Distance test messages board will have to put away their pitchforks for at least another year.

      Most surprising things to me so far:
      -Ping doing (relatively) poorly in both D&A.
      -Nike Vapor Flex doing so well… and the Pro doing awful
      -Learning that “Royal Collection” is even a thing… and a long thing at that!
      -Tour Edge’s overall performance
      -Taylormade not doing well compared to previous years

      Great stuff guys! Looking forward to the Overall award. If I had to guess right now based on data, I’d have to go with either the Vapor Flex (9th in distance, 2nd in accuracy) or the Tour Edge E8 Beta (4th Distance, 5th Accuracy).

      Reply

      JFM628

      9 years ago

      This is very interesting…very. I need a little more time to review but the obvious thing that jumps out here is that while Nike was absent from the distant, they are strong here.

      The most surprising thing to me by far is the absence of the G30 in any form…we have all read for some time and in many places that it is the most forgiving driver available…this is very interesting.

      Reply

      Bryan

      9 years ago

      I’ll have to admit, I am not nearly as excited about distance and accuracy days as the overall which better highlights the perfect balance of LONG and STRAIGHT that we all dream of. That being said, it didn’t stop me from checking into MGS five times this morning until the post was here. Thanks as always for the report.

      Reply

      stevie c

      9 years ago

      ummh, I think ‘wow’ to the folks over @ tour edge; distance, accuracy and swing speed agnostic (mostly).

      Good job, MGS!

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.