Callaway RAZR Laser Rangefinder – REVIEW
News

Callaway RAZR Laser Rangefinder – REVIEW

Callaway RAZR Laser Rangefinder – REVIEW

Want to know which Laser Rangefinder is the best? Well…we’re on a mission for you!  We’re doing a “Laser Rangefinder Round-Up” to find out just who makes the best GPS for your game.  Let’s face it, if you don’t have one of these things by now, it’s absolutely causing you strokes.  No more, “Hey Bob…you see a marker anywhere?”  … “I”m looking Bob, can’t find one…but I’m thinkin’ 175-180 yards.”  Well…let’s just say Bob was off…way off…and your perfect shot that looked like it was tracking the pin…well it fell in the bunker.  Chalk it up…shot lost.  And that’s just on one hole.  So maybe you should go with something more accurate than Bob.

Next Up In The Rangefinder Round Up:  The Callaway RAZR Laser

(Written by: Golfspy_Dave) This is “Part 2” of the “Laser Rangefinder Round-Up”.  Our first contestant, the 2012 Bushnell Pro 1M, led off the competition with a strong score of 98/100.  Our second entrant is the Callaway RAZR Rangefinder.  Not only does this rangefinder have to compete with the Bushnell Pro 1M, but it also must live up to the high standards of the Callaway laser rangefinders that I reviewed last year (iQ and Diablo Octane).  Will this RAZR cut through the competition?

Cosmetics and Feel

One of my issues with last year’s Callaway Diablo Octane laser rangefinder was the case.  OK so I may have poked a bit of fun at the name as well.  Perhaps on both counts I was being a bit petty, but truth be told that case was a weak addition to a good-looking laser.  Callaway obviously listened to my criticism, because the case on the RAZR rangefinder is a huge improvement.  First of all, the case now completely covers and protects the unit.  This lack of protection was my main gripe with the Diablo Octane.  Fear not, with the RAZR case, your unit will be well protected.  But what if you don’t want to mess with taking it in and out of the case every hole?  Well just detach the clip from the case and attach it to the unit.  Drop the case in a pocket and clip the RAZR laser to the outside.  It’s pretty rugged and as long as you are not a bag tosser, it should survive just fine.

OK so the new case makes me happy, but what about the look and feel of the laser itself?  There is a new upgrade here as well.  The Callaway RAZR laser is trimmer and sleeker than its Diablo Octane predecessor.  Callaway says that the RAZR is 10% smaller.  That doesn’t seem like a lot, but they have taken the 10% from just the right areas.  The front of the unit is narrower, fitting the fingers perfectly.  The unit is definitely more compact.  The rubbery case material is very hand-friendly, providing great tactility even under “moist” conditions.  The colors are attractive, without being over-the-top.  With the new case and compact body redesign, this unit is an eye pleaser.

Cosmetics and Feel Score: 20/20 Points


Performance

Here are the Callaway RAZR Specs:

  • Shock resistant and fogproof
  • Waterproof – filled with nitrogen gas, sealed with O-rings (except battery chamber)
  • Multi-coated optics with improved light transmittance
  • Focusing diopter by simple twisting action on eyepiece
  • Reticle allows users to know ranging in progress
  • Capable of distancing different targets in succession for up to 8 seconds
  • Compact, lightweight design (10% reduction in size)
  • Carabiner built-in for ease of access with all walking bags and tour bags
  • Includes travel pouch for shipping protection and lens care.
  • Includes 3 volt CR2 lithium battery

Ease of Use

Push the button to turn it on, push the same button to measure distance to target, and then watch it turn off automatically.  Not too tough there.  If you need meters rather than yards, you are just a “MODE” button away.  Very easy to aim one-handed; working well both with and without sunglasses.  Battery life has been excellent and I have not noticed any targeting struggles as the battery depletes.

On the Course

The Callaway RAZR laser rangefinder powers up and acquires targets very rapidly.  I did not ever feel like I was waiting on the unit.  Target acquisition is excellent.  This unit uses “Nikon’s First Target Priority Mode” to pick up the “closest, smallest object like the pin”.  The laser does take a bit more aiming if there are trees directly behind the pin, but it is definitely able to pick up the pin vs. the background objects.  If you set it to scan mode, you can pick up multiple targets in a single pass.  I was able to target trees, bunkers, and other golfers as needed.

The Callaway iQ laser was my favorite laser from last season.  One of the features that I loved was that it would switch to an orange reticule under low light conditions.  This feature is so amazing when I am trying to finish the last holes of a late tee time round.  While the RAZR does not switch to low-light orange automatically, it is only a press of the MODE button away.  For dawn patrol golfers, this may not be a huge feature, but those of you who head out to play after work will definitely appreciate it.  If you can’t see your target, even with the low-light optics, it may be time for you to break out the glow ball or head for home.

The Callaway RAZR is accurate up to 600 yards and displays distance to the tenth of a yard.  I don’t know that I have ever worried about that 0.1 yard before, but I know some of you reading that have that kind of game.  The 6X optics are extremely clear, providing sufficient magnification and resolution to shoot the laser at just about anything on the course.  Or even birds above the course, as I seem to be prone to lasering…

Performance Score: 60/60


Value

The Callaway RAZR laser rangefinder lists for $349 in the Callaway online store, but you can find it for  cheaper here.  This puts the RAZR a bit above the Diablo Octane in price, but I think that the improvements in the unit are well worth the cost.  Even at $349 though, the Callaway RAZR is the least expensive of the lasers tested this summer.

Value Score: (20/20)

Summary

As the score says, this is a perfect little laser.  The compact size and price point put the Callaway RAZR out in front in the “Rangefinder Round-Up”.  The Bushnell Pro 1M is a great unit, but the Callaway RAZR is just a bit better.  Tune in soon to see how the Callaway RAZR holds up against the final contender, the Bushnell Tour Z6.

Overall Score: 100/100

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

A putter-obsessed recreational golfer, constantly striving to improve his game while not getting too hung up about it. Golf should be fun, always.

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Toulon Golf Small Batch Meadow Club Putter
Apr 11, 2024 | 3 Comments
Bettinardi CB24 and MB24 Forged Irons
Mar 26, 2024 | 11 Comments
Toulon Golf Texas Small Batch Putter
Mar 14, 2024 | 0 Comments
Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Jon

      9 years ago

      I replaced the battery and it doesn’t read yardage…WHY????????

      Reply

      Michael

      10 years ago

      I find your reviews on lasers missing some of the most important features.
      For instance one of the lasers has Pin Seeker software that will yardage the pin even with shaky hands and trees in the background. You also don’t mention if the unit beeps and locks on to pins that have laser reflectors. You don’t mention the practical usage distance either. I can easily hold the unit still to get yardage for a 90 yard pitch shot, but when you are 225 out do you have to put it on a tripod? I am not even commenting on the ridiculous 600 yard claim. I personally picked the Leupold because of the size, solid aluminum body, and battery cover. They also have the best case hands down with a magnetic latch. When I pulled the cheap plastic battery cover off the Bushnell I eliminated it as a choice immediately. Does the Nikon have any of the mentioned features?

      Reply

      Julia Murray

      10 years ago

      Is it USGA approved, to use during tournaments?

      Reply

      Brian Wallace

      10 years ago

      You can use any rangefinder that measures distance only (non-slope)…so yes this unit is USGA approved.

      Reply

      Bruce B

      11 years ago

      GregB,
      Am in my mid-sixties and have to plant the device against my eye using both hands touching and my forefingers and thumbs touching my face to stabilize my shaking hands. Works better than nothing, very stable matter of fact.

      Reply

      GregB

      11 years ago

      As I reach into my mid-sixties, I am finding the hand steadiness is becoming a challenge. Is there any anto-shake compensation in the unit? I have an older Bushnell unit purchased 8 years ago and I can no longer use this on any object more than 75 yards away due to my shakiness. Thanks!

      Reply

      Eugene

      11 years ago

      This is imho very biased and unprofessional review. The author points out the ergonomics of the devices and tells about perfect performance while completely missing the point of what the device purpose is.

      The rangefinders are not only about how fast they can get a reading, but more about how well they can communicate this information to the user and be precise in doing so. In the real world RAZR rangefinder is far from perfect, and of course nowhere near bushnell pro 1M or z6 for that matter, I’m not talking about being better.

      Yes it feels nice, looks nice and has nice pouch (although this pouch needs to be operated with both hands in order to put the damn thing into it, while most bushnells it is one hand operation) BUT it doesn’t lock the pin distance!
      Also the cross-hair is huge and takes all the screen, so the yardage info is tucked into right top corner. You have to actually move your eye to see it causing a bit of refocusing, but guess what happens when you do? Right! You move away from the pin (and i have comparative steady hands) and it picks up something different! Now you have to refocus your attention to get the pin back in the cross-hair.

      Now what happens with bushnell when you’re done measuring? Because it measures when you actually hold the button, it stops when you release it. So you’re ok not to wait for 8-10 seconds to stop scanning. Sometimes it takes me 3-4 seconds to get the distance or less. When pinseeker icon is on, you’re done and it remembers the distance you got. Sometimes you need to double check if you read it right – so you can just look into the screen without remeasuring.
      in RAZR you must make sure that you’re measuring all 8 seconds only the taget you want. If you don’t you will have to remeasure because if you stop earlier it might pickup some unwanted objects while travelling into the pouch.

      And last but not least – the RAZR backlight feature is a joke comparing to pro 1m vivid screen.

      I was Bushnell user for several years and I believed this review and decided to try this rangefinder. It annoyed me to no end after two measurements on the course. It is going back.

      Reply

      LT

      11 years ago

      First off. Thanks for the excellent review of this rangefinder as well as the latest Bushnell models. First, I had the Bushnell 1500 Slope and 1600 Tournament Pro prior to purchasing the Callaway Nikon Razr. I briefly owned a Leupold but quickly returned after I found out I could get the Bushnell 1600 from my club at a lower price. I also didn’t like the fact that the Leupold display was positioned at the lower right making it tougher to see against grass and trees and that it didn’t wouldn’t work through glass/plexiglass. This review (like all) contains some subjectivity, especially given the 100/100 Perfect Score, with which I have to disagree. Personally, I think the score compared against the Bushnell models should have been tied at best, with possibly a 95-97 score based on the following issues:

      1) No Pinseeker Mode ala Bushnell. I believe that the Leupold units haver their own version of this but with the Callaway Nikon Razr you have to hold the reticule steady on your target to display the yardage and if you’re off a little the display will change for whatever object the reticule is tracking during an 8 second period. While I’m sure many can live with this it ended up being a showstopper for me. In fact, when I first started using the Razr I mistakenly thought the yardage displayed was to the pin, when in fact it was for an object behind it. Luckily I didn’t hit my shot pure and was only slightly long. After that incident I used my ESN Espresso GPS Watch to double-check my Razr readings. Personally, I want to shoot the pin quickly while receiving confirmation that I indeed have the reading to the pin. All of the Bushnell units I own do that flawlessly, which I can’t say is true for the Callaway Nikon Razr.

      2) The Callaway Nikon Razr has hung up on me on several occasions and I’ve had to wait for the unit to automatically shut off before I could start measuring again. This is annoying, especially when you’re trying to stay on pace. I cannot remember any of my Bushnell units hanging up.

      While I honestly enjoyed all of the positive features of the Callaway Nikon Razr, as I previously mentioned the above issues proved to be showstoppers for me and I ended up selling it to a friend and purchased the Bushnell Tour V3, which I’m completely happy with. Sure, on paper, it doesn’t have the waterproofing, optics, battery meter and backlighting features of the Callaway Nikon unit but at the end of the day it does what I need it to which is provide quick and reliable distances to the pin and other targets. I forgot to mention that getting one-handed readings with the Bushnell Tour V3 is a snap, something I wasn’t able to easily do with the Callaway Nikon Razr. That said, to each his/her own.

      Reply

      Mike Beaudrias

      11 years ago

      Tow questions:
      1. Any reviews on Garmin
      2. Any reviews on Mizuno Drivers

      Reply

      Ken

      11 years ago

      I happen to own one of these and it’s a high quality device for sure, but I have some basic thoughts that apply to all these devices, not just the Calaway.

      1) Range finders should be redundant on everyone’s home course. Whatever happened to knowing the course like the back of your hand? That’s how we all played fifty years ago and still played up to the time that these devices began to pop up about ten years ago. Now they’re virtually ubiquitous as golf has become much less a game of feel.
      2) High handicappers lack the skills to strike their selected club correctly with any regularly. Therefore, knowing the distance to different areas of the green or the precise distance to the pin is of questionable merit. They should invest their money on lessons instead of something that won’t help improve their skills nearly as much.
      3) Laser range finders are indispensible for setting up a distance chart by working with them on the practice holes or driving range. Then you’ll be able to select and dial in your swing with the appropriate club when you’re on the links.
      4) Range finders are valuable on unfamiliar courses.

      Reply

      gary

      11 years ago

      Love the RAZR but only get Three Rounds out of one battery.Sent back to Nikon to see if there was some kind of DRAIN going on.Got it back with new battery and “no problems found”. Great poduct but lousy batter life @$7.00 a pop!!!!
      Comments please!!!!!

      Reply

      Russ

      12 years ago

      Finally decided to buy a rangefinder rather than continue to guess and decided on the Calloway Razr. On my usual trail around the Internet I discovered that you can buy the Nikon Prostaff 5 from MidwayUSA for 199.95 zero tax and free shipping and its the same!! OK you don’t seem to get the case but that’s 150+ savings.
      I’m hoping mine will arrive in the next week or so and I can then use my 150 savings to pick a case.

      Reply

      Bob

      11 years ago

      Are you sure it’s the same, I read something about priority 1 and 2

      Reply

      Dominic

      12 years ago

      Hi GolfSpy_Dave,

      I am trying to make up my mind on which range finder to get. On the list are Razr, GX3i and GX3. When reading the reviews of GX3i, I find a lot of emphasis on the impressive speed (which is important to me as I have struggled quite a bit with a Bushnell Scout 1000 ARC) and no negatives except for size being a tad too small. While the Razr walks away with a full 100/100 even with a comment that it might take a bit more aiming with trees as background.

      I am trying to figure out if the speed of the Razr is already very good. Maybe, if you able to share in terms of seconds, the time to acquire the distance of flag in front of trees?

      Reply

      Dominic

      12 years ago

      Hi GolfSpy_Dave,

      I am trying to make up my mind on which range finder to get. On the list are Razr, GX3i and GX3. When reading the reviews of GX3i, I find a lot of emphasis on the impressive speed (which is important to me as I have struggled quite a bit with a Bushnell Scout 1000 ARC) and no negatives except for size being a tad too small. While the Razr walks away with a full 100/100 even with a comment that it might take a bit more aiming with trees as background.

      I am trying to figure out if the speed of the Razr is already very good. Maybe, if you able to share in terms of seconds, the time to acquire the distance of flag in front to trees?

      Reply

      Andrew

      12 years ago

      Which one of these models provides slope adjusted readings? Any recommendations for those models?

      Reply

      Andy

      12 years ago

      I have the Bushnell Pro 1M. I’d like to know how this gets to be better …?

      The 1M has a better magnification, which definitely makes it easier to target medium to long targets (180+ yards for sure).

      The 1M is also held horizontally and in my experience this makes it easier to hold steady.

      Can’t think of any advantage this has except perhaps (slightly) size. But as the 1M is attached to my bag (via the Bushnell clip) that not an issue for me. The accuracy to .1yard is totally useless, the only people in the world able to comprehend .1yards in their game are on tour and banned from using them in competition.

      Reply

      Ian

      12 years ago

      Good to see there is new activity here.I e-mailed mygolfspy 4 days ago but have not been replied to and was therefor wandering if the range finder topic had finished.I am choosing between bushnells 1m and z6.Size is an issue as I want to be a bit discreet when ranging so the z6 is high on my list.I am eagerly awaiting the z6 review here before i purchase.

      Reply

      Howard

      12 years ago

      I have an older Nikon/Callaway laser, and it’s the best one I’ve ever had. The new one looks very good. Any one getting a laser might be interested in the Nikon 8172 Retractable Rangefinder Tether (availble from Amazon and others). If you’re a walker, it lets you keep the laser attached to the bag, and extends out far enough to use it, then retracts.

      Reply

      Ian

      12 years ago

      All ready to buy a rangefinder.
      Choosing between Bushnell1M (excellent review) and Z6.
      Very much looking forward to the Z6 review.
      Will it be coming soon??

      Reply

      sonny petrongolo

      12 years ago

      does it factor in slope for elevated tees or greens ?

      Reply

      GolfSpy Dave

      12 years ago

      No Slope on this one, but the Callaway/Nikon iQ does give slope adjusted readings.

      Reply

      Drew

      12 years ago

      If you don’t have a rangefinder you’re not serious. Still enjoying my V2 but looking forward to an upgrade when it dies.

      Reply

      Bruce Bell

      12 years ago

      Been playing by feel and eyeballing distance for three decades. Your review caused me to order one immediately, if not now,when? Great review, got me to pop for something I thought was irrevelevant. Nice job.
      Bruce

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      12 years ago

      Well… we’re not here to make you guys buy things, but when it can help your game and it performs this well we want to let you guys know. Somebody has to filter out all the this stuff for you so you know what is worth the money and what isn’t. Let us know how it works out for you Bruce.

      Reply

      Gil B.

      12 years ago

      Great review as usual. It’s my opinion though that these things are completely over priced. Lets be honest, if we could strike the ball and have it land to very specific yardages, we’d all be on the Tour. My little Callaway uPro Go GPS is perfectly suitable for my needs, and I suspect, most other golfers’ needs. Getting a distance within a yard or two is just fine for most of our needs.

      Reply

      Brian

      12 years ago

      I will give them props for the “hiking” clasp that you can use to anchor to your bag. Nice idea there.

      Reply

      Yohanan

      12 years ago

      I like my v2 and have shared how to get one for something close to 250.
      Find the bolle offer and off the bolle sunglasses on the bay for $50 and call it a day.

      Reply

      Brian Cass

      12 years ago

      My current V2 Bushnell Tour is outstanding, unless this thing can make me shoot 3 under every day, help me win the lottery or service me orally I’m not interested.

      Cheerio

      Reply

      GolfSpy Frank

      12 years ago

      Wow! Perfect Score?! I will definitely be keeping my eye out for one. I have never had a laser rangefinder, but that might change now that there is a perfect score out there.

      Reply

      wdgolf

      12 years ago

      “Let’s face it, if you don’t have one of these things by now, it’s absolutely *causing* you strokes.”

      Boy I’m glad I have a range finder! That’s a serious marketing angle right there! :lol:

      Reply

      TahoeAce

      12 years ago

      Check out the Leopold GX-3i. Best optics, best display.

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      12 years ago

      Reply

      Wannabegolfer67

      12 years ago

      I actually bought the Leopold GX-3i based on the earlier review and love it. I can’t imagine any rangefinder being any better.

      Dronsky

      12 years ago

      100/100! Great review, i have been looking for a rangefinder for my dad, this seems like a good choice, but compaired to a cheeper callaway model (sub 300$) what would the differences be?

      Reply

      Golfspy Dave

      12 years ago

      The Diablo Octane is also a good unit and can be had for a bit less $$$. With this one you get the redesigned case and more compact body. I think that the upgrades are worth it, especially if you plan on using it for a while.

      Reply

      Dronsky

      12 years ago

      What the life on a rangefinder like? 5 years? It would be nice to know which company’s components last longer/more durrable.

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.