SHAFT REVIEW – Miyazaki B. Asha
Golf Accessories

SHAFT REVIEW – Miyazaki B. Asha

SHAFT REVIEW – Miyazaki B. Asha

Miyazaki B Asha Shaft

Introduction

By: Matt Saternus

What do you think of when you hear “Miyazaki Shafts”?  The first things that come to my mind are amazing graphics and the International Flex Code.  And, of course, shafts that perform well.

We haven’t heard much from Miyazaki since they rounded out the Kusala line (reviewed HERE), but now they are back with the B. Asha series…and everyone knows it (seriously, when was the last time you didn’t see a Google Ad for it?)

B. Asha replaces C. Kua as the lightweight portion of the Miyazaki family.  Through new technological developments, they have made the B. Asha lighter and lower in torque than the C. Kua.  Miyazaki believes that these changes will result in higher ball speed and more distance.

A Quick Primer on International Flex Code

One of the things that sets Miyazaki apart from other manufacturers is their transparency about shaft design.  They created the International Flex Code to help the golfer understand how each shaft bends, and they place this information on the tip of every shaft.

The International Flex Code is a four number sequence.  The numbers represent the stiffness of each of the four sections of the shaft: butt, mid-butt, mid-tip, and tip. The numbers range from 0 to 9, with 0 representing a very soft section and 9 representing XX-Stiff.

The beauty of this system is that it allows golfers to learn precisely what they like and need. Miyazaki offers a tremendous variety of profiles, so golfers can experiment with balanced, “flat” profiles (5555), butt-stiff/tip-soft profiles (7552), butt-soft/tip-stiff profiles (5689) or anything in between.

The “International Flex Codes” for the shafts tested are as follows:

3S: 5433

4S: 6732

4X: 7854

5S: 5674

5X: 7785

7S: 5674

7X: 7785

You’ll notice that the 5 and 7 share the same profile, just in different weights.

Notes, Feel, Price, and Miscellaneous

For the B. Asha, I have to start with the art: it’s flat-out awesome.  The artist, B. Asha (all Miyazaki lines are named for the artist), has taken a palette of browns and greys and created a picture of two samurai unsheathing their swords.  Could there be a cooler image to have in your mind when you’re pulling the driver out of the bag?  Methinks not.  The overall look is really understated, bordering on dull, but the samurai graphics make this amazing.  It’s like the old guy at the course who doesn’t hit it far, but takes everyone’s money: sneaky good.

Alright, enough of that, on to feel.  One of the things that has changed with the B. Asha line is that Miyazaki went to “flatter” profiles: this means that all the sections of the shaft, bend more evenly.  The result is shafts that don’t have kick points that are as distinct as past Miyazaki models.  There is much less “kick” in these shafts then in past Miyazakis that I have tried, which could be a good or bad thing, depending on your preferences.  These shafts feel very low torque, even in the lighter weights.

The B. Asha line is currently offered in weights ranging from 45 grams to 77 grams.  Flexes range from A to X.  Retail price for the B. Asha line is $249.

Performance

For the Performance testing, I hit each of the shafts in a Callaway RAZR Fit 10.5 head on a FlightScope X2 launch monitor.  I hit 20 “good” shots with each shaft, changing frequently so that fatigue was not an issue, nor did I get grooved with one shaft to the detriment of fairness.

Testing was done at Golf Nation in Palatine, IL, one of the best indoor golf facilities in the country.

*NOTE: Testing has moved back inside for the winter, and our FlightScope seems to be producing somewhat different numbers indoors compared to outdoors.  To greater or lesser extents, ball speed, club head speed, and spin are all coming in lower than they did outdoors, hence the carry number is smaller.  That said, it’s still an apples-to-apples comparison, so no attempt has been made to “normalize” the numbers: we’re publishing the numbers straight off the FlightScope, as always.

DATA


ANALYSIS

The first thing that I think is worth pointing out is the difference between the “Offline” number in our charts and the Dispersion Circle measurement on the Flightscope graphic.  Looking at the Offline numbers, you see only a 3 yard gap between the straightest and most crooked shaft – not much of a difference.  Then you look at the Dispersion Circles and see a gap of 27 yards between the best and worst.

The reason: the Flightscope number measures the difference between your two most disparate (distance and offline) shots, our number is simply an average of how far each shot was from the centerline.  An example to help clarify: if a tester hit every shot 200 yards and 25 yards to the left of the centerline, Flightscope would say the dispersion is 0 yards, but we would say it was 25 yards offline.

The biggest thing that I noticed while hitting shots with the B. Asha was how low spin many of the shots were. With the 5S, for example, I hit a number of shots that didn’t even carry 200 yards before they fell out of the air.  For many players, this low spin characteristic would be heaven sent; for me, it’s a recipe for knuckleballs.

Finally, with regard to accuracy, I felt that I hit a lot of shots that were very acceptable, but very few that painted the center line.  Usually I will find at least one shaft that allows me to hit a number of shots right down the line, but that was not the case here.  Rather, with a few exceptions, I hit everything pretty well.  None of them screamed “Bag me!” but I wouldn’t have been upset to game any one of them either.

Conclusion

If you had handed a B. Asha shaft to me without telling me what it was, I would have been hard pressed to guess that it was a Miyazaki based on feel.  For those that loved the Kusala or C. Kua line, this might be disappointing.  For those who thought those shafts were too lively, the B. Asha might be a welcome change.  What is inarguable is that this new line offers low spin and very acceptable dispersion. With the wealth of profiles and weights that Miyazaki is offering, I think many players will be able to find a very good fit in the B. Asha line.

VISIT WEBSITE: http://www.miyazakigolfshafts.com/

FOLLOW ON TWITTER: http://twitter.com/#!/Miyazakishafts

FOLLOW ON FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/Miyazakishafts

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Matt Saternus

Matt Saternus

Matt Saternus

Matt Saternus

Matt Saternus

Matt Saternus

8 Can’t Missing Putting Trainers
Sep 5, 2013 | 19 Comments
SHAFT REVIEW – Project X Graphite Shafts
Aug 21, 2013 | 13 Comments
SHAFT REVIEW! – UST PROFORCE VTS
Aug 6, 2013 | 8 Comments
Matt Saternus

Matt Saternus

Matt Saternus

Matt Saternus

Matt Saternus

Matt Saternus





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Joeg Voll

      4 years ago

      Great Review! I have an ancient Cleveland CG Black 16° 3 wood (’12 or ’13 I believe) with a Miyazaki C.Kua 5s IFC# 4446. My driver clubhead speed is 92-95 mph. I flat out love that club and I believe the shaft is what gives it that “IT” factor that separates the club from all other’s, including the most recent models I’ve demo’d. But the thing I like about it is the kick. It’s a much more pronounced kick than any other shafts I’ve played. I currently have Rogue Silver 60s in my driver and 70s in my strong 13° 3 wood. The Cleveland is the only wood that has performed well from fairway and 1st cut lies, since my early 90’s Persimmon Palmer Peerless 4 wood with DG S300 ( my point and shoot BB firing club!) I assume these positive performance traits of the CG Black ’13 are more shaft related, but that particular head is/was the lightest 3 wood on the market. Can anyone suggest the best method/route for me to determine if it’s the 4/4/4/6 profile shaft, the clubhead, or both, that make this particular club such a standalone in performance? I was away from the game for about 15 years so a lot of the technology is still a bit foreign to me. The first time I was handed a 460 cc driver 3 years ago, I laughed because I honestly thought it was a gag club, meant to be a joke. I’m kinda bummed that the reviewed Miyazaki’s have lessened the kick. I really like that kick in the circle “5”s ifc# 4446 model C.koa! Thanks for the review and any help.

      Reply

      Russ Rohatyn

      4 years ago

      I would like some info on Miyazaki shaft tour issue special x with international flex code 7544 I need to know the flex and possibly the price Stamped W41W9830 Thank youi

      Reply

      T. Stephenson

      8 years ago

      Which shaft of the B. Asha series would you say most resembles the Matrix Black Tie in regards to flex ( tip to butt ), spin, dispersion, and feel?

      Reply

      john

      10 years ago

      what do the #5212 on the miyazaki special edition 39r golf shaft mean? can you explain. thank you.

      Reply

      Don

      8 years ago

      Shaft type Miyazaki
      36r, 350 tip
      Flex code 5212
      I’ am trying to find the same shaft type for a replacement of my Cleveland #1 driver 270 clasic
      What does these numbers mean?

      Reply

      hong

      10 years ago

      just curious ,i am using Kena series , but Asha is custom line ? i cant find on their website

      Reply

      Chris

      11 years ago

      Fascinating test. Alas! it appears that efforts to define and utilize one’s swing DNA are simply exercises in futilty. With the exception of backspin, there apear to be no significant differences in outcome regardless of which shaft was used. Furthermore, the shaft’s profile does not seem to account for the reported differences in back spin. I believe that Mr. Wishon has opined that with the exception of late release golfers(eg Sergio Garcia) the shaft will have minimal impact on the results of a swing. Accordingly, fitting, fitting, fitting involving a plethora of shafts remains the only way to find the “perfect shaft”.

      Reply

      damo

      11 years ago

      Any thoughts on why the 5S spun quite a bit less then the 5X and 7S?

      Reply

      Golfspy Matt

      11 years ago

      Not really. I didn’t notice anything when testing (I try not to pay too much attention to the numbers when swinging). It’s not the only time a shaft that “should be” higher spinning hasn’t turned out that way. I think it just speaks to the importance of fitting.

      Best,

      Matt

      Reply

      Dave Mac

      11 years ago

      Kudos to Miyazaki for the international code system, I wish the industry would adopt this system across the board, it would take some of the mystery away regarding shaft matching. It would be good to see the archaic flex labelling be replaced by what is a far superior system.

      Reply

      Vince

      11 years ago

      I’m just curious why some one would put a $249.00 shaft on a 299/399 Driver. Does that shaft add that much distance?

      Reply

      GolfSpy Matt

      11 years ago

      Vince,

      It can. Check out this article: http://mygolfspy.com/what-a-difference-a-shaft-makes/

      As we say ad naseum around here: “It’s all about fitting.”

      Best,

      Matt

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.