Do You Know that Srixon Makes Irons?
Irons

Do You Know that Srixon Makes Irons?

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Do You Know that Srixon Makes Irons?
“For these irons, the sole objective was consistency”

Written By: Tony Covey

Do you know that Srixon makes irons?

I’m hoping most of you are staring at the page right now wondering if the guy who wrote this is an idiot, because frankly, I feel stupid for asking. Of course you know Srixon makes irons…right?

Right?

SRIZ355-110

Not Just Irons…Really Good Irons

I’m continuously baffled by the number of golfers I encounter who have absolutely no idea that Srixon’s product offerings extend beyond the golf ball. So do you know that Srixon makes irons is, sadly, a fair question.

But since you already know that Srixon makes irons, let me re-ask with greater relevancy to a well-informed golfer such as yourself; did you know Srixon makes really good irons?

You’re probably familiar with the Z 545 from our recent Most Wanted Game-Improvement iron test. And despite the fact that the Z 545 is a bit of a better-player-centric stretch for that particularly category (the Z 355 wasn’t available at the time of testing), certainly nobody at Srixon can be too upset about how the irons fared.

SRIZ355-112

Step up to the Z 745 and you find a beautifully-crafted iron which, although Srixon bills as being for Tour Players, is playable-enough for most single digit golfers, and even some low-single digit guys who are above average ballstrikers.

The Z 945…modern blade perfection. I’d love a set. They’d look great on my wall, or in a case someplace where they couldn’t do any real damage.

My point in all of this is that Srixon, somewhat quietly, has amassed an iron lineup that covers nearly every golfer, while maintaining a semi-traditional aesthetic that should appeal to just about everyone.

Let me spell it out for you; I’m really impressed by the Srixon Z-series iron lineup; in many cases moreso than competitive offerings.

Where Does the Z 355 Fit?

SRIZ355-116

The most recent addition to the Z-series is the Z 355. If we’re being honest, it’s a much better fit into the true game-improvement category than the 545. It fits solidly in the 15-20 handicap space, but its refined enough that it’s appeal could sneak into the single digits; particularly for those better golfers looking for more forgiveness.

SRIZ355-113

The Z 355 is a bit more compact than many in its space. It offers enough offset for those who need it without being in your face, totally ugly, or otherwise unappealing. The departure from standard game-improvement practice is most noticeable in the thinner-than-expected topline. As a guy who continues to rail against unnecessarily thick, and poorly shaped toplines, it’s the design feature I most appreciate. Certainly we’re just shy of 600 increments away away from butter knife territory (the 945 is modern butter knife), and I suppose it’s not a huge leap away from an AP1, although I personally find the Z 355 more appealing visually.

Ultimately, the Z 355 is a game-improvement iron that could – and probably should – appeal to guys who generally don’t like game-improvement irons.

Srixon Z 355 Technology

SRIZ355-102

From a technology perspective, Srixon has done a few different things.

Most notably is the inclusion of what Srixon calls Action Mass. It’s the signature technology of Srixon’s 355-series products. In practice Action Mass means heavier heads coupled with high-balance point shafts. The end result of Action Mass is that golfers can put more weight through the ball without increasing swing weights to uncomfortable levels. Even with heavier than average heads, the Z 355’s swing weight comes in at an easily manageable D2.

SRIZ355-115

So what the’s actual benefit of Action Mass?

My guess is Srixon’s thinking is rooted in physics, and more specifically Newton’s second law:

Force = Mass x Acceleration

With Z 355 you’re going to put more mass into the ball, and assuming you don’t have to compromise swing speed (acceleration) to get it, you’re going to hit the ball farther than you would with a lighter head. Toss in the MOI benefits of those heavier heads, and, well, you can start to see how this Action Mass thing is supposed to work.

Apart from typical OEM talking points (maraging steel, 17-4, etc., and of course larger sweet spots), the Z 355 also features Srixon Tour V.T. Sole. Your actual mileage may vary, but the design, which pairs increased leading edge bounce with decreased training edge bounce, is designed to move effortlessly through turf and tighten shot dispersion.

Z 355 Specifications

355-spec

As you can see from the chart, the Z 355 is perhaps slightly agressive in its spec-ology. The pitching wedge is strong at 44°, and the 38″ 5-iron might be a bit longer than some are accustomed to, but nothing is outside the reasonable range for the category, especially among offerings that offer lighter-weight shafts as the primary stock option.

Z 355 Performance

SRIZ355-107

We’re going to be taking a closer look at the performance of the Srixon Z 355 in the very near future. Check back soon for the results.

That stock steel shaft is Nippon’s N.S. Pro 950GH DST. For those who prefer graphite, Miyazaki’s Jinsoku is also an option. Retail price is $799-steel and $899-graphite for an 8-club set.

Have You Tried Srixon Irons?

Have you tried the Srixon Z-series irons? What do you think of the company’s first full scale push into the US Market?

For more information, visit the Srixon Golf Website.

For You

For You

News
Apr 22, 2024
Strength Training for Golfers: Building a Strong and Stable Core
Golf Balls
Apr 22, 2024
Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
Golf Technology
Apr 21, 2024
Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Berniez40

      6 years ago

      Just a quick follow up review here. I still have these in the bag after two years, and have even managed to hunt downn the matching Sand Wedge. They are by far the best set of irons I have ever owned. In just a few short months companies will be introducing new clubs for the 2019 Season. I’ve hit all the latest, and must say, these still shame most of the new stuff from the big OEM’s. I want to thank My Golf Spy for introducing me to these. I am an avowed CLUB HO’ of the worst kind, yet I still can’t see myself parting with these irons. Keep up the good work guys. This review finally convinced Captain Cheapskate here, (who used to write club reviews for epinions), that My Golf Spynot only does a more thorough review of clubs on the technical side than I could ever hope to, but they might even match me for skepticism when it comes to claims made by the OEM’s as well. You shall see my contribution to your cause shortly, and I do hope others follow suit. This is a very much needed resource in the world of Golf Journalism.

      Reply

      Chuck Smith

      6 years ago

      I researched the Z355 irons pretty well before pulling the trigger and trading in my beloved Karsten irons for a set of Z355’s. I can say that I have not been disappointed AT ALL with the trade. Miyazaki shafts (regular flex) are a good fit for me, a 65 year old who hits 8 iron at 140 yards. Distances are virtually equal to Karstens, but where the Z355’s excel is in the shot making department. Draws, fades, high, low, and knockdowns are all available with this club! They are very accurate, have outstanding feel, and are beautiful to look at. I will have to invent some shortcoming of the clubs in my mind to ever ditch them!

      Reply

      Marcus

      7 years ago

      Why aren’t we talking about the fact that the Srixon irons are, in fact, the spiritual successor to the Cleveland 588s? The Cleveland/Srixon Corporation decided to have Cleveland do putters and wedges, and leave the rest of the clubs (and balls) to the Srixon name.

      That said, the Srixon irons really seem to be a blend of the 588 line and the Bridgestone J series. Very attractive clubs with obvious technology benefits built in.

      Reply

      Berniez40

      8 years ago

      For the past year and a half I have had a set of faithful Mizuno JPX EZ’s with the Graphite Orochi Shaft in Regular flex to help my arthritis and slower swing speed get me back into the 80’s. Previously I had been staying in denial and back up into the 90’s with my Stiff Steel Adams Super S Irons. My swing has continued to slow, and rather than put my back through another rough season, I started looking at the New Mizunos, hoping to get them in A-Flex. Well the new JPX EZ’s are great, but they aren’t any longer than the previous model of which I am the proud owner.
      My golf pro, who was strictly a Mizuno man started doing Demos for Srixon as well. We came to the conclusion that the MiyaZaki Jinsoku Shaft was a perfect fit for me. I can’t even begin to tell you how good the club feels at impact. Not only am I still in the 80’s, I have dropped from 85-89 to 81-86. These are the best irons I’ve ever played. They are long, accurate, feel like butter relative to other game improvement clubs, and look good too. If you need some ego-boo, let one of your buds set up with one of these. The topline is so nice and svelte (for game improvement) , that he’ll hand it back to you and say, “I can’t hit a player’s iron.” It’;s happened to me more than once.

      Reply

      CG

      8 years ago

      I’ve played Srixons ever since the i-302s. Then 506, 701 tour and z-tx ii since 2013. I wanted to love 745s but the z-tx 2s remain supreme for me. The hardest thing about upgrading with them is finding somewhere to demo against your own clubs

      Reply

      Massimo

      8 years ago

      I’ve always played Srixon irons since I started to play golf in 2005 and for sure, the Z355 will be my 4th set of Srixon irons.
      I still haven’t try them, but the name is like an insurance for me.

      Reply

      Glen Johnson

      8 years ago

      got an old set on maxfl fires and theyre this shape ,theres a few big oems using very close to this atm,,got g25s and they arent as good yet!!

      Reply

      Greg Smith

      8 years ago

      I did and I want a set!

      Reply

      Allen

      8 years ago

      I just got my Z355 irons in, they are a very good looking set, and they are not too big for a game improvement iron. I was playing I20s and Bridgestone J15 cast this summer. The 355s are right in between the 2 irons, but as forgiving as the Bridgestone’s. I think these are every bit as good as Titleist Ap1s. If you want a low offset (for game improvement irons) with great turf interaction and forgiveness, hit these.

      Reply

      Guy Crawford

      8 years ago

      They do it very well

      Reply

      Teaj

      8 years ago

      why would they not strengthen the lofts if the head launches the ball higher its an easy way for them to gain distance. Would I use them, No but I can tell you that a lot of my buddies could probably use the extra distance and forgiveness that these clubs most likely produce. Do I agree on the longer length not really but this is coming from someone that does not struggle with swing speed, ask my grandfather if he would like to generate a little more club head speed and you would most likely get a different response. I currently hit Srizons Z745 P-5 and their U45 23 deg and 18 deg which I wouldn’t change for the world, I love this setup and it took me 3 swings to give the rep my money, srixon is making some great clubs and from what I can see they had a great year introducing it to the north american market as I know some guys tried to order sets shortly after the release of the Z745, Z545 and U45 irons and they were back-ordered due to the higher then expected interest in there irons.

      do yourself a favor if you are looking for new irons this coming year and hit a couple of the srixon offerings, what do you have to loose.

      Reply

      Pontus Adolfsson

      8 years ago

      Tobias Nilsson

      Reply

      Adam Lund

      8 years ago

      Peter Lund this is a good read

      Reply

      Razi Zuhri

      8 years ago

      Herie Hafiz Yang Le’kill.

      Reply

      Eric

      8 years ago

      The jacked up loft debate is fine but seems kinda silly if one is aware of PW that is 43 instead of 46 or whatever. So then it just is a matter of semantics. My z545s are lofted differently than my last set j40s. Does my z545 9 iron go further than my j40 9 iron? Yea under perfect conditions with a perfect hit, could I replace my j 40 8 iron with my 545 9 iron, no way. The 545 are hotter off the face, for sure and maybe after I get more used to the 545s the difference in lofts might matter, but for now if I have 150 to the flag both sets I am pulling 7 iron.

      Reply

      Kenny B

      8 years ago

      Again with the 35* 8i. WTH! It’s just a ploy to get you to buy more wedges; I already have 4!

      Reply

      DaeGunn Jei

      8 years ago

      Popular in Asia, I heard.

      Reply

      Dave

      8 years ago

      I have a set of z745 on order and coming in this week. Hit the demo 6 iron months ago and feel in love but they were back ordered for 3 or 4 months. Switching from Nike vapor pro combos and AP2 714’s. These sit in the same wheel house. Great feel but the sole is the real story. It doesn’t let you dig if you have a stepper swing & they sit very nicely on the turf even with the high amount of bounce on the front end. I would say if you are a 5 to 13 handicap, you need to try these out before you buy a new set.

      Reply

      Nathan Murray

      8 years ago

      Scott Glaze

      Reply

      mcavoy

      8 years ago

      Not to be a wet blanket here (and not specifically picking on Srixon either) but I see all of these manufacturers come out with their own proprietary names for technology to help people hit it farther with no more effort. In Srixon’s case here they are calling it Action Mass. But the one thing I notice all of these technologies have in common is stronger lofts. In this case a 44* pitching wedge. Shocking. And in many cases (although not here) accompanied by longer lengths. So not to disparage it outright, I’d like to see a more apples to apples comparison. Put Action Mass technology in a 47* / 35.5″ length PW and see what the distance gains are then. It is nice to see however they are offering an AW with the set as not all manufacturers of stronger lofted irons do.

      Reply

      dr. bloor

      8 years ago

      What are the apples that you want to compare to the Srixon’s apples? Forty-four or 45 degrees has been the standard loft for a PW for years now in game-improvement irons; hell, this year’s AP1 PW is at 43 degrees.

      Lofts are strengthened for marketing purposes, sure, but club designers have also been able to strengthen those lofts because of changes in club design that allow for easier ball launch. Would a Z355 lofted at 47* send a ball as far as one lofted at 44*? That’s a pretty obvious, and boring experiment.

      Reply

      ryebread

      8 years ago

      Here’s the specs from a very good set of GI irons from a few years back that you will still see in many peoples’ bags:
      – Loft: 27
      – Lie: 61.5
      – Steel shaft of length: 37.75
      – Very similar offset level (don’t have the #s in front of me)
      When I play in scrambles, I can guarantee that I will walk up and down and see at least two people playing this particular iron set. It’s one of those cult clubs from ~ 2009.

      What’s stamped on the sole of that club? Five iron. Sure looks like the 6 above doesn’t it? Will the 6 above go longer than the 6 in that set? It had sure better.

      Now, marketing would have us believe that in the new set, if it were this stamped as a 6, it would be hit too high, to the detriment of the player. Say what? It was perfectly fine as a 5 but is now unacceptable? I’d bet if you put that older 5 and that newer 6 on a monitor in the hands of 50 amateurs, you’d see almost identical numbers between the two of them.

      The next marketing counter argument is that they’re changing the gapping and using fewer clubs to cover the same gap lengths. Therefore you can pick up other clubs. I look at this and think “I can’t hit that 4 at all, so it’s a complete throw away club.” I see ones going with 3 on top of that even more aggressive, and that’s two throw away clubs that have to be replaced with hybrids or FWs. Either that or there’s an up charge to get that AW/DW.

      If you put the 6 in the new set with the 5 in the old set, maybe you’d see 3 more yards and 3 feet higher in peak trajectory with the new set? I’d bet any real difference is in the shaft weight and thus the club head speed achieved. I just don’t think hotter faces and CG shifts of a millimeter here and there (yet we all hate offset) are making that much of a difference.

      I know this isn’t novel. It’s been posted a million times in the “jacked up lofts” debates. It’s just that I hate hearing that marketing line of “new tech = higher launch, more forgiveness, etc. and thus they have to jack the lofts.” I basically left another golf site because of this type of “science” and I don’t want to see it here.

      I’m not picking on Srixon either. They make absolutely gorgeous irons that I’d love to play if I had that skill level. This issue is across the board. Look to the Tour Edge irons a topic down and you’ll see something very similar with their specs. That’s another OEM whose products I like a lot and have in my bag on a regular basis.

      dr. bloor

      8 years ago

      “It’s been posted a million times in the “jacked up lofts” debates. It’s just that I hate hearing that marketing line of “new tech = higher launch”

      I tire of the marketing hype as much as anyone, but I tire equally as quickly with people who can’t be bothered to educate themselves on the basic physics of why you can–and need to–lower lofts when you tweak the structure of a club face in order to maintain a good ball flight.

      More to the point, anyone who is vaguely interested in buying a set of clubs that suits their games doesn’t pay any bloody attention to the number stamped on the bottom of the club anyways. It’s about proper gapping and consistency of distance, period. Complaining about jacked up lofts is basically barking at the moon for all the good it will do, and totally irrelevant in the first place.

      ryebread

      8 years ago

      Of this post, there are two points I’d agree with you on. The first is related to the gaps. That’s the only distance related factor one should be thinking about when thinking about an iron set.

      The other point that I’d agree with you on is that people “complaining” about gaps aren’t changing the behavior of the golf OEMs. They’re out to make money and they’ve figured out how to sell to us. The loft strengthening is brilliant from a marketing perspective. The average consumer does look at distance when in the store. Then they get home and find they can’t hit the 3 or 4 iron, so then they have to come back and get hybrids. The set may not even come with a gap or sand wedge in default configuration, so they’ll have to pay more for those, or buy “upgrades” at wedges.

      Other quick thoughts:
      – The average consumer doesn’t think about their gaps. This site is about education and making us smarter golf equipment consumers. Therefore examining of specs is certainly relevant.

      – Take a look at the MGS results on fairway woods and compare the titanium max COR models with the steel (just below max COR) results for the average swing speed player. There’s a difference for the high swing speed player, but for the average, that face hotness doesn’t correlate nearly as much to distance as the lofts, shaft lengths and shaft weights. This is on longer shafted clubs with lighter shafts, where the effects of a hotter face are going to be most seen.

      – To your point, it doesn’t matter what is stamped on the bottom when it comes to “maintaining a good ball flight.” That only impacts one’s perception of what the trajectory should look like. Again, if a certain trajectory was fine 5+ years ago at a 5 iron, why is it suddenly unacceptable in a 6 iron?

      – I don’t believe the “hit it too high” argument. You might see it with certain players in certain instances on the driver, but those are few and far between. Ironically I’m one of those and have lots and lots of monitor pulls to prove it (I own a monitor). We’re talking about irons though, and launch is king. Watch the faster swing speed players (PGA tour level swing speed) and they hit the ball very, very high as well as long. That doesn’t mean they can’t hit a wedge even higher and still long though. The argument just doesn’t hold. For them it again should be about just finding the gaps.

      – When talking about CG movement in irons or hybrid irons, we’re really talking about moving it MMs at most. The best ways to move it are to build in a massive amount of offset, or to give a club a huge, fat sole. Neither of these approaches are acceptable to the consumer in Srixon’s target market for irons. Cue the shovel conversation. That means there’s not much difference in CG shift for all of these “technologies.” Nothing that is changing the way the ball fundamentally flies when compared to the variance in the average player’s swing (way more than a few MMs difference in the delivery position of the CG relative to the ball).

      – If there’s really any huge strides that impact actual performance of an iron over the past 5-10 years, it is due to the shafts. Steel shafts can be had at 85 grams in stock sets now versus 130 grams being the norm. Graphite is much more playable and becoming more main stream. I absolutely believe that a lighter shaft will help generate more ball speed and more distance. For this reason, I’d look at an iron upgrade if one is playing an older set. It’s probably cheaper to get newer irons than it is to reshaft, and who doesn’t like new stuff? I just don’t believe that performance gains seen related to the head are anything more than related to the lofts.

      Steven

      8 years ago

      Reliable distances, small dispersion, and consistent gaps are what iron sets should be about. That being said, length and marketing is what sells most clubs.

      mcavoy

      8 years ago

      I’m all for technology that helps with dispersion control, minimizing distance lost on off center hits, trajectory control. All I’m saying is we shouldn’t kid ourselves where the distance gains come from in sets like this.

      Eric

      8 years ago

      I have z545s. Awesome clubs. I bought them off the bay at a great used price, there were like new condition. I find it odd that golf stores(not dicks) do not carry srixon or Bridgestone clubs. Why would a retailer be so uninterested? Set of irons or two seems peanuts compared to the benefit of looking like a store that has more than just the usual stuff. the cool factor. The golf mart around me is a perfect example, no Wilson no srixon , no Bridgestone clubs, so do I even go there to spend 800$, nope. Why even bother to buy balls? Their inventory bores me. And it’s full retail price, with only a playability guarantee as a incentive. I look on that store as a complete waste of space for not trying to be anything besides the most generic of golf retail. Sometimes word of mouth can send $$$$$ through the coffers. Ask srixon supposedly the irons are selling like hot cakes without major retail presence. So that to me says that the golf marts of the world have no idea what they are selling, and what is available to the market. They fail.

      Reply

      Nardu

      8 years ago

      Hi Eric,
      You in the US?
      Strange, because the Srixon Irons made it to South Africa upon release, not very publicized, but everybody here knows about them… Word of Mouth mostly
      Bridgestone is scarce though, I’ve only ever seen one set of their irons in our ProShop stores. Also liked the 545s a lot, but the $ exchange rate kills our golf equipment prices

      Reply

      Jason Geraci

      8 years ago

      Yes they do

      Reply

      Lee Turner

      8 years ago

      Srixon Pro 100’s were awesome!

      Reply

      Joe Gendron

      8 years ago

      Bridgestone J15 CB’s are awesome irons too.

      Reply

      Ryan

      8 years ago

      Let’s just hope that they don’t run out of them. There was no point in fitting 545s last year because they were back ordered for months!

      Reply

      Steven Sabolsky

      8 years ago

      Love my z545’s but can’t buy an A wedge here In the states

      Reply

      Thomas Modolo

      8 years ago

      But they dislike lefty…

      Reply

      Jeremy T. Johnson

      8 years ago

      Love my old i506s. Would love to hit these, but closest place that carries them is 4 hours away.

      Reply

      Mark

      8 years ago

      Great spotlight on an often forgotten about clubs …. I’d say Bridgestone also fits in that category of “they make more than golf balls?!”

      Reply

      Colin Chisholm

      8 years ago

      look nice

      Reply

      Donovan Childers

      8 years ago

      Not sure about these, but the 745’s and 945’s are forged by Endo.

      Reply

      dr. bloor

      8 years ago

      These are cast, so the question about where they’re made isn’t quite as relevant.

      Reply

      David W

      8 years ago

      The owner of my local range plays the Z545 and he let me hit his clubs when I was looking at new irons. I actually came down to them and the i25s but went with the Pings. There were a little more consistent with distance.

      Reply

      Jamie McCormack

      8 years ago

      Where do they make them?

      Reply

      Steven

      8 years ago

      I haven’t seen these irons in person yet, but they look great in the photos.

      I think that the Z 545 and Z 745 are gorgeous clubs. I had a chance to demo a 7 iron from both sets when I played a round last month. I played two balls and hit 7 iron whenever I could and they both performed beautifully. They were equally long and great on thin or slightly fat shots. I was able to hit them straight or play a draw, with the only limitation being my skill level. One surprise was that the Z 745 was more forgiving than I thought it would be.

      I was planning to put the Z 545 or Z 745 in my bag when I switch out my irons, but I will keep an open mind regarding the Z 355 as well. I am looking forward to the results from the testing.

      Reply

      Don

      8 years ago

      Alas, another golf company that has such a limited lefty selection it is not worth following for me.

      Reply

      Robin

      8 years ago

      I would rather be a lefty . You get way better prices when clubs are on sale,and the prices are so much better on eBay for a lefty.

      Reply

      dr. bloor

      8 years ago

      I’ve been demo’ing a six iron with the Jinsoku shaft for the past month or so–time to make the shift to graphite. Nice profile–maybe a millimeter or two longer than the Nike Covert Forged I’m currently playing, although the top line is actually thinner. I might or might not go with them, but the sole grind is heaven. Very forgiving on mishits low on the club face, and on fat shots as well.

      Of course, the biggest problem for most will be trying to find a demo without actually buying a club. You can buy a Srixon ball anywhere; their clubs, not so much.

      Reply

      Pete S

      8 years ago

      Agree with you there. I’m not sure I have ever really looked that closely for Srixon clubs, but you almost never see them in pro-shops.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 22, 2024
    Strength Training for Golfers: Building a Strong and Stable Core
    Golf Balls
    Apr 22, 2024
    Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
    Golf Technology
    Apr 21, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.